Top's Abstract - Draft 1 (May 20

english.txt

Abstract

This project has four main objectives. First, to film a short film, names "Make", using two point-of-views in order to compare. They were shot in a first-person point-of-view and a normal point-of-view. Second, to evaluate the quality of the short film by experts. Third, to compare between a first-person point-of-view film and a normal point-of-view film. Last, to evaluate the satisfaction of the short film project by a sample group. 

Instrumentations that were used are as follows. First, "Make" that was shot in a first-person point-of-view and a normal point-of-view. Second, a quality evaluation form. Last, a satisfaction evaluation form. 

A quality evaluation result of the first-person point-of-view version of this short film is considered high, with an average score of 3.65. A quality evaluation result of the normal point-of-view version of this short film is considered high, with an average score of 3.92.

In the study of the sample group that contains 40 students from the Bachelor’s degree students of Division of Computer and Information Technology, Faculty of Information Education and Technology, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi. 60 percent of the sample group agreed that a normal point-of-view "Make" can convey emotions better than the first-person point-of-view version of "Make". 62.50 percent of the sample group stated that both point-of-views can be further improved. 47.50 percent of the sample group expressed that a normal point-of-view is still suitable for a short film more than a first-person point-of-view. The result from the satisfaction evaluating shows that satisfaction is high, with an average score of 4.15.

Keyword: short film, first-person point-of-view, normal point-of-view