Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@rebane2001
Last active December 25, 2023 16:06
Show Gist options
  • Save rebane2001/c77558b22de1b75a240ab522bd79f297 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save rebane2001/c77558b22de1b75a240ab522bd79f297 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
import json
import sys
if len(sys.argv) < 2:
print("infojsonredact - A simple script to redact private information from ytdl info.json files")
print("Output will be saved in info.json.redacted files")
print("Usage: infojsonredact.py file1.info.json [file2.info.json, file3.info.json...]")
sys.exit(2)
redacted = ["url","manifest_url","fragment_base_url","fragments","http_headers","User-Agent","Accept-Charset","Accept","Accept-Encoding","Accept-Language","player_url","playlist","playlist_id","playlist_title","playlist_uploader","playlist_uploader_id","playlist_index","thumbnail","_filename","downloader_options","http_chunk_size","initialization_url","annotations", "playlist_count","version","_version","repository","release_git_head","filesize_approx","_format_sort_fields"]
allowed = ["id","uploader","uploader_id","uploader_url","channel_id","channel_url","upload_date","license","creator","title","alt_title","thumbnails","width","height","resolution","description","categories","tags","subtitles","automatic_captions","duration","age_limit","chapters","webpage_url","view_count","like_count","dislike_count","average_rating","formats","ext","format_note","acodec","abr","container","format_id","tbr","asr","fps","language","filesize","vcodec","path","protocol","format","is_live","start_time","end_time","series","season_number","episode_number","track","artist","album","release_date","release_year","extractor","webpage_url_basename","extractor_key","n_entries","display_id","vbr","stretched_ratio","fulltitle","quality","ar","bs","bg","ca","zh","zh-TW","hr","cs","da","nl","en","fi","fr","de","el","iw","hi","hu","id","it","ja","ko","no","pl","pt","pt-BR","pt-PT","ro","ru","sr-Cyrl","sr-Latn","sk","es","sv","th","tr","vi","subscriber_count","live_chat","video_id","en-US","en-UK","en-GB","fr-FR","de-DE","hi-Latn","es-MX","es-419","es-US","zh-CN","preference","segment_urls","af","sq","am","ar","hy","az","bn","eu","be","bs","bg","my","ca","ceb","zh-Hans","zh-Hant","co","hr","cs","da","nl","en","eo","et","fil","fi","fr","gl","ka","de","el","gu","ht","ha","haw","iw","hi","hmn","hu","is","ig","id","ga","it","ja","jv","kn","kk","km","rw","ko","ku","ky","lo","la","lv","lt","lb","mk","mg","ms","ml","mt","mi","mr","mn","ne","no","ny","or","ps","fa","pl","pt","pa","ro","ru","sm","gd","sr","sn","sd","si","sk","sl","so","st","es","su","sw","sv","tg","ta","tt","te","th","tr","tk","uk","ur","ug","uz","vi","cy","fy","xh","yi","yo","zu","rows","columns","audio_ext","video_ext","source_preference","audio_channels","playable_in_embed","om","qu","ts","_type","was_live","webpage_url_domain","ti","sa","nso","name","ln","lg","kri","gn","en-orig","dynamic_range","dv","channel","channel_follower_count","comment_count","duration_string","bho","ay","as","aspect_ratio","ak","epoch","ee","availability","live_status","has_drm","language_preference","und","channel_is_verified"]
def redactRecursively(data, allowed, redacted):
if isinstance(data, (dict, list)):
for k, v in (data.items() if isinstance(data, dict) else enumerate(data)):
if k in redacted:
data[k] = "[REDACTED]"
continue
elif not k in allowed:
if not isinstance(k, int):
raise KeyError("Key", k, "not found in both the redacted and allowed keysets")
redactRecursively(v, allowed, redacted)
for filename in sys.argv[1:]:
print(filename)
with open(filename,"r",encoding="utf-8") as f:
infojson = json.load(f)
redactRecursively(infojson, allowed, redacted)
with open(filename + ".redacted","w",encoding="utf-8") as f:
json.dump(infojson,f)
@rebane2001
Copy link
Author

as long as we're confident what's outside the mask is the contents of the other list

Yeah this is why we can't do that.

does it know about sensitive tags in use before 2020

I think I worked on files from 2017 when I first wrote this, but it's always possible there's something that slipped through the cracks at some point.

What you're proposing is pretty involved and would take a lot of effort to do. You can feel free to do that if you'd like, but this script here is just supposed to be quick and simple. I don't think it's worth it to go through all of that effort.

@notevenaperson
Copy link

I think I worked on files from 2017 when I first wrote this, but it's always possible there's something that slipped through the cracks at some point.

Good to know.

What you're proposing is pretty involved and would take a lot of effort to do. You can feel free to do that if you'd like, but this script here is just supposed to be quick and simple. I don't think it's worth it to go through all of that effort.

It's no project of mine. I just wanted to make explicit what it would take for the script to be "complete". It's no life or death situation, even though the way I wrote that might've made it sound like that

@FrostBird347
Copy link

Personally, the only change I would make (and did myself while running this tool) with regards to what's done when an unknown key is found is to print the contents of the unknown value before throwing the error, this made determining which category the key should be in a little easier.

@rebane2001
Copy link
Author

I plan on adding that, as well as something to deal with language keys so they don't all need to be in the list one-by-one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment