Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@ncarboni
Last active July 8, 2019 20:49
Show Gist options
  • Save ncarboni/0ef99d3e520a7496f8dd357dddd000fd to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save ncarboni/0ef99d3e520a7496f8dd357dddd000fd to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Modelling of diverse types of appellations in CIDOC-CRM
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix crm: <http://http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/> .
@prefix sari: <http://w3id.org/sari#> .
<http://example.com/500020981> a crm:E21_Person ;
crm:P1_is_identified_by <http://example.com/500020981/appellation/name> , <http://example.com/500020981/appellation/surname> , <http://example.com/500020981/appellation/full> .
<http://example.com/500020981/appellation/name>
a crm:E41_Appellation ;
rdfs:label "Ferdinand" ;
crm:P2_has_type <http://vocab.getty.edu/page/aat/300404651> .
<http://example.com/500020981/appellation/surname>
a crm:E41_Appellation ;
rdfs:label "Hodler" ;
crm:P2_has_type <http://vocab.getty.edu/page/aat/300404652> .
<http://example.com/500020981/appellation/full>
a crm:E41_Appellation ;
rdfs:label "Ferdinand Hodler" .
<http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300404651> a crm:E55_Type .
<http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300404652> a crm:E55_Type .
@lodewijk81
Copy link

Hi Nicola,

Thanks for sharing the SARI docs and modelling examples; they are very helpful.
I was wondering if this example is correct. You use the AAT concepts to define the various appellations, but shouldn't you then also specify the concepts as being crm:E55_Type(s)?

Put concretely, shouldn't these two lines be added?

<http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300404651> a crm:E55_Type .

<http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300404652> a crm:E55_Type .

Thanks,
Lodewijk Petram (Huygens ING)

@ncarboni
Copy link
Author

ncarboni commented Jul 8, 2019

Hi Petram,

Thanks for sharing the SARI docs and modelling examples; they are very helpful.

No problem, happy it could be useful to someone else :-)

Put concretely, shouldn't these two lines be added?

You are definitively right. I skipped the class declaration for the type. Just added. Thanks for spotting it.

Nicola

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment