Comparison of property access patterns and JVM language integrations.

DemoClass.java

package com.example.java;

public class DemoClass {

    public String fieldProperty = "init";
    private String _cppProperty = "init";;
    private String _javaProperty = "init";;

    public String cppProperty() {
        return _cppProperty;
    }

    public void cppProperty(String newCppProperty) {
        _cppProperty = newCppProperty;
    }

    public String getJavaProperty() {
        return _javaProperty;
    }

    public void setJavaProperty(String newJavaProperty) {
        _javaProperty = newJavaProperty;
    }
}

GroovyAccess.groovy

package com.example.groovy

import com.example.java.DemoClass;

demo = new DemoClass()

println demo.fieldProperty
println demo.cppProperty()
println demo.javaProperty

demo.fieldProperty = "new"
demo.cppProperty("new")
demo.javaProperty = "new"

println demo.fieldProperty
println demo.cppProperty()
println demo.javaProperty

KotlinAccess.kts

import com.example.java.DemoClass

val demo:DemoClass = DemoClass();

println(demo.fieldProperty)
println(demo.cppProperty())
println(demo.javaProperty)

demo.fieldProperty = "new"
demo.cppProperty("new")
demo.javaProperty = "new"

println(demo.fieldProperty)
println(demo.cppProperty())
println(demo.javaProperty)

ScalaAccess.sc

import com.example.java.DemoClass

val demo = new DemoClass

demo.fieldProperty
demo.cppProperty
demo.getJavaProperty

demo.fieldProperty = "new"
demo.cppProperty("new")
demo.setJavaProperty("new")

demo.fieldProperty
demo.cppProperty
demo.getJavaProperty