AI Captions for Rumble (v42yfh5) Pathologist Arne Burkhardt Final Interview - Revealing the Grave Dangers of mRNA Vaccines [TheLastAmericanVagabond]

v40d2iz (2023-12-23) - Pathologist Arne Burkhardt Final Interview - Revealing the Grave Dangers of mRNA Vaccines [TheLastAmericanVagabond].vtt

WEBVTT

00:00.000 --> 00:02.000
You

00:30.000 --> 00:32.000
You

01:00.000 --> 01:09.000
Many cases of sudden death and severe disease are being reported since the rollout of the COVID-19 gene-based vaccines.

01:09.000 --> 01:22.000
Early on, several doctors and scientists hypothesized that the COVID vaccines would lead to several complications, including autoimmune disease, blood clots, strokes, and more.

01:22.000 --> 01:31.000
Additionally, the vaccine adverse event reporting system or VAERS data showed a strong correlation between the vaccines and adverse events.

01:31.000 --> 01:40.000
The warning signs were always there, but most of the evidence that is discussed surrounding adverse events is focused on the numbers.

01:40.000 --> 01:46.000
This many more sudden deaths, stillbirths, or cases of myocarditis, for example.

01:47.000 --> 01:55.000
So, how does one determine, in an individual case, that the vaccine was the cause of death or the adverse event?

01:55.000 --> 01:58.000
It is done through pathology.

01:58.000 --> 02:09.000
An early pioneer of pathological investigations into vaccine adverse events was Professor Arna Burkhardt, a senior, highly accomplished pathologist from Germany.

02:10.000 --> 02:20.000
Professor Burkhardt came out of retirement in 2021 to examine the autopsy and biopsy materials of vaccinated patients, both living and deceased.

02:20.000 --> 02:35.000
The work of Professor Burkhardt not only provided strong evidence of vaccine causation, it's substantiated the professional medical hypotheses of doctors and scientists around the world.

02:36.000 --> 02:46.000
Unfortunately, in May 2023, Professor Burkhardt passed away.

02:46.000 --> 02:58.000
But shortly before his death, I had the chance to interview him in his laboratory in Germany, in which he gave a detailed and compelling account of his work.

02:58.000 --> 03:12.000
During the next two hours, you will hear Professor Burkhardt once more in his own words, discuss his findings, his motivation, and what he hoped for the future of the fields of science and medicine.

03:12.000 --> 03:21.000
This is one of the few extensive English language interviews with Professor Arna Burkhardt, and it is one of his last.

03:28.000 --> 03:39.000
I'm journalist Taylor Houdak, and today I'm in Roitlingen, Germany at the Laboratory of Health and Health.

03:39.000 --> 03:54.000
I am journalist Taylor Houdak.

03:55.000 --> 04:00.000
I'm in Roitlingen, Germany at the Laboratory of Pathologist Professor Dr. Arna Burkhardt.

04:00.000 --> 04:06.000
Professor Burkhardt is a highly esteemed pathologist with more than 50 years experience in the field.

04:06.000 --> 04:23.000
Since 2021, he has examined 75 autopsies in patients who died shortly after vaccination, as well as 41 biopsies in living persons to determine if the COVID-19 vaccinations caused either the death or disease in the patient.

04:23.000 --> 04:30.000
Alright, Professor Arna Burkhardt, it is my pleasure to be here in your lab today and to speak with you.

04:30.000 --> 04:43.000
I have been following your work very closely for the past year in particular, so why don't you just introduce yourself to the viewers, explain your credentials, your qualifications, as well as your contributions to the field of pathology.

04:44.000 --> 04:55.000
Well, first of all, of course, I would like to thank you for the opportunity to talk to you and for those people who are interested in this field.

04:56.000 --> 05:09.000
Well, as you said, I've been in the field of pathology for many, many years now and many years also in scientific projects involved.

05:09.000 --> 05:23.000
The latest book has appeared in just last year, so I think I'm still in the business, so to say, actually, beginning of 2021.

05:23.000 --> 05:29.000
I wanted to close this laboratory and go into retirement.

05:29.000 --> 05:38.000
And just at that moment, the vaccination campaign started in Germany and it only took three months.

05:39.000 --> 05:55.000
That was in March 21, that the first reports came to me about serious side effects and especially cases of people who died in timely connection with vaccination.

05:55.000 --> 06:05.000
And in most of these cases, even if an autopsy was performed, it was stated whether this was a natural death.

06:05.000 --> 06:16.000
And the relatives were suspicious about this and they didn't accept this because usually these people were very healthy before vaccination.

06:16.000 --> 06:23.000
So they contacted me and other pathologists about a second opinion.

06:23.000 --> 06:42.000
Now, a second opinion is something very usual in oncology because to type a certain type of cancer, you have many, sometimes many psologists look at it and they have different opinions and so on.

06:42.000 --> 06:48.000
But in autopsy, usually the autopsy is considered something like a gold standard.

06:48.000 --> 06:52.000
If you do the autopsy and you have a result, you accept it.

06:52.000 --> 07:02.000
And maybe only once a year it happened that somebody said, well, there's an autopsy and I don't believe the results, please look at it.

07:02.000 --> 07:23.000
But suddenly these were many, many relatives that came to me and sometimes also attorneys who turned to me and asked if I would be willing to lose this because usually many other pathologists just refused this.

07:23.000 --> 07:35.000
And actually I said, well, I can look at five or six cases and probably everything is okay and this will be it.

07:35.000 --> 07:50.000
But then I received the first five cases and I saw things that were very unusual and lesions that I have not seen before in this context.

07:50.000 --> 08:13.000
So actually I contacted other pathologists and also university institutes and asked them if they would continue this work and take over my project because actually I didn't want to do this and go into retirement.

08:13.000 --> 08:26.000
But actually some of the pathologists that I contacted first said, well, yes, yes, we do it and we have some support from the government for these projects and we will do it.

08:26.000 --> 08:39.000
But after a while when it should have been started they drew back and they said, well, we don't have one to have anything to do with it, please leave us alone.

08:39.000 --> 09:05.000
So I was forced to continue my work and as a consequence of our first results luckily I had a second experienced pathologist for Salang from Manova who helped me and who was able to confirm what I saw.

09:05.000 --> 09:12.000
Of course the initial diagnosis was either death caused by some natural causes or another cause.

09:12.000 --> 09:20.000
So how do you account for the discrepancy between your second opinion findings and the initial cause of death?

09:21.000 --> 09:29.000
Well, as you said, there was a discrepancy in almost all of the cases that we saw.

09:29.000 --> 09:41.000
The pathologist of the corona who did the first autopsy claimed it was a natural cause of death or some stated it was unclear.

09:41.000 --> 09:45.000
Okay, that's always a very honest diagnosis.

09:45.000 --> 09:57.000
The problem is that quality of autopsy as it is practiced now in Germany I think has dramatically declined in the last years.

09:57.000 --> 10:04.000
When I learned pathology this was the main focus of the institutes of pathology was autopsy.

10:04.000 --> 10:11.000
But now it's mostly bioptic diagnostic which of course is also very important.

10:11.000 --> 10:23.000
But the pathologists have lost the interest in autopsy and usually they are satisfied if they find something plausible as a death.

10:23.000 --> 10:38.000
So if they see a discoloration of the heart muscle well they say well this is an infraction of the heart and if the person is older than 50 years I mean that's always plausible.

10:39.000 --> 10:48.000
And so they no longer look for the causes behind what they see.

10:48.000 --> 10:58.000
I mean even in many cases histology is not done that means the tissue is not examined in the microscope.

10:58.000 --> 11:07.000
And you cannot make a diagnosis without or not many diagnosis you cannot make without looking at the microscope.

11:07.000 --> 11:13.000
And that's what you did you used histopathology is that correct and can you explain to us what that is.

11:13.000 --> 11:20.000
We will also show these images here to help explain the use of histopathology.

11:20.000 --> 11:35.000
Yes well first of all you take a small specimen from the tissue that you want to examine and it has to be fixed because it's soft and you cannot cut it.

11:35.000 --> 11:53.000
And you have to perform very thin sections thousands of millimeters thickness and if you put them on a glass slide so they are fixed then they don't have any color at all.

11:53.000 --> 12:02.000
Only few elements have color like the red blood cells that's why they are called red blood cells but all the other cells do not have any color.

12:02.000 --> 12:13.000
So you use special stains to make structures visible and there are two ways to do this.

12:13.000 --> 12:21.000
One is that you have a chemical affinity of dye and you see special structures.

12:21.000 --> 12:31.000
And the other thing is that you have antibodies that bind to certain proteins that you then see in what we call immunosochemistry.

12:31.000 --> 12:44.000
Let's focus on this image here. This explains on the left or it shows rather unstained prostate gland tissue and kidney tissue and then on the right we see it labeled as HE stain.

12:44.000 --> 12:49.000
Can you just explain why you would use this method when examining a specimen?

12:49.000 --> 13:04.000
Well actually the H and E stain which is Hematoxylene Aosene operation is a standard coloration or stain used in pathology.

13:04.000 --> 13:08.000
Almost all examinations start with the H and E stain.

13:08.000 --> 13:15.000
So it's a very common practice to use this staining method and does it help you differentiate between the different structures that you are looking at?

13:15.000 --> 13:18.000
Well at most structures at least.

13:18.000 --> 13:27.000
I'm just showing these images to the viewers now so they can be prepared for what they are about to see as we begin discussing your own work and the images from your studies.

13:27.000 --> 13:33.000
But if we could just take a look here at this next image this is liver tissue stained with HE.

13:33.000 --> 13:40.000
Can you just describe why it is so useful to stain a specimen again with HE?

13:40.000 --> 13:44.000
Yes while you see the blue points these are the nuclei.

13:44.000 --> 13:59.000
As I said and they may be enlarged or there may be multiple nuclei in a cell and then of course you see the cytoplasm which is clearly red here and you can see that there may be changes there too.

13:59.000 --> 14:06.000
There may be inclusions, there may be vacuoles, there may be abhorrent bodies in there so all this you can see.

14:07.000 --> 14:19.000
In addition to the HE stain there are also various special staining methods that highlight specific structures and disease related features.

14:19.000 --> 14:23.000
Here we see two examples from Professor Burkhardt's findings.

14:23.000 --> 14:31.000
In the image on the left the Congo red stain is used to highlight a ring of amyloid within the vessel which is a darker red color.

14:32.000 --> 14:39.000
In the image on the right the Prussian blue stain is used to highlight iron deposits in the periphery of the vessel.

14:39.000 --> 14:44.000
Later on in this interview Professor Burkhardt will explain what the findings mean.

14:44.000 --> 14:54.000
I next asked him whether the pathologists who had performed the initial autopsies had also examined the tissue samples under the microscope.

14:55.000 --> 15:07.000
Those autopsies that were performed in legal institutions usually know histology at all is done.

15:07.000 --> 15:09.000
Is that unusual to you?

15:09.000 --> 15:23.000
No this has been practiced since the beginning of legal medicine actually and it is upon the prosecutor if he orders histology to be done or not.

15:24.000 --> 15:33.000
So of course if there is a clear case like somebody has been stepped by a knife I mean you don't have to have a histology for that.

15:33.000 --> 15:37.000
And so the prosecutor says well this is okay.

15:37.000 --> 15:48.000
But if it is stated unclear cause of death is unclear then the prosecutor has to decide whether histology is done or not.

15:48.000 --> 15:57.000
But actually in many cases that I have seen now even if the coroner said cause of death is unclear no histology was ordered.

15:57.000 --> 16:12.000
In many cases toxicological examinations were done especially in young people who die suddenly of unexplained causes often drug abuse is suspected.

16:12.000 --> 16:17.000
But in all of these cases that we examined this was negative.

16:18.000 --> 16:28.000
So in your own studies upon your second opinion you did use the histopathology whereas it was not done at the initial diagnosis.

16:28.000 --> 16:29.000
Yes yes.

16:29.000 --> 16:34.000
So that accounts for the discrepancy in your second opinion compared to the initial diagnosis.

16:34.000 --> 16:47.000
Usually yes as I said in the legal institutions do not histology as a routine work but they preserve specimens.

16:47.000 --> 16:57.000
And these specimens are guarded for two or three years and so we got these specimens and we did the histology.

16:57.000 --> 17:11.000
Now I would like to focus on the pathological changes commonly seen in vaccinated persons and so many of us who are not medical professionals have heard of myocarditis which is inflammation of the heart muscle tissue.

17:11.000 --> 17:18.000
And you were able to observe this in your own studies so I would like to now discuss these two images here.

17:18.000 --> 17:26.000
This shows on the left normal heart muscle tissue and on the right lymphocytic myocarditis after the vaccine.

17:26.000 --> 17:32.000
Can you explain to us the observed abnormalities that you see with the image on the right?

17:32.000 --> 17:47.000
Well on the left side you see the muscle cells which are elongated and have these long nuclei but on the right side you see that in the middle between these muscle cells

17:47.000 --> 17:52.000
are small blue dots which are the nuclei of lymphocytes.

17:52.000 --> 18:05.000
Lymphocytes are immunologically active cells and apparently they have been attracted by some antigenic material that is in the heart.

18:05.000 --> 18:14.000
Now of course one or two lymphocytes are always seen in a section but not an aggregation like that.

18:14.000 --> 18:22.000
You may compare this to the police controlling a city for example.

18:22.000 --> 18:30.000
Now if you see one policeman or police woman that's okay I mean that's normal.

18:30.000 --> 18:40.000
If you see two it's still not alarming but if you all of a sudden you see 50 policemen then you know there must be some trouble somewhere in the city.

18:40.000 --> 18:51.000
And that's the same in the heart muscle. I mean if I see one or two lymphocytes that's normal and they control so to say if there's anything wrong.

18:51.000 --> 18:58.000
But if they are aggregated like this in clumps there's something wrong and that's myocarditis.

