Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@shobhitsharma
Forked from jhwheeler/bigONotation.js
Created July 20, 2021 07:47
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save shobhitsharma/10f2217c1a33e0fb90e94208f2153c28 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save shobhitsharma/10f2217c1a33e0fb90e94208f2153c28 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Big O Notation Exercises
// 1. Even or odd
function isEven(value){
if (value % 2 == 0){
return true;
}
else
return false;
}
/*
Answer: O(1). Constant run time complexity.
Reasoning: Because you're only ever taking one value, there is no "loop" to go through.
Even as the value gets bigger, you simply divide it by 2 and see whether it returns an integer or a float.
*/
// 2. Are You Here?
function areYouHere(arr1, arr2) {
//let ticks1, ticks2 = 0;
for (let i=0; i<arr1.length; i++) {
const el1 = arr1[i];
//ticks1++;
for (let j=0; j<arr2.length; j++) {
const el2 = arr2[j];
//ticks2++;
if (el1 === el2) return true;
}
//console.log(ticks1);
//console.log(ticks2);
}
return false;
}
/*
Answer: O(n^2). Quadratic run time complexity.
Reasoning: For each run through the first loop, you have to run through the entire second loop.
If you add even just one more item to `arr1`, you have to run another full loop through `arr2`.
So it's quadratic because as N doubles (taking N as `arr1.length` or `arr2.length`), the time it takes
will increase exponentially (N * N).
UPDATE: As per the comments below, the above answer assumes somewhat naively that the two arrays would have the same lengths.
It's quite likely that they don't have the same lengths; therefore the complexity would be in fact O(n*m) instead of O(n^2).
*/
// 3. Doubler
function doubleArrayValues(array) {
for (let i=0; i<array.length; i++) {
array[i] *= 2;
}
return array;
}
/*
Answer: O(n). Linear run time complexity.
Reasoning: As `array.length` increases, the number of iterations increases at the same rate.
This is because you don't have to loop any more than once: however many items are in the array
is how many times you run the function.
*/
// 4. Naive Search
function naiveSearch(array, item) {
for (let i=0; i<array.length; i++) {
if (array[i] === item) {
return i;
}
}
}
/*
Answer: O(n). Linear run time complexity.
Reasoning: Same as above with the doubler. You have to check each and every item once and only once
in order to determine whether you've got a match.
*/
// 5. Creating Pairs
function createPairs(arr) {
//let ticks = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
for(let j = i+1; j < arr.length; j++) {
console.log(arr[i] + ", " + arr[j] );
//ticks++;
}
}
//console.log(ticks);
}
/* Answer: O(n^2). Quadratic run time complexity.
Reasoning: The first loop has O(n) complexity, as with each new addition, the number of times
you run through the loop increases by one. As the inner loop also has O(n) complexity, together they have
quadratic run time complexity.
*/
// 6. Computing Fibonacci Numbers
function generateFib(num) {
let result = [];
//let ticks = 0;
for (let i = 1; i <= num; i++) {
//ticks++;
if (i === 1) {
result.push(0);
}
else if (i == 2) {
result.push(1);
}
else {
result.push(result[i - 2] + result[i - 3]);
}
}
//console.log(ticks);
return result;
}
/* Answer: O(n). Linear run time complexity.
Reasoning: As you add 1 to `num`, the run time complexity increases at the same rate.
*/
// 7. Efficient Search
function efficientSearch(array, item) {
let minIndex = 0;
let maxIndex = array.length - 1;
let currentIndex;
let currentElement;
while (minIndex <= maxIndex) {
currentIndex = Math.floor((minIndex + maxIndex) / 2);
currentElement = array[currentIndex];
if (currentElement < item) {
minIndex = currentIndex + 1;
}
else if (currentElement > item) {
maxIndex = currentIndex - 1;
}
else {
return currentIndex;
}
}
return -1;
}
/* Answer: O(log n). Logarithmic run time complexity.
Reasoning: Cutting `array.length` in half in each iteration, the time complexity increases slowly, in a logarithmic fashion.
*/
// 8. Random element
function findRandomElement(arr) {
return arr[Math.floor(Math.random() * arr.length)];
}
/* Answer: O(1). Constant run time complexity.
Reasoning: With no iteration occurring, selecting an element at random from an array has constant time complexity.
*/
// 9. Is It Prime?
function isPrime(n) {
if (n < 2 || n % 1 != 0) {
return false;
}
for (let i = 2; i < n; ++i) {
if (n % i == 0) return false;
}
return true;
}
/* Answer: O(n). Linear run time complexity.
Reasoning: Disregarding the constant time it takes to check the first if condition, this function is linear,
as it iterates through each item once and only once.
*/
// 10. Factorial of a number w/ recursion
function factorialOf(n) {
switch (n) {
case 0:
case 1:
return 1;
default: return n * factorialOf(n - 1);
}
}
/* Answer: O(n). Linear run time complexity.
Reasoning: This function is being called recursively n times before reaching the base case.
*/
@otabek2006
Copy link

def return_squares(n):
square_list + []
for num in n:
square_list.append(num * num)
return squares_list

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment