Created
June 24, 2024 10:40
-
-
Save peteryates/7a8377a549f2ebcd0718c684d0266384 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Fixing a pandoc-generated Word table in AsciiDoc
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
diff --git a/documentation/providers/ecf-call-off-contract-2023-2024-redacted.adoc b/documentation/providers/ecf-call-off-contract-2023-2024-redacted.adoc | |
index c0dbeff..ca2fe44 100644 | |
--- a/documentation/providers/ecf-call-off-contract-2023-2024-redacted.adoc | |
+++ b/documentation/providers/ecf-call-off-contract-2023-2024-redacted.adoc | |
@@ -3393,9 +3393,9 @@ of the KPI target | |
[width="100%",cols="57%,27%,16%",options="header",] | |
|=== | |
-|*KPI;* |*Measure* | | |
-a| | |
-*1 – Recruitment* | |
+|*KPI;* 2+|*Measure* | |
+.5+a| | |
+1. *Recruitment* | |
Recruit the target number of ECTs and their assigned Mentors onto the | |
programme by the end of the recruitment window. | |
@@ -3405,56 +3405,33 @@ reviewed at the following milestones: | |
*[.underline]#2023 Cohort#* | |
-* {blank} | |
-+ | |
-____ | |
-31 October 2023 | |
-____ | |
-* {blank} | |
-+ | |
-____ | |
-31 December 2023 | |
-____ | |
-* {blank} | |
-+ | |
-____ | |
-31 March 2024 | |
-____ | |
+* 31 October 2023 | |
+* 31 December 2023 | |
+* 31 March 2024 | |
The final KPI measure will be reported on 31 July 2023. | |
*[.underline]#2024 Cohort#* | |
-* {blank} | |
-+ | |
-____ | |
-31 October 2024 | |
-____ | |
-* {blank} | |
-+ | |
-____ | |
-31 December 2024 | |
-____ | |
-* {blank} | |
-+ | |
-____ | |
-31 March 2025 | |
-____ | |
+* 31 October 2024 | |
+* 31 December 2024 | |
+* 31 March 2025 | |
The final KPI measure will be reported on 31 July 2025. | |
-|*Recruitment % against target:* | | |
+2+|*Recruitment % against target:* | |
-| |*Good* |96% + | |
+| *Good* |96% + | |
-| |*Approaching Target* |90% - 95% | |
+| *Approaching Target* |90% - 95% | |
-| |*Requires Improvement* |75% - 89% | |
+| *Requires Improvement* |75% - 89% | |
-| |*Inadequate* |Below 75% | |
+| *Inadequate* |Below 75% | |
-a| | |
-*2 – Recruitment (Pupil Premium and Sparsity)* | |
+.5+a| | |
+[arabic, start=2] | |
+2. *Recruitment (Pupil Premium and Sparsity)* | |
The number of ECTs and their assigned Mentors recruited onto the | |
programme from either; schools with at least 40% of their pupils | |
@@ -3464,18 +3441,19 @@ eligible for PP; or Local Department Districts identified as in the top | |
Performance reviewed monthly and reported at closure of recruitment | |
window. | |
-|*Number of eligible ECTs:* | | |
+2+|*Number of eligible ECTs:* | |
-| |*Good* |660 + | |
+| *Good* |660 + | |
-| |*Approaching Target* |600 - 659 | |
+| *Approaching Target* |600 - 659 | |
-| |*Requires Improvement* |540 - 599 | |
+| *Requires Improvement* |540 - 599 | |
-| |*Inadequate* |Below 540 | |
+| *Inadequate* |Below 540 | |
-a| | |
-*3 – Retention* | |
+.5+a| | |
+[arabic, start=3] | |
+3. *Retention* | |
The number of Participants that start the training retained at the end | |
of year 2 of delivery. | |
@@ -3488,18 +3466,19 @@ each year. The Department reserves the right to measure the retention of | |
participants who begin the programme at other points during the academic | |
year. | |
-|*Retention rate:* | | |
+2+|*Retention rate:* | |
-| |*Good* |75% + | |
+| *Good* |75% + | |
-| |*Approaching Target* |70% - 74% | |
+| *Approaching Target* |70% - 74% | |
-| |*Requires Improvement* |65% - 69% | |
+| *Requires Improvement* |65% - 69% | |
-| |*Inadequate* |Below 65% | |
+| *Inadequate* |Below 65% | |
-a| | |
-*4 – Satisfaction* | |
+.5+a| | |
+[arabic, start=4] | |
+4. *Satisfaction* | |
The number of participants who rate the FIP experience as ‘Good’ or | |
better. | |
@@ -3510,15 +3489,15 @@ Provider. Minimum response rate of 40% required. | |
Surveys will be issued and performance measured at the end of years 1 | |
and 2 of the programme. | |
-|*Rate of participants rating the experience as ‘Good’ or better:* | | |
+2+|*Rate of participants rating the experience as ‘Good’ or better:* | |
-| |*Good* |80% + | |
+| *Good* |80% + | |
-| |*Approaching Target* |75% - 79% | |
+| *Approaching Target* |75% - 79% | |
-| |*Requires Improvement* |70% - 74% | |
+| *Requires Improvement* |70% - 74% | |
-| |*Inadequate* |Below 70% | |
+| *Inadequate* |Below 70% | |
|=== | |
1.13 In line with the cross-government transparency agenda the |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment