Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@nilebox
Last active August 15, 2017 21:08
Show Gist options
  • Save nilebox/ffa2c0585914b2ba541cfbfdfeef3375 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save nilebox/ffa2c0585914b2ba541cfbfdfeef3375 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
service-catalog beta issues status
  • Backward compatible API:
    • API resource names finalized (#1080)
      • implemented by @duglin and merged (#1054), but then reverted
      • proposal: pending for API review? Who's taking action? @pmorie?
    • Kube names of ServiceClass and Plan determined (#802)
      • proposal: @pmorie started a discussion in sig-architecture, no consensus yet
    • Use Generation instead of checksum (#1095)
      • proposal: written by @pmorie, there are questions, no consensus yet
    • Create new resource for plan (#454)
      • proposal: @MHBauer, had a consensus today with reverse reference from plan to class
      • assign to @MHBauer?
  • Brokers:
    • API for refresh settings (#705)
      • proposal: @pmorie (and other RedHat folks) for BrokerSpec and subresources, no consensus yet
      • isn't just clearing the status field in the Broker object sufficient for beta?
    • Refresh semantics (#801)
      • proposal: @duglin, consensus reached
      • assign to @duglin?
    • API for OSB API version to use for broker (#982)
      • needs proposal: who? @MHBauer volunteered himself to implement this?
    • Opaque bearer token auth (#1053)
      • done (@nilebox)
    • TLS verification of broker (#1064)
      • proposal: reached consensus
      • assigned to @staebler, no open PRs
  • Instances
    • API for sourcing parameters from secrets and configmaps (#1075)
      • doc needs LGTMs (@nilebox)
      • implementation already merged (@nilebox)
    • Orphan mitigation (error handling for OSB integration) (#988)
      • needs proposal: @pmorie
    • Plan updates (#816)
      • OSB compliance, no actions taken
    • Parameter updates (#748)
      • marked with 1.0.0 - shall we remove it from the list?
      • required by #869?
    • User impersonation (#462)
      • proposal: no consensus on propagation through OSB
      • implementation: @pmorie #939, needs reviews
    • Clear handling of deletion when an instance has bindings (#820)
      • proposal: consensus reached
      • assign to ???
    • Ensure no other operations can start during async operations (#781)
      • proposal: consensus reached
      • assigned to @vaikas-google, status?
    • Reject plan changes for instances of services that are not plan_updateable (#869)
      • no actions, no assignees, depending on #748?
  • Bindings
    • Do not retry bindings that have failed (#1051)
      • merged (#1057, @jpeeler), done?
    • API for sourcing parameters from secrets and configmaps (#1075)
      • duplication, see above
    • Orphan mitigation (#989)
      • needs proposal: @pmorie
    • User impersonation (#462)
      • duplication, see above
    • Remove PodPreset integration (#1030)
      • done (@nilebox)
    • Determine whether to send app_guid on bindings (#818)
      • closed with no action
  • Documentation for overall concepts and supported use cases
    • Secret updates (#1046)
      • needs doc (no coding needed), assign to @duglin?
@mihnjong
Copy link

Hello Nail, thanks for the summary. Can I take issue #869? I'm new here, and want to start to contribute to the project.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment