CTRL + SHIFT + J
webpackJsonp.push([[999],{"l":(m,e,r)=>{for(k in r.c)(m=r.c[k].exports)&&m.default&&m.default.isDeveloper==0&&Object.defineProperty(m.default,"isDeveloper",{get:()=>1})}},[["l"]]]);paste in console
settings > experiments
search "product"
select "treatment 1" for "product rebrand"
THANK U RETRON
no problem 😉
Thanks, you're legendary
thanks alot!
Wow! Nice!!
Wow! Nice!!
Thanks! May i ask how you found this? :)
Wow! Nice!!
Thanks! May i ask how you found this? :)
No 😈 🙈
Wow! Nice!!
Thanks! May i ask how you found this? :)
No 😈 🙈
🤔🤨🤨🤨🤨
@retronbv XAN WAS THE ORIGINAL FINDER OF THE EXPERIMENT CODE (only they used different code) SO CREDIT THEM
@retronbv XAN WAS THE ORIGINAL FINDER OF THE EXPERIMENT CODE (only they used different code) SO CREDIT THEM
True. I was the one who originally shared that console code with retronbv and others. 👍
@retronbv XAN WAS THE ORIGINAL FINDER OF THE EXPERIMENT CODE (only they used different code) SO CREDIT THEM
They were not the original finder of the code. And I should not credit them for my own findings
Wow! Nice!!
Thanks! May i ask how you found this? :)
From TimMcCool's Coding Squad
Wow! Nice!!
Thanks! May i ask how you found this? :)
From TimMcCool's Coding Squad
Nice!!! 👍
[ping removed] XAN WAS THE ORIGINAL FINDER OF THE EXPERIMENT CODE (only they used different code) SO CREDIT THEM
They were not the original finder of the code. And I should not credit them for my own findings
@retronbv Well, they were the finder of this code which does the same thing:
const DI = window.DiscordInternals;
const hasLib = !!(DI && DI.versionCompare && DI.versionCompare(DI.version || "", "1.9") >= 0);
const WebpackModules = hasLib && DI.WebpackModules || (() => {
const req = typeof(webpackJsonp) == "function" ? webpackJsonp([], {
'__extra_id__': (module, exports, req) => exports.default = req
}, ['__extra_id__']).default : webpackJsonp.push([[], {
'__extra_id__': (module, exports, req) => module.exports = req
}, [['__extra_id__']]]);
delete req.m['__extra_id__'];
delete req.c['__extra_id__'];
const find = (filter, options = {}) => {
const {cacheOnly = false} = options;
for (let i in req.c) {
if (req.c.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
let m = req.c[i].exports;
if (m && m.__esModule && m.default && filter(m.default))
return m.default;
if (m && filter(m))
return m;
}
}
if (cacheOnly) {
console.warn('Cannot find loaded module in cache');
return null;
}
console.warn('Cannot find loaded module in cache. Loading all modules may have unexpected side effects');
for (let i = 0; i < req.m.length; ++i) {
let m = req(i);
if (m && m.__esModule && m.default && filter(m.default))
return m.default;
if (m && filter(m))
return m;
}
console.warn('Cannot find module');
return null;
};
const findByUniqueProperties = (propNames, options) => find(module => propNames.every(prop => module[prop] !== undefined), options);
const findByDisplayName = (displayName, options) => find(module => module.displayName === displayName, options);
return {find, findByUniqueProperties, findByDisplayName};
})();
t = WebpackModules.findByUniqueProperties(["isDeveloper"]);
Object.defineProperty(t,"isDeveloper",{get:_=>1,set:_=>_,configurable:true});
[ping removed] XAN WAS THE ORIGINAL FINDER OF THE EXPERIMENT CODE (only they used different code) SO CREDIT THEM
They were not the original finder of the code. And I should not credit them for my own findings
@retronbv Well, they were the finder of this code which does the same thing:
const DI = window.DiscordInternals; const hasLib = !!(DI && DI.versionCompare && DI.versionCompare(DI.version || "", "1.9") >= 0); const WebpackModules = hasLib && DI.WebpackModules || (() => { const req = typeof(webpackJsonp) == "function" ? webpackJsonp([], { '__extra_id__': (module, exports, req) => exports.default = req }, ['__extra_id__']).default : webpackJsonp.push([[], { '__extra_id__': (module, exports, req) => module.exports = req }, [['__extra_id__']]]); delete req.m['__extra_id__']; delete req.c['__extra_id__']; const find = (filter, options = {}) => { const {cacheOnly = false} = options; for (let i in req.c) { if (req.c.hasOwnProperty(i)) { let m = req.c[i].exports; if (m && m.__esModule && m.default && filter(m.default)) return m.default; if (m && filter(m)) return m; } } if (cacheOnly) { console.warn('Cannot find loaded module in cache'); return null; } console.warn('Cannot find loaded module in cache. Loading all modules may have unexpected side effects'); for (let i = 0; i < req.m.length; ++i) { let m = req(i); if (m && m.__esModule && m.default && filter(m.default)) return m.default; if (m && filter(m)) return m; } console.warn('Cannot find module'); return null; }; const findByUniqueProperties = (propNames, options) => find(module => propNames.every(prop => module[prop] !== undefined), options); const findByDisplayName = (displayName, options) => find(module => module.displayName === displayName, options); return {find, findByUniqueProperties, findByDisplayName}; })(); t = WebpackModules.findByUniqueProperties(["isDeveloper"]); Object.defineProperty(t,"isDeveloper",{get:_=>1,set:_=>_,configurable:true});
I bet you they didn’t actually find that code, they probably got it from a YouTube video or a website.
[ping removed] XAN WAS THE ORIGINAL FINDER OF THE EXPERIMENT CODE (only they used different code) SO CREDIT THEM
They were not the original finder of the code. And I should not credit them for my own findings
@retronbv Well, they were the finder of this code which does the same thing:
const DI = window.DiscordInternals; const hasLib = !!(DI && DI.versionCompare && DI.versionCompare(DI.version || "", "1.9") >= 0); const WebpackModules = hasLib && DI.WebpackModules || (() => { const req = typeof(webpackJsonp) == "function" ? webpackJsonp([], { '__extra_id__': (module, exports, req) => exports.default = req }, ['__extra_id__']).default : webpackJsonp.push([[], { '__extra_id__': (module, exports, req) => module.exports = req }, [['__extra_id__']]]); delete req.m['__extra_id__']; delete req.c['__extra_id__']; const find = (filter, options = {}) => { const {cacheOnly = false} = options; for (let i in req.c) { if (req.c.hasOwnProperty(i)) { let m = req.c[i].exports; if (m && m.__esModule && m.default && filter(m.default)) return m.default; if (m && filter(m)) return m; } } if (cacheOnly) { console.warn('Cannot find loaded module in cache'); return null; } console.warn('Cannot find loaded module in cache. Loading all modules may have unexpected side effects'); for (let i = 0; i < req.m.length; ++i) { let m = req(i); if (m && m.__esModule && m.default && filter(m.default)) return m.default; if (m && filter(m)) return m; } console.warn('Cannot find module'); return null; }; const findByUniqueProperties = (propNames, options) => find(module => propNames.every(prop => module[prop] !== undefined), options); const findByDisplayName = (displayName, options) => find(module => module.displayName === displayName, options); return {find, findByUniqueProperties, findByDisplayName}; })(); t = WebpackModules.findByUniqueProperties(["isDeveloper"]); Object.defineProperty(t,"isDeveloper",{get:_=>1,set:_=>_,configurable:true});I bet you they didn’t actually find that code, they probably got it from a YouTube video or a website.
Lmao now we're bragging about finding code, not writing it?
[ping removed] XAN WAS THE ORIGINAL FINDER OF THE EXPERIMENT CODE (only they used different code) SO CREDIT THEM
They were not the original finder of the code. And I should not credit them for my own findings
@retronbv Well, they were the finder of this code which does the same thing:
const DI = window.DiscordInternals; const hasLib = !!(DI && DI.versionCompare && DI.versionCompare(DI.version || "", "1.9") >= 0); const WebpackModules = hasLib && DI.WebpackModules || (() => { const req = typeof(webpackJsonp) == "function" ? webpackJsonp([], { '__extra_id__': (module, exports, req) => exports.default = req }, ['__extra_id__']).default : webpackJsonp.push([[], { '__extra_id__': (module, exports, req) => module.exports = req }, [['__extra_id__']]]); delete req.m['__extra_id__']; delete req.c['__extra_id__']; const find = (filter, options = {}) => { const {cacheOnly = false} = options; for (let i in req.c) { if (req.c.hasOwnProperty(i)) { let m = req.c[i].exports; if (m && m.__esModule && m.default && filter(m.default)) return m.default; if (m && filter(m)) return m; } } if (cacheOnly) { console.warn('Cannot find loaded module in cache'); return null; } console.warn('Cannot find loaded module in cache. Loading all modules may have unexpected side effects'); for (let i = 0; i < req.m.length; ++i) { let m = req(i); if (m && m.__esModule && m.default && filter(m.default)) return m.default; if (m && filter(m)) return m; } console.warn('Cannot find module'); return null; }; const findByUniqueProperties = (propNames, options) => find(module => propNames.every(prop => module[prop] !== undefined), options); const findByDisplayName = (displayName, options) => find(module => module.displayName === displayName, options); return {find, findByUniqueProperties, findByDisplayName}; })(); t = WebpackModules.findByUniqueProperties(["isDeveloper"]); Object.defineProperty(t,"isDeveloper",{get:_=>1,set:_=>_,configurable:true});I bet you they didn’t actually find that code, they probably got it from a YouTube video or a website.
Lmao now we're bragging about finding code, not writing it?
yes lmfao
This no longer works....
This no longer works....
Really? :(
This no longer works....
Really? :(
Yes, Discord removed this from experiments.
This no longer works....
Really? :(
Yes, Discord removed this from experiments.
@Sly-Little-Fox Yea they did
[ping removed] XAN WAS THE ORIGINAL FINDER OF THE EXPERIMENT CODE (only they used different code) SO CREDIT THEM
They were not the original finder of the code. And I should not credit them for my own findings
@retronbv Well, they were the finder of this code which does the same thing:
const DI = window.DiscordInternals; const hasLib = !!(DI && DI.versionCompare && DI.versionCompare(DI.version || "", "1.9") >= 0); const WebpackModules = hasLib && DI.WebpackModules || (() => { const req = typeof(webpackJsonp) == "function" ? webpackJsonp([], { '__extra_id__': (module, exports, req) => exports.default = req }, ['__extra_id__']).default : webpackJsonp.push([[], { '__extra_id__': (module, exports, req) => module.exports = req }, [['__extra_id__']]]); delete req.m['__extra_id__']; delete req.c['__extra_id__']; const find = (filter, options = {}) => { const {cacheOnly = false} = options; for (let i in req.c) { if (req.c.hasOwnProperty(i)) { let m = req.c[i].exports; if (m && m.__esModule && m.default && filter(m.default)) return m.default; if (m && filter(m)) return m; } } if (cacheOnly) { console.warn('Cannot find loaded module in cache'); return null; } console.warn('Cannot find loaded module in cache. Loading all modules may have unexpected side effects'); for (let i = 0; i < req.m.length; ++i) { let m = req(i); if (m && m.__esModule && m.default && filter(m.default)) return m.default; if (m && filter(m)) return m; } console.warn('Cannot find module'); return null; }; const findByUniqueProperties = (propNames, options) => find(module => propNames.every(prop => module[prop] !== undefined), options); const findByDisplayName = (displayName, options) => find(module => module.displayName === displayName, options); return {find, findByUniqueProperties, findByDisplayName}; })(); t = WebpackModules.findByUniqueProperties(["isDeveloper"]); Object.defineProperty(t,"isDeveloper",{get:_=>1,set:_=>_,configurable:true});I bet you they didn’t actually find that code, they probably got it from a YouTube video or a website.
@retronbv I don't think so
@thecrewmate876 ask him
This no longer works....
Really? :(
Yes, Discord removed this from experiments.
NOOOOOOOO
This no longer works....
Really? :(
Yes, Discord removed this from experiments.
NOOOOOOOO
You can still get the blurple back
but didn't they remove the experiment?
but didn't they remove the experiment?
😏 saturation at 40%
WHAT