18:58.000 --> 19:09.000
By the way myocarditis as a consequence of vaccination of the so-called vaccination is now internationally recognized.

19:09.000 --> 19:20.000
I mean this is nothing that we have to prove anymore. This has been proven and is a solid scientific standard.

19:20.000 --> 19:32.000
Absolutely. Now with this particular case that we are referencing here do you know what symptoms the person had and if not what symptoms would you expect one to experience in a case like this?

19:32.000 --> 19:49.000
Well the main symptom is phatics and physical deterioration the necessity to sleep after some sport activity and physical strain.

19:49.000 --> 20:03.000
So actually we had 31 cases among the 75 cases where it was stated they died of heart failure.

20:03.000 --> 20:09.000
And normal heart failure like rhythmogenic failure and so on.

20:09.000 --> 20:18.000
And of these 31 cases actually in 15 cases there was a periomyocarditis inflammation.

20:18.000 --> 20:33.000
And in the other 16's we saw what is called a microangiopathy that is changes in the small vessels that have nothing to do with arterial sclerosis which of course is normal in older patients.

20:33.000 --> 20:37.000
So this is the myocarditis.

20:37.000 --> 20:51.000
Prior to the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccinations when you look back on your career how often did you see myocarditis then compared to now within the past two years?

20:52.000 --> 20:57.000
I don't think I saw buocaritis more than once a year.

20:57.000 --> 21:06.000
And at that time we did between 1500 and 2500 and 2000 autopsies a year.

21:06.000 --> 21:10.000
And as I said one or two cases a year.

21:10.000 --> 21:17.000
And now this is one of the most common diagnosis especially in younger people.

21:17.000 --> 21:24.000
Professor Burkhardt has explained that clusters of lymphocytes in heart muscle tissue indicate inflammation.

21:24.000 --> 21:30.000
A large cluster of lymphocytes is also seen in this sample of lung tissue.

21:30.000 --> 21:40.000
The sample is from an 82 year old woman who died 40 days after receiving a second injection of the Moderna vaccine.

21:40.000 --> 21:51.000
You can see a small vessel and there's lymphocytic infiltration around it which is not normally in the lung.

21:51.000 --> 22:00.000
And so this person definitely must have had some deficit in the gas exchange of the lung.

22:00.000 --> 22:08.000
We next discussed the case of a 70 year old woman in whom Professor Burkhardt found striking changes within the thyroid gland.

22:09.000 --> 22:13.000
A tissue sample from the woman's thyroid gland is shown on the right.

22:13.000 --> 22:18.000
On the left we see some normal thyroid gland tissue for comparison.

22:18.000 --> 22:32.000
Well yes on the left side you see what we call follicles which contain the thyroid hormone and the hormone is of course needed for the body.

22:32.000 --> 22:38.000
And on the right side you see that these structures are lacking.

22:38.000 --> 22:47.000
And instead of these structures as lymphocytic infiltration which we already have seen in the other pictures.

22:47.000 --> 22:53.000
So these lymphocytes destroy the thyroid tissue.

22:53.000 --> 23:01.000
And this is a well known autoimmune disease which is known for many years and it of course occurs without vaccination.

23:02.000 --> 23:07.000
But after this vaccination we see it more often.

23:07.000 --> 23:14.000
And these people that we saw the autopsies in many cases this disease was not known before.

23:14.000 --> 23:20.000
So it probably started or was at least promoted by the vaccination.

23:20.000 --> 23:28.000
We ask about if there were symptoms before nobody knew anything about thyroid disease in this person.

23:28.000 --> 23:33.000
So this person did not have any pre-existing condition that could maybe put them at risk for something like this?

23:33.000 --> 23:34.000
No.

23:34.000 --> 23:35.000
Interesting, okay.

23:35.000 --> 23:38.000
Is this damage reversible?

23:38.000 --> 23:43.000
Once the thyroid gland is destroyed this is not a reverse ability.

23:43.000 --> 23:48.000
It does not have the capability of a reconstruction.

23:48.000 --> 23:54.000
But it can be treated of course by giving the hormone medical treatment.

23:55.000 --> 24:04.000
The lymphocytes are a common theme among the findings discussed thus far and will continue to be discussed in subsequent cases.

24:04.000 --> 24:11.000
So how do mRNA vaccines cause lymphocytes, a type of white blood cell, to attack healthy cells?

24:11.000 --> 24:21.000
An mRNA vaccine particle consists of a modified RNA molecule which is contained in an envelope of fat-like molecules or lipids.

24:21.000 --> 24:36.000
Once the vaccine has been injected and comes into contact with the body cells, the lipids which encase the mRNA molecule help the mRNA traverse the membrane which surrounds the cell allowing it to enter the cell.

24:36.000 --> 24:43.000
The mRNA binds to the ribosomes within the cell, which are the cell's little protein factories.

24:44.000 --> 24:51.000
The ribosomes read the information on the mRNA and create multiple copies of the spike protein molecule.

24:51.000 --> 25:03.000
Intact spike protein molecules will transport to the cell's surface and some spike protein molecules are fragmented and the fragments are taken to the cell's surface.

25:04.000 --> 25:15.000
They are presented to the cells of the immune system by a specific carrier molecule called MHC-1. MHC-1 is the orange figure shown here.

25:15.000 --> 25:30.000
Think of MHC-1 as a passport and the antigenic peptide or the spike protein fragment carried by MHC-1 as the individual details printed within the passport such as name and photograph.

25:30.000 --> 25:45.000
T lymphocytes which happen to possess T cell receptors which match these antigenic peptides or spike protein fragments will recognize the MHC-1 in combination with the spike protein fragments it carries and then bind to it.

25:45.000 --> 25:55.000
If a cytotoxic T cell recognizes and binds its matching antigenic peptide, then it will attack and destroy the cell which presents it.

25:56.000 --> 26:11.000
This is a necessary step in antiviral defense. However, in the context of vaccination, it is unnecessary and potentially dangerous as the immune system will attack healthy cells.

26:11.000 --> 26:17.000
Lymphocytes occur in the spleen and the lymph nodes but are also seen in the blood.

26:17.000 --> 26:23.000
The lymphocytes are fairly small, are round, and are typically stained dark purple.

26:23.000 --> 26:36.000
If lymphocytes appear in large quantities in tissues other than the lymph nodes or the spleen, this usually means that either a viral infection or some autoimmune disease is in progress.

26:36.000 --> 26:40.000
A third possibility would be the rejection of a transplanted organ.

26:40.000 --> 26:50.000
Now we must contemplate another novel mechanism, namely the attack of the immune system on the vaccine expressing cells.

26:50.000 --> 27:02.000
The vaccines are known to enter the bloodstream shortly after injections, and this does raise questions as to how it could impact the blood vessels, so what have been your observations on this point?

27:03.000 --> 27:15.000
First of all, the spike protein, which is on the one hand produced by the virus in viral infection, but on the other side is induced by the vaccination in the body.

27:15.000 --> 27:21.000
But these two possibilities have completely different access to the body cells.

27:21.000 --> 27:43.000
If you have the viral infection, the toxic spike protein first has to pass through the epithelium, and the epithelium is immunocompetent and already has the capability of detoxification and the destruction of harmful elements.

27:43.000 --> 28:09.000
But the endothelium, which is the lining of the vessels, is not an immunocompetent cell structure, so the toxin that is entering into the bloodstream and into the lymphatic vessels directly hits the cells that are not able to defend themselves.

28:09.000 --> 28:18.000
So they may be destroyed, they may be destroyed by toxic action, and they may be destroyed by immunologic attack.

28:19.000 --> 28:23.000
Blood vessels are preferred targets of lymphocyte attack after vaccination.

28:23.000 --> 28:30.000
Both the large and small blood vessels can be afflicted anywhere and everywhere in the body.

28:30.000 --> 28:38.000
This is because the vaccine will distribute from the injection site to other locations in the body, mainly through the bloodstream.

28:39.000 --> 28:44.000
This image shows a dissection of the aorta, the largest blood vessel in the body.

28:44.000 --> 28:48.000
An aortic dissection is usually very rare.

28:48.000 --> 28:57.000
It is a serious condition in which a tear in the aorta allows blood to rush into the vessel wall, causing it to split or dissect.

28:57.000 --> 29:04.000
This patient was a 55-year-old male who died 21 days after the second injection.

29:05.000 --> 29:08.000
What is being observed here, and why is it significant?

29:08.000 --> 29:10.000
Can you talk about this case in particular?

29:10.000 --> 29:23.000
Yes, you see a section of the aorta, and if you see on the left side there's a solid wall, which is kind of yellow coloration.

29:23.000 --> 29:37.000
Yellow is the color of the elastic fibers by the way, and then you see that there's a split formation in the middle, and then on the right side there are actually two walls.

29:37.000 --> 29:48.000
In the middle there's this black material which actually is blood, so there has been blood flown into this dissected aorta.

29:48.000 --> 29:56.000
The media, what we call the media of the aorta has been destroyed, and the blood has entered.

29:56.000 --> 30:05.000
Once the blood has entered there, and then the aorta may rupture, and the people die of blood loss.

30:05.000 --> 30:12.000
I also want to look at this image from a microscopic viewpoint, so here again is the dissection of the aorta.

30:12.000 --> 30:19.000
This is the same aortic wall, but this time it is stained with HE, which we talked about earlier, and placed under a microscope.

30:19.000 --> 30:21.000
So here are the two images.

30:21.000 --> 30:25.000
Can you describe in a greater detail what we are seeing here?

30:25.000 --> 30:31.000
Now that it's under the microscope and there's also diapplied, what can we tell about this aortic dissection?

30:32.000 --> 30:41.000
Yes, if you look at the left side, on top you see the lumen of the aorta where once the blood was flowing,

30:41.000 --> 30:53.000
then there is the inner section of the aorta, and below there's a dissection, and then you have the outer wall.

30:53.000 --> 31:04.000
So as I said the wall is split into two, and you see the red here is the leading, and then you see this line of blue dots.

31:04.000 --> 31:19.000
These are inflammatory cells, and on the right side we have a higher magnification, and here you can see that actually on the left side you see the inner wall of the aorta,

31:19.000 --> 31:32.000
and then on the right side the beating, and in the interface there is this infiltration of mostly lymphocytic cells, some macrophages are also there.

31:32.000 --> 31:46.000
Why do we do this? I mean the dissection of the aorta you can see without the microscope, but of course a dissection of the aorta may have different causes.

31:47.000 --> 32:00.000
And one is an older person, the arterial sclerosis, but if you look here on the left side again you don't see any sign of arterial sclerosis here.

32:00.000 --> 32:13.000
So you were able to rule that out as the cause? I can rule this out. The second thing that has to be ruled out is the genetic defect of the connective tissue,

32:13.000 --> 32:29.000
which may lead to this set type of aortic rupture. It appears in younger persons, and this usually does not go along with any significant inflammatory infiltrates.

32:29.000 --> 32:48.000
So the inflammatory infiltrates proof in this case that it is not a genetic defect, and we can further make this plausible because we did the immunoisochemistry for the spike protein, and it is selectively located in these areas.

32:48.000 --> 32:51.000
So this is an additional proof.

32:51.000 --> 33:02.000
Just to tie it all together, I want to make note that this methodology that you use was not used during the initial autopsies. Is that correct?

33:02.000 --> 33:04.000
Yes, this is correct.

33:04.000 --> 33:13.000
Okay. Before the rollout or implementation of the COVID-19 vaccines, how common was an aortic dissection?

33:14.000 --> 33:29.000
As I said, we did about 1,500 to 2,000 autopsies a year, and I might say it might have been one or two a year at that time.

33:29.000 --> 33:44.000
And in this series of 75 autopsies that we have re-examined, we saw five ruptures of the aorta with consecutive deaths.

33:44.000 --> 33:56.000
And actually in those cases where histology from the aorta was taken, smaller areas of dissection, especially loss of the elastic fibers.

33:56.000 --> 34:06.000
I think we come to this later, can be proven in many, many cases, in almost all cases. Some of these findings are minimal.

34:06.000 --> 34:07.000
Okay.

34:07.000 --> 34:21.000
So we know that the COVID-19 vaccines induce blood clotting, and this was predicted by several doctors and scientists before the COVID-19 vaccines were made available to the general public.

34:21.000 --> 34:33.000
And these two images here which are not from your own studies, but from a general archive or published studies show vasculitis, which is inflammation of the blood vessels, and that can induce blood clotting.

34:33.000 --> 34:41.000
So can you just explain for us what is being observed in these two images, and in particular what staining method was used?

34:41.000 --> 34:49.000
When you describe this here, it's going to help provide a better context for the listeners as we begin to discuss images from your own studies.

34:49.000 --> 35:00.000
On the left side, you see the standard H and E stain, and you see this circular structure, which is a little bit more red.

35:00.000 --> 35:05.000
That's the inside of the vessel, and it's a thrombus formation.

35:05.000 --> 35:08.000
And you can see where the arrow is.

35:08.000 --> 35:11.000
You can see that the endothelium is destroyed.

35:11.000 --> 35:21.000
So one of our main results, we stated that the endothelial damage is one of the main causes of the complications.

35:21.000 --> 35:25.000
What happens if you have endothelial damage?

35:25.000 --> 35:40.000
Well, if the endothelium is damaged and discarded into the vessel lumen, then the basement membrane and the extracellular matrix of the vessel wall is exposed to the blood.

35:40.000 --> 35:52.000
And as soon as this happens, the body wants to heal this, and the thrombus sites come, and the thrombus sites are those that initiate a thrombus formation.

35:52.000 --> 35:57.000
So thrombus formation actually is a normal healing process.

35:57.000 --> 36:03.000
And in this case, healing process of damage that has been triggered by the vaccine.

36:04.000 --> 36:17.000
Okay, and then if you would like to go ahead and describe for us the image on the right, and I believe that immunohistochemistry was used in this image because we see different colors.

36:17.000 --> 36:19.000
We see some brown, some black even.

36:19.000 --> 36:22.000
If you could just describe what is being observed here.

36:22.000 --> 36:29.000
Well, you see these brown staining, and this is a fibrin.

36:29.000 --> 36:41.000
So besides thrombus sites, fibrin is the main component of thrombus, and so we can actually prove that in this case there's a thrombus formation.

36:41.000 --> 36:43.000
And that means a blood clot?

36:43.000 --> 36:45.000
That's a blood clot, yes.

36:45.000 --> 36:53.000
Continuing with our discussion on the blood vessels, there has been evidence of lymphocytic inflammation of the small blood vessels.

36:53.000 --> 36:57.000
Here we have an image from Dr. Michael Mertz.

36:57.000 --> 37:08.000
Can you explain to us the differences we see here from the image on the left, which is a normal small blood vessel compared to the image on the right, which is a blood vessel attacked by the lymphocytes.

37:08.000 --> 37:10.000
What would observe differences do you see?

37:10.000 --> 37:35.000
Well, actually on the left side you see this small vessel, and inside there are these red dots, which are red blood cells, and then you can see these elongated spindle-shaped nuclei that form something like a wallpaper outlining and protecting the vessel.

37:35.000 --> 37:53.000
And if these are destroyed, as I said before, then thrombosis might happen, and on the right side actually you see this microthrombus, which usually mainly contains thrombocytes and some fibrin.

37:53.000 --> 38:07.000
And with a very important, you see that instead of the normal myofibroplasts that form the vessel wall, there's an infiltration of inflammatory cells.

38:07.000 --> 38:16.000
Now these next two images and cases that we will discuss are from your own studies in which you observed vasculitis of the small blood vessels in the brain.

38:16.000 --> 38:23.000
This is now the second time that we mentioned vasculitis, so just a reminder for everybody listening that is an inflammation of the blood vessels.

38:23.000 --> 38:28.000
If you could, again, for us to describe what is being observed in these two images here.

38:28.000 --> 38:44.000
Yes, well, actually this is one of the most alarming findings that we had from the beginning on that if you really look closely at these at the brain tissue sections,

38:44.000 --> 38:53.000
you find this vasculitis in almost all cases. In many cases it's a very discrete, but you have to look for it.

38:53.000 --> 39:04.000
And these are two images where you can see you really have to look closely to see that these small vessels in the brain,

39:05.000 --> 39:18.000
the endothelium is swollen, but then there are these small blue dots, these again are lymphocytes, which aggregate around these small vessels.

39:18.000 --> 39:20.000
And lymphocytes cause inflammation?

39:20.000 --> 39:32.000
The fact that lymphocytes are found there means that there's some inflammation probably triggered by some antigenic structure.

39:32.000 --> 39:39.000
In this case, maybe spike protein or something from the vaccination.

39:39.000 --> 39:51.000
And as I said, this is a finding that a minimal degree is found in almost all of these people who died after vaccination.

39:51.000 --> 39:58.000
And actually we have seen it also in one needle biopsy from the brain.

39:58.000 --> 40:00.000
We come to this later.

40:01.000 --> 40:10.000
And in many of these cases, which have more pronounced inflammation of the vessels of the brain,

40:10.000 --> 40:23.000
there have been transient defects like loss of speech for a few hours, unconsciousness for some hours, blindness for some hours.

40:24.000 --> 40:36.000
The brain is, if there's no major inflammation and no hemorrhage, the brain is able to compensate again.

40:36.000 --> 40:43.000
But of course this is a very striking side effect.

40:43.000 --> 40:50.000
So just in order for me to summarize what you had just said, this finding here was one of the most concerning.

40:50.000 --> 40:55.000
It is also one that is very commonly seen in people who have died post-vaccination.

40:55.000 --> 40:56.000
Yes.

40:56.000 --> 41:06.000
And it can oftentimes individuals with this complication have had periods of blindness and ability to speak properly.

41:06.000 --> 41:07.000
Is that correct?

41:07.000 --> 41:08.000
Yes, yes.

41:08.000 --> 41:15.000
Now, just to get this clear, I mean, they did not die from this.

41:16.000 --> 41:17.000
Okay.

41:17.000 --> 41:19.000
This is something we find.

41:19.000 --> 41:26.000
We find other cases where there's blood bleeding and hemorrhage in the brain and they died of it.

41:26.000 --> 41:33.000
But this is just a side effect which may be compensated and healed to a certain degree.

41:33.000 --> 41:41.000
So somebody who's listening right now or anybody could have received the COVID-19 vaccine, they could have this very issue,

41:41.000 --> 41:45.000
and experience some symptoms and not even know that they are experiencing this?

41:45.000 --> 41:47.000
Yes, exactly.

41:47.000 --> 41:56.000
And actually in some cases change in the correct end of these vaccinated, this reported.

41:56.000 --> 42:01.000
Sometimes it's reversible and apparently in some cases not.

42:01.000 --> 42:04.000
And this may be one of the reasons.

42:05.000 --> 42:13.000
In addition to lymphocytic inflammation, Professor Burkhardt also found other forms of damage to small blood vessels.

42:13.000 --> 42:18.000
These three images show lesions of these small blood vessels in the brain and heart.

42:18.000 --> 42:28.000
Images A and C show these small vessels from the brain of an 87-year-old woman who died 302 days after receiving a second Pfizer vaccine.

42:29.000 --> 42:39.000
Image B shows these small vessels from the heart muscle tissue of an 81-year-old woman who died 23 days after receiving one dose of the Pfizer vaccine.

42:39.000 --> 42:45.000
So if you could just go ahead and describe what we are seeing in these three images.

42:45.000 --> 42:51.000
Well, in all three images you see lesions of the blood vessels, of the smaller blood vessels.

42:52.000 --> 42:57.000
And on the left side this is a small vessel from the brain.

42:57.000 --> 43:08.000
And in this case there's no major inflammation, but we have this blue stain and the blue stain means iron deposition.

43:08.000 --> 43:13.000
And iron is deposited where there has been bleeding before.

43:13.000 --> 43:23.000
So the aerosides contain iron and it is deposited in the tissue as what we call hemozetarine.

43:23.000 --> 43:33.000
And hemozetarine is a very strong indication of bleeding in this vessel wall.

43:33.000 --> 43:42.000
Now this person at this point at least was lucky because this bleeding was stopped within the vessel wall.

43:42.000 --> 43:45.000
And it did not go outside into the brain tissue.

43:45.000 --> 43:49.000
And if you look at the right side, again this is from the brain.

43:49.000 --> 43:57.000
And this is a stain which we call combo red, but it stains especially the elastic fibers.

43:57.000 --> 44:08.000
And usually these small vessels are completely surrounded by elastic fibers so that they will not rupture.

44:09.000 --> 44:14.000
And you can see that in this part there are elastic fibers.

44:14.000 --> 44:17.000
Now they are also not normal.

44:17.000 --> 44:23.000
They are clumped together and they're discontinuous, but in this part they are completely lacking.

44:23.000 --> 44:30.000
And you see that this small vessel has what we call an aneurysm.

44:30.000 --> 44:40.000
Now this of course could rupture at any time because there is no elastic lamella anymore which may contain it.

44:40.000 --> 44:47.000
And in the middle you see that also the small vessels in the heart muscle are affected.

44:47.000 --> 44:59.000
And in this case the endothelium is swollen and there has been a deposition of some acellular red stain material

44:59.000 --> 45:04.000
which is apparently related to what we call amylurite.

45:04.000 --> 45:09.000
And in some cases also related to prions.

45:09.000 --> 45:22.000
And these are proteins that may be derived from the spike protein and the deleterious effect is that the body cannot get rid of them.

45:22.000 --> 45:28.000
They are not digestible by macrophages or other inflammatory cells.

45:28.000 --> 45:34.000
The image in the middle it is labeled amyloid protein deposits. Can you explain what that is?

45:34.000 --> 45:50.000
Well this is this strange type of protein. It's a misfolded protein which by this unnatural structure cannot be disintegrated by the body.

45:50.000 --> 45:54.000
And so it remains in the body.

45:54.000 --> 46:07.000
And as I said there is a certain disease amyloidosis which is very rare and develops after many years of infections and something like that.

46:07.000 --> 46:22.000
But we find similar proteinous deposits in after vaccination and they are probably not identical but they are related to it.

46:22.000 --> 46:25.000
That's why we call it amyloid like.

46:25.000 --> 46:29.000
Now how do these changes to the blood vessels affect organ function?

46:29.000 --> 46:36.000
Well if you look at the middle picture of course you can see that this small vessel is practically occluded.

46:36.000 --> 46:39.000
I mean there's maybe one third only open.

46:39.000 --> 46:56.000
So of course if you have some travel with perfusion of the myocardium and these small vessels are occluded in many areas and you might actually die of a heart failure.

46:56.000 --> 47:09.000
But this is not a heart failure by arterial sclerosis or something like that but it's in the larger sense what we call a small vessel disease.

47:09.000 --> 47:15.000
Small vessel disease is also detected in some cases of intoxication.

47:15.000 --> 47:20.000
There's other materials and in this case apparently it's a spike protein.

47:21.000 --> 47:32.000
In this next case Professor Burkhardt observed a subarachnoid hemorrhage in a 29 year old male who received one dose of AstraZeneca and one dose of Pfizer.

47:32.000 --> 47:36.000
He died 46 days after the second injection.

47:36.000 --> 47:44.000
Most cases of subarachnoid hemorrhage arise from structural defects of brain vessels, most often aneurysms.

47:44.000 --> 47:52.000
However no such defects were found in this case nor did the patient have any other known illnesses.

47:52.000 --> 48:01.000
First of all before we discuss the image from your study can you just explain briefly what a subarachnoid hemorrhage is?

48:01.000 --> 48:16.000
Well the brain is covered by a very delicate kind of skin and inside there are small vessels which also supply the brain.

48:17.000 --> 48:20.000
In this image actually this is the surface of the brain.

48:20.000 --> 48:32.000
You see the surface of the brain here and there's this very delicate structure which is the subarachnoid membrane with a small vessel here.

48:32.000 --> 48:45.000
And then we have the brain groove here and here is a little bit larger vessel is shown and you can see that the vessel wall if you would look at it at a high magnification

48:45.000 --> 48:53.000
is dissolved and you can see that there's blood also in the surrounding of this vessel.

48:53.000 --> 49:00.000
So this vessel apparently is not containing the blood anymore but there's a hemorrhage.

49:01.000 --> 49:23.000
And in this patient no larger aneurysm was found because this type of subarachnoid bleeding usually occurs or may occur in younger persons but it is caused by genetic defect in the larger vessels of the brain bases.

49:23.000 --> 49:36.000
And this was not the case in this patient it was not found so he had a diffuse hemorrhage from inflamed and partly destroyed smaller vessels.

49:36.000 --> 49:49.000
Do you know what symptoms that he may have had and if not what symptoms would one experience if they were suffering with this particular condition? Would they have any symptoms?

49:49.000 --> 50:03.000
Well actually this was one of these cases he was suddenly unconscious and reanimation was done in the hospital but he died actually they could not.

50:03.000 --> 50:04.000
Did he die suddenly?

50:05.000 --> 50:07.000
Yes actually.

50:07.000 --> 50:08.000
Excuse me.

50:08.000 --> 50:12.000
Before he was unconscious he had convulsions.

50:12.000 --> 50:13.000
Okay.

50:13.000 --> 50:22.000
And after that and he was resuscitated and died in the hospital and then came dead to the hospital.

50:22.000 --> 50:25.000
At age 29 otherwise healthy male?

50:25.000 --> 50:27.000
Yes, yes.

50:28.000 --> 50:42.000
Now what persuaded you to conclude that it was possible that it was the COVID-19 vaccine that was perhaps associated with this death this ailment?

50:43.000 --> 50:58.000
Well actually in addition to these lesions in the brain we found myocarditis also which would be very unusual that you have brain hemorrhage and myocarditis.

50:59.000 --> 51:11.000
And we had endothelial lesions, damage and destruction of endothelium especially not only in the brain as I showed you but also in the myocardium.

51:11.000 --> 51:27.000
So this is apparently toxic effect and the assumption that this is a toxic effect mediated by the spike protein is made further very probable because we could

51:28.000 --> 51:40.000
show the spike protein in these lesions and by the way this is the person where we found the spike protein in the testis in the sphermatogenic cells.

51:40.000 --> 51:45.000
Yes and we will get to that but I just want to speak generally here.

51:45.000 --> 51:49.000
You are able to find several abnormalities in one patient.

51:49.000 --> 51:50.000
Yes.

51:50.000 --> 51:52.000
And what does that suggest to you?

51:53.000 --> 52:09.000
Well that suggests that he did not die of a brain aneurysm but he died of multiple lesions which probably are caused by the same in this case toxic agent.

52:09.000 --> 52:10.000
Thank you.

52:10.000 --> 52:17.000
I now want to have you take a look here at some of the findings from German-Swedish pathologist Ute Kruger.

52:18.000 --> 52:24.000
I think it's important to highlight that there are other pathologists as well who are doing this work who are seeing the same abnormalities.

52:24.000 --> 52:28.000
So I'd just like you to provide a comment on what's being shown here and its implications.

52:28.000 --> 52:32.000
Well actually this is exactly what we see too.

52:32.000 --> 52:35.000
On the left there's a normal artery.

52:35.000 --> 52:41.000
I mean it's an H and E stain so you don't see the elastic fibers.

52:41.000 --> 52:45.000
If you would have an elastic stain you would see some defects there.

52:45.000 --> 52:57.000
And here you can see the inflammatory infiltration in the intimate part of the vessel and there's no endothelium here to see to be seen.

52:57.000 --> 53:02.000
And if there's no endothelium then trombus is formed.

53:03.000 --> 53:13.000
How are you able to determine if these lesions which are tissue abnormalities are a result of the COVID-19 vaccine or the COVID virus?

53:13.000 --> 53:28.000
The esogenic agent is in both cases identical and especially the spike protein of course is induced by the vaccination.

53:28.000 --> 53:32.000
And the spike protein is also produced by the virus.

53:32.000 --> 53:44.000
So the levels of the spike protein is very much lower in viral infected persons in contra distinction to those who have been vaccinated.

53:44.000 --> 53:54.000
And actually nobody knows how high these concentrations of the spike protein can be in the vaccinated.

53:55.000 --> 54:01.000
And of course we know it can persist for many months now and can be found in all organs.

54:01.000 --> 54:09.000
While in the normal infection it usually stays limited to the erudatestic tract.

54:09.000 --> 54:19.000
And in addition to the spike protein of course the true viral infection has other antigenic structures.

54:19.000 --> 54:25.000
And one of these other antigenic structures is the nucleocapside.

54:25.000 --> 54:36.000
And so if we find the spike protein and the nucleocapside then it is probably the result of a true viral infection.

54:36.000 --> 54:48.000
But if we find only spike protein and no nucleocapside this is a very strong suggestion that this is a consequence of the

54:48.000 --> 54:51.000
vaccination.

54:51.000 --> 54:58.000
How do we know that the spike protein expression is caused by the vaccination and not the virus?

54:58.000 --> 55:06.000
To best understand this it is important to note that SARS-CoV-2 virus particles contain two major proteins.

55:06.000 --> 55:11.000
First the spike protein which is located at the surface of the virus particle.

55:12.000 --> 55:19.000
And second the nucleocapside protein which forms a protective layer around the RNA genome.

55:19.000 --> 55:24.000
Therefore virus infected cells should make both of these proteins.

55:24.000 --> 55:31.000
Meanwhile the vaccine only encodes the spike protein and not the nucleocapside protein.

55:31.000 --> 55:37.000
This has been experimentally confirmed by German physician Dr. Michael Mertz.

55:37.000 --> 55:45.000
How can we determine whether the spike protein and or the nucleocapside protein had been present in the patient's tissues?

55:45.000 --> 55:49.000
We can use immunohistochemistry or IHC.

55:49.000 --> 55:57.000
This method allows for the detection of specific molecules of interest in the tissue samples by using specific antibodies.

55:57.000 --> 56:05.000
In this case the molecules of interest are the spike protein or the nucleocapside respectively.

56:05.000 --> 56:08.000
We will here use the spike protein as the example.

56:08.000 --> 56:11.000
Let's now summarize this technique.

56:11.000 --> 56:20.000
First an antibody which interacts with the molecule of interest in this case the spike protein is applied to the tissue sample.

56:20.000 --> 56:28.000
After allowing some time for the antibody to bind to its target the unbound surplus is washed off.

56:28.000 --> 56:36.000
Next a secondary antibody coupled with a catalytic protein enzyme is applied to the same tissue sample.

56:36.000 --> 56:40.000
This second antibody binds to the first one.

56:40.000 --> 56:45.000
After some more time the unbound surplus is again washed off.

56:45.000 --> 56:53.000
Third a colorless dye precursor most often diaminobenzidine is added to the sample.

56:53.000 --> 57:03.000
This dye precursor can be converted to an actual dye by the enzyme that is attached to the second antibody and thus indirectly to the spike protein.

57:03.000 --> 57:11.000
The brown dye that is produced by the enzyme is insoluble so it comes out of solution and is deposited close by.

57:11.000 --> 57:18.000
Thus wherever there are deposits of brown pigment we know that spike protein must have been present.

57:18.000 --> 57:25.000
We can perform these same procedures separately with an antibody that specifically recognizes the nucleocapside.

57:25.000 --> 57:34.000
And now we're going to focus on the use of immunohistochemistry to detect vaccine induced expression of the spike protein.

57:34.000 --> 57:44.000
Here we have two images and these images come from Dr. Michael Mertz and they show the cross sections through two small blood vessels.

57:44.000 --> 57:47.000
Can you explain what is being observed here?

57:47.000 --> 57:52.000
Yes I think these pictures illustrate exactly what I just tried to explain.

57:52.000 --> 58:08.000
I mean you see on the top you see small vessels and already from this magnification you can see that these vessels have an endothelial damage.

58:08.000 --> 58:17.000
Then you have the brown stain and that means that immunohistochemistry spike protein can be seen here.

58:17.000 --> 58:23.000
Below the same vessels are seen and they are stained for nucleocapside.

58:23.000 --> 58:31.000
And you see the same lesions of course of the endothelium but there's no staining so this is a very strong indication.

58:31.000 --> 58:46.000
In considering everything that you see that this is a specific lesion by the vaccine produced a spike protein and not by the virus produced a spike protein.

58:46.000 --> 58:50.000
In each of the cases did you perform nucleocapside control?

58:51.000 --> 59:01.000
In all the cases that we have a positive spike protein reaction we do the nucleocapside with negative and positive controls.

59:01.000 --> 59:13.000
And if the spike protein is negative of course then we don't have to do the nucleocapside because this is not relevant anymore.

59:13.000 --> 59:22.000
And actually we have I think two or three cases where we do have an expression of the nucleocapside.

59:22.000 --> 59:34.000
So in these cases of course there might be an additive effect of the vaccination and a viral infection either before or after vaccination.

59:34.000 --> 59:41.000
And in our observations these are the cases with the most severe side effects.

59:41.000 --> 59:50.000
When somebody has been infected and then also was vaccinated you see the most severe symptoms.

59:50.000 --> 59:57.000
We cannot prove this scientifically by now but this is just the case observation.

59:57.000 --> 01:00:02.000
Thank you that is a very important point that you raise here.

01:00:03.000 --> 01:00:12.000
While detection of spike protein clearly points to vaccine causation Professor Burkart does not rely on this method alone.

01:00:12.000 --> 01:00:22.000
Let me stress this we never make this diagnosis just solely only dependent on our immunohistochemistry.

01:00:22.000 --> 01:00:42.000
We only make this diagnosis if we have lesions which are distinctly positive and which by themselves are already more or less absolutely typical of vaccination damage like an elastica destruction.

01:00:43.000 --> 01:00:52.000
This next image shows the expression of spike protein in the coronary artery of a 24 year old male with no known prior illnesses.

01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:57.000
The young man received one dose of Johnson & Johnson and one dose of Pfizer.

01:00:57.000 --> 01:01:02.000
He died 56 days after the second injection.

01:01:02.000 --> 01:01:06.000
Can you just describe the significance of this of this image?

01:01:06.000 --> 01:01:14.000
Well you see the vessel wall on the left lower corner and then you see the split in the middle.

01:01:14.000 --> 01:01:21.000
And here you can see a dense infiltration of lymphocytes these are the small dark dots.

01:01:21.000 --> 01:01:31.000
And then you can hear this is a thrombus and we did the spike protein and it is positive in some of these inflammatory cells.

01:01:31.000 --> 01:01:39.000
And maybe we are not very sure of what it means in the thrombus but this might be an artifact.

01:01:39.000 --> 01:01:42.000
And this by the way is an artifact too.

01:01:42.000 --> 01:01:50.000
But given that this image shows a lot of brown pigmentation does that mean that there is a lot of spike protein being observed here?

01:01:51.000 --> 01:02:05.000
Yes, I mean here in this line should have been the endothelial protecting the blood which has been flown here and this is the wall.

01:02:05.000 --> 01:02:13.000
And here the endothelium should have made a borderline between the two and it is destroyed.

01:02:13.000 --> 01:02:26.000
It has inflammatory infiltration and in this context also some thrombocytes have been attached and then the process of thrombotic you had was started.

01:02:26.000 --> 01:02:33.000
What role did the spike protein have in the formation of the blood clot here?

01:02:33.000 --> 01:02:44.000
Well it is the endothelial damage. It is a destruction of the endothelium whether it is by toxic or by immunologic interaction.

01:02:44.000 --> 01:02:52.000
It is not clear in every case but in any case there is no endothelium here.

01:02:52.000 --> 01:02:54.000
Just like that.

01:02:55.000 --> 01:03:01.000
It is now well established that there is an increased risk of myocarditis after vaccination.

01:03:01.000 --> 01:03:10.000
Professor Burkhardt further established in this particular case that the severe myocarditis observed in the patient was spike protein induced.

01:03:10.000 --> 01:03:18.000
The patient was a 54 year old woman who died 11 days after receiving a second Pfizer injection.

01:03:18.000 --> 01:03:22.000
I'll let you just describe here what we are able to see.

01:03:22.000 --> 01:03:32.000
Well on the left side of course you see a heart muscle with very pronounced disintegration and destruction of muscle cells.

01:03:32.000 --> 01:03:46.000
And there is a dense infiltration again of these small dots that are the lymphocytes and in contrast to infection there are no neutrophile granulocytes

01:03:47.000 --> 01:03:52.000
which are the cells that are predominant in myocardial infection.

01:03:52.000 --> 01:04:02.000
And on the right side it is just shown that the spike protein is found in these destroyed muscle cells.

01:04:02.000 --> 01:04:13.000
In this case the autopsy done by the pathologist was death by cardial decompilation which of course contains everything.

01:04:14.000 --> 01:04:28.000
I mean it is not an etiological diagnosis it's just a statement of a plausible cause of death.

01:04:28.000 --> 01:04:39.000
Another pathologist Dr. Michael Mertz is also using immunohistochemical staining to detect spike protein in the tissues of vaccinated persons.

01:04:39.000 --> 01:04:51.000
These two images are from Dr. Mertz published study in which he examined the brain tissue of a vaccinated patient who developed myocarditis and encephalitis post injection.

01:04:51.000 --> 01:04:58.000
The patient was a 76 year old male who had received one dose of AstraZeneca and two doses of Pfizer.

01:04:58.000 --> 01:05:03.000
He died three weeks after the third injection.

01:05:03.000 --> 01:05:11.000
Would you like to just comment on what is being observed here on the left we see this spike and then on the right we see the nucleocapsid control?

01:05:11.000 --> 01:05:24.000
Well yes you see the brain tissue and the larger cellular elements are the nerve cells and on the left side you see positive staining.

01:05:24.000 --> 01:05:32.000
In this case a brown staining of some of these neural elements on the right side again a negative finding.

01:05:32.000 --> 01:05:41.000
So this is a strong indication that these debitches are caused by this vaccine induced spike protein.

01:05:41.000 --> 01:05:53.000
So just to reiterate one more time for the listeners the nucleocapsid control which is being shown here on the right indicates in this case that the expression of the spike protein

01:05:53.000 --> 01:06:00.000
was caused by the COVID-19 vaccination and not the COVID-19 virus.

01:06:00.000 --> 01:06:03.000
Yes this in the context of the whole.

01:06:03.000 --> 01:06:08.000
In the context again of all findings and all clinical data yes.

01:06:08.000 --> 01:06:09.000
Yes thank you.

01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:18.000
Okay now we can have a discussion about encephalitis and I want to talk about a case in which a brain biopsy was done.

01:06:18.000 --> 01:06:30.000
And to be honest I was very surprised by this particular case because I did not know that one could have a brain biopsy from my understanding it's done very rarely.

01:06:30.000 --> 01:06:35.000
So can you talk about why in this case a brain biopsy was done on this particular individual?

01:06:36.000 --> 01:06:53.000
Well actually a needle biopsy of brain allegiance actually is something that must be very rare because in 40 years I have not had a needle biopsy of the brain.

01:06:53.000 --> 01:07:02.000
What I did have is fast frozen sections to open up a surgery of the brain of course.

01:07:02.000 --> 01:07:14.000
If they open the brain and find a tumor or something and then they make a fast frozen section to get the diagnosis during a surgery.

01:07:15.000 --> 01:07:21.000
But in this case she had severe neurological symptoms.

01:07:21.000 --> 01:07:29.000
They of course they did investigate the spinal fluid and everything but they did not come to a conclusion.

01:07:29.000 --> 01:07:37.000
So there was a suggestion of a tumor in the brain and they suspected a molecular lymphoma.

01:07:38.000 --> 01:07:52.000
And a molecular lymphoma can be very successfully treated if you know the exact type so they were desperate to find out what type of a lymphoma was here to give her the right treatment.

01:07:53.000 --> 01:08:03.000
But then they did this needle biopsy and no tumor, no cancer was found.

01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:17.000
This has been confirmed by several university pathologists who looked at it but instead they found very pronounced vasculitis

01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:22.000
and also a concomitant encephalitis.

01:08:22.000 --> 01:08:32.000
On the left side you see this is the needle, the contents of the needle that was used to get the tissue out of the brain.

01:08:32.000 --> 01:08:43.000
And on the right side you see a high magnification and also in this overview you can see these spots where there's a more dense aggregation of cells.

01:08:43.000 --> 01:08:50.000
These are inflammatory cells and they are located selectively around small vessels.

01:08:50.000 --> 01:09:02.000
So this is definitely vasculitis, lymphocytic vasculitis and also some inflammation in the surrounding tissue could be found.

01:09:03.000 --> 01:09:14.000
So there was also a codcomitant encephalitis, malignant lymphoma was excluded and vasculitis and encephalitis was confirmed.

01:09:14.000 --> 01:09:23.000
And I suppose she's treated now probably with some anti-inflammatory agents.

01:09:23.000 --> 01:09:31.000
Professor Burkhardt also tested this same brain biopsy sample for the spike protein using immunohistochemistry.

01:09:32.000 --> 01:09:40.000
On the left side you see the spike protein and it is selectively expressed in the vessel walls of the small vessel.

01:09:40.000 --> 01:09:46.000
It's a brown stain and there's not much background in this case.

01:09:46.000 --> 01:09:53.000
And on the right side you see the nucleic cup side which is absolutely negative in this case.

01:09:53.000 --> 01:09:59.000
And in the middle you can see that these large nerve cells also express the spike protein.

