Each day at our company, developers are required to document their activities, painstakingly jotting down their daily work and future plans. A monotonous chore that I just really dislike.
So now, there's a scribe for that :
Each day at our company, developers are required to document their activities, painstakingly jotting down their daily work and future plans. A monotonous chore that I just really dislike.
So now, there's a scribe for that :
# Created with: $ diagtool tree | |
-Wall | |
-Wextra | |
-Wpedantic | |
-Warray-bounds-pointer-arithmetic | |
-Wbind-to-temporary-copy | |
-Wcalled-once-parameter | |
-Wcast-align |
{ config, pkgs, lib, ... }: | |
let | |
nvidia-offload = pkgs.writeShellScriptBin "nvidia-offload" '' | |
export __NV_PRIME_RENDER_OFFLOAD=1 | |
export __NV_PRIME_RENDER_OFFLOAD_PROVIDER=NVIDIA-G0 | |
export __GLX_VENDOR_LIBRARY_NAME=nvidia | |
export __VK_LAYER_NV_optimus=NVIDIA_only | |
exec -a "$0" "$@" | |
''; |
:def hoogle \x -> return $ ":!hoogle --count=15 \"" ++ x ++ "\"" | |
:def doc \x -> return $ ":!hoogle --info \"" ++ x ++ "\"" | |
:set -Wall | |
:set -fno-warn-type-defaults -ferror-spans -freverse-errors -fprint-expanded-synonyms | |
:set prompt "\ESC[0;32m%s\n\ESC[m[ghci]\ESC[38;5;172mλ \ESC[m" | |
:set prompt-cont " \ESC[38;5;172m> \ESC[m" |
The set
lines
set -euxo pipefail
is short for:set -e
set -u
[package] | |
name = "test-rust" | |
version = "0.1.0" | |
authors = ["yihuang <yi.codeplayer@gmail.com>"] | |
edition = "2018" | |
# See more keys and their definitions at https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/manifest.html | |
[dependencies] |
I'll preface this with three things. 1. I prefer schemes over Common Lisps, and I prefer Racket of the Schemes. 2. There is more to it than the points I raise here. 3. I assume you have no previous experience with Lisp, and don't have a preference for Schemes over Common Lisp. With all that out of the way... I would say Common Lisp/SBCL. Let me explain
Now as to why Common Lisp over Scheme
I did not submit this to Hacker News and did not intend that this post would have high circulation but have no real problem with it being there or with it having such. I have more recent comments below. This post is from January 2020 and predates the Modular Font Editor K (MFEK) project.
I have not worked on Rust projects in quite a while, and don't know if I ever will again. I feel many crate maintainers are way too perfectionist, for example, despite all the developer hours that went into this PR, it took the effort within years to be (halfway) merged.
There's always a reason not to merge, isn't there? It would be better done with a new nightly language feature, or the function signature should have a where clause, or the documentation is not perfect. There's always a new nit to pick in the world of Ru
Currently in no particular order. Most of these are kind of ancient.
Where's all the modern documentation? So much of what I've turned up searching is other folks complaining about having few options beyond reading source code.
The OREILLY books, while dated, seem to be some of the best available. Note that these can be read with a 7-day trial. Do this! At least get through the introduction section and first chapter of each to see if it's what you're after.