indygreg

#!/usr/bin/perl

# This script parses Git blame's "porcelain" output format and
# ascertains the oldest lines of code seen.
#
# If you want to perform a custom report, just define your own callback
# function and invoke parse_porcelain() with it.
#
# The expected input format is slightly modified from raw `git blame
# -p`. Here is an example script for producing input:

nairbv

//quick hack to pretty-print some text:

 "((hi)(bye(yeah))((x)))".foldLeft(0){ 
    (a,b)=> { 
        var indent=a; 
        b match { 
          case '('=> println("("); indent=a+2; print(" "*indent); 
          case ')'=>println;indent=a-2;println(" "*indent + ")");print(" "*indent) 
          case x => print(x); 

atenni

Problem: When linking to the raw version of a gist, the link changes with each revision.

Solution:

To return the first file from a gist: https://gist.github.com/[gist_user]/[gist_id]/raw/

• Example: https://gist.github.com/atenni/5604522/raw/
• Works even when you change the filename.

To get a file from multi–file gist: https://gist.github.com/[gist_user]/[gist_id]/raw/[file_name]

daniel-trinh

def pp(tree: String, indentSize: Int = 2): String = {
  var indentLevel = 0
  var outputTree = ""
  tree foreach { char => char match {
    case '(' =>
      indentLevel += 1
      outputTree += char.toString+'\n'+indents
    case ')' =>                     
      indentLevel -= 1
      outputTree += "\n" + indents + char.toString

djspiewak

Collections Redesign Proposal

I'm going to start off by motivating what I'm doing here. And I want to be clear that I'm not "dissing" the existing collections implementation or anything as unproductively negative as that. It was a really good experiment, it was a huge step forward given what we knew back in 2.8, but now it's time to learn from that experiment and do better. This proposal uses what I believe are the lessons we can learn about what worked, what didn't work, and what is and isn't important about collections in Scala.

This is going to start out sounding really negative and pervasively dismissive, but bear with me! There's a point to all my ranting. I want to be really clear about my motivations for the proposal being the way that it is.

Problems

Generic Interfaces

adriaanm

// originally by @SethTisue, see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/40622878/how-do-i-tell-sbt-to-use-a-nightly-build-of-scala-2-11-or-2-12/40622879#40622879
resolvers += "nightlies" at "https://scala-ci.typesafe.com/artifactory/scala-release-temp/"                           
scalaVersion := {
  val propsUrl = new URL("https://scala-ci.typesafe.com/job/scala-2.12.x-integrate-bootstrap/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/jenkins.properties/*view*/")
  val props = new java.util.Properties
  props.load(propsUrl.openStream)
  props.getProperty("version")
}
scalaBinaryVersion := "2.12"

terlar

# kubernetes - is an open source system for managing containerized
# applications across multiple hosts, providing basic mechanisms for
# deployment, maintenance, and scaling of applications.
# See: https://kubernetes.io

function __kubectl_no_command
    set -l cmd (commandline -poc)
    if not set -q cmd[2]
        return 0
    end

nafg

#!/usr/bin/env amm

import scala.xml.{Elem, Node, Text, XML}


def quoteString(s: String) =
  '"' +
    s.replace("\n", "\\n").replace("\"", "\\\"") +
    '"'

gijsbotje

milessabin

import cats.{Applicative, Monad}
import cats.implicits._

abstract class Foo[+M[_[_]], F[_]](implicit val M: M[F])
trait Bar[F[_]] extends Foo[Applicative, F] { def bar = Applicative[F] }
trait Baz[F[_]] extends Foo[Monad, F] { def baz = Monad[F] }

class User[F[_]: Monad] extends Bar[F] with Baz[F]

object Test {