Created
May 17, 2020 19:59
-
-
Save mxblsdl/1bef1daf5d7d9646bad94e860cf868da to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
K constant | Genus | Species | Size Class (cm) | Reference | Fuel Class | Classification | Notes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.002 | Abies | amabilis | 1.5 | Erickson et al. 1985 | branch | Gymnosperm | suspended material | ||
0.009 | Abies | amabilis | 10 | Erickson et al. 1985 | log | Gymnosperm | suspended material | ||
0.003 | Abies | amabilis | 1.5 | Erickson et al. 1985 | branch | Gymnosperm | on ground | ||
0.009 | Abies | amabilis | 10 | Erickson et al. 1985 | log | Gymnosperm | on ground | ||
0.033 | Abies | balsamea | 12.5 | Foster & Lang 1982 | log | Gymnosperm | averaged bole size | ||
0.038 | Abies | balsamea | 12.5 | Foster & Lang 1982 | bark | Gymnosperm | bark | ||
0.049 | Abies | concolor | 20 | Harmon 1987 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.039 | Abies | concolor | branch | Harmon 1987 | branch | Gymnosperm | |||
0.027 | Abies | concolor | bark | Harmon 1987 | bark | Gymnosperm | bark | ||
0.035 | Abies | lasiocarpa | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.051 | Abies | amabilis | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.035 | Abies | concolor | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.043 | Abies | magnifica | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.038 | Abies | grandis | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.051 | Abies | concolor | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.03 | Abies | procera | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.072 | Abies | spp. | log | Janish 2005 | log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.004 | Abies | spp. | bark | Janish 2005 | bark | Gymnosperm | |||
0.128 | Abies | grandis | foliage | Keane et al. 2008 | foliage | Gymnosperm | |||
0.063 | Abies | grandis | twigs (1hr) | Keane et al. 2008 | twigs | Gymnosperm | |||
0.072 | Abies | grandis | branch (10hr) | Keane et al. 2008 | branch | Gymnosperm | |||
0.042 | Abies | grandis | large branch (100hr) | Keane et al. 2008 | large branch | Gymnosperm | |||
0.0299 | Abies | balsamea | 8 | Lambert et al. 1980 | log | Gymnosperm | averaged bole size | ||
0.032 | Abies | spp. | 8 | Shorohova and Kapitsa | log | Gymnosperm | greater than 8cm | CWD size found not to affect decomp rate | |
0.13 | Abies | concolor | litter | Stohlgren 1988 | twigs | Gymnosperm | excludes initial 0.7 years, first fall and winter wil give better description of long term litter decay | ||
0.14 | Abies | concolor | litter | Stohlgren 1988 | twigs | Gymnosperm | excludes initial 0.7 years, first fall and winter wil give better description of long term litter decay | ||
0.0353 | Abies | lasiocarpa | branch | Taylor et al. 1991 | branch | Gymnosperm | Finds lignin content to be best predictor of litter decay rate | ||
0.062 | Abies | lasiocarpa | twigs (1hr) | Taylor et al. 1991 | twigs | Gymnosperm | |||
0.0933 | Abies | lasiocarpa | needles | Taylor et al. 1991 | foliage | Gymnosperm | |||
0.15 | Abies | lasiocarpa | foliage | Keane et al. 2008 | foliage | Gymnosperm | |||
0.082 | Abies | lasiocarpa | twigs (1hr) | Keane et al. 2008 | twigs | Gymnosperm | |||
0.037 | Abies | lasiocarpa | branch (10hr) | Keane et al. 2008 | branch | Gymnosperm | |||
0.038 | Abies | lasiocarpa | large branch (100hr) | Keane et al. 2008 | large branch | Gymnosperm | |||
0.08 | Acer | rubrum | 10 | Harmon 1982 | log | Angiosperm | |||
0.053 | Acer | spp. | 31 | Kahl et al. 2017 | large log | Angiosperm | |||
0.0452 | Acer | spp. | 18 | MacMillan 1988 | log | Angiosperm | |||
0.081 | Acer | rubrum | 14.5 | Mattson 1987 | log | Angiosperm | CWD size found not to affect decomp rate | ||
0.072 | Allocasuarina | fraseriana | bole and branch | Brown et al. 1996 | Angiosperm | These values are boles and brnaches together for each species. Since this study did find an inverse relationship between CWD size I will use the ratio of bole to branch to infer the decay rates for the size classes of each species. | |||
0.136615385 | Allocasuarina | fraseriana | 4 | Brown et al. 1996 | large branch | Angiosperm | Dervied values | ||
0.037945946 | Allocasuarina | fraseriana | 12.5 | Brown et al. 1996 | log | Angiosperm | Dervied values | ||
0.23 | Alnus | rubra | 1.5 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | branch | Angiosperm | surface | ||
0.122 | Alnus | rubra | 5 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | large branch | Angiosperm | surface | ||
0.088 | Alnus | rubra | 10 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | log | Angiosperm | surface | ||
0.115 | Alnus | rubra | 1.5 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | branch | Angiosperm | surface | ||
0.109 | Alnus | rubra | 5 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | large branch | Angiosperm | surface | ||
