Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@n-s-k
Last active October 3, 2024 15:50
Show Gist options
  • Save n-s-k/522f2669979ed6d0582b8e80cf6c95fd to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save n-s-k/522f2669979ed6d0582b8e80cf6c95fd to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Object-Oriented Programming in Fortran 2003 Part 1: Code Reusability

Object-Oriented Programming in Fortran 2003 Part 1: Code Reusability

Original articles by Mark Leair, PGI Compiler Engineer

This is Part 1 of a series of articles:

1. Introduction

Polymorphism is a term used in software development to describe a variety of techniques employed by programmers to create flexible and reusable software components. The term is Greek and it loosely translates to "many forms".

In programming languages, a polymorphic object is an entity, such as a variable or a procedure, that can hold or operate on values of differing types during the program's execution. Because a polymorphic object can operate on a variety of values and types, it can also be used in a variety of programs, sometimes with little or no change by the programmer. The idea of write once, run many, also known as code reusability, is an important characteristic to the programming paradigm known as Object-Oriented Programming (OOP).

OOP describes an approach to programming where a program is viewed as a collection of interacting, but mostly independent software components. These software components are known as objects in OOP and they are typically implemented in a programming language as an entity that encapsulates both data and procedures.

2. Objects in Fortran 90/95/2003

A Fortran 90/95 module can be viewed as an object because it can encapsulate both data and procedures. Fortran 2003 (F2003) added the ability for a derived type to encapsulate procedures in addition to data. So, by definition, a derived type can now be viewed as an object as well in F2003.

F2003 also introduced type extension to its derived types. This feature allows F2003 programmers to take advantage of one of the more powerful OOP features known as inheritance. Inheritance allows code reusability through an implied inheritance link in which leaf objects, known as children, reuse components from their parent and ancestor objects. For example,

type shape
    integer :: color
    logical :: filled
    integer :: x
    integer :: y
end type shape

type, extends(shape) :: rectangle
    integer :: length
    integer :: width
end type rectangle

type, extends(rectangle) :: square
end type square

In the example above, we have a square type that inherits components from rectangle which inherits components from shape. The programmer indicates the inheritance relationship with the EXTENDS keyword followed by the name of the parent type in parentheses. A type that EXTENDS another type is known as a type extension (e.g., rectangle is a type extension of shape, square is a type extension of rectangle and shape). A type without any EXTENDS keyword is known as a base type (e.g., shape is a base type).

A type extension inherits all of the components of its parent (and ancestor) types. A type extension can also define additional components as well. For example, rectangle has a length and width component in addition to the color, filled, x, and y components that were inherited from shape. The square type, on the other hand, inherits all of the components from rectangle and shape, but does not define any components specific to square objects. Below is an example on how we may access the color component of square:

type(square) :: sq           ! declare sq as a square object

sq%color                     ! access color component for sq
sq%rectangle%color           ! access color component for sq
sq%reactangle%shape%color    ! access color component for sq

Note the three different ways for accessing the color component for sq. A type extension includes an implicit component with the same name and type as its parent type. This can come in handy when the programmer wants to operate on components specific to a parent type. It also helps illustrate an important relationship between the child and parent types.

We often say the child and parent types have a "is a" relationship. Using our shape example above, we can say "a square is a rectangle", "a rectangle is a shape", "a square is a shape", and "a shape is a base type". We can also apply this relationship to the type itself (e.g., "a shape is a shape", "a rectangle is a rectangle", and "a square is a square").

Note that the "is a" relationship does not imply the converse. A rectangle is a shape, but a shape is not a rectangle since there are components found in rectangle that are not found in shape. Furthermore, a rectangle is not a square because square has a component not found in rectangle; the implicit rectangle parent component.

3. Polymorphism in Fortran 2003

The "is a" relationship also helps us visualize how polymorphic variables interact with type extensions. The CLASS keyword allows F2003 programmers to create polymorphic variables. A polymorphic variable is a variable whose data type is dynamic at runtime. It must be a pointer variable, allocatable variable, or a dummy argument. Below is an example:

class(shape), pointer :: sh

In the example above, the sh object can be a pointer to a shape or any of its type extensions. So, it can be a pointer to a shape, a rectangle, a square, or any future type extension of shape. As long as the type of the pointer target "is a" shape, sh can point to it.

