Modelling of diverse types of appellations in CIDOC-CRM
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . | |
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . | |
@prefix crm: <http://http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/> . | |
@prefix sari: <http://w3id.org/sari#> . | |
<http://example.com/500020981> a crm:E21_Person ; | |
crm:P1_is_identified_by <http://example.com/500020981/appellation/name> , <http://example.com/500020981/appellation/surname> , <http://example.com/500020981/appellation/full> . | |
<http://example.com/500020981/appellation/name> | |
a crm:E41_Appellation ; | |
rdfs:label "Ferdinand" ; | |
crm:P2_has_type <http://vocab.getty.edu/page/aat/300404651> . | |
<http://example.com/500020981/appellation/surname> | |
a crm:E41_Appellation ; | |
rdfs:label "Hodler" ; | |
crm:P2_has_type <http://vocab.getty.edu/page/aat/300404652> . | |
<http://example.com/500020981/appellation/full> | |
a crm:E41_Appellation ; | |
rdfs:label "Ferdinand Hodler" . | |
<http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300404651> a crm:E55_Type . | |
<http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300404652> a crm:E55_Type . |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hi Petram,
No problem, happy it could be useful to someone else :-)
You are definitively right. I skipped the class declaration for the type. Just added. Thanks for spotting it. Nicola |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This comment has been minimized.
Hi Nicola,
Thanks for sharing the SARI docs and modelling examples; they are very helpful.
I was wondering if this example is correct. You use the AAT concepts to define the various appellations, but shouldn't you then also specify the concepts as being crm:E55_Type(s)?
Put concretely, shouldn't these two lines be added?
Thanks,
Lodewijk Petram (Huygens ING)