A list of objects that, when broken, still function.
Things that, when broken, are the same only shorter/smaller:
Things that, when broken, become insulated boxes:
| <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | |
| <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> | |
| <head> | |
| <title>Animated Variants v.1.1</title> | |
| <script src="styles.css"></script> | |
| <script src="readings.js"></script> | |
| </head> | |
| <body onload="getReadings()"> | |
| <sp> |
| $(document).ready(function(){ | |
| var isNotDancing = true; | |
| function makeItDance() { | |
| $(".quoted").animate({ top: "0%"}, 300, 'linear', function() { | |
| $(this).css("top", "0%"); // dummy animation...i.e. shameless hack | |
| if (isNotDancing){ | |
| $('.quoted').addClass("dancing"); | |
| isNotDancing = false; | |
| } | |
| else { |
Examples using processing-js.
3D stars using paper.js
Up, down, left and right keys control the centroid. Mouse location with respect to center of screen controls rotation.
Don't lose the red star!
The following words have unique character repeat patterns. More here.
aa
geggee
deedeed
anapanapa
The above 13 character repeat patterns account for 50% of English words (117893 of 235786 words, using nltk's corpus.words).
The word "apple" has the letter "p" used twice, and three other letters each used once. Its character repeat pattern is written as "AABCD".
The data above counts the number of occurrences of all character repeat patterns in English words. (Word source is nltk's corpus "corpus.word".)
More information can be found here.
The following questions can be asked of people (e.g., family members) who somehow manage to form simple opinions about very complex events.
Q1. Where have you learned about the event? First-hand? Or second-hand, through the media?
Q2. Have you ever sought out news about the event?
For example, have you ever had a question about the event and then sought an answer yourself, or do you learn about it as presented via friends and/or the media?
Q3. Have you tried your best to consider the perspective of both sides involved? If so, is there a benefit to you personally in arriving at a definitive opinion?