Get text before "author" or "researcher" and after "author is" or "authors are"

_words before and after.R

library(tidyverse)

PATH = "peerj_reviews_txt/"
ignored_words = c("the", "dear", "original")
filenames = dir(path = PATH, pattern="*.txt", recursive = TRUE)



preceeding_words = sapply(filenames, function(f) {
  words = read_file(paste0(PATH, f)) %>%
    str_split_fixed(fixed("Summary"), n = 2) %>%
    `[`(,2) %>%
    str_extract_all( "(?<=\\s)\\w+?(?=\\s(authors?[^']|researchers?[^']))" ) %>%
    unlist()
  words[! (str_to_lower(words) %in% ignored_words)] %>%
    paste0(f, ": ", .) %>% 
    paste(collapse = "\n")
})

preceeding_words %>% paste(collapse = "\n") %>% 
  write_lines(paste0(PATH, "../author_is authors_are.txt"))



following_words = sapply(filenames, function(f) {
  words = read_file(paste0(PATH, f)) %>% 
    str_split_fixed(fixed("Summary"), n = 2) %>% 
    `[`(,2) %>% 
    str_to_lower() %>% 
    str_extract_all( "(author is|authors are|they are)([, ]+[\\w-]+)+" ) %>% 
    unlist()
  words[! (str_to_lower(words) %in% ignored_words)] %>% 
    paste0(f, ": ", .) %>% 
    paste(collapse = "\n")
})

following_words %>% paste(collapse = "\n") %>% 
  write_lines(paste0(PATH, "../following.txt"))

author_is authors_are.txt

peerj_cs_reviews_txt/1.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/10.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/100.txt: describing a methodology for teaching graduate students
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/101.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/102.txt: encouraged to rewrite the paper in a more mathematically formal way since the work is interesting
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/103.txt: trying to follow
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/104.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/105.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/106.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/107.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/108.txt: aware of this, since these scripting capabilities made possible their own development using eeglab as a base, as well as the many contribution received as eeglab
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/109.txt: substantiated and insightful
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/11.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/110.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/111.txt: measuring are differences in how the two genders perform on various activities wrt pull request handling, including their under
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/112.txt: comparing with latex or this example is the instruction in case of you want to transform md to latex
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/113.txt: not considering the balanced case
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/114.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/115.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/116.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/117.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/118.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/119.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/12.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/120.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/121.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/122.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/123.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/124.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/125.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/126.txt: commended for reporting in a largely clear and unambiguous manner, particularly across languages
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/126.txt: commended for contributing a novel technique for modelling market prices based on social media data, as well as eliciting interesting empirical results to inform public policy and future research
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/127.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/128.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/129.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/13.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/130.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/131.txt: somewhat negative about the current application in se education
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/132.txt: encouraged to improve the language and presentation of their results to remove any ambiguity about the claims they make and evidence that supports such claims
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/132.txt: invited to review those observations and incorporate them, according to their judgement, in a resubmitted version of the manuscript
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/133.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/134.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/135.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/136.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/137.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/138.txt: commended this work
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/138.txt: recommended to state the region
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/139.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/14.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/140.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/141.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/142.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/143.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/144.txt: active in the national data services consortium, i was disappointed that nds is not mentioned, e
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/145.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/146.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/147.txt: the first one to discover a result and puts a time stamp on it
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/148.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/149.txt: trying to say here
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/15.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/150.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/151.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/152.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/153.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/154.txt: not clear and they require a better explanation
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/155.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/156.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/157.txt: in agreement that they are relevant and useful
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/158.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/159.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/16.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/160.txt: using a package for the dae solve
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/161.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/162.txt: in agreement that they are relevant and useful
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/163.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/164.txt: in agreement that they are relevant and useful
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/165.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/166.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/167.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/168.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/169.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/17.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/170.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/171.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/172.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/173.txt: generally careful in delineating conclusions based on evidence and speculation
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/173.txt: exploring, e
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/174.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/175.txt: trying to
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/176.txt: invited to perform a last careful proofread to fix typing errors that may still be present in the manuscript to ensure the highest quality manuscript for peerj cs
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/177.txt: in full agreement that they are relevant and useful
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/178.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/179.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/18.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/180.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/181.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/182.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/183.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/184.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/185.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/186.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/187.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/188.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/189.txt: just selling themselves short by not maximizing the use of the network measures and terminology
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/189.txt: not doing their work justice, by stuffing them into one paper
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/19.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/190.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/191.txt: cutting-edge research on many machine learning and related topics nowadays and the authors explore their architecture for aspect extraction within the context of sentiment analysis
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/192.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/193.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/194.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/195.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/196.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/197.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/198.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/199.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/2.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/20.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/200.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/201.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/202.txt: not only interested in the model, but also in the possibilities for parallel implementations, and their benefits
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/203.txt: in agreement that they are relevant and useful
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/204.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/205.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/206.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/207.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/208.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/209.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/21.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/210.txt: using data collected from a can of an suv
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/210.txt: tackling
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/211.txt: trying to address in the paper
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/212.txt: really addressing current needs, not of integrating two different apps, but rather the integration of new modules of skill sets into the apps
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/212.txt: examining
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/212.txt: exploring
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/212.txt: introducing in this manuscript
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/213.txt: in agreement that they are relevant and useful
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/213.txt: not clear on the ethical guidelines that they follow
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/214.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/215.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/216.txt: in agreement that they are relevant and useful
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/217.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/218.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/219.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/22.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/220.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/221.txt: professionals and this shows
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/222.txt: suggested to make revisions accordingly
