Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@rponte
Last active March 11, 2024 07:50
Show Gist options
  • Save rponte/fdc0724dd984088606b0 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save rponte/fdc0724dd984088606b0 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Getting latest tag on git repository
# The command finds the most recent tag that is reachable from a commit.
# If the tag points to the commit, then only the tag is shown.
# Otherwise, it suffixes the tag name with the number of additional commits on top of the tagged object
# and the abbreviated object name of the most recent commit.
git describe
# With --abbrev set to 0, the command can be used to find the closest tagname without any suffix:
git describe --abbrev=0
# other examples
git describe --abbrev=0 --tags # gets tag from current branch
git describe --tags `git rev-list --tags --max-count=1` # gets tags across all branches, not just the current branch
@ispyhumanfly
Copy link

This is how you get the latest tagged version, but remove the v...

git tag --sort=committerdate | grep -E '[0-9]' | tail -1 | cut -b 2-7

@remysalim
Copy link

I had more accurate results with taggerdate as a sort key instead of committerdate
git tag --sort=taggerdate | tail -1

@thomasleduc
Copy link

I had more accurate results with taggerdate as a sort key instead of committerdate
git tag --sort=taggerdate | tail -1

Yes or the creatordate, the committerdate doesn't work for me.
And don't forget that you can add - (e.g. --sort=-taggerdate) before to sort it as newer -> older

@the-glima
Copy link

the-glima commented Apr 8, 2020

For the latest tag on remote I'm doing this:

$ git ls-remote --tags --sort=committerdate | grep -o 'v.*' | sort -r

v1.2.3
v1.2.2
v1.2.1
v1.2.0
v1.1.0

Or, what I wanted, just the single latest one:

 $ git ls-remote --tags --sort=committerdate | grep -o 'v.*' | sort -r | head -1

v1.2.3

@bodia-uz
Copy link

bodia-uz commented Apr 9, 2020

Faced with problem after using taggerdate and old git version on CI:

git tag --list "RC;*" --sort=taggerdate | tail -1
error: unsupported sort specification ‘taggerdate’

Found a better way to do it (git describe and --abbrev=0 argument):

git describe --abbrev=0
git describe --abbrev=0 --match "RC;*"

You can find a same example on https://git-scm.com/docs/git-describe page:
image

The difference is, that git will take the latest tag for this branch (not for all branches).

A similar approach uses lerna for getting the last tag:
https://github.com/lerna/lerna/blob/f2c3a92fe41b6fdc5d11269f0f2c3e27761b4c85/utils/collect-updates/collect-updates.js#L31
https://github.com/lerna/lerna/blob/f2c3a92fe41b6fdc5d11269f0f2c3e27761b4c85/utils/describe-ref/lib/describe-ref.js#L36

@joseluisq
Copy link

joseluisq commented Apr 23, 2020

In my case (Git v2.25), the command git describe --tags $(git rev-list --tags --max-count=1) returns the latest tag.

@varundey
Copy link

varundey commented May 4, 2020

What's wrong with a simple git tag -l | tail -1?

@remysalim
Copy link

It's sorted alphabetically...

@tsologub
Copy link

+1 to @joseluisq. Thx man!

@brunocoelho
Copy link

Just in case anyone is looking for how to update package.json's version with the latest tag:

let fs = require('fs');
const { exec, execSync } = require('child_process');

if (fs.existsSync('./package.json')) {
  var package = require('./package.json');
  let currentVersion = package.version;

  exec('git tag --sort=committerdate | tail -1', (error, stdout) => {
    if (error) {
      console.error(`exec error: ${error}`);
      return;
    }

    let newVersion = stdout.trim();
    package.version = newVersion;
    fs.writeFileSync('./package.json', JSON.stringify(package, null, 2));

    execSync("git commit -am 'Bump version '" + newVersion);

    console.log('Version updated', currentVersion, '=>', newVersion);
  });
}

@Mr-LiuDC
Copy link

Not working with gitlab, got the usage information.

$ git rev-list --tags --max-count=1
usage: git rev-list [OPTION] <commit-id>... [ -- paths... ]
  limiting output:
    --max-count=<n>
    --max-age=<epoch>
    --min-age=<epoch>
    --sparse
    --no-merges
    --min-parents=<n>
    --no-min-parents
    --max-parents=<n>
    --no-max-parents
    --remove-empty
    --all
    --branches
    --tags
    --remotes
    --stdin
    --quiet
  ordering output:
    --topo-order
    --date-order
    --reverse
  formatting output:
    --parents
    --children
    --objects | --objects-edge
    --unpacked
    --header | --pretty
    --abbrev=<n> | --no-abbrev
    --abbrev-commit
    --left-right
  special purpose:
    --bisect
    --bisect-vars
    --bisect-all

@cawa-93
Copy link

cawa-93 commented Dec 11, 2020

Maybe someone will tell me how to get the last tag, or if there are no tags in the branch - the initial commit?

@nextgenthemes
Copy link

nextgenthemes commented Jan 30, 2021

I would like to know how the last tag that was tagged before a specific tag. Meaning lets say I have.

2.0.0
1.5.10
1.5.8
1.0.1

I like to say git --last-tag-b4="1.5.10" and it should give me 1.5.8. When 1.5.9 was never created or deleted.

@patricknelson
Copy link

@cawa-93 why not just git tag | sort -V | tail -1? i.e. Sort tags by version and just take the last one (tail -1). If that's empty, then git tag returned nothing.

@nextgenthemes The best (hacky) way I can think of quickly is to use version sort and then use grep to to find an exact match for the version you know already exists (a possible shortcoming if that exact version you're looking for isn't already present).

# 1. Pull out tags
# 2. Use version sort
# 3. Use grep to find the known version, ensuring we also output the line before
# 4. Just take the first line (the line before the match)

git tag | sort -V | grep -B 1 1.5.8 | head -1

Alternative, you could probably use awk to use a comparison operator (e.g. awk '$1 < NUMBER { print }') but I don't know how to do that when the number has multiple dots in it, nor in a way that would be version safe... 😞

@nextgenthemes
Copy link

@patricknelson Thanks. I was thinking about some pipe thing. This actually reads and works quite nice. Not sure why I am obsessing trying to do it with more git and less gnu right now. Tell me to stop ;)

@dimisjim
Copy link

dimisjim commented Mar 16, 2021

One could also do, without using git: curl -s GET https://api.github.com/repos/aws/aws-cli/tags | jq -r '.[].name' | head -n1

@cloverzrg
Copy link

One could also do, without using git: curl -s GET https://api.github.com/repos/aws/aws-cli/tags | jq -r '.[].name' | head -n1

add per_page params curl -s GET https://api.github.com/repos/cloudreve/Cloudreve/tags\?per_page\=1 | jq -r '.[].name'

@mrjones2014
Copy link

Ran into an issue where we accidentally made two tags on the same commit, in that case this method returns the first tag it encounters, which is the earliest tag, not the latest.

You can get the most recent commit by doing git tag --sort=committerdate | tail -1

@oodzchen
Copy link

The commit date sort way is unreliable, because you don't know if someone create a wrong tag.

@MarcusPetri
Copy link

Using:

git describe --tags git rev-list --tags --max-count=1

returns me the last tag with a commit.

but if I create a new tag from an older commit (without a new commit), it will return the wrong tag: the last tag with a commit!

Using:

git tag --sort=committerdate | tail -1

returns me a tag created 1 year ago, I dont know why...

git-tag1

My real last tag:

git-tag2

can someone help me to return the last tag created?

@patricknelson
Copy link

patricknelson commented Mar 15, 2022

@MarcusPetri found this on StackOverflow: https://stackoverflow.com/a/6270112/899075

git for-each-ref --sort=creatordate --format '%(refname) %(creatordate)' refs/tags

But are you interested in when the tag itself was actually created, or, are you really just interested in seeing the semantically largest tag number (see number sorting below)? The reason I ask is because it's technically possible for you to currently be on v2 but then at a later date create the tag v1.1 (which is obviously smaller) well after both v1 and v2 already existed. That command would sort it as v1, v2, v1.1 instead of the semantic ordering of v1, v1.1, v2 and etc.