0.04 | Alnus | rubra | 10 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | log | Angiosperm | surface | ||
0.146 | Alnus | rubra | 1.5 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | branch | Angiosperm | elevated | ||
0.086 | Alnus | rubra | 5 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | large branch | Angiosperm | elevated | ||
0.119 | Alnus | rubra | 10 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | log | Angiosperm | elevated | ||
0.145 | Alnus | rubra | 1.5 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | branch | Angiosperm | elevated | ||
0.093 | Alnus | rubra | 5 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | large branch | Angiosperm | elevated | ||
0.035 | Alnus | rubra | 10 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | log | Angiosperm | elevated | ||
0.083 | Alnus | rubra | 25 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Angiosperm | https://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/sites/default/files/lter/pubs/webdocs/reports/decomp/cwd_decomp_web.htm | ||
0.055 | Alnus | rubra | 25 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Angiosperm | |||
0.69 | Artemisia | tridentata | litter | Comaner and Staffeldt 1979 | foliage | Angiosperm | From Bates et al. 2007 | ||
0.6 | Artemisia | tridentata | litter | Murray 1975 | foliage | Angiosperm | From Bates et al. 2007 | ||
0.133 | Banksia | grandis | bole and branch | Brown et al. 1996 | Angiosperm | ||||
0.252358974 | Banksia | grandis | 4 | Brown et al. 1996 | large branch | Angiosperm | Dervied values | ||
0.070094595 | Banksia | grandis | 12.5 | Brown et al. 1996 | log | Angiosperm | Dervied values | ||
0.053 | Betula | papyrifera | logs | Brais 2006 | log | Angiosperm | >10cm | ||
0.046 | Betula | pendula | logs | Harmon 2000 | log | Angiosperm | |||
0.042 | Betula | spp. | 31 | Kahl et al. 2017 | large log | Angiosperm | |||
0.045 | Betula | spp. | log | Krankina & Harmon 1995 | log | Angiosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.149 | Betula | lenta | 21.5 | Mattson 1987 | large log | Angiosperm | CWD size found not to affect decomp rate | ||
0.066 | Betula | spp. | 8 | Shorohova and Kapitsa | log | Angiosperm | greater than 8cm | CWD size found not to affect decomp rate | |
0.13 | Betula | pendula | branch | Swift et al. 1976 | branch | Angiosperm | CWD greater than 2cm | elevated | |
0.148 | Betula | pendula | branch | Swift et al. 1976 | branch | Angiosperm | CWD greater than 2cm | on ground | |
0.088 | Betula | spp. | 10 | Tarasov and Birdsey 2001 | log | Angiosperm | |||
0.039 | Betula | spp. | 37.5 | Tarasov and Birdsey 2001 | large log | Angiosperm | |||
0.023 | Betula | spp. | bark | Tarasov and Birdsey 2001 | bark | Angiosperm | |||
0.054 | Betula | pendula | log | Yatskov et al. 2003 | log | Angiosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.061 | Betula | pendula | log | Yatskov et al. 2003 | log | Angiosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.042 | Betula | pendula | log | Yatskov et al. 2003 | log | Angiosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.078 | Betula | pendula | log | Yatskov et al. 2003 | log | Angiosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.03 | Betula | costata | log | Yatskov et al. 2003 | log | Angiosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.027 | Betula | pendula | snag | Yatskov et al. 2003 | snag | Angiosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.056 | Betula | pendula | snag | Yatskov et al. 2003 | snag | Angiosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.052 | Betula | pendula | snag | Yatskov et al. 2003 | snag | Angiosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.088 | Betula | pendula | snag | Yatskov et al. 2003 | snag | Angiosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.081 | Betula | costata | snag | Yatskov et al. 2003 | snag | Angiosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.02 | Calocedrus | decurrens | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.16 | Calocedrus | decurrens | litter | Stohlgren 1988 | twigs | Gymnosperm | excludes initial 0.7 years, first fall and winter wil give better description of long term litter decay | ||
0.083 | Carpinus | spp. | 31 | Kahl et al. 2017 | large log | Angiosperm | |||
0.08 | Carya | spp. | 10 | Harmon 1982 | log | Angiosperm | |||
0.035 | Carya | spp. | 29.66666667 | MacMillan 1988 | large log | Angiosperm | |||
0.166 | Carya | spp. | 13 | Mattson 1987 | log | Angiosperm | CWD size found not to affect decomp rate | ||
0.041 | Castanea | dentata | 7.6 | Mattson 1987 | large branch | Angiosperm | CWD size found not to affect decomp rate | ||
0.05 | Cornus | florida | 10 | Harmon 1982 | log | Angiosperm | |||
0.125 | Cornus | florida | 6.3 | Mattson 1987 | large branch | Angiosperm | CWD size found not to affect decomp rate | ||
0.068 | Cornus/Quercus | 0.5 | Mattson 1987 | twigs | Angiosperm | FWD | |||
0.092 | Cornus/Quercus | 2 | Mattson 1987 | branch | Angiosperm | FWD | |||