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/223.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/224.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/225.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/23.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/24.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/25.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/26.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/27.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/28.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/29.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/3.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/30.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/31.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/32.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/33.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/34.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/35.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/36.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/37.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/38.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/39.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/4.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/40.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/41.txt: the core
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/41.txt: working with a large dataset and hence, these should be minimized
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/41.txt: not necessarily the most productive and more cited one
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/42.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/43.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/44.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/45.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/46.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/47.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/48.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/49.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/5.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/50.txt: aware of this project, and am happy to leave this to their discretion
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/51.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/52.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/53.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/54.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/55.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/56.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/57.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/58.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/59.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/6.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/60.txt: appropriately guarded and circumspect in their interpretation of the frontal delta and theta components
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/61.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/62.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/63.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/64.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/65.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/66.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/67.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/68.txt: not marked
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/69.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/7.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/70.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/71.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/72.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/73.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/74.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/75.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/76.txt: then using in the experimental validation
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/77.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/78.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/79.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/8.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/80.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/81.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/82.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/83.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/84.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/85.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/86.txt: affiliated with github, i assume this aspect was left out intentionally, but why
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/87.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/88.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/89.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/9.txt: having trouble doing this, i urge them to contact me for assistance
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/90.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/91.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/92.txt: commended on embarking the 2 studies
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/93.txt: aware of ecthr practice that i am unaware of, this seems dangerously naive
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/94.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/95.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/96.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/97.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/98.txt: 
peerj_cs_reviews_txt/99.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/10.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/100.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1000.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1001.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1002.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1003.txt: missing in the reference list
peerj_reviews_txt/1004.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1005.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1006.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1007.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1008.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1009.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/101.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1010.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1011.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1012.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1013.txt: interested primarily in the mean growth rate i think this could be obtained analytically from the mean matrix
peerj_reviews_txt/1014.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1015.txt: referring to the lack of more systematic or multi-drug studies of selective publication that should be made more explicit
peerj_reviews_txt/1015.txt: able to address the above concerns, i believe it should be accepted for publication
peerj_reviews_txt/1015.txt: able to explain and analyse the legal rights issues in greater depth, i suggest that they remove those references from the paper
peerj_reviews_txt/1016.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1017.txt: sure they are really gii rts
peerj_reviews_txt/1018.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1019.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/102.txt: recommended to directly refer to the comparison of the treatments, not only to the within-group effects
peerj_reviews_txt/102.txt: recommended to add these data in the text
peerj_reviews_txt/102.txt: recommended to discuss this result more in detail as well
peerj_reviews_txt/1020.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1021.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1022.txt: encouraged to address the reviewers concern and submit a revised version along with a point to point response
peerj_reviews_txt/1023.txt: fortunately aware of this and have attempted to propose potential reasons for this in the discussion
peerj_reviews_txt/1024.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1025.txt: advised to take care of the comments suggested by the reviewers in the manuscript
peerj_reviews_txt/1026.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1027.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1028.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1029.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/103.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1030.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1031.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1032.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1033.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1034.txt: trying to say
peerj_reviews_txt/1035.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1036.txt: unaware that that these tarsal elements, attributed to caenopithecus, were originally reported in dagosto
peerj_reviews_txt/1036.txt: welcome to disagree with dagosto in terms of phyletic closeness with afradapis, a taxon unknown in 1986, but the original work belongs to her
peerj_reviews_txt/1037.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1038.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1039.txt: talking about groups of encapsulated cells
peerj_reviews_txt/104.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1040.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1041.txt: simply predicting the solvent exposure of these fragments
peerj_reviews_txt/1042.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1043.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1044.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1045.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1046.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1047.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1048.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1049.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/105.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1050.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1051.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1052.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1053.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1054.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1055.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1056.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1057.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1058.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1059.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/106.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1060.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1061.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1062.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1063.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1064.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1065.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1066.txt: particularly interested in three compounds, azadirachtin a, nimbin and salanin
peerj_reviews_txt/1066.txt: interested in the genome work, they should perform genome comparison and not report genome sequence, which is already been done
peerj_reviews_txt/1066.txt: interested in the genome work, they should perform genome comparison with the new version of the tool but with reads from published assembly and then compare genomes
peerj_reviews_txt/1067.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1068.txt: critically taking their results, but i think that concernig metabolic syndrome
peerj_reviews_txt/1069.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/107.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1070.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1071.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1072.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1073.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1074.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1075.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1076.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1077.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1078.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1079.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/108.txt: relying on previous publications on related experiments
peerj_reviews_txt/1080.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1081.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1082.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1083.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1084.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1085.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1086.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1087.txt: presenting an artifact of doing a different taxonomic research project all together
peerj_reviews_txt/1088.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1089.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/109.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1090.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1091.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1092.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1093.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1094.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1095.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1096.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1097.txt: able to tackle these issues readily
