Scala vs Javaslang pattern match option

In Scala I can do:
Option<Response> responseForTransaction = Option(getResponseForTransaction(transaction))
responseForTransaction match {
  case Some(r) => // do something with r
  case None => ....
}

In Javaslang I tried this:
Option<Response> responseForTransaction = getResponseForTransaction(transaction);
  Match(responseForTransaction).of(
    Case(Option($())), r -> .....)
    Case(None()), ....)
 )

Javaslang currently has the API.run() method in order to perform side-effect.

String value = Match(responseForTransaction).of(
        Case(Some($()), String::valueOf),
        Case(None(), "no value")
);

/*Void nothing =*/
Match(responseForTransaction).of(
        Case(Some($()), r -> run(() -> System.out.println("response: " + r))),
        Case(None(), () -> run(() -> System.out.println("no response")))
);

But we still work on something better, e.g.

Match(...).of(
    Case(Some($()), r -> { ... }),
    Case(None(), () -> { ... })
);

Maybe it will be run() instead of of(). And we will need Comsumer1..8.

Or:

responseForTransaction.<Runnable>map(r -> () -> { ....}).getOrElse(() -> .... ).run();