0.081 | Cornus/Quercus | 4 | Mattson 1987 | large branch | Angiosperm | FWD | |||
0.098 | Corylus | avellana | branch | Swift et al. 1976 | branch | Angiosperm | CWD greater than 2cm | elevated | |
0.28 | Corylus | avellana | branch | Swift et al. 1976 | branch | Angiosperm | CWD greater than 2cm | on ground | |
0.261 | Diospyros | virginiana | 11.6 | Mattson 1987 | log | Angiosperm | CWD size found not to affect decomp rate | ||
0.215 | Eucalyptus | calophylla | bole and branch | Brown et al. 1996 | Angiosperm | ||||
0.174 | Eucalyptus | diversicolor | bole and branch | Brown et al. 1996 | Angiosperm | ||||
0.067 | Eucalyptus | marginata | bole and branch | Brown et al. 1996 | Angiosperm | ||||
0.407948718 | Eucalyptus | calophylla | 4 | Brown et al. 1996 | large branch | Angiosperm | Dervied values | ||
0.330153846 | Eucalyptus | diversicolor | 4 | Brown et al. 1996 | large branch | Angiosperm | Dervied values | ||
0.127128205 | Eucalyptus | marginata | 4 | Brown et al. 1996 | large branch | Angiosperm | Dervied values | ||
0.113310811 | Eucalyptus | calophylla | 12.5 | Brown et al. 1996 | log | Angiosperm | Dervied values | ||
0.091702703 | Eucalyptus | diversicolor | 12.5 | Brown et al. 1996 | log | Angiosperm | Dervied values | ||
0.035310811 | Eucalyptus | marginata | 12.5 | Brown et al. 1996 | log | Angiosperm | Dervied values | ||
0.041 | Eucalyptus | regnans | 20 | Mackensen and Bauhus 2003 | log | Angiosperm | |||
0.049 | Eucalyptus | maculata | 20 | Mackensen and Bauhus 2003 | log | Angiosperm | |||
0.107 | Eucalyptus | diversicolor | 0.8 | O'connell 1997 | twigs | Angiosperm | twigs | ||
0.12 | Eucalyptus | diversicolor | 1.1 | O'connell 1997 | branch | Angiosperm | twigs | ||
0.094 | Eucalyptus | diversicolor | 1.4 | O'connell 1997 | branch | Angiosperm | twigs | ||
0.046 | Eucalyptus | diversicolor | 2.5 | O'connell 1997 | branch | Angiosperm | stem | ||
0.03 | Eucalyptus | diversicolor | 4.3 | O'connell 1997 | large branch | Angiosperm | stem | ||
0.022 | Eucalyptus | diversicolor | 8.4 | O'connell 1997 | log | Angiosperm | stem | ||
0.288 | Fagus | sylvatica | twigs | Cotrufo 2000 | twigs | Angiosperm | |||
0.223 | Fagus | sylvatica | twigs | Cotrufo 2000 | twigs | Angiosperm | |||
0.069 | Fagus | spp. | 31 | Kahl et al. 2017 | large log | Angiosperm | |||
0.0189 | Fagus | spp. | 15 | MacMillan 1988 | log | Angiosperm | |||
0.019 | Fraxinus | spp. | 31 | Kahl et al. 2017 | large log | Angiosperm | |||
0.071 | Fraxinus | profunda | 13.75 | Rice et al. 1997 | log | Angiosperm | values are averages of ranges of diameter | ||
0.071 | Fraxinus | profunda | 1.5 | Rice et al. 1997 | branch | Angiosperm | values are averages of ranges of diameter | ||
0.019 | Fraxinus | excelsior | branch | Swift et al. 1976 | branch | Angiosperm | CWD greater than 2cm | elevated | |
0.165 | Fraxinus | excelsior | branch | Swift et al. 1976 | branch | Angiosperm | CWD greater than 2cm | on ground | |
0.16 | Juniperus | occidentalis | litter | Bates et al. 2007 | foliage | Gymnosperm | cut treatment | ||
0.09 | Juniperus | occidentalis | litter | Bates et al. 2007 | foliage | Gymnosperm | uncut treatment | ||
0.008 | Juniperus | communis | 7.5 | Devries and Kuyper 1988 | large branch | Gymnosperm | branches | ||
0.027 | Juniperus | communis | 7.5 | Devries and Kuyper 1988 | large branch | Gymnosperm | branches | ||
0.044 | Juniperus | communis | 7.5 | Devries and Kuyper 1988 | large branch | Gymnosperm | branches | ||
0.025 | Juniperus | communis | 7.5 | Devries and Kuyper 1988 | large branch | Gymnosperm | branches | ||
0.06 | Juniperus | communis | 7.5 | Devries and Kuyper 1988 | large branch | Gymnosperm | branches | ||
0.055 | Juniperus | communis | 7.5 | Devries and Kuyper 1988 | large branch | Gymnosperm | branches | ||
0.037 | Kalmia | latifolia | 8.5 | Mattson 1987 | log | Angiosperm | CWD size found not to affect decomp rate | ||
0.004 | Larix | spp. | 31 | Kahl et al. 2017 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.023 | Larix | siberica | log | Yatskov et al. 2003 | log | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.031 | Larix | siberica | log | Yatskov et al. 2003 | log | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.015 | Larix | dahurica | log | Yatskov et al. 2003 | log | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.004 | Larix | siberica | snag | Yatskov et al. 2003 | snag | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.01 | Larix | siberica | snag | Yatskov et al. 2003 | snag | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.009 | Larix | dahurica | snag | Yatskov et al. 2003 | snag | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.8 | Larrea | tridentata | litter | Whitford et al. 1986 | foliage | Angiosperm | From Bates et al. 2007 | ||
0.107 | Liriodendron | tulipifera | 6.4 | Mattson 1987 | large branch | Angiosperm | CWD size found not to affect decomp rate | ||