There are two basic types of polymorphism: procedure polymorphism and data polymorphism. Procedure polymorphism deals with procedures that can operate on a variety of data types and values. Data polymorphism, a topic for part 2 of this article, deals with program variables that can store and operate on a variety of data types and values.

4. Procedure Polymorphism

Procedure polymorphism occurs when a procedure, such as a function or a subroutine, can take a variety of data types as arguments. This is accomplished in F2003 when a procedure has one or more dummy arguments declared with the CLASS keyword. For example,

subroutine setColor(sh, color)
    class(shape) :: sh
    integer :: color
    sh%color = color
end subroutine setColor

The setColor subroutine takes two arguments, sh and color. The sh dummy argument is polymorphic, based on the usage of class(shape). The subroutine can operate on objects that satisfy the "is a" shape relationship. So, setColor can be called with a shape, rectangle, square, or any future type extension of shape. However, by default, only those components found in the declared type of an object are accessible. For example, shape is the declared type of sh. Therefore, you can only access the shape components, by default, for sh in setColor (i.e., sh%color, sh%filled, sh%x, sh%y). If the programmer needs to access the components of the dynamic type of an object (e.g., sh%length when sh is a rectangle), then they can use the F2003 SELECT TYPE construct. The following example illustrates how a SELECT TYPE construct can access the components of a dynamic type of an object:

subroutine initialize(sh, color, filled, x, y, length, width)
    ! initialize shape objects
    class(shape) :: sh
    integer :: color
    logical :: filled
    integer :: x
    integer :: y
    integer, optional :: length
    integer, optional :: width

    sh%color = color
    sh%filled = filled
    sh%x = x
    sh%y = y
    
    select type (sh)
    type is (shape)
        ! no further initialization required
    class is (rectangle)
        ! rectangle or square specific initializations
        if (present(length))  then
           sh%length = length
        else
           sh%length = 0
        endif
        if (present(width)) then
            sh%width = width
        else
            sh%width = 0
        endif
    class default
      ! give error for unexpected/unsupported type
         stop 'initialize: unexpected type for sh object!'
    end select
    
end subroutine initialize

The above example illustrates an initialization procedure for our shape example. It takes one shape argument, sh, and a set of initial values for the components of sh. Two optional arguments, length and width, are specified when we want to initialize a rectangle or a square object. The SELECT TYPE construct allows us to perform a type check on an object. There are two styles of type checks that we can perform. The first type check is called type is. This type test is satisfied if the dynamic type of the object is the same as the type specified in parentheses following the type is keyword. The second type check is called class is. This type test is satisfied if the dynamic type of the object is the same or an extension of the specified type in parentheses following the class is keyword.

Returning to our example, we will initialize the length and width fields if the type of sh is rectangle or square. If the dynamic type of sh is not a shape, rectangle, or square, then we will execute the class default branch. This branch may get executed if we extended the shape type without updating the initialize subroutine. Because we added a class default branch, we also added the type is (shape) branch, even though it does not perform any additional assignments. Otherwise, we would incorrectly print our error message when sh is of type shape.

5. Procedure Polymorphism with Type-Bound Procedures

Section 2, "Objects in Fortran 90/95/2003", mentioned that derived types in F2003 are considered objects because they now can encapsulate data as well as procedures. Procedures encapsulated in a derived type are called type-bound procedures. Below illustrates how we may add a type-bound procedure to shape:

type shape
    integer :: color
    logical :: filled
    integer :: x
    integer :: y
contains
    procedure :: initialize
end type shape

F2003 added a contains keyword to its derived types to separate a type's data definitions from its procedures. Anything that appears after the contains keyword in a derived type must be a type-bound procedure declaration. Below is the syntax of the type-bound procedure declaration:

PROCEDURE [(interface-name)] [[,binding-attr-list ]::] binding-name[=> procedure-name]

Anything in brackets is considered optional in the type-bound procedure syntax above. At the minimum, a type-bound procedure is declared with the PROCEDURE keyword followed with a binding-name. The binding-name is the name of the type-bound procedure.

The first option is called interface-name. This option is a topic of discussion in part 2 of this article.

The binding-attr-list option is a list of binding-attributes. The binding-attributes that we will discuss in this article include PASS, NOPASS, NON_OVERRIDABLE, PUBLIC, and PRIVATE. There is one other binding-attribute, called DEFERRED, that is a topic of discussion in part 2 of this article.

The procedure-name option is the name of the underlying procedure that implements the type-bound procedure. This option is required if the name of the underlying procedure differs from the binding-name. The procedure-name can be either a module procedure or an external procedure with an explicit interface.

In our example above, we have a binding-name called initialize. Because procedure-name was not specified, an implicit procedure-name, called initialize is also declared. Another way to write our example above is procedure :: initialize => initialize.

Below is an example of a type-bound procedure that uses a module procedure:

module shape_mod

type shape
    integer :: color
    logical :: filled
    integer :: x
    integer :: y
contains
    procedure :: initialize
end type shape

type, extends(shape) :: rectangle
        integer :: length
        integer :: width
end type rectangle

type, extends(rectangle) :: square
end type square

contains

subroutine initialize(sh, color, filled, x, y, length, width)
    ! initialize shape objects
    class(shape) :: sh
    integer :: color
    logical :: filled
    integer :: x
    integer :: y
    integer, optional :: length
    integer, optional :: width

    sh%color = color
    sh%filled = filled
    sh%x = x
    sh%y = y
    
    select type (sh)
    type is (shape)
          ! no further initialization required
    class is (rectangle)
        ! rectangle or square specific initializations
        if (present(length))  then
           sh%length = length
        else
           sh%length = 0
        endif
        if (present(width)) then
            sh%width = width
        else
            sh%width = 0
        endif
    class default
      ! give error for unexpected/unsupported type
         stop 'initialize: unexpected type for sh object!'
    end select
    
end subroutine initialize

end module

Below is an example of a type-bound procedure that uses an external procedure with an explicit interface:

module shape_mod

type shape
    integer :: color
    logical :: filled
    integer :: x
    integer :: y
contains
    procedure :: initialize
end type shape

type, extends(shape) :: rectangle
    integer :: length
    integer :: width
end type rectangle

type, extends(rectangle) :: square
end type square

interface
    subroutine initialize(sh, color, filled, x, y, length, width)
        import shape
        class(shape) :: sh
        integer :: color
        logical :: filled
        integer :: x
        integer :: y
        integer, optional :: length
        integer, optional :: width
  end subroutine
end interface

end module

Using the examples above, we can invoke the type-bound procedure in the following manner:

use shape_mod
type(shape) :: shp                       ! declare an instance of shape
call shp%initialize(1, .true., 10, 20)   ! initialize shape

The syntax for invoking a type-bound procedure is very similar to accessing a data component in a derived type. The name of the component is preceded by the variable name separated by a percent (%) sign. In this case, the name of the component is initialize and the name of the variable is shp. So, we type shp%initialize to access the initialize type-bound procedure. The above example calls the initialize subroutine and passes in 1 for color, .true. for filled, 10 for x, and 20 for y.

You may notice that we have not yet mentioned anything about the first dummy argument, sh, in initialize. This dummy argument is known as the passed-object dummy argument. By default, the passed-object dummy is the first dummy argument in the type-bound procedure. It receives the object that invoked the type-bound procedure. In our example, sh is the passed-object dummy and the invoking object is shp. Therefore, the shp object gets assigned to sh when initialize is invoked.

The passed-object dummy argument must be declared CLASS and of the same type as the derived type that defined the type-bound procedure. For example, a type bound procedure declared in shape must have a passed-object dummy argument declared class(shape).

We can also specify a different passed-object dummy argument using the PASS binding-attribute. For example, let's say that the sh dummy in our initialize subroutine did not appear as the first argument. Then we would need to specify a PASS attribute like in the following code:

type shape
    integer :: color
    logical :: filled
    integer :: x
    integer :: y
contains
    procedure, pass(sh) :: initialize
end type shape

Sometimes we do not want to specify a passed-object dummy argument. We can choose to not specify one using the NOPASS binding-attribute:

type shape
    integer :: color
    logical :: filled
    integer :: x
    integer :: y
contains
    procedure, nopass :: initialize
end type shape

If we specify NOPASS in our example, then we still invoke the type-bound procedure the same way. The only difference is that the invoking object is not automatically assigned to a passed-object dummy in the type-bound procedure. Therefore, if we were to specify NOPASS in our initialize type-bound procedure, we would invoke initialize in the following manner:

type(shape) :: shp                            ! declare an instance of shape
call shp%initialize(shp, 1, .true., 10, 20)   ! initialize shape
Note that we explicitly specify shp for the first argument of initialize because it was declared NOPASS.

6. Inheritance and Type-Bound Procedures

Recall from section 2, "Objects in Fortran 90/95/2003", that a child type inherits or reuses components from their parent or ancestor types. This applies to both data and procedures when dealing with F2003 derived types. In the code below, rectangle and square will both inherit the initialize type-bound procedure from shape.

type shape
    integer :: color
    logical :: filled
    integer :: x
    integer :: y
contains
    procedure :: initialize
end type shape

type, extends(shape) :: rectangle
    integer :: length
    integer :: width
end type rectangle

type, extends(rectangle) :: square
end type square

Using the example above, we can invoke initialize with a shape, rectangle, or square object:

type(shape) :: shp                                  ! declare an instance of shape
type(rectangle) :: rect                             ! declare an instance of rectangle
type(square) :: sq                                  ! declare an instance of square
call shp%initialize(1, .true., 10, 20)              ! initialize shape
call rect%initialize(2, .false., 100, 200, 50, 25)  ! initialize rectangle
call sq%initialize(3, .false., 400, 500, 30, 20)    ! initialize rectangle

7. Procedure Overriding

Most OOP languages allow a child object to override a procedure inherited from its parent object. This is known as procedure overriding. In F2003, we can specify a type-bound procedure in a child type that has the same binding-name as a type-bound procedure in the parent type. When the child overrides a particular type-bound procedure, the version defined in its derived type will get invoked instead of the version defined in the parent. Below is an example where rectangle defines an initialize type-bound procedure that overrides shape's initialize type-bound procedure:

module shape_mod
type shape
    integer :: color
    logical :: filled
    integer :: x
    integer :: y
contains
    procedure :: initialize => initShape
end type shape

type, extends(shape) :: rectangle
    integer :: length
    integer :: width
contains
    procedure :: initialize => initRectangle
end type rectangle

type, extends(rectangle) :: square
end type square

contains

    subroutine initShape(this, color, filled, x, y, length, width)
        ! initialize shape objects
        class(shape) :: this
        integer :: color
        logical :: filled
        integer :: x
        integer :: y
        integer, optional :: length  ! ingnored for shape
        integer, optional :: width   ! ignored for shape

        this%color = color
        this%filled = filled
        this%x = x
        this%y = y
    end subroutine initShape

    subroutine initRectangle(this, color, filled, x, y, length, width)
        ! initialize rectangle objects
        class(rectangle) :: this
        integer :: color
        logical :: filled
        integer :: x
        integer :: y
        integer, optional :: length  
        integer, optional :: width   

        this%color = color
        this%filled = filled
        this%x = x
        this%y = y

        if (present(length)) then
           this%length = length
        else
           this%length = 0
        endif
        if (present(width)) then 
            this%width = width
        else
             this%width = 0
        endif

    end subroutine initRectangle
    
end module

In the sample code above, we defined a type-bound procedure called initialize for both shape and rectangle. The only difference is that shape's version of initialize will invoke a procedure called initShape and rectangle's version will invoke a procedure called initRectangle. Note that the passed-object dummy in initShape is declared class(shape) and the passed-object dummy in initRectangle is declared class(rectangle). Recall that a type-bound procedure's passed-object dummy must match the type of the derived type that defined it. Other than differing passed-object dummy arguments, the interface for the child's overriding type-bound procedure is identical with the interface for the parent's type-bound procedure. That is because both type-bound procedures are invoked in the same manner:

type(shape) :: shp                                  ! declare an instance of shape
type(rectangle) :: rect                             ! declare an instance of rectangle
type(square) :: sq                                  ! declare an instance of square
call shp%initialize(1, .true., 10, 20)              ! calls initShape
call rect%initialize(2, .false., 100, 200, 11, 22)  ! calls initRectangle 
call sq%initialize(3, .false., 400, 500)            ! calls initRectangle

Note that sq is declared square but its initialize type-bound procedure invokes initRectangle because sq inherits the rectangle version of initialize.

Although a type may override a type-bound procedure, it is still possible to invoke the version defined by a parent type. Recall in section 2, "Objects in Fortran 90/95/2003", that each type extension contains an implicit parent object of the same name and type as the parent. We can use this implicit parent object to access components specific to a parent, say, a parent's version of a type-bound procedure:

call rect%shape%initialize(2, .false., 100, 200)         ! calls initShape
call sq%rectangle%shape%initialize(3, .false., 400, 500) ! calls initShape

Sometimes we may not want a child to override a parent's type-bound procedure. We can use the NON_OVERRIDABLE binding-attribute to prevent any type extensions from overriding a particular type-bound procedure:

type shape
    integer :: color
    logical :: filled
    integer :: x
    integer :: y
contains
    procedure, non_overridable :: initialize
end type shape

8. Functions as Type-Bound Procedures

Up to this point, subroutines have been used to implement type-bound procedures. We can also implement type-bound procedures with functions as well. Below is an example with a function that queries the status of the filled component in shape.

module shape_mod

type shape
    integer :: color
    logical :: filled
    integer :: x
    integer :: y
contains
    procedure :: isFilled
end type shape

contains

    logical function isFilled(this)
        class(shape) :: this
        isFilled = this%filled
    end function isFilled
     
end module

We can invoke the above function in the following manner:

use shape_mod
type(shape) :: shp        ! declare an instance of shape
logical filled
call shp%initialize(1, .true., 10, 20)              
filled = shp%isFilled()

9. Information Hiding

In section 7, "Procedure Overriding", we showed how a child type can override a parent's type-bound procedure. This allows a user of our type to invoke, say, the initialize type-bound procedure, without any knowledge of the implementation details of initialize. This is an example of information hiding, another important feature of OOP.

Information hiding allows the programmer to view an object and its procedures as a "black box". That is, the programmer can use (or reuse) an object without any knowledge of the implementation details of the object.

Inquiry functions, like the isFilled function in section 8, "Functions as Type-Bound Procedures", are common with information hiding. The motivation for inquiry functions, rather than direct access to the underlying data, is that the object's implementer can change the underlying data without affecting the programs that use the object. Otherwise, each program that uses the object would need to be updated whenever the underlying data of the object changes.

To enable information hiding, F2003 provides a PRIVATE keyword (and binding-attribute). F2003 also provides a PUBLIC keyword (and binding-attribute) to disable information hiding. By default, all derived type components are declared PUBLIC. The PRIVATE keyword can be placed on derived type data and type-bound procedure components (and on module data and procedures). We illustrate PUBLIC and PRIVATE in the sample code below:

module shape_mod

private    ! hide the type-bound procedure implementation procedures
public :: shape, constructor   ! allow access to shape & constructor procedure

type shape
    private               ! hide the underlying details
    integer :: color
    logical :: filled
    integer :: x
    integer :: y
contains
    private                         ! hide the type bound procedures by default
    procedure         :: initShape  ! private type-bound procedure
    procedure, public :: isFilled   ! allow access to isFilled type-bound procedure
    procedure, public :: print      ! allow access to print type-bound procedure
end type shape

contains

    logical function isFilled(this)
        class(shape) :: this
        isFilled = this%filled
    end function isFilled
 
    function constructor(color, filled, x, y)
        type(shape) :: constructor
        integer :: color
        logical :: filled
        integer :: x
        integer :: y
        call constructor%initShape(color, filled, x, y)
    end function constructor

