Modelling of diverse types of appellations in CIDOC-CRM

appellation.ttl

@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix crm: <http://http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/> .
@prefix sari: <http://w3id.org/sari#> .

<http://example.com/500020981> a  crm:E21_Person ;
        crm:P1_is_identified_by <http://example.com/500020981/appellation/name> , <http://example.com/500020981/appellation/surname> , <http://example.com/500020981/appellation/full> .

<http://example.com/500020981/appellation/name>
        a                crm:E41_Appellation ;
        rdfs:label       "Ferdinand" ;
        crm:P2_has_type  <http://vocab.getty.edu/page/aat/300404651> .

<http://example.com/500020981/appellation/surname>
        a                crm:E41_Appellation ;
        rdfs:label       "Hodler" ;
        crm:P2_has_type  <http://vocab.getty.edu/page/aat/300404652> .

<http://example.com/500020981/appellation/full>
        a                crm:E41_Appellation ;
        rdfs:label       "Ferdinand Hodler" .


<http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300404651> a crm:E55_Type .

<http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300404652> a crm:E55_Type .

Hi Nicola,

Thanks for sharing the SARI docs and modelling examples; they are very helpful.
I was wondering if this example is correct. You use the AAT concepts to define the various appellations, but shouldn't you then also specify the concepts as being crm:E55_Type(s)?

Put concretely, shouldn't these two lines be added?

<http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300404651> a crm:E55_Type .

<http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300404652> a crm:E55_Type .

Thanks,
Lodewijk Petram (Huygens ING)

Hi Petram,

Thanks for sharing the SARI docs and modelling examples; they are very helpful.

No problem, happy it could be useful to someone else :-)

Put concretely, shouldn't these two lines be added?

You are definitively right. I skipped the class declaration for the type. Just added. Thanks for spotting it.

Nicola