0.0062 | mixed | <45 | MacMillan 1988 | large log | Angiosperm | Analysis by size class regardless of spp. | |||
0.0099 | mixed | 45 | MacMillan 1988 | large log | Angiosperm | Analysis by size class regardless of spp. | |||
0.0051 | mixed | 25 | MacMillan 1988 | large log | Angiosperm | Analysis by size class regardless of spp. | |||
0.0241 | mixed | 34.5 | MacMillan 1988 | large log | Angiosperm | Analysis by size class regardless of spp. | |||
0.0099 | mixed | 45 | MacMillan 1988 | large log | Angiosperm | Analysis by size class regardless of spp. | |||
0.0063 | mixed | 20 | MacMillan 1988 | large log | Angiosperm | Analysis by size class regardless of spp. | |||
0.0027 | mixed | 30.5 | MacMillan 1988 | large log | Angiosperm | Analysis by size class regardless of spp. | |||
0.0098 | mixed | 50.5 | MacMillan 1988 | large log | Angiosperm | Analysis by size class regardless of spp. | |||
0.0337 | mixed | 70.5 | MacMillan 1988 | large log | Angiosperm | Analysis by size class regardless of spp. | |||
0.01 | mixed | 81 | MacMillan 1988 | large log | Angiosperm | Analysis by size class regardless of spp. | |||
0.078 | mixed species | Brown et al. 1996 | log | ||||||
0.148 | mixed species | Brown et al. 1996 | branch | ||||||
0.2 | Nyssa | sylvatica | 10 | Harmon 1982 | log | Angiosperm | |||
0.126 | Nyssa | sylvatica | 10.8 | Mattson 1987 | log | Angiosperm | CWD size found not to affect decomp rate | ||
0.05 | Oxydendrum | arboreum | 10 | Harmon 1982 | log | Angiosperm | |||
0.033 | Oxydendrum | arboreum | 12.7 | Mattson 1987 | log | Angiosperm | CWD size found not to affect decomp rate | ||
0.071 | Picea | glauca | 12.7 | Alban and Pastor 1993 | log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.038 | Picea | glauca | logs | Brais 2006 | log | Gymnosperm | >10cm | ||
0.033 | Picea | rubens | 12.5 | Foster & Lang 1982 | log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.027 | Picea | rubens | 20 | Foster & Lang 1982 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.032 | Picea | rubens | 25 | Foster & Lang 1982 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.011 | Picea | rubens | 12.5 | Foster & Lang 1982 | bark | Gymnosperm | bark | ||
0.014 | Picea | rubens | 20 | Foster & Lang 1982 | bark | Gymnosperm | bark | ||
0.022 | Picea | rubens | 25 | Foster & Lang 1982 | bark | Gymnosperm | bark | ||
0.0096 | Picea | sitchensis | >60 | Graham and Cromack 1982 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.0119 | Picea | sitchensis | <60 | Graham and Cromack 1982 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.0111 | Picea | sitchensis | all | Graham and Cromack 1982 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.033 | Picea | abies | logs | Harmon 2000 | log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.028 | Picea | engelmannii | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.023 | Picea | sitchensis | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.0054 | Picea | engelmannii | 10 | Johnson and Green 1991 | log | Gymnosperm | boles | ||
0.0025 | Picea | engelmannii | 10 | Johnson and Green 1991 | log | Gymnosperm | boles | ||
0.035 | Picea | spp. | 31 | Kahl et al. 2017 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.034 | Picea | spp. | log | Krankina & Harmon 1995 | log | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.0013 | Picea | engelmannii | 15.6 | Kueppers et al. 2004 | log | Gymnosperm | boles | ||
0.0015 | Picea | engelmannii | 15.6 | Kueppers et al. 2004 | log | Gymnosperm | boles | ||
0.0275 | Picea | abies | 10 | Naesset 1999 | large branch | Gymnosperm | less than 10 | ||
0.0342 | Picea | abies | 12.5 | Naesset 1999 | log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.0435 | Picea | abies | 18 | Naesset 1999 | log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.0391 | Picea | abies | 23 | Naesset 1999 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.0412 | Picea | abies | 25 | Naesset 1999 | large log | Gymnosperm | greater than 25 | ||
0.059 | Picea | abies | 12.5 | Tarasov and Birdsey 2001 | log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.022 | Picea | abies | 30 | Tarasov and Birdsey 2001 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.0215 | Picea | abies | 50 | Tarasov and Birdsey 2001 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.017 | Picea | abies | bark | Tarasov and Birdsey 2001 | bark | Gymnosperm | |||
0.027 | Picea | abies | coarse roots | Tarasov and Birdsey 2001 | Gymnosperm | ||||
0.0265 | Picea | engelmannii | branch | Taylor et al. 1991 | branch | Gymnosperm | |||
0.0549 | Picea | engelmannii | twigs (1hr) | Taylor et al. 1991 | twigs | Gymnosperm | |||
0.1828 | Picea | engelmannii | needles | Taylor et al. 1991 | foliage | Gymnosperm | |||
0.026 | Picea | abies | log | Yatskov et al. 2003 | log | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.049 | Picea | obovata | log | Yatskov et al. 2003 | log | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.028 | Picea | ajanensis | log | Yatskov et al. 2003 | log | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.066 | Picea | abies | snag | Yatskov et al. 2003 | snag | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
-0.0006 | Picea | obovata | snag | Yatskov et al. 2003 | snag | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.035 | Picea | ajanensis | snag | Yatskov et al. 2003 | snag | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.055 | Pinus | resinosa | 14.4 | Alban and Pastor 1993 | log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.042 | Pinus | banksiana | 14.4 | Alban and Pastor 1993 | log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.058 | Pinus | taeda | small | Barber and Van Lear 1984 | branch | Gymnosperm | ground contact | ||
0.081 | Pinus | taeda | medium | Barber and Van Lear 1984 | large branch | Gymnosperm | ground contact | ||
0.068 | Pinus | taeda | large | Barber and Van Lear 1984 | log | Gymnosperm | ground contact | diameters less than 15cm | |
0.036 | Pinus | taeda | small | Barber and Van Lear 1984 | branch | Gymnosperm | aerial | ||
0.057 | Pinus | taeda | medium | Barber and Van Lear 1984 | large branch | Gymnosperm | aerial | ||
0.045 | Pinus | taeda | large | Barber and Van Lear 1984 | log | Gymnosperm | aerial | diameters less than 15cm | |
0.02 | Pinus | banksiana | logs | Brais 2006 | log | Gymnosperm | >10cm | ||
0.049 | Pinus | pinaster | bole and branch | Brown et al. 1996 | Gymnosperm | ||||
0.092974359 | Pinus | pinaster | 4 | Brown et al. 1996 | large branch | Gymnosperm | Dervied values | ||
0.025824324 | Pinus | pinaster | 12.5 | Brown et al. 1996 | log | Gymnosperm | Dervied values | ||
0.027 | Pinus | contorta | 25 | Busse 1994 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.022 | Pinus | sylvestris | 7.5 | Devries and Kuyper 1988 | large branch | Gymnosperm | branches | ||
0.134 | Pinus | sylvestris | 7.5 | Devries and Kuyper 1988 | large branch | Gymnosperm | branches | ||
0.054 | Pinus | sylvestris | 7.5 | Devries and Kuyper 1988 | large branch | Gymnosperm | branches | ||
0.042 | Pinus | sylvestris | 7.5 | Devries and Kuyper 1988 | large branch | Gymnosperm | branches | ||
0.113 | Pinus | sylvestris | 7.5 | Devries and Kuyper 1988 | large branch | Gymnosperm | branches | ||
0.109 | Pinus | sylvestris | 7.5 | Devries and Kuyper 1988 | large branch | Gymnosperm | branches | ||
0.013 | Pinus | ponderosa | 10 | Erickson et al. 1985 | log | Gymnosperm | suspended material | ||
0.012 | Pinus | ponderosa | 10 | Erickson et al. 1985 | log | Gymnosperm | on ground | ||
0.005 | Pinus | ponderosa | 1.5 | Erickson et al. 1985 | branch | Gymnosperm | suspended material | ||
0.009 | Pinus | ponderosa | 1.5 | Erickson et al. 1985 | branch | Gymnosperm | on ground | ||
0.0163 | Pinus | contorta | 15 | Fahey 1983 | log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.06 | Pinus | rigida | 10 | Harmon 1982 | log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.04 | Pinus | virginiana | 10 | Harmon 1982 | log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.035 | Pinus | sylvestris | logs | Harmon 2000 | log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.042 | Pinus | contorta | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.035 | Pinus | monticola | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.011 | Pinus | ponderosa | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.042 | Pinus | jefferyi | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.036 | Pinus | lambertiana | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.37 | Pinus | ponderosa | litter | Hart et al. 1992 | foliage | Gymnosperm | clearcut | From Bates et al. 2007 | |
0.17 | Pinus | ponderosa | litter | Hart et al. 1992 | foliage | Gymnosperm | forested | From Bates et al. 2007 | |
0.19 | Pinus | ponderosa | litter | Hart et al. 1992 | foliage | Gymnosperm | young forest | From Bates et al. 2007 | |
0.08 | Pinus | ponderosa | litter | Hart et al. 1992 | foliage | Gymnosperm | old forest | From Bates et al. 2007 | |
0.0171 | Pinus | contorta | 10 | Johnson and Green 1991 | log | Gymnosperm | boles | ||
0.0299 | Pinus | contorta | 10 | Johnson and Green 1991 | log | Gymnosperm | boles | ||
0.0153 | Pinus | contorta | 10 | Johnson and Green 1991 | log | Gymnosperm | boles | ||
0.0045 | Pinus | contorta | 10 | Johnson and Green 1991 | log | Gymnosperm | boles | ||
0.0035 | Pinus | contorta | 10 | Johnson and Green 1991 | log | Gymnosperm | boles | ||
0.016 | Pinus | spp. | 31 | Kahl et al. 2017 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.226 | Pinus | albicaulis | foliage | Keane et al. 2008 | foliage | Gymnosperm | |||
0.195 | Pinus | contorta | foliage | Keane et al. 2008 | foliage | Gymnosperm | |||
0.111 | Pinus | ponderosa | foliage | Keane et al. 2008 | foliage | Gymnosperm | |||
0.083 | Pinus | albicaulis | twigs (1hr) | Keane et al. 2008 | twigs | Gymnosperm | |||