    subroutine initShape(this, color, filled, x, y)
        ! initialize shape objects
        class(shape) :: this
        integer :: color
        logical :: filled
        integer :: x
        integer :: y

        this%color = color
        this%filled = filled
        this%x = x
        this%y = y
    end subroutine initShape

    subroutine print(this)
        class(shape) :: this
        print *, this%color, this%filled, this%x, this%y
    end subroutine  print

end module

The example above uses information hiding in the host module as well as in the shape type. The private statement, located at the top of the module, enables information hiding on all module data and procedures. The isFilled module procedure (not to be confused with the isFilled type-bound procedure) is hidden as a result of the private statement at the top of the module. We added public :: constructor to allow the user to invoke the constructor module procedure. We added a private statement on the data components of shape. Now, the only way a user can query the filled component is through the isFilled type-bound procedure, which is declared public.

Note the private statement after the contains in type shape. The private that appears after type shape only affects the data components of shape. If you want your type-bound procedures to also be private, then a private statement must also be added after the contains keyword. Otherwise, type-bound procedures are public by default.

In our example, the initShape type-bound procedure is declared private. Therefore, only procedures local to the host module can invoke a private type-bound procedure. In our example above, the constructor module procedure invokes the initShape type-bound procedure. Below is how we may invoke our example from above:

program shape_prg
    use shape_mod
    type(shape) :: sh
    logical filled
    sh = constructor(5, .true., 100, 200)
    call sh%print()
end program shape_prg

Below is a sample compile and sample run of the above program (we assume that the shape_mod module is saved in a file called shape.f03 and that the main program is called main.f03):

% pgfortran -V ; pgfortran shape.f03 main.f03 -o shapeTest
pgfortran 11.2-1 64-bit target on x86-64 Linux -tp penryn 
Copyright 1989-2000, The Portland Group, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2000-2011, STMicroelectronics, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
shape.f03:
main.f03:
% shapeTest
            5  T          100          200

10. Type Overloading

In our previous example, we created an instance of shape by invoking a function called constructor. This allows us to hide the details for constructing a shape object, including the underlying type-bound procedure that performs the initialization. However, you may have noticed that the word constructor could very well be defined somewhere else in the host program. If that is the case, the program cannot use our module without renaming one of the constructor functions. But since OOP encourages information hiding and code reusability, it would make more sense to come up with a name that probably is not being defined in the host program. That name is the type name of the object we are constructing.

F2003 allows the programmer to overload a name of a derived type with a generic interface. The generic interface acts as a wrapper for our constructor function. The idea is that the user would then construct a shape in the following manner:

program shape_prg
    use shape_mod
    type(shape) :: sh
    logical filled
    sh = shape(5, .true., 100, 200)  ! invoke constructor through shape generic interface
    call sh%print()
end program shape_prg

Below is the modified version of our example from section 9, "Information Hiding", that uses type overloading:

module shape_mod

private    ! hide the type-bound procedure implementation procedures
public :: shape ! allow access to shape

type shape
    private               ! hide the underlying details
    integer :: color
    logical :: filled
    integer :: x
    integer :: y
contains
    private                         ! hide the type bound procedures by default
    procedure         :: initShape  ! private type-bound procedure
    procedure, public :: isFilled   ! allow access to isFilled type-bound procedure
end type shape

interface shape
    procedure constructor       ! add constructor to shape generic interface
end interface

contains
     :
     :
end module shape_mod

Our constructor function is now declared private and it is invoked through the shape public generic interface.

11. Conclusion

Code reusability, an important feature of Object-Oriented Programming (OOP), is enabled through inheritance, polymorphism, and information hiding. With inheritance, an object can be extended and code from the parent object can be reused or overloaded in the child object. Code reusability is also enabled through polymorphism. There are two types of polymorphism: procedure polymorphism and data polymorphism. Procedure polymorphism enables code reusability because a procedure can operate on a variety of data types and values. The programmer does not have to reinvent the wheel for every data type a program may encounter with a polymorphic procedure. Part 2 of this article will cover data polymorphism. Finally, we examined information hiding which allows programmers to use an object without having to understand its underlying implementation details. Fortran 2003 (F2003) supports inheritance, polymorphism, and information hiding through type extension, the CLASS keyword, and the PUBLIC/PRIVATE keywords/binding-attributes respectively.

