#Paper Session 4: Policy, Practice, and Research Data (Hogan)
Chair: Jane Gray, Senior Lecturer, Sociology, Maynooth University
####**DRI as a Bilingual Digital Repository; Processes and Challenges; Turning Policy into Practice
Rosemary Coll, NUI Galway @rosemary_coll
DRI requirements - develop an Irish language interface, and be able to use metadata created as gaeilge.
Metadata:
RnaG collection was a DRI demonstrator collection.
Original metadata was as gaeilge, stored on an MS database. Decision taken to both translate this to English and to ingest in Irish. Records were enriched - to makes it more useful to the user / add detail.
Issues around specific Irish language conventions - i.e. variant spelling of surnames. Issues where people would ne known locally by surname and local names. This isn't something the DC legislates for. Response was to use the 'Irish guidelines for indexing archives'.
Questions Christophe: are there cases where translations aren't identical? A: Often came up with technical metadata - 'cuma' means to keepk. If you're using it for preservation then you can't use it else where. Another issue was that in English technical metadata might have four nouns, but no definate articles which just doesn't happen in Irish. [did I get this right?]
####Identifying HSS research data for preservation - a snapshot of current policy and guidelines
Rebecca Grant, Royal Irish Academy @Beck_Grant
PhD question: how can proffessional archivists engage with research data?
Lit review: how is research data defined for researchers? Who provides these definitions?
Research Data is published to:
- fulfill OA requirements
- share ideas
- allow for reproducible research
Humanities REsearch Data;
####Preserving the essence: Identifying the significant properties of social science research data
Astrid Recker, Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences @CESSDAtraining
Steffan Müller, Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences
How do we preserve the essence of the data as the medium changes.
Intro: Significent Properties.
Paradoxically digital preservation means changing the digital object. What level of change is possible before the object ceases to be authentic?
The significant properties are those which "must be maintained ... be be accepted as evidence of what it purpots to record"
Different ways to determine significant properties:
- people centric
- process centric
- data centric
What are the objects to be looked at?
Understnding the data requires understanding the research process which created the data. As a consequence data received into the archive is accompanied by questionairres, methods reports, codebooks.
Data model of archival object drawn up using Premis 2.2. Incoprorates data sets, reports, methods and field work reports.
Question
Why not store everything? A: the problem isn't storage - the exercise anticipates change and is planning for a way to deal with the consequences of that change. An example would be the hoped for move from an SPSS db to ascii.
Ruth Gerathy: Do you interact with the researcher when deciding what is significant. A: No. They do interact when ingesting the material in the first place however.
Emphasis on sig props will change with move to emulation and virtualisation. A: emulation may be a game-changer but future users may not know how to interact with emulations. Contextual information will have to be added to facilitate this interaction.
Jane: assumption is SS is that researchers will interact with entire datasets. However researchers may only use parts of this dataset, out of context. How much does that threaten our understanding of how we archive SS data? A: We determine sig props with a designated user community in mind. Also woried about objects being chosen from diff datasets - how can we judge research quality without original context.