0.093 | Pinus | contorta | twigs (1hr) | Keane et al. 2008 | twigs | Gymnosperm | |||
0.039 | Pinus | ponderosa | twigs (1hr) | Keane et al. 2008 | twigs | Gymnosperm | |||
0.069 | Pinus | albicaulis | branch (10hr) | Keane et al. 2008 | branch | Gymnosperm | |||
0.045 | Pinus | contorta | branch (10hr) | Keane et al. 2008 | branch | Gymnosperm | |||
0.028 | Pinus | ponderosa | branch (10hr) | Keane et al. 2008 | branch | Gymnosperm | |||
0.05 | Pinus | albicaulis | large branch (100hr) | Keane et al. 2008 | large branch | Gymnosperm | |||
0.041 | Pinus | contorta | large branch (100hr) | Keane et al. 2008 | large branch | Gymnosperm | |||
0.075 | Pinus | ponderosa | large branch (100hr) | Keane et al. 2008 | large branch | Gymnosperm | |||
0.033 | Pinus | spp. | log | Krankina & Harmon 1995 | log | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.0029 | Pinus | ponderosa | 15.6 | Kueppers et al. 2004 | log | Gymnosperm | boles | ||
0.0016 | Pinus | ponderosa | 15.6 | Kueppers et al. 2004 | log | Gymnosperm | boles | ||
0.127 | Pinus | radiata | 20 | Mackensen and Bauhus 2003 | log | Gymnosperm | diameter given as range between 10 and 30cm | ||
0.063 | Pinus | rigida | 6.9 | Mattson 1987 | large branch | Gymnosperm | CWD size found not to affect decomp rate | ||
0.12 | Pinus | pinaster | litter | Moro and Domingo 2000 | foliage | Gymnosperm | From Bates et al. 2007 | ||
0.17 | Pinus | nigra | litter | Moro and Domingo 2000 | foliage | Gymnosperm | From Bates et al. 2007 | ||
0.027 | Pinus | sylvestris | 8 | Shorohova and Kapitsa | log | Gymnosperm | greater than 8cm | CWD size found not to affect decomp rate | |
0.014 | Pinus | sibirica | 8 | Shorohova and Kapitsa | log | Gymnosperm | greater than 8cm | CWD size found not to affect decomp rate | |
0.12 | Pinus | lambertiana | litter | Stohlgren 1988 | twigs | Gymnosperm | excludes initial 0.7 years, first fall and winter wil give better description of long term litter decay | ||
0.1 | Pinus | lambertiana | litter | Stohlgren 1988 | twigs | Gymnosperm | excludes initial 0.7 years, first fall and winter wil give better description of long term litter decay | ||
0.041 | Pinus | sylvestris | 10 | Tarasov and Birdsey 2001 | log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.0185 | Pinus | sylvestris | 25 | Tarasov and Birdsey 2001 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.018 | Pinus | sylvestris | 45 | Tarasov and Birdsey 2001 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.009 | Pinus | sylvestris | bark | Tarasov and Birdsey 2001 | bark | Gymnosperm | |||
0.0521 | Pinus | contorta | branch | Taylor et al. 1991 | branch | Gymnosperm | |||
0.0549 | Pinus | contorta | twigs (1hr) | Taylor et al. 1991 | twigs | Gymnosperm | |||
0.1151 | Pinus | contorta | needles | Taylor et al. 1991 | foliage | Gymnosperm | |||
0.027 | Pinus | sylvestris | log | Yatskov et al. 2003 | log | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.044 | Pinus | sylvestris | log | Yatskov et al. 2003 | log | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.036 | Pinus | sylvestris | log | Yatskov et al. 2003 | log | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.019 | Pinus | siberica | log | Yatskov et al. 2003 | log | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.015 | Pinus | koraiensis | log | Yatskov et al. 2003 | log | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.037 | Pinus | sylvestris | snag | Yatskov et al. 2003 | snag | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
-0.02 | Pinus | sylvestris | snag | Yatskov et al. 2003 | snag | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.004 | Pinus | sylvestris | snag | Yatskov et al. 2003 | snag | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.003 | Pinus | siberica | snag | Yatskov et al. 2003 | snag | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.003 | Pinus | koraiensis | snag | Yatskov et al. 2003 | snag | Gymnosperm | >10 cm | ||
0.235 | Pinus | contorta | litter | Yavitt and Fahey 1986 | foliage | Gymnosperm | From Bates et al. 2007 | ||
0.05 | Pinus | ponderosa | Avery et al. 1976 | log | Gymnosperm | From Keane 2008 | |||
0.4 | Pinus | contorta | Keenan et al. 1996 | foliage | Gymnosperm | From Keane 2008 | |||
0.023 | Pinus | contorta | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.08 | Populus | tremuloides | 15.3 | Alban and Pastor 1993 | log | Angiosperm | |||
0.06 | Populus | tremuloides | logs | Brais 2006 | log | Angiosperm | >10cm | ||
0.055 | Populus | spp. | 31 | Kahl et al. 2017 | large log | Angiosperm | |||
0.295 | Populus | tremuloides | litter | Louiser and Parkinson 1976 | foliage | Angiosperm | From Bates et al. 2007 | ||
0.071 | Populus | tremula | 15 | Tarasov and Birdsey 2001 | log | Angiosperm | |||
0.044 | Populus | tremula | 42.5 | Tarasov and Birdsey 2001 | large log | Angiosperm | |||
0.018 | Populus | tremula | bark | Tarasov and Birdsey 2001 | bark | Angiosperm | |||
0.031 | Prunus | spp. | 31 | Kahl et al. 2017 | large log | Angiosperm | |||
0.036 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 1.5 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | branch | Gymnosperm | surface | ||
0.027 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 5 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | large branch | Gymnosperm | surface | ||
0.013 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 10 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | log | Gymnosperm | surface | ||
0.038 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 1.5 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | branch | Gymnosperm | surface | ||
0.013 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 5 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | large branch | Gymnosperm | surface | ||
0.019 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 10 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | log | Gymnosperm | surface | ||
0.033 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 1.5 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | branch | Gymnosperm | elevated | ||
0.022 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 5 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | large branch | Gymnosperm | elevated | ||
0.007 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 10 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | log | Gymnosperm | elevated | ||
0.029 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 1.5 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | branch | Gymnosperm | elevated | ||
0.016 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 5 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | large branch | Gymnosperm | elevated | ||
0.012 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 10 | Edmonds et al. 1986 | log | Gymnosperm | elevated | ||
0.016 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 10 | Erickson et al. 1985 | log | Gymnosperm | suspended material | ||
0.037 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 10 | Erickson et al. 1985 | log | Gymnosperm | on ground | ||
0.004 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 1.5 | Erickson et al. 1985 | branch | Gymnosperm | suspended material | ||
0.011 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 1.5 | Erickson et al. 1985 | branch | Gymnosperm | on ground | ||
0.015 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.014 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.016 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | log | Janish 2005 | log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.002 | Psuedotsuga | spp. | 31 | Kahl et al. 2017 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.12 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | foliage | Keane et al. 2008 | foliage | Gymnosperm | |||
0.084 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | twigs (1hr) | Keane et al. 2008 | twigs | Gymnosperm | |||
0.031 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | branch (10hr) | Keane et al. 2008 | branch | Gymnosperm | |||
0.142 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | large branch (100hr) | Keane et al. 2008 | large branch | Gymnosperm | |||
0.0063 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | logs | Means et al. 1985 | large log | Gymnosperm | greater than 50 | ||
0.007 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | logs | Means et al. 1985 | large log | Gymnosperm | greater than 50 | ||
0.01 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | logs | Sollins et al. 1987 | large log | Gymnosperm | median 55 | ||
0.029 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | logs | Spies et al. 1988 | log | Gymnosperm | 10cm to 60cm | ||
0.022 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | logs | Stone et al. 1997 | large log | Gymnosperm | all diameters | ||
0.067 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 20 | Stone et al. 1997 | log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.056 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 30 | Stone et al. 1997 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.021 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 60 | Stone et al. 1997 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.012 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | 80 | Stone et al. 1997 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.021 | Psuedotsuga | menziesii | Harmon 2004 | snag | Gymnosperm | applied rate constants | |||
0.1244 | Quercus | prinus | 0.5 | Abbott and Crossley 1982 | twigs | Angiosperm | |||
0.1144 | Quercus | prinus | 2 | Abbott and Crossley 1982 | branch | Angiosperm | |||
0.0978 | Quercus | prinus | 4 | Abbott and Crossley 1982 | large branch | Angiosperm | |||
0.26 | Quercus | spp. | litter | Christensen 1977 | foliage | Angiosperm | |||
