redbo

func DoRequest(req *http.Request, c net.Conn) (*http.Response, error) {
    defer req.Body.Close()
    dumped, err := httputil.DumpRequestOut(req, false)
    if err != nil {
        return nil, err
    }
    if _, err = c.Write(dumped); err != nil {
        return nil, err
    }
    reader := bufio.NewReader(c)

redbo

package main

import (
    "bufio"
    "fmt"
    "io"
    "io/ioutil"
    "net"
    "net/http"
    "net/http/httptest"

redbo

Michaels-MacBook-Pro:~ redbo$ ssh whoami.filippo.io 
The authenticity of host 'whoami.filippo.io (178.32.139.168)' can't be established.
RSA key fingerprint is c8:9a:b0:9d:59:96:24:37:70:4c:ef:eb:31:47:68:40.
Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes
Warning: Permanently added 'whoami.filippo.io,178.32.139.168' (RSA) to the list of known hosts.

    +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
    |                                                                     |
    |             _o/ Hello Michael Barton!
    |                                                                     |

redbo

import ctypes
import os
import mmap


class Record(ctypes.Structure):
    _fields_ = [('index', ctypes.c_uint64),
                ('key_length', ctypes.c_uint16),
                ('key', ctypes.c_char * 256)]

redbo

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Soren Hansen <soren@linux2go.dk> wrote:
> To me, the PPA's have always been a QA tool. I wanted people willing to
> help test OpenStack to be able to do so with as little effort as
> possible.  Building packages per-commit gave us that.
...
> This is completely different from a "production" PPA. I wouldn't dream
> of pointing people to the above mentioned PPA for their production
> environment.  If someone wants to offer this outside of (but perhaps in
> cooperation with) OpenStack, that'd be great. I'd be delighted to see
> companies taking this on and offering a supported OpenStack

redbo

import mmap
import ctypes


class Record(ctypes.Structure):
    _fields_ = [('index', ctypes.c_uint64),
                ('key', ctypes.c_char * 256)]

RECORD_COUNT = 256

redbo

#include <stdio.h>

struct args {
  int someval;
  int someval2;
  char *someval3;
};

void _print_some_stuff(struct args a)
{

redbo

gholt		Mar 14

Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn't submit this

swift/common/middleware/proxy_logging.py:152:9: E301 expected 1 blank line, found 0

This is called proxy_logging in some places, access-logging in others. With where it is
suggested in the pipeline, it seems like access-logging would be the proper name.

However, with this change some requests will be double-logged due to folks writing

redbo

package main

import (
    "fmt"
    "os"
    "io"
    "encoding/binary"
    "encoding/json"
    "compress/gzip"
)

redbo

@app.route('/<path:path>', methods=['OPTIONS'])
def allow_cors(path):
    resp = current_app.make_default_options_response()
    resp.headers['Access-Control-Allow-Origin'] = request.headers.get('Origin')
    resp.headers['Access-Control-Allow-Methods'] = 'GET, POST, PUT'
    resp.headers['Access-Control-Max-Age'] = '21600'
    resp.headers['Access-Control-Allow-Credentials'] = 'true'
    return resp