Inspired by David Herman's gist here: https://gist.github.com/2011902

new-forms.js

(( window ) -> {
  // "doQuery" is a fake, future descendant of "jQuery"

  // Create a WeakMap instance for Node data storage. This is perfect
  // because using the Node as the key ensures that any data associated
  // with the Node will be GC'ed if the Node is removed from the DOM
  var nodeData = new WeakMap();

  function doQuery( selector, context ) {
    var matches;

    this.context = context || document;

    // Handle doQuery(DOMElement)
    if ( selector.nodeType ) {
      this.context = this[ 0 ] = selector;
      this.length = 1;
      return this;
    }

    // query DOM for elements
    matches = (context || document).querySelectorAll( selector );

    if ( matches.length ) {
      // spread matches NodeList into an array
      [ ...matches ].forEach((match, index) => do {
        // do-expression retains outer |this|
        this[ index ] = match;
      });

      this.length = matches.length;
    }
  }

  // Multipurpose static function for getting and setting
  // values to a node collection
  // The value(s) can optionally be executed if it's a function
  doQuery.execute = ( ...args ) -> {
    let [ nodes, key, val, fn ] = args,
        length = nodes.length,
        p;

    // Call self to set many { key: val }
    // on a collection
    if ( key && typeof key === "object" ) {
      for ( p in key ) {
        doQuery.execute( nodes, p, key[ p ], fn );
      }

    // Sets a single "key" to "val" for
    // all nodes in a collection
    } else {
      nodes.each( (node) => fn(node, key, val) );
    }

    return nodes;
  };


  doQuery.prototype.each = ( callback ) -> {
    // Spread the "array like" instance object into an array
    [ ...this ].forEach(( node, index ) -> {
      // Inside the callback:
      // Preserve jQuery's "node is |this|" style semantics
      // Also, index comes first in jQuery callback params
      callback.call( node, index, node );
    });

    return this;
  };

  doQuery.prototype.data = ( opts ) -> {

    // If no argument, return stored data of first item in set
    if ( !opts ) {
      return nodeData.get( this[0] );
    }

    // |this| is the doQuery/jQuery instance/query match set
    return this.each((index) -> {
      // Inside the callback:
      // |this| refers to the node, as set by
      // callback.call( node, ... ) in
      // doQuery.prototype.each
      let merged = {},
          data = nodeData.get( this );

      // I need a way to merge two objects.
      // A serious pain-point. This is totally made up
      // and has no proposal to back it up
      Object.merge( merged, data, opts );

      nodeData.set( this, merged );
    });
  };

  // Static style get/set function
  doQuery.style = ( node, prop, value ) -> {
    let defaultView = node.ownerDocument.defaultView;

    if ( value ) {
      node.style[ prop ] = value;
    } else {
      return defaultView.getComputedStyle( node ).getPropertyValue( prop );
    }
  };

  // Proto css method
  doQuery.prototype.css = ( ...args ) -> {

    let [ prop, value ] = args;

    // If no value, return current style of
    // first node in collection
    if ( !value ) {
      return doQuery.syle( this[0], prop );
    }

    // Otherwise, apply new style to
    // all nodes in collection
    return doQuery.execute( this, prop, value, (node, k, v) => doQuery.style(node, k, v) );
  };


  window.doQuery = doQuery;

})( this );

Isn't the do expression at line 14 incorrect? If I read things right, => is all you need to retain outer this.

IIUC, the AssignmentExpression needs to be wrapped in the do-expression, per http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:do_expressions Take a look, could be that I missed something?

So, after re-reading, you're right about only needing => retain the outer this, but in my case, I have expressions that might require more logic and therefore benefit from the do { ... } expression form