01:09:59.000 --> 01:10:04.000
So this is an indication of a codcomitant encephalitis.

01:10:04.000 --> 01:10:10.000
Michael Mertz was also able to find in his case study of a 76 year old man.

01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:16.000
He found that this individual who was also vaccinated had encephalitis as well.

01:10:16.000 --> 01:10:25.000
So is encephalitis potentially a common ailment associated with COVID-19 vaccination?

01:10:25.000 --> 01:10:28.000
Well apparently yes.

01:10:28.000 --> 01:10:45.000
As I said we find minor lesions of the small vessels and if the small vessels or if the vessels are inflamed the so-called blood brain barrier breaks down.

01:10:45.000 --> 01:10:52.000
And that means that the vaccine contents can enter into the brain.

01:10:52.000 --> 01:11:05.000
And I think just recently some Japanese investigators found that the spike protein is selectively toxic for gungan cells, for nerve cells.

01:11:05.000 --> 01:11:12.000
Once it gets into the brain it may cause encephalitis.

01:11:12.000 --> 01:11:22.000
This image shows the strong expression of spike protein within the spleen of a 94 year old female who died 67 days after the second injection.

01:11:22.000 --> 01:11:27.000
Spike protein expression in the spleen is notable for two reasons.

01:11:27.000 --> 01:11:32.000
Firstly we know that vaccine particles tend to accumulate in the spleen.

01:11:32.000 --> 01:11:35.000
Secondly it is a major lymphatic organ.

01:11:35.000 --> 01:11:45.000
Spike protein expression in the spleen may therefore result in the killing of many lymphocytes which would in turn lead to immunosuppression.

01:11:45.000 --> 01:11:55.000
Can you explain what is being observed here with this case and why does the spleen show such strong expression of the spike protein?

01:11:55.000 --> 01:12:03.000
Well actually of course this is one of the aims of the vaccination.

01:12:03.000 --> 01:12:10.000
They want to provoke the immune system to produce a spike protein.

01:12:10.000 --> 01:12:16.000
But in this case it was a very strong expression and not only in the spleen.

01:12:16.000 --> 01:12:24.000
I just took this picture to show that the vaccination does what it should do but it does too much.

01:12:24.000 --> 01:12:30.000
In some cases it is what we call lymphocytic amok.

01:12:30.000 --> 01:12:36.000
Yes this is a term or phrase that you have coined really you coined the term lymphocyte amok.

01:12:36.000 --> 01:12:38.000
What do you mean by that?

01:12:38.000 --> 01:12:46.000
I mean that the lymphocytes are overstimulated.

01:12:46.000 --> 01:12:52.000
The vaccination wants to stimulate them of course but in some cases they are overstimulated.

01:12:52.000 --> 01:13:00.000
Clinicians talk about hyperinflammatory syndrome and this may be destructive in many organs.

01:13:00.000 --> 01:13:10.000
And this always has a danger of an autoimmune disease which we talked about earlier about the thyroid nucleus and so on.

01:13:10.000 --> 01:13:20.000
So how serious is immunosuppression for example and how does it typically present itself in patients who may be suffering from it?

01:13:20.000 --> 01:13:31.000
Immunosuppression is something that is not conspicuous in our cases because we see overstimulation like in this picture

01:13:31.000 --> 01:13:43.000
and sometimes we see depletion of the spleen and lymph nodes but of course by the morphological structures

01:13:43.000 --> 01:13:52.000
we cannot make any statement about the state of the immune system.

01:13:52.000 --> 01:14:00.000
So this next case involves a 35 year old woman who was vaccinated and started to experience skin lesions

01:14:00.000 --> 01:14:04.000
and this has had a severe impact on her life.

01:14:04.000 --> 01:14:08.000
I have heard you speak about her case publicly before.

01:14:08.000 --> 01:14:15.000
Can you just explain for us what this woman was experiencing and how this impacted her quality of life?

01:14:15.000 --> 01:14:27.000
Well first of all she had several severe side effects but the one side effect that affects her reduces her quality of life.

01:14:27.000 --> 01:14:41.000
The most is the skin lesions. She had an absolutely healthy skin before and now she does not want to enter into the swimming pool or in the open

01:14:41.000 --> 01:14:54.000
and actually the whole skin is covered with these posterior lesions and we took a biopsy and you can see on the left side

01:14:54.000 --> 01:15:05.000
that this is something that is related to what we call a lichen plane or set is an autoimmune disease destroying the basal cells

01:15:05.000 --> 01:15:15.000
and you can see that here these cells are specifically stained by the spike protein and they are vacuillated

01:15:15.000 --> 01:15:23.000
that means they are damaged or even dead and then you can see the spike protein also in this lymphocytic infiltrate

01:15:23.000 --> 01:15:27.000
the lymphocytic infiltrate is the one that attacks the basal cells.

01:15:27.000 --> 01:15:36.000
So you did find the spike protein expressed in the skin biopsy so I do want to ask you could skin biopsies also be useful in potential

01:15:36.000 --> 01:15:39.000
vaccine damage to organs other than the skin?

01:15:40.000 --> 01:15:56.000
Well first of all I said this is a lesion that is related to what is known as lichen planar but it is an atypical type because in addition to these

01:15:57.000 --> 01:16:07.000
distractions of the epidermis we also find a vasculitis and this is not a typical feature of this disease lichen planar

01:16:07.000 --> 01:16:21.000
so we have an atypical autoimmune disease with concomitant vasculitis and we get a lot of skin biopsies now with the question

01:16:21.000 --> 01:16:32.000
and there are two different types of questions one are the persons that have lesions of the skin and there we find atypical lichen planar

01:16:32.000 --> 01:16:45.000
and what is called penthogites lesions which are autoimmune diseases they have lesions of the skin but then we have other persons that do not have any skin

01:16:46.000 --> 01:17:01.000
but other side effects and here we find this vasculitis of the skin and this is very clear and it is also associated with spike protein expression in the endothelium

01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:05.000
so there are these two possibilities.

01:17:06.000 --> 01:17:15.000
Many women have experienced and reported on menstrual disruptions post-vaccination and you have been able to see this in your own studies

01:17:15.000 --> 01:17:26.000
in particular there was one woman a 52 year old woman who was still having a menstrual cycle and post-vaccine she began to experience very heavy bleeding

01:17:26.000 --> 01:17:37.000
these three images here are showing the tissue of the endometrium which is the lining of the uterus and I see that on the right we do see the nucleocapsid control

01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:47.000
which is important because again that is able to indicate that the expression of the spike protein here is a result of the COVID-19 vaccine and not the virus

01:17:47.000 --> 01:17:50.000
but I'll let you take it from here what are we seeing in these three images?

01:17:50.000 --> 01:18:05.000
Well first of all let me add this effect this woman not only had these disastrous bleeding problems but she also had other very severe side effects

01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:19.000
and neurologically blood perfusion and so on she's really very sick but nobody took her seriously so this abrasio was done

01:18:19.000 --> 01:18:31.000
and we can see on the left side we see the glands of the endometrium and you can see that the epithelial cells are positively stained

01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:45.000
the background the stroma what we call it is negative so this is an indication that this is a specific stain and also in this case the nucleocapsid is negative

01:18:45.000 --> 01:18:55.000
now what you see here this is these are red blood cells these are vessels so this is not a immuno is the chemical staining

01:18:55.000 --> 01:19:06.120
but what is very striking and I have never seen this before and I looked into textbooks about the formation of lymphopholic

01:19:06.120 --> 01:19:21.120
small lymph nodes so to say in the endometrium and there are some references to lymphoplasmocytic endometritis but I didn't find the term

01:19:21.120 --> 01:19:37.120
lymphonodular endometritis and actually we find I think even non-physologist may see that this is a small nodule here of dense aggregated cells these are lymphocytes

01:19:37.120 --> 01:19:47.120
and this you would call a lympholic and in the middle here you can see these stains and there's a gland in this gland

01:19:47.120 --> 01:19:59.120
expresses the spike protein so actually we have the autoimmune attack inflagranti here in the endometrium

01:19:59.120 --> 01:20:14.120
great explanation there so this what we're seeing in the middle image you say is highly unusual what you just described okay and the excess bleeding that this woman had experienced that is attributable to the COVID-19 vaccine

01:20:14.120 --> 01:20:32.120
well I think this is a very strong case I mean why would she have of course it could be menopausal bleeding but as I said she has other very strong symptoms side effects

01:20:33.120 --> 01:20:48.120
lymphocytic inflammation and spike expression is also observed in the testis the image on the left stained with HE is from a 55 year old male who died seven days after receiving a second Pfizer injection

01:20:48.120 --> 01:21:08.120
the image on the right shows spike protein expression in the spermatogonia which are the cells that produce sperm this sample is from a 29 year old male who died 46 days after his second injection as discussed earlier the immediate cause of his death was a subarachnoid hemorrhage

01:21:09.120 --> 01:21:33.120
well first of all on the left side you see a distinct lymphocytic nodule forming around a blood vessel and so this is lymphocytic vasculitis and this is a section from the testis and on the right side you can see the spermatogenic tubules of the testis and you can see that the

01:21:34.120 --> 01:21:55.120
stratification usually is very regular and you can see it is disturbed and usually in the middle in the lumen there should be lots of spermatocytes and you can see a few spermatocytes here these are the very small elements but what is

01:21:56.120 --> 01:22:20.120
conspicuous is that these larger elements which are the spermatogonia with the cells that form the sperms are detached and in the lumen of these small canals the image on the right side labeled spike protein do you see sperm cells in this image here?

01:22:20.120 --> 01:22:40.120
if you look exactly you can find one or two in one of these canals but usually there should be at least 20 or 30 or more usually it is filled and especially the stratification is completely destroyed

01:22:40.120 --> 01:22:47.120
would you expect someone to have symptoms if they were to be experiencing this complication?

01:22:47.120 --> 01:23:08.120
well I wouldn't think that they have any dramatic symptoms but probably sexual activity would be lowered because it is connected with spermatocyte production and by the way we also found

01:23:08.120 --> 01:23:26.120
a fine expression of spike protein in the prostate gland so this is also part of the semen so it should be affected but probably not everybody would take a racket of this

01:23:26.120 --> 01:23:40.120
during a recent speech in Stockholm you said that you would recommend a woman of childbearing age to not become pregnant by a man who has been vaccinated can you expand further on what you meant by that?

01:23:41.120 --> 01:23:50.120
well actually I wanted to add something but I was interrupted by a big applause to this

01:23:50.120 --> 01:24:09.120
if I may make a personal comment this is not a scientific comment if I were a woman in fertile age I would not plan a motherhood from a person from a man who has been vaccinated

01:24:09.120 --> 01:24:32.120
unless I think these pictures are very disturbing very disturbing for me and I said unless and then I stopped and I get many telephone calls of women who say well what did you say unless what?

01:24:32.120 --> 01:24:54.120
yeah so right now why don't you tell us what else were you going to say at that moment? I would at least wait for two or three cycles of spermatogenesis now the cycle of spermatogenesis is about 70 days so I would wait for let's say

01:24:55.120 --> 01:25:09.120
two well three quarters of a year or something like that and before this I would suggest to make a spermatogram

01:25:10.120 --> 01:25:28.120
and especially the mortality of the spermat so I think this would be an indication now as far as I can I have seen and I have not only seen the

01:25:29.120 --> 01:25:53.120
testes of this young man but also of older men but of course they are more difficult to interpret but as far as I can see the spermatocytes themselves do not express the spike protein as far as I know by now anyhow this is this is of course an alarming finding

01:25:53.120 --> 01:26:10.120
sure and according to data submitted by Pfizer to the Japanese health regulator the vaccine particles do distribute to the ovaries but in your own studies were you able to find spike protein expression in the ovaries?

01:26:11.120 --> 01:26:31.120
yes we did find this unfortunately these are mostly elderly women where we get specimens from the ovary unfortunately during autopsy the ovaries are often not taken for histological

01:26:31.120 --> 01:26:50.120
examination so this has to be interpreted very cautiously we find it actually mostly in the vessels in the vessel walls of the ovary but we are behind this question

01:26:50.120 --> 01:27:13.120
Professor Burkhardt a few times throughout this interview we did mention the elastic fibers so that is now what I would like to focus on and you have been able to show that there is damage to the elastic fibers caused by the COVID-19 vaccines but before we discuss some of the images I would like you to describe in simple terms the function of elastic fibers in the body

01:27:13.120 --> 01:27:40.120
actually the elastic fibers are very late development in the evolution of life and these are structures that like rubber band have elasticity and these fibers are formed in the first years of the life at around

01:27:40.120 --> 01:27:58.120
poverty no more or only very little elastic fibers are formed anymore so it's a permanent structure it's very important for the arteries especially the main artery the

01:27:58.120 --> 01:28:27.120
artery because it gives elasticity it is important in the lung because it gives elasticity in breathing and it is also important in the skin because it gives the baby face appearance of the skin and if you get older these elastic fibers of the skin are destroyed

01:28:28.120 --> 01:28:57.120
so that's why we look older when we get old but there have been very convincing reports that people after the vaccination suddenly appear to look much older now this may be due to psychological factors too but we definitely have proof that these elastic fibers in some cases

01:28:58.120 --> 01:29:25.120
are profoundly destroyed in the skin and the other organ that is very important in view of elasticity are the arteries I mean the heart contracts and there's a rise in pressure and this pressure is taken up by the elasticity so the blood pressure

01:29:25.120 --> 01:29:40.120
is not going up indefinitely but it is taken up and then when the heart is not contracting the arteries flow the blood to the organs

01:29:40.120 --> 01:29:49.120
the walls of the aorta and of other major arteries are rich in elastic fibers which are arranged into stacked layers or lamella

01:29:49.120 --> 01:29:55.120
these elastic lamella are essential for the vessel's ability to withstand the pulsating blood pressure

01:29:55.120 --> 01:30:05.120
Professor Burkhardt found that in many of his cases the elastic lamella were damaged and disrupted particularly within the hotspots of inflammation

01:30:05.120 --> 01:30:26.120
If the arteries are not elastic we would have peaks in the blood pressure and this peaks of course may lead to rupture and we already talked about a rupture of arteries in the brain in the aorta

01:30:27.120 --> 01:30:37.120
Damage to the aorta and to other major arteries was also apparent in patients who had not suffered overt failure or rupture to these vessels

01:30:37.120 --> 01:30:46.120
This image shows the aortic wall of a 29 year old male who died 67 days after receiving the second Pfizer injection

01:30:46.120 --> 01:30:51.120
The tissue sample has been treated with a special stain which highlights the disrupted elastic lamella

01:30:51.120 --> 01:30:56.120
The image on the left shows intact elastic lamella for a comparison

01:30:56.120 --> 01:31:03.120
Can you describe what we are viewing here and the significant findings related to the elastic fibers?

01:31:03.120 --> 01:31:26.120
Yes, well on the left side you see that the normal arteries especially the aorta the main artery of the body is constructed of a very regular stratification of myofaproplastic cells and smooth muscle cells and these elastic fibers

01:31:26.120 --> 01:31:39.120
This is very important and we have very alarming findings first of all the destruction of elastic fibers in the arteries especially in the aorta

01:31:39.120 --> 01:31:49.120
Sometimes very small lesions you don't see this in the in a radiograph patients with these lesions don't have any symptoms

01:31:49.120 --> 01:32:02.120
but those that have further development which have a total median necrosis of the elastic fibers they may die of the aortic rupture

01:32:02.120 --> 01:32:05.120
and we have as I said five cases of this

01:32:05.120 --> 01:32:11.120
Can you explain in simple terms what median necrosis is or how it would present itself?

01:32:11.120 --> 01:32:23.120
Well, especially the larger arteries especially the main artery of the body the aorta is made up of three layers

01:32:23.120 --> 01:32:33.120
The intima, this is where the aortaiosclerosis and cholesterol deposition happens

01:32:33.120 --> 01:32:44.120
Then we have the the media which is the where the elastic fibers and the myofaproplastic smooth muscle cells are located

01:32:44.120 --> 01:32:57.120
and then we have the atvantizia which there are the so-called vasavazoleum which supply the vasovol with blood oxygen and so on

01:32:57.120 --> 01:33:05.120
We have the outside supplied by vasavazoleum and the inside directly by perfusion

01:33:05.120 --> 01:33:18.120
but then we have the middle the deep media and the deep media is affected by toxic agents and by infectious toxic agents

01:33:18.120 --> 01:33:29.120
Now a hundred years ago the necrosis, media necrosis was very often seen in syphilis

01:33:29.120 --> 01:33:37.120
It was infectious toxicity and it also led to rupture and death

01:33:37.120 --> 01:33:47.120
and this is probably because this is the what we call a chilis heal of the of the aorta

01:33:47.120 --> 01:33:51.120
where toxic agents we act there especially

01:33:51.120 --> 01:34:00.120
and there's also some kind of a food poisoning which is called lateralism

01:34:00.120 --> 01:34:10.120
which by now we don't see very often in my first years as a pathologist I had a case where I saw this

01:34:10.120 --> 01:34:19.120
and it's also a toxic agent in some plants Kicha epsin, a kind of chickpeas which may be toxic

01:34:19.120 --> 01:34:26.120
I suppose that this is a phenomenon which is similar to what we know have seen in the past

01:34:26.120 --> 01:34:31.120
so there's a toxic and maybe also immunologic attack

01:34:31.120 --> 01:34:36.120
in the area of the arteries where there's a weak point

01:34:36.120 --> 01:34:45.120
and there may be local bleeding with hemocytic roses, iron deposition deposits and there may be perforation

01:34:45.120 --> 01:34:53.120
and there may be probably in many cases small lesions may heal

01:34:53.120 --> 01:35:04.120
I mean but then the elastic fibres cannot be replaced by elastic fibres once you're older than 15 years let's say

01:35:04.120 --> 01:35:17.120
and so there's a scar and if there's a scar the artery loses its elasticity and so the rise of the blood pressure

01:35:17.120 --> 01:35:25.120
during contraction of the heart is very high and it goes down and it goes up and it goes down

01:35:25.120 --> 01:35:38.120
and it leads to probably the brain arteries are the most sensitive arteries to rupture and death by cerebral bleeding

01:35:38.120 --> 01:35:48.120
and now my fear is maybe somebody who has a scar in his artery

01:35:48.120 --> 01:36:00.120
maybe he will die in five years from cerebral bleeding but nobody will associate this with the vaccination

01:36:00.120 --> 01:36:10.120
and nobody will even examine the artery, this is not a standard to examine the artery

01:36:10.120 --> 01:36:22.120
there will be a high number of cases where nobody sees any connection with the vaccination although it is probable

01:36:22.120 --> 01:36:31.120
as professor Burkhardt mentioned earlier damage to elastic fibres was also commonly found in the skin of vaccinated persons

01:36:31.120 --> 01:36:40.120
he observed these changes in biopsies that is in skin tissue samples of living patients

01:36:40.120 --> 01:36:50.120
right now I'm systematically reviewing our biopsies from the skin and I have one example here and you see on the left side

01:36:50.120 --> 01:37:01.120
there's a very delicate network of very fine elastic fibres they are black on the top is the epitherium of the dermis

01:37:01.120 --> 01:37:16.120
and here you can see this man he's 38 years old and he has a vasculitis of the skin here you can see there's these very delicate black lines here

01:37:16.120 --> 01:37:25.120
these are the remnants of the elastic fibres and there's no network below the basement membrane

01:37:25.120 --> 01:37:30.120
let's now shift our focus back to clots and we did discuss this a little bit earlier

01:37:30.120 --> 01:37:38.120
and I think that the topic of clots has received a lot of public attention and has generated a lot of public interest

01:37:38.120 --> 01:37:46.120
I want to first clarify before we discuss a few images that there are two types of clots associated with the COVID-19 vaccines

01:37:46.120 --> 01:37:49.120
can you explain those two clots?

01:37:49.120 --> 01:38:00.120
well first of all there's the so you may call normal trombotic clot which is formed by trombocytes and piperine

01:38:00.120 --> 01:38:12.120
and which as I said earlier is of course a kind of a healing of the traumatic events I mean if you

01:38:12.120 --> 01:38:23.120
so if someone gets a cut if you cut your skin of course there will be a trombotic formation and then the endothelium regenerates

01:38:23.120 --> 01:38:26.120
and this is a normal process

01:38:26.120 --> 01:38:32.120
so that's one type of clotting that is when for example somebody has a cut it bleeds a little bit but eventually stops

01:38:32.120 --> 01:38:35.120
that's one type and that's considered normal and the second type

01:38:35.120 --> 01:38:49.120
well the second time is the type that has not been observed before actually and actually the first notice of this was came from the United States

01:38:49.120 --> 01:38:59.120
I personally have been in the United States and I was a guest for almost one year with an undertaker

01:38:59.120 --> 01:39:12.120
and actually there I got my first experience with dead people at the I know that from that time nobody ever observed these casts in the vessels

01:39:12.120 --> 01:39:20.120
because in the United States different from Germany where people are buried or burned they embalmed

01:39:20.120 --> 01:39:34.120
and all deceased persons are embalmed and this makes it necessary to open the arteries or veins

01:39:34.120 --> 01:39:40.120
and put the fixation fluid into the body so the body is embalmed

01:39:40.120 --> 01:39:57.120
soon after this vaccination campaign started there were reports from undertakers in the United States that they observed these very strange casts in the blood vessels

01:39:57.120 --> 01:40:10.120
they were long elastic structures not adherent to the walls so they are not caused by normal vascular damage

01:40:10.120 --> 01:40:23.120
and they are very extensive so just from the first report that I read this I was convinced this could not have been the cause of the death

01:40:23.120 --> 01:40:32.120
because I mean if all your arteries are blocked you would die before all this has formed

01:40:32.120 --> 01:40:44.120
these clots formed post-mortem after death I'm absolutely sure they formed after death and they were associated with the cooling of the body

01:40:44.120 --> 01:40:49.120
all dead persons have to be cooled before they are embalmed

01:40:49.120 --> 01:41:03.120
these are the two things that I stated they cannot have been formed inter-beta during life and they have been formed by cooling

01:41:03.120 --> 01:41:11.120
now we come to the point that we have been observing these phenomenon in living persons

01:41:11.120 --> 01:41:19.120
and this is I think something that has not been looked into before

01:41:19.120 --> 01:41:30.120
In cases in which abnormal blood clots were observed in living patients it is important to note that the clots were localized events and therefore more survivable

01:41:30.120 --> 01:41:37.120
in this case the patient is a woman in her early 40s who was an avid marathon runner

01:41:37.120 --> 01:41:47.120
after receiving one dose of the Pfizer vaccine the woman began to experience blood perfusion problems and sensitivity to cold temperatures

01:41:47.120 --> 01:41:57.120
the angiogram showed double-beveled arteries in the in the legs so this is the phenomenon that I described before

01:41:57.120 --> 01:42:07.120
that the media necrosis in this case it was not in the auto but it was in the lower leg arteries

01:42:07.120 --> 01:42:18.120
this lady was fortunately in in a way that the this media necrosis did not rupture but it found its way back

01:42:18.120 --> 01:42:30.120
so it's well known that there are two ways either if you have a dissection of the auto or a large vessel there are two ways either it goes outside

01:42:30.120 --> 01:42:42.120
and you die by a bleeding by by a hemorrhage and the other way is that it finds its way back at some other location

01:42:42.120 --> 01:42:53.120
and then you have the circulation is again possible but you have of course trouble with perfusion

01:42:53.120 --> 01:43:04.120
and this lady actually she was active marathon runner she was she participated in marathon runs soon after this vaccination

01:43:04.120 --> 01:43:18.120
she could not walk anymore for some time and had very severe problems she did all kinds of therapeutic measurements like plasma for raises and things like that

01:43:18.120 --> 01:43:28.120
and she is better now but it it relapses this is after the vaccination that shows that there's a profound damage of the perfusion

01:43:28.120 --> 01:43:40.120
I mean she at some times she could not walk she couldn't walk walk anymore no wow and 40 years old otherwise healthy yes as I said marathon runner

01:43:40.120 --> 01:43:48.120
now this is also a point of interest this image here on the left which shows the blood after it has been separated and cooled

01:43:48.120 --> 01:44:01.120
what is this yellow structure that we see at the top of that vial can you explain what's happening here yes well let me first say that she had a biopsy of the skin

01:44:01.120 --> 01:44:20.120
and the skin biopsy we saw vasculitis we saw necrosis of endothelium we saw expression of spike protein and then she called me and said well the doctor took blood for analysis

01:44:21.120 --> 01:44:36.120
and put it in the refrigerator and the strange things happened that in the upper part where the serum is they formed this strange clot

01:44:36.120 --> 01:44:51.120
which apparently is not a trombus because it's white as you see it says no more ericicides in there and it is like jellyfish and a little bit sticky

01:44:51.120 --> 01:45:00.120
Professor Burkhardt also examined the clot under the microscope which is shown here he used a special staining technique that highlights bibrin

01:45:00.120 --> 01:45:07.120
cellular proteins within the clot were identified with modern biochemical techniques in another laboratory

01:45:07.120 --> 01:45:21.120
we found it was almost cell-free aggregation of small microfibrates probably un-mature fibrin

01:45:21.120 --> 01:45:35.120
the thing is it's definitely not a normal trombosis and we have fibrin which is a constituent of trombotic of a trombus it's only on the surface

01:45:35.120 --> 01:45:50.120
we have inside these small fibrils and this is a surface and you see here this slightly bluish is the very delicate fibres

01:45:50.120 --> 01:46:04.120
which probably are some pre-stage of fibrin and then on the surface you see there is only on the surface trombocytes are some lymphocytes

01:46:04.120 --> 01:46:17.120
there is mature fibrin on the surface end which is most important there are CD61 which is a constituent of endothelial cells

01:46:17.120 --> 01:46:29.120
so the contents of endothelial cells comes into the blood and under certain circumstances apparently after cooling

01:46:29.120 --> 01:46:50.120
these may form these structures these clots then we had autonomic analysis done by a friendly laboratory and they found that the protein is a composition of the serum and of the clot

01:46:50.120 --> 01:47:15.120
different and in the clot there were 139 proteinous structures that were not in the serum and these were extracellular matrix collagen, elastin and some other structures especially CD31 which is related to endothelial contents

01:47:16.120 --> 01:47:39.120
we consider now and of course we have more cases to examine we have some more already now we concluded that these clot formations are an indication that in the past there was an endothelial damage

01:47:39.120 --> 01:47:57.120
and if it's still forming it's an ongoing endothelial damage and through the endothelial damage proteins and matrix constituents of the vessel all come into the blood and circulate in the blood

01:47:58.120 --> 01:48:03.120
and in certain circumstances they can form these clots

01:48:03.120 --> 01:48:10.120
and you were seeing this in several people who were vaccinated these types of clots is that correct?

01:48:10.120 --> 01:48:11.120
yes

01:48:11.120 --> 01:48:12.120
okay

01:48:12.120 --> 01:48:24.120
but at this moment we don't have a systematic evaluation but it seems to be the case that it is associated with vaccination

01:48:24.120 --> 01:48:31.120
all of your years of pathology prior to the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccinations you did not see this type of blood clotting is that correct?

01:48:31.120 --> 01:48:47.120
that is correct yes and actually we have one specimen which was taken from a person who was still living and they did angioplastic

01:48:47.120 --> 01:48:52.120
and they removed such a clot outside of artery

01:48:52.120 --> 01:49:03.120
and this is definitely associated with temperature because this lady especially but I have heard it also from other persons

01:49:03.120 --> 01:49:10.120
they feel they have no major problems as long as the temperature is good

01:49:10.120 --> 01:49:21.120
so but if it's below 25 degrees they have problems with their hands maybe

01:49:21.120 --> 01:49:23.120
is it their circulation?

01:49:23.120 --> 01:49:24.120
apparently

01:49:24.120 --> 01:49:29.120
in problems in the cold temperature and multiple people who have been vaccinated are reporting this?

01:49:29.120 --> 01:49:30.120
yes

01:49:30.120 --> 01:49:31.120
okay

01:49:31.120 --> 01:49:37.120
next professor Burkhardt and I discuss his findings and his work more generally

01:49:37.120 --> 01:49:44.120
he provides his perspective on the scientific community, academic science and the public health industry

01:49:44.120 --> 01:49:51.120
he also reflects back on his career and shares his motivation for doing this work

01:49:51.120 --> 01:49:56.120
all right professor Burkhardt I just want to have a general discussion with you

01:49:56.120 --> 01:50:02.120
about the findings about your work and first of all I would just like to know to what degree of certainty

01:50:02.120 --> 01:50:12.120
are you able to show or that you can say that the damage that you have observed is associated with the COVID-19 vaccines?

01:50:12.120 --> 01:50:24.120
well as I said there's not a single test or a single histological change or immunostological change

01:50:24.120 --> 01:50:33.120
it's always the combination of all the findings that we see and of course we have to take into account the medical history

01:50:33.120 --> 01:50:52.120
in these 75 cases now we have 78% where we are certain that the death process was in some way influenced by the vaccination

01:50:52.120 --> 01:51:01.120
now this does not say that all these people died of the vaccination this process is complicated

01:51:01.120 --> 01:51:12.120
in persons over 50 years of course there's always there are many organizations that can be made responsible for this

01:51:12.120 --> 01:51:23.120
in these 78% we are sure that it played a major role and that these people may have survived without vaccination

01:51:23.120 --> 01:51:34.120
for I would say at least six months nobody can say this exactly because nobody can see into the future

01:51:34.120 --> 01:51:39.120
but they would have survived for some time

01:51:39.120 --> 01:51:51.120
by the way in our first pathology conference we had only 50 cases examined at that time we came to the conclusion it is 80%

01:51:51.120 --> 01:51:57.120
and now we have 75 order of these examined and now it's 78%

01:51:57.120 --> 01:52:05.120
and this is an ongoing project it's ongoing yes these figures may change but the trend is obvious

01:52:05.120 --> 01:52:12.120
and I don't think there will be anything that will prove us wrong

01:52:12.120 --> 01:52:19.120
when you take a step back and look at all of your findings what are the conclusions that really stand out the most to you

01:52:19.120 --> 01:52:24.120
just speaking generally if you could just describe what is the most significant

01:52:24.120 --> 01:52:36.120
the key is the endothelial damage and the vascular ed and after the endothelial damage the vascular damage

01:52:36.120 --> 01:52:45.120
which may be in the heart in the brain and also in other organs but these are the organs mostly affected

01:52:46.120 --> 01:52:53.120
now some pathologists may be inclined to disbelieve your findings without independent confirmation

01:52:53.120 --> 01:52:59.120
so has there been any other pathologists or medical professionals who have been able to confirm your findings

01:52:59.120 --> 01:53:03.120
and if so can you name who those pathologists might be?

01:53:03.120 --> 01:53:08.120
I have many colleagues which confirm my findings

01:53:08.120 --> 01:53:20.120
unfortunately German pathologists don't want the name to be published but just to name some international pathologists

01:53:20.120 --> 01:53:25.120
I mean you probably have heard about Ryan Cole

01:53:25.120 --> 01:53:33.120
I have discussed with him in Vienna in Stockholm and I will meet him in Brussels next week

01:53:33.120 --> 01:53:44.120
he sees the same things and well he made this remark which I can subscribe 100% he said

01:53:44.120 --> 01:53:57.120
if anybody would see only 1% what I see in the microscope of vaccinated persons vaccination would be stopped immediately

01:53:58.120 --> 01:54:06.120
and this is 1% and I see 100% and he sees 100%

01:54:06.120 --> 01:54:14.120
it's very important to highlight that there are many pathologists out there who are seeing exactly what you are seeing here

01:54:14.120 --> 01:54:24.120
and I'm very curious as to what you think we could expect in the future if we continue to vaccinate people against COVID-19 with gene-based vaccines

01:54:24.120 --> 01:54:34.120
and with gene-based vaccines in general what health complications and trends do you see arising if we continue to go down this pathway?

01:54:34.120 --> 01:54:38.120
Well I think this pathway has to be stopped immediately

01:54:38.120 --> 01:54:45.120
Are there any other health issues that you could see arising in the long term in someone who has been vaccinated?

01:54:45.120 --> 01:55:03.120
This refers to problems that I as a person can not see but as a physician medical person of course I have the very strong suspicion that changes in the genetic construction of our cells will be changed

01:55:03.120 --> 01:55:08.120
and this is something that has never been done in history of mankind

01:55:08.120 --> 01:55:17.120
so I think it's absolutely it has to be stopped immediately

01:55:17.120 --> 01:55:28.120
and before I mean even in my I just yesterday I read a textbook that was written by my teacher of pathology

01:55:28.120 --> 01:55:42.120
and this was in the 1980s and he said well messing around with the DNA has many promising aspects but it has grave problems

01:55:42.120 --> 01:55:54.120
and everybody must be very careful and I cannot understand that physicians in all over the world just ignore this

01:55:54.120 --> 01:56:02.120
and believe some people who say well this is absolutely without any side effects

01:56:02.120 --> 01:56:06.120
You have had a long and successful career in pathology

01:56:06.120 --> 01:56:23.120
How do you think that we got to the point in which academic medical science is unable to understand and correct the serious mistakes that have been made with regard to the handling of the COVID-19 so-called crisis and also the COVID vaccines?

01:56:23.120 --> 01:56:40.120
I think it must have been in the 1980s that the system of recruiting university professorships was changed

01:56:40.120 --> 01:56:54.120
I don't know why and I don't know who if there was any intention behind this or if this just was a normal course of evolution

01:56:54.120 --> 01:57:09.120
I don't know but I'm definitely sure that the generation of my teachers of pathology and medicine and I may be one of the last of this

01:57:09.120 --> 01:57:21.120
generation that this was a different and critical generation and now we have what we call in Germany

01:57:22.120 --> 01:57:27.120
It's the same conformed person

01:57:27.120 --> 01:57:35.120
I mean everybody should have cried out when somebody says you never have to question this

01:57:35.120 --> 01:57:40.120
Questioning is the essence of any science

01:57:41.120 --> 01:57:52.120
Actually only now I have come to the conclusion that the academic world has changed in the last 20 to 30 years

01:57:52.120 --> 01:57:58.120
It's completely different from the way it was when I was at the university

01:57:58.120 --> 01:58:10.120
I would never think that my teachers of pathology like Professor Khatier which is a very known Swiss pathologist that they would have

01:58:10.120 --> 01:58:16.120
in any way gone along with all these things today

01:58:16.120 --> 01:58:35.120
and I can only have the notion that something went wrong and the selection of what was once called the experts has changed in the last years

01:58:35.120 --> 01:58:47.120
So I shook my head already very early when in the television so-called experts came out and say this thing should never be questioned

01:58:47.120 --> 01:59:00.120
I mean this is actually a person who claims to be an expert and a scientific person who says this fact should never be questioned

01:59:01.120 --> 01:59:06.120
He does not belong to the scientific world in my opinion

01:59:06.120 --> 01:59:12.120
The so-called experts I think they have themselves proven wrong

01:59:12.120 --> 01:59:24.120
I mean there are some people who said well very soon in Africa when the COVID so-called Panemia started they said

01:59:24.120 --> 01:59:37.120
well people in Africa will die by the millions and in Africa almost nobody dies of the COVID but here we had some

01:59:37.120 --> 01:59:47.120
You know and what were your thoughts about the so-called pandemic and the hysteria that was being pushed on to the public in early 2020

01:59:47.120 --> 01:59:57.120
I think a lot of viewers will be curious as to what you were thinking in those early months of 2020 when this was really being reported on extensively in the media

01:59:57.120 --> 02:00:12.120
Well I did not panic at all there were a few weeks where I thought well we should be careful

02:00:12.120 --> 02:00:20.120
But I think in March 2020 at that time I thought well maybe it's better to be careful

02:00:20.120 --> 02:00:33.120
But already six weeks after that I heard the reports and it became clear to me this is absolutely fraught

02:00:33.120 --> 02:00:44.120
There is nothing to it and I was never panicked because as a pathologist I had autopsies

02:00:44.120 --> 02:00:50.120
Every winter of let's say four or five people who died of normal flu

02:00:50.120 --> 02:01:01.120
We did some precautions but we did not run around with mouse protection or anything like that

02:01:01.120 --> 02:01:04.120
We did normal washing off the hands

02:01:04.120 --> 02:01:15.120
Now early on during the so-called COVID pandemic many pathologists were prevented from performing autopsies on patients who were suspected of having died from COVID-19

02:01:15.120 --> 02:01:19.120
Or COVID-19 the virus was listed as the official cause of death

02:01:19.120 --> 02:01:26.120
Why do you think it was that these pathologists were not allowed to perform autopsies on these bodies?

02:01:26.120 --> 02:01:31.120
Well this is actually a scandal by itself

02:01:31.120 --> 02:01:47.120
This was the second point when I became an unbeliever of all this and I doubted the truths of all things that were taught to us

02:01:47.120 --> 02:01:55.120
Because if you have an unknown disease the first thing that you do is that you order to do autopsies

02:01:55.120 --> 02:02:02.120
And this is actually a shame to all pathologists especially in Germany

02:02:02.120 --> 02:02:09.120
I mean they should have gone, what do you say, I go ape now

02:02:09.120 --> 02:02:11.120
I get it, yes

02:02:12.120 --> 02:02:21.120
And they should have gone to the government and said this is absolutely unscientific

02:02:21.120 --> 02:02:31.120
And it was corona in Hamburg, Poisson Pischel who said well this is not the way to do it

02:02:31.120 --> 02:02:39.120
And he performed these autopsies although there was a recommendation not to do this

02:02:39.120 --> 02:02:43.120
I had some very good results

02:02:43.120 --> 02:02:47.120
I understand that about a month prior to taking on this project

02:02:47.120 --> 02:02:52.120
That is examining the autopsies in patients who died shortly after vaccination

02:02:52.120 --> 02:02:56.120
As well as examining biopsies and living patients who were vaccinated

02:02:56.120 --> 02:02:59.120
You were about to head into retirement

02:02:59.120 --> 02:03:00.120
Yes

02:03:00.120 --> 02:03:05.120
And you decided to take on this work without much recognition, without pay

02:03:05.120 --> 02:03:10.120
Why are you doing this work? What motivates you to continue to do this?

02:03:14.120 --> 02:03:20.120
Well I think it's a human responsibility

02:03:20.120 --> 02:03:33.120
I mean if I have the knowledge and the education and the ability to see and make a diagnostic in the microscope

02:03:33.120 --> 02:03:43.120
And I see something that is alarming and that may be a threat to actually all humanity

02:03:43.120 --> 02:03:46.120
There's no way out

02:03:46.120 --> 02:03:51.120
Actually I did not know what I was going into

02:03:51.120 --> 02:03:54.120
Are you surprised by what you have found?

02:03:54.120 --> 02:03:57.120
Are you surprised by what you have found?

02:03:57.120 --> 02:04:03.120
Well yes definitely I never would have thought that this could be possible

02:04:03.120 --> 02:04:05.120
You never thought this could be possible?

02:04:05.120 --> 02:04:07.120
Yes

02:04:07.120 --> 02:04:09.120
Wow

02:04:09.120 --> 02:04:13.120
I want to now discuss a few points looking ahead

02:04:13.120 --> 02:04:19.120
Now the damage that you see from the COVID-19 gene-based vaccines

02:04:19.120 --> 02:04:24.120
Would you expect to see that same damage with other gene-based vaccines

02:04:24.120 --> 02:04:28.120
that are not necessarily to protect against the COVID-19 virus?

02:04:28.120 --> 02:04:31.120
That's a difficult question

02:04:31.120 --> 02:04:36.120
Apparently in the COVID-19 vaccination

02:04:36.120 --> 02:04:44.120
The main harmful agent is the spike protein

02:04:45.120 --> 02:05:00.120
But if you read or listen to what I publish or what I say I always speak of spike associated damages

02:05:00.120 --> 02:05:05.120
Because I can see the damage

02:05:05.120 --> 02:05:08.120
I can see there's spike there

02:05:08.120 --> 02:05:13.120
But I cannot say the damage is done by the spike

02:05:13.120 --> 02:05:16.120
It could be that the spike is only one bystander

02:05:16.120 --> 02:05:24.120
And that the lipid nanoparticles and other contaminations of the vaccines are responsible

02:05:24.120 --> 02:05:27.120
So this is why I take this

02:05:27.120 --> 02:05:31.120
I think scientifically correct denomination

02:05:31.120 --> 02:05:33.120
Spike associated

02:05:33.120 --> 02:05:35.120
Okay

02:05:35.120 --> 02:05:41.120
Have you been able to observe or rather have you tested for harms caused by the lipid?

02:05:41.120 --> 02:05:47.120
Well unfortunately nanoparticles as the word nano says

02:05:47.120 --> 02:05:51.120
They are not visible in the microscope

02:05:51.120 --> 02:05:53.120
They are beyond the microscope

02:05:53.120 --> 02:05:55.120
So unfortunately I cannot see them

02:05:55.120 --> 02:05:56.120
Okay

02:05:56.120 --> 02:06:01.120
And unfortunately lipids are not accessible for immuno-histochemistry

02:06:01.120 --> 02:06:04.120
Because they are not proteins but they are lipids

02:06:04.120 --> 02:06:10.120
But actually we do have some

02:06:10.120 --> 02:06:27.120
Not yet completely confirmed indications that these lipid nanoparticles may form crystalline-like formations with cholesterol

02:06:27.120 --> 02:06:36.120
And we see these very strange particles in some of the, in many organs of the disease

02:06:36.120 --> 02:06:41.120
That this is one of the things that we still have to clarify

02:06:41.120 --> 02:06:45.120
I cannot make a definite statement about this

02:06:45.120 --> 02:06:54.120
But this is something possible and I would say as soon as we do not have a clear answer to this

02:06:54.120 --> 02:07:00.120
If it's only the spike or if it's other, especially the nanoparticles

02:07:00.120 --> 02:07:10.120
Every vaccination with this modified messenger are now shortly stopped until we know more

02:07:10.120 --> 02:07:19.120
What causes some people to have severe symptoms after vaccination and others to not have any symptoms?

02:07:19.120 --> 02:07:25.120
Yes, well this refers to what you might call the vaccination paradox

02:07:25.120 --> 02:07:28.120
There are millions vaccinated and

02:07:28.120 --> 02:07:35.120
For many times it was that there are no side effects

02:07:35.120 --> 02:07:46.120
But this definitely now has been withdrawn and everybody admits that there are serious, even deadly complications

02:07:47.120 --> 02:07:53.120
Now there may be quite a number of explanations

02:07:53.120 --> 02:08:06.120
One of course, and I hope this is the case that most or many of the charges were not efficient

02:08:06.120 --> 02:08:14.120
Especially if you look at these vaccinations streets as we call them in Germany

02:08:14.120 --> 02:08:19.120
I mean, they were not cool probably and so on

02:08:19.120 --> 02:08:24.120
Then there may be some charges that are different

02:08:24.120 --> 02:08:33.120
So called, I think there's a website about the charges that are especially

02:08:33.120 --> 02:08:36.120
Where's my batch or find my batch?

02:08:36.120 --> 02:08:37.120
How bad is my batch?

02:08:37.120 --> 02:08:39.120
Yes, how bad is my batch?

02:08:39.120 --> 02:08:41.120
Exactly

02:08:41.120 --> 02:08:56.120
And then I personally think that it's a question where the injection was applied

02:08:56.120 --> 02:09:10.120
I don't know if you have followed this, but in 2016 the WHO said that for vaccine injections

02:09:10.120 --> 02:09:15.120
You don't have to aspirate to see if you are in a blood vessel

02:09:15.120 --> 02:09:25.120
And they argued at that time that children, at that time mostly children were vaccinated

02:09:25.120 --> 02:09:31.120
That the vessels in children are so small that you don't hit them with a needle

02:09:31.120 --> 02:09:36.120
And it would be impossible to do this

02:09:36.120 --> 02:09:44.120
But we measured the vessels in the day to day muscles

02:09:44.120 --> 02:09:54.120
And they easily needed of the type that you use for vaccination easily can get into these vessels

02:09:54.120 --> 02:09:59.120
So it's possible that some people, adults who have been vaccinated against COVID-19

02:09:59.120 --> 02:10:03.120
The needle actually went into the blood vessel

02:10:03.120 --> 02:10:07.120
And that is what's causing them to have a worse reaction?

02:10:07.120 --> 02:10:08.120
Well, yes

02:10:08.120 --> 02:10:14.120
And then is it also too perhaps the amount of the vaccine contents that circulate throughout the body?

02:10:14.120 --> 02:10:19.120
Would that also have an impact on how severe someone's symptoms would be post-vaccination?

02:10:19.120 --> 02:10:31.120
Well, I think it's absolutely clear that if you get what you call a bolos injection

02:10:31.120 --> 02:10:40.120
It's very dangerous, bolos, that means all the vaccine is directly into the blood

02:10:40.120 --> 02:10:48.120
I mean, this is true for every toxin and for every drug

02:10:48.120 --> 02:10:53.120
The higher the concentration, the higher the side effects

02:10:53.120 --> 02:11:01.120
This may be an explanation and in February 2022

02:11:01.120 --> 02:11:06.120
This recommendation by the WHO was withdrawn

02:11:06.120 --> 02:11:16.120
And they said only for the messenger and our vaccinations we recommend aspiration

02:11:16.120 --> 02:11:23.120
And I mean, this is an admission that this is a different vaccination than all the other vaccinations

02:11:23.120 --> 02:11:27.120
Why would they make that recommendation? What was the justification for that?

02:11:27.120 --> 02:11:35.120
I personally think they changed their recommendation because in September we had our first

02:11:35.120 --> 02:11:39.120
pathology conference and I showed the picture as well

02:11:39.120 --> 02:11:47.120
I showed that the needle could be easily put into the vessel of the deltaic muscle

02:11:47.120 --> 02:11:55.120
But they referred to a publication from a Japanese authors in the vessel

02:11:55.120 --> 02:11:58.120
And the other group in the muscle

02:11:58.120 --> 02:12:10.120
And those that were directly injected into the vessels had meocarditis in most cases and died

02:12:10.120 --> 02:12:18.120
And this was published in July 2021 in February 2022

02:12:18.120 --> 02:12:25.120
They withdrew their recommendation and said you must make aspiration

02:12:25.120 --> 02:12:32.120
But actually, this was only a small notice in the German papers

02:12:32.120 --> 02:12:38.120
I would be interested how many doctors that do vaccinations ever took notice of this

02:12:38.120 --> 02:12:46.120
This was just a tiger blood you say in German, it's just a cover-up

02:12:46.120 --> 02:12:50.120
Of course, many people are hearing this right now and they are going to be wondering why

02:12:50.120 --> 02:13:00.120
Why continue to keep these gene-based COVID-19 vaccines on the market if they are causing this significant amount of harm

02:13:00.120 --> 02:13:02.120
What do you think that is?

02:13:02.120 --> 02:13:12.120
That's a difficult question which just have to think about it

02:13:12.120 --> 02:13:13.120
Sure

02:13:13.120 --> 02:13:31.120
But I think the connection of political, scientific and ideological aspects are responsible

02:13:31.120 --> 02:13:50.120
And personally, I cannot understand how anybody who ever recommended this MR&R vaccination can sleep soundly

02:13:50.120 --> 02:13:59.120
Now, I would not be able to do this and I can only consider that they are afraid

02:13:59.120 --> 02:14:09.120
And they do not have the courage to come out and say, well, I was wrong

02:14:09.120 --> 02:14:13.120
Well, now I would like to give you an opportunity to address your colleagues

02:14:13.120 --> 02:14:19.120
Fellow pathologists, fellow medical professionals, what do you have to say to them?

02:14:19.120 --> 02:14:21.120
Let me think

02:14:21.120 --> 02:14:22.120
Okay

02:14:34.120 --> 02:14:46.120
Well, I think one of the things is always a question what so-called experts tell you

02:14:46.120 --> 02:15:00.120
Because actually before this vaccination campaign, the expert for a scientific person I have never heard

02:15:00.120 --> 02:15:05.120
I don't know how you define an expert

02:15:05.120 --> 02:15:15.120
And now that the so-called experts have been proven wrong in so many cases

02:15:15.120 --> 02:15:23.120
And even the general public may not believe in experts

02:15:23.120 --> 02:15:31.120
Now they have a new term and they call it top scientific

02:15:31.120 --> 02:15:36.120
So it's a top virologist, top hessologist

02:15:36.120 --> 02:15:42.120
And I think this is not in the interest of the people you don't need top scientists

02:15:42.120 --> 02:15:50.120
You need soundly thinking people with experience with patients

02:15:50.120 --> 02:15:56.120
Doctors that have experienced in their everyday life

02:15:56.120 --> 02:16:02.120
There were people dying by the flu for many years, nobody ever made a pandemic out of it

02:16:02.120 --> 02:16:06.120
And locked people away because of that

02:16:06.120 --> 02:16:14.120
I mean, I can very well remember that there was some kind of a panic in rottling in the 1990s

02:16:14.120 --> 02:16:24.120
Because there was a 7-year-old girl dying and an 8-year-old boy dying of the flu

02:16:24.120 --> 02:16:28.120
And actually at that time I did the autopsy

02:16:28.120 --> 02:16:36.120
And I tried to give the specimens to be examined by a virologist

02:16:36.120 --> 02:16:42.120
And nobody wanted to pay for it, actually at that time I had to pay for it myself

02:16:42.120 --> 02:16:47.120
So something went wrong

02:16:48.120 --> 02:16:53.120
Well, you know what that shows me? That shows me that throughout your career

02:16:53.120 --> 02:16:56.120
You have been making an effort to do what is right

02:16:56.120 --> 02:16:58.120
And that's exactly what you're doing right now

02:16:58.120 --> 02:17:02.120
Even if it's difficult, even if you face challenges, even if there's no pay

02:17:02.120 --> 02:17:05.120
You are doing what is right

02:17:05.120 --> 02:17:09.120
Well, I think this is the obligation if you are a doctor

02:17:09.120 --> 02:17:15.120
And as I said, we don't need any top experts that influence the politics

02:17:15.120 --> 02:17:22.120
And we need soundly thinking people with everyday experience with patients

02:17:22.120 --> 02:17:28.120
It doesn't matter if they have experience with living persons or with dead persons as I have

02:17:28.120 --> 02:17:36.120
But I mean, I have a sound, I think I have a sound judgement about what is happening

02:17:36.120 --> 02:17:45.120
And the idea that there are some supernatural top whatever experts

02:17:45.120 --> 02:17:57.120
This is just, I cannot believe that people fall into this deception

02:17:57.120 --> 02:18:03.120
I would also like to give you the opportunity to address, once again, fellow pathologists

02:18:03.120 --> 02:18:06.120
And others who could help contribute to your work

02:18:06.120 --> 02:18:12.120
Perhaps help contribute with writing summaries and analysis of the work that you are providing

02:18:12.120 --> 02:18:15.120
Do you have any message to others in your field?

02:18:15.120 --> 02:18:25.120
In our pathology conferences, as we call them, which always reports of the progress that we made

02:18:25.120 --> 02:18:33.120
We have now defined many clear lesions

02:18:33.120 --> 02:18:42.120
And we put some recommendations for procedure in autopsy

02:18:42.120 --> 02:18:49.120
And I would just suggest and ask that my colleagues follow these recommendations

02:18:49.120 --> 02:18:57.120
I mean, this is not a question of how to do the work but how to be responsible for the work that you do

02:18:57.120 --> 02:19:03.120
What would you recommend that fellow pathologists watch out for?

02:19:03.120 --> 02:19:12.120
Well, we definitely have some main and very convincing

02:19:12.120 --> 02:19:23.120
Tissulations and these are myocarditis, perimyocarditis, vascular damage, endothelial damage

02:19:23.120 --> 02:19:33.120
And bleeding into vessel walls and in the brain, which may lead to death

02:19:33.120 --> 02:19:45.120
And in any case, if an autopsy is done, the large vessels and especially the outer should be histologically examined

02:19:45.120 --> 02:20:03.120
And generally, an autopsy for a supposedly new disease can never be done without a histological examination of all organs

02:20:03.120 --> 02:20:14.120
I mean, even if you think this is a clear-cut case of a heart infection or whatever of a brain hemorrhage

02:20:14.120 --> 02:20:25.120
You should examine the other organs, the genital organs, in some cases, not even the spleen was examined

02:20:25.120 --> 02:20:42.120
Autopsy is not only a service to the doctors who were responsible for this patient

02:20:42.120 --> 02:20:50.120
But it is a public service for our health system

02:20:50.120 --> 02:21:04.120
What would be your final message here today? Taking a look back at all of your work? What is a really important point that you want to leave the viewers with?

02:21:04.120 --> 02:21:13.120
Just let me think a little bit

02:21:13.120 --> 02:21:32.120
Well, actually, the main point is already set by my colleague Ryan Cole from the United States, I cited him and he said, well, if you only see 1% of what I have seen

02:21:32.120 --> 02:21:48.120
And please, all my colleagues look, and if you see this 1%, you must stand up and say, this vaccination campaign has to be stopped immediately

02:21:48.120 --> 02:22:02.120
And there have to be implemented strict regulation on any messing around with our genetic material

02:22:02.120 --> 02:22:11.120
What keeps you going? What motivates you to do this work under difficult circumstances?

02:22:11.120 --> 02:22:17.120
Well, first of all, of course, I think everybody has responsibility

02:22:17.120 --> 02:22:38.120
Everybody today is calling for solidarity of our society and I think solidarity demands of you to step forward and come out when you see something is going wrong

02:22:38.120 --> 02:22:55.120
I mean, if I see a car heading for a child on the street, I have to do something I cannot just turn my back and say, well, bad luck

02:22:56.120 --> 02:23:01.120
All right, Professor Dr. Arnaburkhart, thank you

02:23:01.120 --> 02:23:05.120
Thank you

02:23:06.120 --> 02:23:31.120
Professor Birkhart has shown very likely or with certainty the role of the COVID vaccine in causing death or disease in the patients that he examined

02:23:31.120 --> 02:23:41.120
The final years of his life to helping bereaved families and living patients who were seeking answers and not receiving them anywhere else

02:23:41.120 --> 02:23:56.120
He inspired deep affection, respect, and admiration from the many doctors, scientists, and medical professionals who worked with him to stop the harm and death that was and is underway

02:23:56.120 --> 02:24:03.120
He is now up to other pathologists to follow his leadership and bring the full truth to light

02:24:03.120 --> 02:24:09.120
It is on the rest of us to support them in the endeavor

02:24:09.120 --> 02:24:20.120
Professor Arnaburkhart demanded high moral and professional standards in the medical profession and he himself set the example

02:24:26.120 --> 02:24:51.120
For more information, visit our website at www.beadaholique.com