(by @andrestaltz)
If you prefer to watch video tutorials with live-coding, then check out this series I recorded with the same contents as in this article: Egghead.io - Introduction to Reactive Programming.
(by @andrestaltz)
If you prefer to watch video tutorials with live-coding, then check out this series I recorded with the same contents as in this article: Egghead.io - Introduction to Reactive Programming.
Agnes en_US # Isn't it nice to have a computer that will talk to you? | |
Albert en_US # I have a frog in my throat. No, I mean a real frog! | |
Alex en_US # Most people recognize me by my voice. | |
Alice it_IT # Salve, mi chiamo Alice e sono una voce italiana. | |
Alva sv_SE # Hej, jag heter Alva. Jag är en svensk röst. | |
Amelie fr_CA # Bonjour, je m’appelle Amelie. Je suis une voix canadienne. | |
Anna de_DE # Hallo, ich heiße Anna und ich bin eine deutsche Stimme. | |
Bad News en_US # The light you see at the end of the tunnel is the headlamp of a fast approaching train. | |
Bahh en_US # Do not pull the wool over my eyes. | |
Bells en_US # Time flies when you are having fun. |
This is a post by Joel Spolsky. The original post is linked at the bottom.
This is such a common question here and elsewhere that I will attempt to write the world's most canonical answer to this question. Hopefully in the future when someone on answers.onstartups asks how to split up the ownership of their new company, you can simply point to this answer.
The most important principle: Fairness, and the perception of fairness, is much more valuable than owning a large stake. Almost everything that can go wrong in a startup will go wrong, and one of the biggest things that can go wrong is huge, angry, shouting matches between the founders as to who worked harder, who owns more, whose idea was it anyway, etc. That is why I would always rather split a new company 50-50 with a friend than insist on owning 60% because "it was my idea," or because "I was more experienced" or anything else. Why? Because if I split the company 60-40, the company is going to fail when we argue ourselves to death. And if you ju
Simple guide for setting up OTG modes on the Raspberry Pi Zero - By Andrew Mulholland (gbaman).
The Raspberry Pi Zero (and model A and A+) support USB On The Go, given the processor is connected directly to the USB port, unlike on the B, B+ or Pi 2 B, which goes via a USB hub.
Because of this, if setup to, the Pi can act as a USB slave instead, providing virtual serial (a terminal), virtual ethernet, virtual mass storage device (pendrive) or even other virtual devices like HID, MIDI, or act as a virtual webcam!
It is important to note that, although the model A and A+ can support being a USB slave, they are missing the ID pin (is tied to ground internally) so are unable to dynamically switch between USB master/slave mode. As such, they default to USB master mode. There is no easy way to change this right now.
It is also important to note, that a USB to UART serial adapter is not needed for any of these guides, as may be documented elsewhere across the int
[ | |
{name: 'Afghanistan', code: 'AF'}, | |
{name: 'Åland Islands', code: 'AX'}, | |
{name: 'Albania', code: 'AL'}, | |
{name: 'Algeria', code: 'DZ'}, | |
{name: 'American Samoa', code: 'AS'}, | |
{name: 'AndorrA', code: 'AD'}, | |
{name: 'Angola', code: 'AO'}, | |
{name: 'Anguilla', code: 'AI'}, | |
{name: 'Antarctica', code: 'AQ'}, |
I have moved this over to the Tech Interview Cheat Sheet Repo and has been expanded and even has code challenges you can run and practice against!
\
public class Dexter { | |
private static String optimizedDirectory = "optimized"; | |
private static String workDirectory = "working"; | |
public static void loadFromAssets(Context context, String fileName) throws Exception { | |
File optimized = new File(optimizedDirectory); | |
optimized = context.getDir(optimized.toString(), Context.MODE_PRIVATE); | |
optimized = new File(optimized, fileName); |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> | |
<manifest xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" | |
package="com.example.bgfirebaseapp" | |
android:versionCode="1" | |
android:versionName="1.0" > | |
<uses-sdk | |
android:minSdkVersion="16" | |
android:targetSdkVersion="17" /> |
// #!Swift-1.1 | |
import Foundation | |
// MARK: - (1) classes | |
// Solution 1: | |
// - Use classes instead of struct | |
// Issue: Violate the concept of moving model to the value layer | |
// http://realm.io/news/andy-matuschak-controlling-complexity/ |