0.066 | Quercus | robur | 7.5 | Devries and Kuyper 1988 | large branch | Angiosperm | branches | ||
0.273 | Quercus | robur | 7.5 | Devries and Kuyper 1988 | large branch | Angiosperm | branches | ||
0.489 | Quercus | robur | 7.5 | Devries and Kuyper 1988 | large branch | Angiosperm | branches | ||
0.253 | Quercus | robur | 7.5 | Devries and Kuyper 1988 | large branch | Angiosperm | branches | ||
0.151 | Quercus | robur | 7.5 | Devries and Kuyper 1988 | large branch | Angiosperm | branches | ||
0.175 | Quercus | robur | 7.5 | Devries and Kuyper 1988 | large branch | Angiosperm | branches | ||
0.1 | Quercus | coccinea | 10 | Harmon 1982 | log | Angiosperm | |||
0.18 | Quercus | prinus | 10 | Harmon 1982 | log | Angiosperm | |||
0.021 | Quercus | spp. | 31 | Kahl et al. 2017 | large log | Angiosperm | |||
0.0175 | Quercus | spp. | 43 | MacMillan 1988 | large log | Angiosperm | size classes are averages by species | ||
0.05 | Quercus | coccinea | 14.9 | Mattson 1987 | log | Angiosperm | CWD size found not to affect decomp rate | ||
0.063 | Quercus | alba | 11.4 | Mattson 1987 | log | Angiosperm | CWD size found not to affect decomp rate | ||
0.17 | Quercus | prinus | 8.7 | Mattson 1987 | log | Angiosperm | CWD size found not to affect decomp rate | ||
0.28 | Quercus | spp. | 30 | Schowalter 1992 | large log | Angiosperm | |||
0.069 | Quercus | spp. | 30 | Schowalter 1998 | large log | Angiosperm | |||
0.088 | Quercus | robur | branch | Swift et al. 1976 | branch | Angiosperm | CWD greater than 2cm | elevated | |
0.067 | Quercus | robur | branch | Swift et al. 1976 | branch | Angiosperm | CWD greater than 2cm | on ground | |
0.059 | Rhododendron | maximum | 6 | Mattson 1987 | large branch | Angiosperm | CWD size found not to affect decomp rate | ||
0.015 | Robinia | pseudoacacia | 9.7 | Mattson 1987 | log | Angiosperm | CWD size found not to affect decomp rate | ||
0.2 | Salvia | mellifera | litter | Schlesinger 1985 | foliage | Angiosperm | From Bates et al. 2007 | ||
0.024 | Sequoia | sempervirens | 10 | Busing and Fijumori 2005 | large branch | Gymnosperm | size classes below 10cm | ||
0.07 | Sequoiadendron | giganteum | litter | Stohlgren 1988 | twigs | Gymnosperm | excludes initial 0.7 years, first fall and winter wil give better description of long term litter decay | ||
0.007 | Thuja | plicata | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.165 | Thuja | plicata | foliage | Keane et al. 2008 | foliage | Gymnosperm | |||
0.093 | Thuja | plicata | twigs (1hr) | Keane et al. 2008 | twigs | Gymnosperm | |||
0.047 | Thuja | plicata | branch (10hr) | Keane et al. 2008 | branch | Gymnosperm | |||
0.023 | Thuja | plicata | large branch (100hr) | Keane et al. 2008 | large branch | Gymnosperm | |||
0.009 | Thuja | plicata | logs | Sollins et al. 1987 | large log | Gymnosperm | median 30 | ||
0.011 | Thuja | plicata | Harmon 2004 | snag | Gymnosperm | method derived from Graham 1982 | |||
0.035 | Tilia | spp. | 31 | Kahl et al. 2017 | large log | Angiosperm | |||
0.024 | Tsuga | heterophylla | 10 | Erickson et al. 1985 | log | Gymnosperm | suspended material | ||
0.036 | Tsuga | heterophylla | 10 | Erickson et al. 1985 | log | Gymnosperm | on ground | ||
0.01 | Tsuga | heterophylla | 1.5 | Erickson et al. 1985 | branch | Gymnosperm | suspended material | ||
0.01 | Tsuga | heterophylla | 1.5 | Erickson et al. 1985 | branch | Gymnosperm | on ground | ||
0.0079 | Tsuga | heterophylla | >30 | Graham and Cromack 1982 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.023 | Tsuga | heterophylla | <30 | Graham and Cromack 1982 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.01 | Tsuga | heterophylla | all | Graham and Cromack 1982 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.0118 | Tsuga | heterophylla | 35 | Grier 1978 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.04 | Tsuga | canadensis | 10 | Harmon 1982 | log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.023 | Tsuga | heterophylla | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.026 | Tsuga | heterophylla | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.018 | Tsuga | heterophylla | 52 | Harmon 2005 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.015 | Tsuga | heterophylla | log | Janish 2005 | log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.024 | Tsuga | canadensis | 7.6 | Mattson 1987 | large branch | Gymnosperm | CWD size found not to affect decomp rate | ||
0.016 | Tsuga | heterophylla | logs | Sollins et al. 1987 | large log | Gymnosperm | median 30 | ||
0.021 | Tsuga | canadensis | 30 | Tyrrell and Crow 1994 | large log | Gymnosperm | |||
0.029 | litter | Rosswall 1975 | foliage | mixed pine and beech | |||||
0.0245 | litter | Rosswall 1975 | foliage | mixed pine and beech | |||||
0.0318 | litter | Rosswall 1975 | foliage | mixed pine and beech | |||||
0.029 | litter | Rosswall 1975 | foliage | mixed pine and beech |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment