RSpec matcher for ensuring a model is accepting nested attributes for an association, and accepting/rejecting the right values.

spec_helper.rb

  # Use: it { should accept_nested_attributes_for(:association_name).and_accept({valid_values => true}).but_reject({ :reject_if_nil => nil })}
  RSpec::Matchers.define :accept_nested_attributes_for do |association|
    match do |model|
      @model = model
      @nested_att_present = model.respond_to?("#{association}_attributes=".to_sym)
      if @nested_att_present && @reject
        model.send("#{association}_attributes=".to_sym,[@reject])
        @reject_success = model.send("#{association}").empty?
      end
      model.send("#{association}").clear
      if @nested_att_present && @accept
        model.send("#{association}_attributes=".to_sym,[@accept])
        @accept_success = ! (model.send("#{association}").empty?)
      end
      @nested_att_present && ( @reject.nil? || @reject_success ) && ( @accept.nil? || @accept_success )
    end
    
    failure_message_for_should do
      messages = []
      messages << "accept nested attributes for #{association}" unless @nested_att_present
      messages << "reject values #{@reject.inspect} for association #{association}" unless @reject_success
      messages << "accept values #{@accept.inspect} for association #{association}" unless @accept_success
      "expected #{@model.class} to " + messages.join(", ")
    end
    
    description do
      desc = "accept nested attributes for #{expected}"
      if @reject
        desc << ", but reject if attributes are #{@reject.inspect}"
      end
    end
    
    chain :but_reject do |reject|
      @reject = reject
    end
    
    chain :and_accept do |accept|
      @accept = accept
    end
  end

hi paul,
firstly thank you for the code...is solved my problem for the rspec, however i would like to ask how can i test for the reject_if => proc { |attrs| attrs.all? { |key, val| val.blank?}}

hi paul,
firstly thank you for the code...is solved my problem for the rspec, however i would like to ask how can i test for the reject_if => proc { |attrs| attrs.all? { |key, val| val.blank?}}

Hi @maheeptathgur. I think you should just be able to do:

it { should accept_nested_attributes_for(:association_name).but_reject({ :val_1 => "", :val_2 => "" }) }

Let me know if that doesn't work, and I'll try and help some more.

Hi @maheeptathgur. I think you should just be able to do:

it { should accept_nested_attributes_for(:association_name).but_reject({ :val_1 => "", :val_2 => "" }) }

Let me know if that doesn't work, and I'll try and help some more.

HI @pauljamesrussell
Thanks for the solution you gave, it worked, however i also happened to do the following and that too worked :)
it { should accept_nested_attributes_for(:association_name, :reject_if => {:val_1 => "", :val_2 => ""}) }
is it right to do this way?

HI @pauljamesrussell
Thanks for the solution you gave, it worked, however i also happened to do the following and that too worked :)
it { should accept_nested_attributes_for(:association_name, :reject_if => {:val_1 => "", :val_2 => ""}) }
is it right to do this way?

Hi @maheeptathgur, no I'm afraid not - it'll just ignore the rejection test and not test for rejection. Your test will still pass, but it won't be proving what you want it to prove.

Hi @maheeptathgur, no I'm afraid not - it'll just ignore the rejection test and not test for rejection. Your test will still pass, but it won't be proving what you want it to prove.

Thank you!

Thank you!

@pauljamesrussell the description message doesnt work.
When I changed it as below, it worked.

description do
  desc = "accept nested attributes for #{expected}"
  if @reject
    desc << ", but reject if attributes are #{@reject.inspect}"
  end
  desc
end

@pauljamesrussell the description message doesnt work.
When I changed it as below, it worked.

description do
  desc = "accept nested attributes for #{expected}"
  if @reject
    desc << ", but reject if attributes are #{@reject.inspect}"
  end
  desc
end

+1 to @takehiro-adachi . Thanks Paul for sharing!

+1 to @takehiro-adachi . Thanks Paul for sharing!

Great, it worked. But I thought RSpec already included Shoulda macros. I'm missing something here

Great, it worked. But I thought RSpec already included Shoulda macros. I'm missing something here

Thank you! Just what I was looking for

👍

Thank you! Just what I was looking for

👍

@JohnSmall - I believe the Shoulda macros do not support the reject_if: option.

@JohnSmall - I believe the Shoulda macros do not support the reject_if: option.

@pauljamesrussell maybe you should do a pull request to the shoulda macros to use your features for rejection?

@pauljamesrussell maybe you should do a pull request to the shoulda macros to use your features for rejection?

+1 for @andreorvalho. cc @pauljamesrussell.

+1 for @andreorvalho. cc @pauljamesrussell.