In the next installment of this article we will continue our discussion of OOP with F2003 by examining the other form of polymorphism, data polymorphism, and see how it can be used to create flexible and reusable software components. We will also examine the following OOP features offered by F2003: unlimited polymorphic objects, typed allocation, sourced allocation, generic type-bound procedures, deferred bindings, and abstract types.

@samymukadi
Copy link

samymukadi commented May 18, 2018

Good presentation. I am a FORTRAN/95 and java/C++ programmer. I appreciate the presentation OOP in Fortran. So large FORTRAN codes needs less of c++ now.

@zhoutengye
Copy link

thank you very much, I was just stuck with the OOP while re-writing my module, this helped me a lot

@esterjo
Copy link

esterjo commented Dec 10, 2020

This is wonderful for students. One question. Coming from C++, I know that non-virtual member functions are tied to their classes through name-mangling. I'm trying to learn Modern Fortran and my question is how are Fortran type-bound procedures linked to their types?

@shahmoradi
Copy link

shahmoradi commented Dec 10, 2020

@esterjo The same way as in C++, through name mangling. By default all procedures have the pass attribute, meaning that all procedures are considered type-bound dynamic procedures. You can override the default behavior by providing the nopass attribute to create static type-bound procedures.
Here is an example (not really the best style of OOP to follow, but to just show a few possibilities),

module example_mod

    use iso_fortran_env, only: RK => real64

    type :: example_type
        character(:), allocatable   :: message
        real(RK)                    :: realNumber = 4._RK
        real(RK)                    :: realNumberSqrt
        real(RK)                    :: realNumberSquared
    contains
        procedure, pass     :: exampleDynamicTypeBoundProcedure
        procedure, nopass   :: exampleStaticTypeBoundProcedure
        procedure, pass     :: hello
    end type example_type

contains

    !> Return square(number).
    function exampleDynamicTypeBoundProcedure(self) result(realNumberSquared)
        implicit none
        class(example_type), intent(inout)  :: self ! class indicates that `self` is a runtime polymorphic object.
        real(RK)                            :: realNumberSquared
        realNumberSquared = self%realNumber**2
    end function exampleDynamicTypeBoundProcedure

    !> Return sqrt(number).
    subroutine exampleStaticTypeBoundProcedure(realNumber, realNumberSqrt)
        real(RK), intent(in)                :: realNumber
        real(RK), intent(out)               :: realNumberSqrt
        realNumberSqrt = sqrt(realNumber)
    end subroutine exampleStaticTypeBoundProcedure

    ! output a Hello message and set the `message` component of the object.
    function hello(self) result(message)
        class(example_type), intent(inout)  :: self ! class indicates that `self` is a runtime polymorphic object.
        character(:), allocatable           :: message
        message = "Hello from inside type-bound dynamic function."
        self%message = message
    end function hello

end module example_mod


use example_mod
type(example_type) :: example

example%realNumberSquared = example%exampleDynamicTypeBoundProcedure()
write(*,*) "The square of", example%realNumber, "is", example%realNumberSquared

call example%exampleStaticTypeBoundProcedure( example%realNumber, example%realNumberSqrt )
write(*,*) "The square-root of", example%realNumber, "is", example%realNumberSqrt

write(*,*) example%hello()

end

You can test it here: https://www.tutorialspoint.com/compile_fortran_online.php

For a modern comprehensive introduction, See "Modern Fortran Explained: Incorporating Fortran 2018" by Metcalf et al: https://books.google.com/books?id=sB1rDwAAQBAJ&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&lpg=PP1&dq=Modern%20Fortran%20Explained%3A%20Incorporating%20Fortran%202018&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false

There are also many others. Here is a more recent publication, that I have not read, but I see people recommending it: https://www.amazon.com/Modern-Fortran-Building-Efficient-Applications/dp/1617295280

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment