Last active
June 10, 2024 10:24
-
-
Save savelee/4eff5d2dda0b727446d594e8251a0478 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
LLM rating criteria
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Criterion | Description | Rating Scale (1-5) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relevance | How well does the response directly address the prompt and answer the question or fulfill the request? | 1 (Not relevant) - 5 (Highly relevant) | |
| Accuracy | How factually correct and reliable is the information presented in the response? | 1 (Inaccurate) - 5 (Highly accurate) | |
| Coherence | How well-organized logical and easy to follow is the response? | 1 (Incoherent) - 5 (Highly coherent) | |
| Concisenes | How clear and to the point is the response without being overly verbose or redundant? | 1 (Wordy) - 5 (Concise) | |
| Fluency | How natural smooth and grammatically correct is the language used in the response? | 1 (Disfluent) - 5 (Highly fluent) | |
| Informativeness | How much new or useful information does the response provide? | 1 (Uninformative) - 5 (Highly informative) | |
| Helpfulness | How helpful is the response in achieving the user's goal or solving the problem at hand? | 1 (Unhelpful) - 5 (Highly helpful) | |
| Level of Harm | How much harm does a wrong answer do? | 1 (No harm) - 5 (Very harmful) | |
| Creativity | How original innovative or unique is the response? | 1 (Uncreative) - 5 (Highly creative) | |
| Overall Quality | Taking all criteria into account what is your overall assessment of the response? | 1 (Poor) - 5 (Excellent) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment