CLN (openchannel, openchannel2) | LND (ChannelAcceptResponse) | Eclair | Description | Example plugin use cases | Include? | Reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
result | accept | AcceptOpenChannel, RejectOpenChannel | accept or continue the channel open | whitelist | Yes | basic usage |
psbt, our_funding_msat | fundingAmount, psbt? | to add inputs/outputs |
The async-payment user story I'm interested in exploring is a mobile user (not always connected) who wants to receive donations (no PoP) via a static invoice from another mobile user.
My understanding of how this could work:
-
The static invoice should contain a blinded route to the payment receiver via their LSP and an ephemeral public key that the payment sender will use to encrypt the last hop of a payment onion containing a keysend TLV. The LSP of the payment receiver must support store-and-forward of onion messages.
-
A payment sender builds a payment onion where the first hop is their LSP that supports trampoline payments, onion messages and async-payments. The first hop of the onion includes a TLV to indicate the payment should be held until triggered (with a async-payment nonce) and gives the blinded route to the payment receiver. The last hop of the onion is encrypted to the payment receiver's ephemeral public key and includes:
- the keysend TLV payment secret
- the amount being sent
$remoteport = bash.exe -c "ifconfig eth0 | grep 'inet '" | |
$found = $remoteport -match '\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}'; | |
if( $found ){ | |
$remoteport = $matches[0]; | |
} else{ | |
echo "The Script Exited, the ip address of WSL 2 cannot be found"; | |
exit; | |
} |
#! /bin/sh | |
counter=$1 | |
while [ $counter -gt 0 ] | |
do | |
cupsenable Canon_MX410_series__5FE302000000 | |
sleep 60 | |
done |
Thoughts on timeouts for eltoo/lot49 based on conversation with Snyke Aug4, 2020.
- Assume online access to blockchain data once per week
- Then the settlement tx CSV should be 1 week (~1008 blocks)
- BUT the problem is: what if upstream node does not have fully signed update tx?
- NOT a problem for for nodes that originate or receive a payment because they do not have both an upstream AND downstream peers.
Bad Scenario: Node connections: A-> B -> C
[Fund Channel] | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
v | |
P=Musig(A,B)+scripts (for Taproot script-path spend) | |
Q=Musig(A,B) (for Taproot key-path spend) | |
OR ----------- [Cooperative Close] |
Ubuntu 18.04 install steps:
$ sudo apt update
$ sudo apt upgrade
$ sudo apt install software-properties-common
$ sudo apt install python-pip -y
$ sudo apt install python3-pip -y
$ sudo apt install python3.7-venv -y
$ sudo apt install python3.7-dev -y
Add this code at end of add_eltoo_witness | |
self.log.debug("\nbtcdeb --tx=%s --txin=%s --modify-flags=\"-NULLFAIL\"\n",tx_hex, spend_tx_hex) | |
or to debug from a transaction: | |
self.log.debug("btcdeb --tx=%s --txin=%s\n", ToHex(close_tx), ToHex(setup_tx[A]) ) | |
Add code before and in the method after the normal CHashWriter call to serialize the txTo. | |
template <class T> |
Looking for optimally minimal data transfer to send a transaction.
Just throwing this out there; I'm sure we can do better.
Some stuff should be pre-agreed by anyone following this protocol. For example:
- Preagreed: script type (say legacy P2PKH)
- Preagreed: version 1, locktime 0, sequence maxint-1, fee 10K sats (tweak this later)
Receiver has address AR, requests X sats.
Verifying my Blockstack ID is secured with the address 16ZGScXvPR8DU1Bs2MagWwXHi8B1yatjnM https://explorer.blockstack.org/address/16ZGScXvPR8DU1Bs2MagWwXHi8B1yatjnM |