Example of naïve sort vs. version sorting:

# Naïve sort
$ sort test/test.txt
0
1.01
10.1
2

vs.

# Version sort
$ sort -V test/test.txt
0
1.01
2
10.1

@MarcusPetri
Copy link

@MarcusPetri found this on StackOverflow: https://stackoverflow.com/a/6270112/899075

git for-each-ref --sort=creatordate --format '%(refname) %(creatordate)' refs/tags

But are you interested in when the tag itself was actually created, or, are you really just interested in seeing the semantically largest tag number (see number sorting below)? The reason I ask is because it's technically possible for you to currently be on v2 but then at a later date create the tag v1.1 (which is obviously smaller) well after both v1 and v2 already existed. That command would sort it as v1, v2, v1.1 instead of the semantic ordering of v1, v1.1, v2 and etc.

Example of naïve sort vs. version sorting:

# Naïve sort
$ sort test/test.txt
0
1.01
10.1
2

vs.

# Version sort
$ sort -V test/test.txt
0
1.01
2
10.1

Thanks for the answer.

I just really need the last tag created, I don't care if it has v1, v2...

@sdteotonio
Copy link

git tag | sort -g | tail -1

@AhirGhosh
Copy link

Get the latest tags filtered by branch in descending order, this one looks for latest tags in desc order from develop branch:
git tag --merged develop --sort=committerdate | sort -V desc

@TiloGit
Copy link

TiloGit commented Feb 8, 2023

git ls-remote --tags --sort=committerdate

@the-glima

important: (from https://git-scm.com/docs/git-ls-remote.html)
_but be aware keys like committerdate that require access to the objects themselves will not work for refs whose objects have not yet been fetched from the remote, and will give a missing object error.

I get this for example on:

git ls-remote --tags --sort=committerdate "https://github.com/box/box-java-sdk"
git ls-remote --tags --sort=committerdate "https://github.com/derailed/k9s"

Get:

tilo@mypc:/mnt/c/GHreps$ git ls-remote --tags --sort=committerdate "https://github.com/derailed/k9s"
fatal: missing object 25b364dd96ae53e70b9639a20732647fd4bb23a7 for refs/tags/0.1.0
tilo@mypc:/mnt/c/GHreps$ git ls-remote --tags --sort=committerdate "https://github.com/box/box-java-sdk"
fatal: missing object 9a8b39475952def867a5b68ab92e7cd45bb3d8e0 for refs/tags/v0.1

@eggbean
Copy link

eggbean commented Mar 20, 2023

If the remote is GitHub and there's an associated release for the tag, why not just use the GitHub API?

$ tag="$(curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/box/box-java-sdk/releases/latest | jq -r '.tag_name')"
$ echo $tag
v4.0.1

@nextgenthemes
Copy link

Just deleted a stupid long ass comment. Just want to warn about git tag --sort=committerdate it does not work correctly with the tag command for whatever reason. But this does work.

git for-each-ref --sort=creatordate --format '%(refname) %(creatordate)' refs/tags

COMPLETELY different result that makes no sense to me git tag --sort=committerdate

However git tag --sort=taggerdate is basically what I always looked for, what should be the default output for git-tag IMG. I also hate how it paginates the output with lessor whatever by default.

Again, be warned about committerdate ! There is somebody above that had issue as well I think because of this. Even if my commit of things I tagged days or maybe even a week later. I makes absolutely no sense to me WTF this produces. Maybe my memory is just bad and it all makes sense, well probably actually. I think to much about this shit.

@arderyp
Copy link

arderyp commented Jul 18, 2023

@eggbean I like that idea, but it hits an auth wall for private/enterprise repos

@eggbean
Copy link

eggbean commented Jul 18, 2023

@arderyp There are a few different ways to authenticate. Have you tried the gh cli tool?

@Gabomfim
Copy link

Gabomfim commented Dec 4, 2023

Thanks! :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment