Are possible Haskell Typeclasses in Java?

TypeClasses_Exampls.java

//
// Empty Typeclass
//
interface Empty<A> {

	A empty();

	static Empty<Integer> emptyInt() {
		return () -> 0;
	}

	static Empty<String> emptyString() {
		return () -> "";
	}
}


//
// Show Typeclass
//
public interface Show<A> {
	String show(A a);

	static Show<Stringable> stringableShow() {
		return a -> "[stringable]"+a.toString();
	}

	static Show<Object> objectShow() {
		return a -> "[base]"+String.valueOf(a);
	}
	
	static Show<Integer> integerShow() {
		return a -> "[number]"+String.valueOf(a);
	}
}

//
// Monoid Typeclass
//
public interface Monoid<A> extends Empty<A> {
		
		A combine(A x, A y);
		
		static Monoid<Integer> intMonoid()
		{
			return new Monoid<Integer>() {

				@Override
				public Integer empty() {
					return emptyInt().empty();
				}

				@Override
				public Integer combine(Integer x, Integer y) {
					return x+y;
				}
			};
		}
		
		static Monoid<String> stringMonoid()
		{
			return new Monoid<String>() {

				@Override
				public String empty() {
					return emptyString().empty();
				}

				@Override
				public String combine(String x, String y) {
					return x+y;
				}
			};
		}
		
		static Monoid<String> csvMonoid()
		{
			return new Monoid<String>() {

				@Override
				public String empty() {
					return emptyString().empty();
				}

				@Override
				public String combine(String x, String y) {
					return x+";;"+y;
				}
			};
		}
}

//
// Commodity Interface
//
public interface Stringable {
	String toString();
}

//
// Entry-Point to apply Typeclass to related Instances
//
public interface Operations {
  
	static <A> String show(A instance, Show<A> typeclass) {
		return typeclass.show(instance);
	}
  
	static <T> T combineAll(List<T> list, Monoid<T> monoid) {
		return list.stream().reduce(monoid.empty(), monoid::combine);
	}
}


//
// Examples: The composition is possible as "functions"
//           that are defined by Operations Interface
//           Can we find another way of composition...
//           Theoretically a monadic approach is possible 
//           but it needs to be verified...
//
public class Usage implements Operations {

	static class TestBean implements Stringable {
	}

	static List<Integer> intList() {
		var intList = new ArrayList<Integer>();
		intList.add(8);
		intList.add(10);
		intList.add(5);
		return intList;
	}

	static List<String> csvList() {
		var csvList = new ArrayList<String>();
		csvList.add("pippo");
		csvList.add("pluto");
		csvList.add("paperino");
		return csvList;
	}

	static Consumer<String> console()
  { return System.out::println; }
    
	
	public static void main(String[] args) {
    
		var testBean = new TestBean();
		Consumer<String> console = console();

		
		//
		//  Using Show Type Class
		//
		console.accept(show(testBean, objectShow()));
		console.accept(show(testBean, stringableShow()));
		console.accept(show(testBean, TestBean::toString));


		//
		//  Using Monoid Type Class
		//
		console.accept("result: " + combineAll(new ArrayList<>(), intMonoid()));
		console.accept("result: " + combineAll(intList(), intMonoid()));
		console.accept("result: " + combineAll(csvList(), csvMonoid()));
		
		//
    // A complex composition
    //
		console.accept(show(combineAll(intList(), intMonoid()), integerShow()));
	}
}