peerj_reviews_txt/1098.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1099.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/11.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/110.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1100.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1101.txt: concerned that they can
peerj_reviews_txt/1102.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1103.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1104.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1105.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1106.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1107.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1108.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1109.txt: incorrect in referring to n
peerj_reviews_txt/111.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1110.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1111.txt: on to something here
peerj_reviews_txt/1112.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1113.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1114.txt: probably not a statistician
peerj_reviews_txt/1114.txt: right to emphasise in the discussion that this is probably not due to the fact that this analysis is bayesian but the others are frequentist
peerj_reviews_txt/1115.txt: correct that various physiological signal contributions
peerj_reviews_txt/1116.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1117.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1118.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1119.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/112.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1120.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1121.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1122.txt: referring to the same thing or not and indeed if they are using both interchangeably with the microhabitat variables that they examined in the paper
peerj_reviews_txt/1123.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1124.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1125.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1126.txt: suggested to have more introduction to show why they choose this strain for study
peerj_reviews_txt/1126.txt: suggested to have more description and discussion in this part
peerj_reviews_txt/1127.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1128.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1129.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/113.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1130.txt: encouraged to consult zoologic medicine texts and journal articles to develop their differential diagnoses more appropriately in this section
peerj_reviews_txt/1130.txt: encouraged to develop differential diagnoses based on relevant zoologic or veterinary literature
peerj_reviews_txt/1131.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1132.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1133.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1134.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1135.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1136.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1137.txt: to be commended for including their r code
peerj_reviews_txt/1137.txt: in the attached pdf
peerj_reviews_txt/1138.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1139.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/114.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1140.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1141.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1142.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1143.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1144.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1145.txt: advised to address comments raised by reviewers including the important concern on ethical approval
peerj_reviews_txt/1145.txt: advice the make correction to the conclusion section which does not reflect the main findings of the research
peerj_reviews_txt/1146.txt: advised to revise to meet their minor concerns
peerj_reviews_txt/1147.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1148.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1149.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/115.txt: attempting to link changes in expression of key genes involved in a specialised metabolism, rather than trying to analyse everything
peerj_reviews_txt/1150.txt: rather speculative
peerj_reviews_txt/1151.txt: to be congratulated on their interesting and informative work that explores an overlooked area of communication
peerj_reviews_txt/1152.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1153.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1154.txt: better to focus on the main issue of the manuscript rather than describing or commenting on how the identities of the authors can be ascertained
peerj_reviews_txt/1154.txt: better to focus on the main issue of the manuscript rather than describing or commenting on how the identities of the authors can be ascertained
peerj_reviews_txt/1155.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1156.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1157.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1158.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1159.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/116.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1160.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1161.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1162.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1163.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1164.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1165.txt: suggesting both t and r can be true simultaneously
peerj_reviews_txt/1166.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1167.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1168.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1169.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/117.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1170.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1171.txt: hoping for
peerj_reviews_txt/1172.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1173.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1174.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1175.txt: to be commended for building a novel apparatus to measure the locomotion, although more expensive and more sensitive gait machines are available on the market
peerj_reviews_txt/1176.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1177.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1178.txt: conveying two different informations
peerj_reviews_txt/1178.txt: saying that the user can classify his
peerj_reviews_txt/1179.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/118.txt: able to apply these available methods to demonstrate common secondary structural elements among mrna subsets
peerj_reviews_txt/1180.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1181.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1182.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1183.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1184.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1185.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1186.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1187.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1188.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1189.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/119.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1190.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1191.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1192.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1193.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1194.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1195.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1196.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1197.txt: assuming that one kind of variation corresponds to the other, but cannot establish this
peerj_reviews_txt/1198.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1199.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/12.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/120.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1200.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1201.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1202.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1203.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1204.txt: referring to frogs as predators or frogs as prey
peerj_reviews_txt/1204.txt: looking at whether a given species was eaten by other amphibians, but i think it
peerj_reviews_txt/1205.txt: trying to achieve
peerj_reviews_txt/1205.txt: likely correct that the accuracy of the units will be higher when recording tracklogs than the 95
peerj_reviews_txt/1206.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1207.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1208.txt: to be congratulated on the very thorough method for establishing content validity in terms of both language and cultural relevance
peerj_reviews_txt/1209.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/121.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1210.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1211.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1212.txt: extending their findings to the ecosystem level
peerj_reviews_txt/1213.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1214.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1215.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1216.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1217.txt: advised to revise the captions, esp
peerj_reviews_txt/1217.txt: advised to revise the terminology
peerj_reviews_txt/1218.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1219.txt: looking at wing morphology
peerj_reviews_txt/122.txt: encouraged to improve the mechanism
peerj_reviews_txt/1220.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1221.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1222.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1223.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1224.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1225.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1226.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1227.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1228.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1229.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/123.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1230.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1231.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1232.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1233.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1234.txt: exploring the issue of preying of padauginella langeniformis on euhypha sp
peerj_reviews_txt/1235.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1236.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1237.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1238.txt: referring to stock within the sea-cages
peerj_reviews_txt/1239.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/124.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1240.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1241.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1242.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1243.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1244.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1245.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1246.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1247.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1248.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1249.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/125.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1250.txt: advised to address their concerns especially with regards to objectives and data analyses
peerj_reviews_txt/1251.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1252.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1253.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1254.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1255.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1256.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1257.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1258.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1259.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/126.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1260.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1261.txt: aware, the term
peerj_reviews_txt/1262.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1263.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1264.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1265.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1266.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1267.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1268.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1269.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/127.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1270.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1271.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1272.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1273.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1274.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1275.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1276.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1277.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1278.txt: aware that questionnaire validation is a complex multi-step process
peerj_reviews_txt/1279.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/128.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1280.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1281.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1282.txt: welcome to know my identity
peerj_reviews_txt/1283.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1284.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1285.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1286.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1287.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1288.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1289.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/129.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1290.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1291.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1292.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1293.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1294.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1295.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1296.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1297.txt: aware of this effect
peerj_reviews_txt/1297.txt: advised to check carefully their use of references
peerj_reviews_txt/1298.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1299.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/13.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/130.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1300.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1301.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1302.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1303.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1304.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1305.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1306.txt: thanked for addressing all the minor wording points raised in the last round of reviews in a timely manner, and for a thorough justification of their approach to calculating volume measures
peerj_reviews_txt/1306.txt: consistent with the results and figures
peerj_reviews_txt/1307.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1308.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1309.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/131.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1310.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1311.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1312.txt: discussing the cultural difference of social anxiety, the following paper must be cited
peerj_reviews_txt/1313.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1314.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1315.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1316.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1317.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1318.txt: right about the ths breed as being distinct, it should be obvious at k2
peerj_reviews_txt/1319.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/132.txt: advised to submitted a revision ms together with a detailed response to the comments made by each reviewer
peerj_reviews_txt/1320.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1321.txt: also advised to reduce number of figures and tables
peerj_reviews_txt/1322.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1323.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1324.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1325.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1326.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1327.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1328.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1329.txt: reasoning from a false premise, that correlations seen in vivo should also be evident in vitro
peerj_reviews_txt/1329.txt: reasoning from a false premise, that correlations seen in vivo should also be evident in vitro
peerj_reviews_txt/1329.txt: reasoning from a false premise, that correlations seen in vivo should also be evident in vitro
peerj_reviews_txt/1329.txt: reasoning from a false premise, that correlations seen in vivo should also be evident in vitro
peerj_reviews_txt/133.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1330.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1331.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1332.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1333.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1334.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1335.txt: well defined
peerj_reviews_txt/1335.txt: well defined
peerj_reviews_txt/1336.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1337.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1338.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1339.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/134.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1340.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1341.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1342.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1343.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1344.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1345.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1346.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1347.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1348.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1349.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/135.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1350.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1351.txt: advised to include another vesicle preparation in their experiments by using cytochalasin and
peerj_reviews_txt/1352.txt: investigating the effect of migration
peerj_reviews_txt/1353.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1354.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1355.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1356.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1357.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1358.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1359.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/136.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1360.txt: right when considering the importance of the biological effect size when calling degs
peerj_reviews_txt/1361.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1362.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1363.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1364.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1365.txt: requested to perform the experiments using actual 1rm values rather than predictive 1rm values
peerj_reviews_txt/1365.txt: requested in substantiate differences in the type of instability these would create in the discussion
peerj_reviews_txt/1366.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1367.txt: silent on the constituents of the culture medium
peerj_reviews_txt/1368.txt: relevant, but i think there figures to be added if all the studies presented in this first version remain in the article
peerj_reviews_txt/1369.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/137.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1370.txt: interested to use the backward stepwise selection approach, include all variables that meet a pre-specified p-value cut-off
peerj_reviews_txt/1371.txt: stating
peerj_reviews_txt/1372.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1373.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1374.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1375.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1376.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1377.txt: summing p extracted during the fractionation process without incorporating the final step
peerj_reviews_txt/1377.txt: likely underestimating total soil p at their research sites for two reasons
peerj_reviews_txt/1377.txt: indeed underestimating the total soil p pool, this would greatly alter their findings re
peerj_reviews_txt/1378.txt: recommended to check for accuracy of used figures at their end
peerj_reviews_txt/1379.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/138.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1380.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1381.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1382.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1383.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1384.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1385.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1386.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1387.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1388.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1389.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/139.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1390.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1391.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1392.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1393.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1394.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1395.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1396.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1397.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1398.txt: discussing the potential effect of dysbiosis in the development of pprom and preterm labor and this seems to be the strong subject on which they designed and developed their study
peerj_reviews_txt/1399.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/14.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/140.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1400.txt: requested to give an outline of different spp
peerj_reviews_txt/1400.txt: pointing on certain difference in the fatty acid profile compared to related genera
peerj_reviews_txt/1401.txt: trying to write multiple manuscripts in one, and i think that readers not familiar with most of the software used will be unable to extract much from the text
peerj_reviews_txt/1402.txt: to be commended for being totally up-front in disclaiming any proof of causation and in specifically noting potentially confounding variables
peerj_reviews_txt/1403.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1404.txt: able to validate their findings in this setting, however, and would provide benefit to the patients, doctors, and health system
peerj_reviews_txt/1405.txt: sometimes having hard times to promote their
peerj_reviews_txt/1405.txt: well aware of the fact that resisting prevailing opinion usually requires much more effort than following it
peerj_reviews_txt/1406.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1407.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1408.txt: doing is not a diagnosis in the nomenclatural sense
peerj_reviews_txt/1409.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/141.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1410.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1411.txt: unable to differentiate between herbivores and other agents of selection using their particular methods, they must account for this
peerj_reviews_txt/1411.txt: basing most of their analyses on their fst values, if these values are estimated poorly, it could have a large impact on their conclusions
peerj_reviews_txt/1411.txt: under-estimating the fst values, it will make it more likely that they find erroneous differences between pst and fst for their traits
peerj_reviews_txt/1412.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1413.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1414.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1415.txt: analyzing proportional data
peerj_reviews_txt/1415.txt: sure that the adults collected developed in the lake where they were collected
peerj_reviews_txt/1415.txt: trying to test here
peerj_reviews_txt/1416.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1417.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1418.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1419.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/142.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1420.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1421.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1422.txt: convincingly supported by the data and the analyses conducted
peerj_reviews_txt/1423.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1424.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1425.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1426.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1427.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1428.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1429.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/143.txt: urged to take advantage of professional editing services
peerj_reviews_txt/1430.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1431.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1432.txt: primarily interested in estimating the live body mass of the dodo
peerj_reviews_txt/1432.txt: willing to add such a regression and use it to calculate dodo mass, i can heartily recommend publication after another round of reviews
peerj_reviews_txt/1433.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1434.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1435.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1436.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1437.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1438.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1439.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/144.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1440.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1441.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1442.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1443.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1444.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1445.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1446.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1447.txt: right about this, at least with respect to chukars in the usa
peerj_reviews_txt/1448.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1449.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/145.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1450.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1451.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1452.txt: interested in this review, i will be happy to send them a copy of the manuscript
peerj_reviews_txt/1453.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1454.txt: dealing with two different cryptic species when comparing individuals from two different populations
peerj_reviews_txt/1455.txt: over-stating what they have done
peerj_reviews_txt/1456.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1457.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1458.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1459.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/146.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1460.txt: very clear on this throughout the test
peerj_reviews_txt/1461.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1462.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1463.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1464.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1465.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1466.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1467.txt: not mentioned in the text
peerj_reviews_txt/1468.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1469.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/147.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1470.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1471.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1472.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1473.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1474.txt: trying to do, i have some concerns about it that should be addressed before it is suitable for publication
peerj_reviews_txt/1475.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1476.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1477.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1478.txt: trying to understand the functional significance of sperm variation
peerj_reviews_txt/1478.txt: considerably more cautious in the interpretation of the results given that sperm measures were assessed at variable time points post-mortem
peerj_reviews_txt/1479.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/148.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1480.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1481.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1482.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1483.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1484.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1485.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1486.txt: suggested to address minor concerns raised by reviewers 1 and 3
peerj_reviews_txt/1486.txt: fully supported by the experimental data
peerj_reviews_txt/1487.txt: trying to emphasize here
peerj_reviews_txt/1488.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1489.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/149.txt: right calling them unimportant at the end of their manuscript
peerj_reviews_txt/1490.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1491.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1492.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1493.txt: to be commended for a much more thorough interpretation and reporting of findings
peerj_reviews_txt/1494.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1495.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1496.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1497.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1498.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1499.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/15.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/150.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1500.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1501.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1502.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1503.txt: also the group who supported most of the ohi exercises reviewed, the reference list is mainly self-citing
peerj_reviews_txt/1504.txt: clear in the introduction, i noticed that the sentence included in lines 74-77 is missing one verb
peerj_reviews_txt/1505.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1506.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1507.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1508.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1509.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/151.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1510.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1511.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1512.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1513.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1514.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1515.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1516.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1517.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1518.txt: taking about nr4a receptors in liver fibrosis, this study becomes the center of their contrasting results and should be introduced and discussed extensively
peerj_reviews_txt/1519.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/152.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1520.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1521.txt: focusing on the video selected for fig 4, rather than the ones the show ateles actually walking overground over multiple strides
peerj_reviews_txt/1521.txt: responsible for making materials, code, raw data and associated protocols relevant to the submission available without delay
peerj_reviews_txt/1521.txt: likely correct on this point, and i like the use of a platyrrhine analogy to test the hypothesis that these morphologies are indeed associated with lordosis in a lineage outside of hominoids
peerj_reviews_txt/1521.txt: arguing
peerj_reviews_txt/1522.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1523.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1524.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1525.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1526.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1527.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1528.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1529.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/153.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1530.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1531.txt: calling
peerj_reviews_txt/1531.txt: using light intensity data to support an explanation based on photosynthetic responses, which also requires certain wavelengths of light
peerj_reviews_txt/1531.txt: using the appropriate data to conclude water motion had no effect, despite finding differences between deep and shallow sites
peerj_reviews_txt/1531.txt: relating lux to a discussion involving photosynthesis
peerj_reviews_txt/1532.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1533.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1534.txt: addressing an interesting question within the yeast telomere field on whether the long non-coding rna tlc1, which minimally serves as the rna template for the specialized reverse transcriptase enzyme telomerase, can form a dimeric rna species
peerj_reviews_txt/1535.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1536.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1537.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1538.txt: suggesting that recent suicidal desire is behind the correlations between two previously published psychological pain scales it appears to be another way of saying that psychological pain mediates the correlation between two psychological pain scales
peerj_reviews_txt/1538.txt: referred to the following reference regarding corrections for multiple correlations
peerj_reviews_txt/1539.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/154.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1540.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1541.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1542.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1543.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1544.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1545.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1546.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1547.txt: not very happy about dealing the ces-d items as distributing normally, they should be referred to muthen and muthen
peerj_reviews_txt/1547.txt: correct, then the practice of calculating a scale sum or scale mean and using that number as a continuous measure of the construct in question is wrong
peerj_reviews_txt/1548.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1549.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/155.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1550.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1551.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1552.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1553.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1554.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1555.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1556.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1557.txt: also a co-corresponding author, the new criterion could prescribe that the country affiliation remains to be the first affiliation of the first author
peerj_reviews_txt/1558.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1559.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/156.txt: explicit with their aim about generalizing previous results from the swedish general population
peerj_reviews_txt/1560.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1561.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1562.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1563.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1564.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1565.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1566.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1567.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1568.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1569.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/157.txt: interested in repeating a test with noise-cleaned sequence data and a more robust otu table, i happily volunteer to help out with data-treatment
peerj_reviews_txt/1570.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1571.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1572.txt: a bit irrelevant
peerj_reviews_txt/1572.txt: using excellent data to reach new conclusions based on this new fossil that has been discovered
peerj_reviews_txt/1573.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1574.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1575.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1576.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1577.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1578.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1579.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/158.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1580.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1581.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1582.txt: opening themselves up to criticism that perhaps the original goal of the research was never designed to address
peerj_reviews_txt/1582.txt: trying to publish a descriptive paper aimed at a general audience, it would be beneficial to keep things simple - the summary of what organisms were generally common in the 50 houses, how many families you encountered
peerj_reviews_txt/1583.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1584.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1585.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1586.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1587.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1588.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1589.txt: attempting to do
peerj_reviews_txt/159.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1590.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1591.txt: suggesting opposing transmission strategies between sbv and dwv, and considering co-infection was administered in the study it is again conspicuously absent from the discussion
peerj_reviews_txt/1592.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1593.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1594.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1595.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1596.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1597.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1598.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1599.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/16.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/160.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1600.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1601.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1602.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1603.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1604.txt: invited to add a section to describe the main goal of their paper
peerj_reviews_txt/1604.txt: encouraged to review discussion in line with theoretical model and revised theoretical framework
peerj_reviews_txt/1605.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1606.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1607.txt: able to get closed bacterial genomes from illumina data, much less from a metagenomic assembly
peerj_reviews_txt/1607.txt: planning on peribacter
peerj_reviews_txt/1608.txt: to be commended on his very diligent and thorough paper
peerj_reviews_txt/1609.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/161.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1610.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1611.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1612.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1613.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1614.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1615.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1616.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1617.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1618.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1619.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/162.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1620.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1621.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1622.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1623.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1624.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1625.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1626.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1627.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1628.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1629.txt: not correctly cited
peerj_reviews_txt/163.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1630.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1631.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1632.txt: not highlighting the potential toxicity of the use of the preparation used to intoxicated the rats
peerj_reviews_txt/1632.txt: very speculative
peerj_reviews_txt/1633.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1634.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1635.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1636.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1637.txt: encouraged to explore review articles
peerj_reviews_txt/1638.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1639.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/164.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1640.txt: taking relative values how the control
peerj_reviews_txt/1640.txt: invited to investigate the role of mitochondrial distress and
peerj_reviews_txt/1641.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1642.txt: aware of this scenario
peerj_reviews_txt/1642.txt: restricted to make ill defined comparisons like
peerj_reviews_txt/1643.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1644.txt: reporting their work on the intrinsic association between taste words and visual shape with two experiments
peerj_reviews_txt/1644.txt: reporting are to the point and interesting
peerj_reviews_txt/1645.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1646.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1647.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1648.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1649.txt: still valid, but the numbers or methods do not seem without bias
peerj_reviews_txt/165.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1650.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1651.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1652.txt: planning to include the table with their plot
peerj_reviews_txt/1653.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1654.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1655.txt: investigating each of the variables at hand in relation to achieving motive
peerj_reviews_txt/1656.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1657.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1658.txt: trying to have it both ways
peerj_reviews_txt/1659.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/166.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1660.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1661.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1662.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1663.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1664.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1665.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1666.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1667.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1668.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1669.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/167.txt: worried about the computational burden for their server, they can set up accounts for the reviewers only, without making their galaxy server public
peerj_reviews_txt/1670.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1671.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1672.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1673.txt: doing and how they are doing it
peerj_reviews_txt/1673.txt: considering is not clear
peerj_reviews_txt/1673.txt: trying to tackle
peerj_reviews_txt/1674.txt: encourage to explain this better in method
peerj_reviews_txt/1675.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1676.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1677.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1678.txt: well aware that nucleotide variation and tajima
peerj_reviews_txt/1679.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/168.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1680.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1681.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1682.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1683.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1684.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1685.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1686.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1687.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1688.txt: transparent about
peerj_reviews_txt/1689.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/169.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1690.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1691.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1692.txt: tackling is the identification of novel amplicons, not surprisingly sequence similarity networks reported the less amount of novel amplicons due the implicit continuos nature of the network
peerj_reviews_txt/1693.txt: trying to communicate
peerj_reviews_txt/1693.txt: alluding to
peerj_reviews_txt/1694.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1695.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1696.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1697.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1698.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1699.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/17.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/170.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1700.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1701.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1702.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1703.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1704.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1705.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1706.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1707.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1708.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1709.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/171.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1710.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1711.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1712.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1713.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1714.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1715.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1716.txt: using ultrasound thermal ablation
peerj_reviews_txt/1717.txt: working with paleontological data, for this reason they must provide a better justification of its choosing the probability approaches
peerj_reviews_txt/1718.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1719.txt: welcome to coin a new or raise an old name for the clade
peerj_reviews_txt/1719.txt: showing here a summary of all the well-supported clades in all analyses
peerj_reviews_txt/1719.txt: highlighting the importance of enhance both collection and analyses of genomic data
peerj_reviews_txt/1719.txt: discussing and comparing data, i extremely recommend them to use source results as in griswold et al
peerj_reviews_txt/172.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1720.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1721.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1722.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1723.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1724.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1725.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1726.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1727.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1728.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1729.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/173.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1730.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1731.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1732.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1733.txt: the absence of real replicates in overtime and about the conclusions discussed by the authors
peerj_reviews_txt/1733.txt: trying to identify bioindicators but there is no correlation to microbial communities or an attempt at validating these candidates bioindicators in other soils
peerj_reviews_txt/1734.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1735.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1736.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1737.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1738.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1739.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/174.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1740.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1741.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1742.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1743.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1744.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1745.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1746.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1747.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1748.txt: correct, however, in noting the impressively large sample their study brings to bear on these issues, which is particularly appropriate for several of the stats employed here
peerj_reviews_txt/1749.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/175.txt: aware of the appropriate use of
peerj_reviews_txt/1750.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1751.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1752.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1753.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1754.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1755.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1756.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1757.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1758.txt: quite vague regarding diuron concentrations in time in general
peerj_reviews_txt/1759.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/176.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1760.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1761.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1762.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1763.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1764.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1765.txt: referring to the pubic symphysis
peerj_reviews_txt/1766.txt: trying to say that in some species, exposure of chicks with the same parasite may result in either a blocking effect or a priming effect
peerj_reviews_txt/1767.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1768.txt: perfectly right when saying that better understanding of adipose tissue
peerj_reviews_txt/1769.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/177.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1770.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1771.txt: working with very rare and precious human embryonic tissue, so i do not want to insist that they embark on large scale repetition of the immunohistochemistry
peerj_reviews_txt/1772.txt: explaining what has previously been done, or stating that this is what they intend to do in their study
peerj_reviews_txt/1772.txt: using would also be beneficial for the reader here
peerj_reviews_txt/1772.txt: comparing the correlation coefficients between each cpt test and something else but it isn
peerj_reviews_txt/1773.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1774.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1775.txt: highlighting some interesting avenues for future studies
peerj_reviews_txt/1776.txt: certainly correct to point out the possible error inherent in using a relatively low frame rate
peerj_reviews_txt/1777.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1778.txt: to be applauded for his in-depth studies
peerj_reviews_txt/1779.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/178.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1780.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1781.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1782.txt: referring to the trend from hours 0 to 24, or from hours 24 to day 10
peerj_reviews_txt/1783.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1784.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1785.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1786.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1787.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1788.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1789.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/179.txt: free to ignore this comment if they feel strongly otherwise
peerj_reviews_txt/1790.txt: referring to
peerj_reviews_txt/1791.txt: encouraged to provide literature evidence that the specification of 5a is suitable for flexible docking
peerj_reviews_txt/1791.txt: strongly encouraged to check with the english native speaking expert and submit the revised version
peerj_reviews_txt/1792.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1793.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1794.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1795.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1796.txt: testing the nc-part approach to species delimitation
peerj_reviews_txt/1797.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1798.txt: talking about all chinese authors, either living in china or not, whereas what they mean is authors who are based in mainland china, hong kong and taiwan
peerj_reviews_txt/1798.txt: talking about the journals from china
peerj_reviews_txt/1799.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/18.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/180.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1800.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1801.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1802.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1803.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1804.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1805.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1806.txt: interested in casas-crivill
peerj_reviews_txt/1807.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1808.txt: reporting negative results
peerj_reviews_txt/1809.txt: testing, is not relevant enough, mainly because they are not considering some important aspects about black howlers biology
peerj_reviews_txt/181.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1810.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1811.txt: to be commended for providing all data and code for their study
peerj_reviews_txt/1811.txt: to be commended for providing all data and code for their study
peerj_reviews_txt/1812.txt: right for the first time
peerj_reviews_txt/1812.txt: right for the first time
peerj_reviews_txt/1813.txt: likely trying to be conservative in their recommendations, especially since goldberg and waits did find a bias when all siblings were included
peerj_reviews_txt/1814.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1815.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1816.txt: commended for their dna barcoding and chlorophyll a analyses
peerj_reviews_txt/1817.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1818.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1819.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/182.txt: to be commended for a particularly fastidious and patient revision of the paper
peerj_reviews_txt/182.txt: to be commended on a rigorous, substantive body of work in this manuscript
peerj_reviews_txt/1820.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1821.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1822.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1823.txt: not doing themselves a favor
peerj_reviews_txt/1824.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1825.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1826.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1827.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1828.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1829.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/183.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1830.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1831.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1832.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1833.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1834.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1835.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1836.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1837.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1838.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1839.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/184.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1840.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1841.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1842.txt: referring to species not genera
peerj_reviews_txt/1842.txt: not making in this sentence
peerj_reviews_txt/1842.txt: only comparing growth in davis, ca to the iss, the assumption seems to be that b
peerj_reviews_txt/1843.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1844.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1845.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1846.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1847.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1848.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1849.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/185.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1850.txt: required to provide a street address this didn
peerj_reviews_txt/1851.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1852.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1853.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1854.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1855.txt: asked though why pcr products were sized on etbr
peerj_reviews_txt/1856.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1857.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1858.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1859.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/186.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1860.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1861.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1862.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1863.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1864.txt: directly testing this hypothesis, so it seems crucial that this work be referenced
peerj_reviews_txt/1865.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1866.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1867.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1868.txt: referring to in their rebuttal letter, which did in most cases not match any of the files
peerj_reviews_txt/1869.txt: to be commended for having redone the complete experiment and analysis using the current pacbio sequencing technology
peerj_reviews_txt/1869.txt: well-versed in the technical issues associated with the use of this data, and have presented a compelling case that this platform may not offer sufficient advantages in terms of error rates
peerj_reviews_txt/187.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1870.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1871.txt: sensitive to biases that may be introduced by low abundance, as well as the sampling procedure used to quantify evi
peerj_reviews_txt/1872.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1873.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1874.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1875.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1876.txt: appropriately cautious about its interpretation
peerj_reviews_txt/1877.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1878.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1879.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/188.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1880.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1881.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1882.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1883.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1884.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1885.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1886.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1887.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1888.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1889.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/189.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1890.txt: explained by the fact that cellular toxicity is decreased by parp-1 inhibitors and that more cell divide in the treated samples
peerj_reviews_txt/1891.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1892.txt: conflating stochasticity with uncertainty
peerj_reviews_txt/1892.txt: assuming, or with the model formulation itself
peerj_reviews_txt/1892.txt: using an extremely unusual definition of r
peerj_reviews_txt/1893.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1894.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1895.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1896.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1897.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1898.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1899.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/19.txt: responsible for making materials, data and associated protocols available to readers without delay
peerj_reviews_txt/190.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1900.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1901.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1902.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1903.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1904.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1905.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1906.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1907.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1908.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1909.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/191.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1910.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1911.txt: willing to rework the manuscript and resubmit it
peerj_reviews_txt/1912.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1913.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1914.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1915.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1916.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1917.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1918.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1919.txt: reproducible or not
peerj_reviews_txt/192.txt: to be commended on a much improved manuscript, with the majority of reviewers
peerj_reviews_txt/192.txt: correct that different cell types express different cofactors, a less committed
peerj_reviews_txt/1920.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1921.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1922.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1923.txt: very vague in their wording in this context throughout the paper
peerj_reviews_txt/1924.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1925.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1926.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1927.txt: handling categorical variables
peerj_reviews_txt/1928.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1929.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/193.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1930.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1931.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1932.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1933.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1934.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1935.txt: choosing an empirical cutoff of p
peerj_reviews_txt/1936.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1937.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1938.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1939.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/194.txt: well aware of the limitations of their conclusions derived from the methods applied
peerj_reviews_txt/1940.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1941.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1942.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1943.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1944.txt: proposing it only for s
peerj_reviews_txt/1945.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1946.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1947.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1948.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1949.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/195.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1950.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1951.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1952.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1953.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1954.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1955.txt: providing the number of genomic features in which the variants occur
peerj_reviews_txt/1956.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1957.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1958.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1959.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/196.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1960.txt: likely aiming for
peerj_reviews_txt/1961.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1962.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1963.txt: trying to include museum numbers
peerj_reviews_txt/1964.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1965.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1966.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1967.txt: writing in a second language
peerj_reviews_txt/1968.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1969.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/197.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1970.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1971.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1972.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1973.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1974.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1975.txt: a bit strong in attributing the potential for causal cognition by the subjects
peerj_reviews_txt/1976.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1977.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1978.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1979.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/198.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1980.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1981.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1982.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1983.txt: probably trying to submit another manuscript with more details
peerj_reviews_txt/1984.txt: assuming mortality was caused by competition
peerj_reviews_txt/1985.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1986.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1987.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1988.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1989.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/199.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1990.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1991.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1992.txt: using an inflammatory model
peerj_reviews_txt/1993.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1994.txt: trying to achieve with their study
peerj_reviews_txt/1995.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1996.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1997.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1998.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/1999.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/20.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/200.txt: expected to provide the genbank accession numbers of their sequences when submit the revision
peerj_reviews_txt/200.txt: also interested in seeing the impact of migratory birds and human introductions on the phylogeography
peerj_reviews_txt/2000.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2001.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2002.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2003.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2004.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2005.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2006.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2007.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2008.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2009.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/201.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2010.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2011.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2012.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2013.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2014.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2015.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2016.txt: discussing de novo assembly or reference-based assembly
peerj_reviews_txt/2017.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2018.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2019.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/202.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2020.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2021.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2022.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2023.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2024.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2025.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2026.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2027.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2028.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2029.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/203.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2030.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2031.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2032.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2033.txt: unable to reach conclusions about their original research question
peerj_reviews_txt/2033.txt: testing
peerj_reviews_txt/2034.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2035.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2036.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2037.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2038.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2039.txt: interested in promoting the application of these results in land use planning it would be helpful if they could provide a more straightforward interpretation of how this research might guide the development of more bird-friendly suburbs and exurban areas
peerj_reviews_txt/204.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2040.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2041.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2042.txt: primarily concerned with the question of which es
peerj_reviews_txt/2043.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2044.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2045.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2046.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2047.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2048.txt: right when they state that the challenge is to determine the processes that are involved in the configuration of the interactions
peerj_reviews_txt/2049.txt: sure about where the ants are returning to
peerj_reviews_txt/2049.txt: overstepping their data
peerj_reviews_txt/205.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2050.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2051.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2052.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2053.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2054.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2055.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2056.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2057.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2058.txt: recommended to provide the human data, if they insist to provide the conclusion using human aging-related proteins
peerj_reviews_txt/2058.txt: recommended to amend manuscript according to reviewers
peerj_reviews_txt/2059.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/206.txt: aiming much too high here
peerj_reviews_txt/2060.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2061.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2062.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2063.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2064.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2065.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2066.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2067.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2068.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2069.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/207.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2070.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2071.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2072.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2073.txt: invited to review work by sato et al
peerj_reviews_txt/2074.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2075.txt: probably correct that the higher ri is due to missing data in the postcranial data set, so they should give the percentage of missing data for each of the sets
peerj_reviews_txt/2076.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2077.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2078.txt: right ahl has effect on rhlr production however, i wonder whether authors have considered that in the supernatant contain also rhamnolipids, do rhamnolipids have any effect
peerj_reviews_txt/2079.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/208.txt: quite careful to mention that these results reflect reef accretion and not necessarily how the corals themselves are dealing with the acidification, thus providing a new insight in that perspective
peerj_reviews_txt/2080.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2081.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2082.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2083.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2084.txt: missing important references to recent work that supports their own, including the loh et al peerj paper, which also finds no relationship between fish abundance and seaweed cover, and the recent work of burkepile et al, which suggests that higher fish abundance results in greater nutrient inputs that enhance seaweed cover
peerj_reviews_txt/2085.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2086.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2087.txt: recommended to describe how they conducted the data collection, such as via e-mail, mail, or in person, as well as a brief statement of research procedure
peerj_reviews_txt/2087.txt: recommended to describe how they conducted the data collection, such as via e-mail, mail, or in person, as well as a brief statement of research procedure
peerj_reviews_txt/2087.txt: suggested to update the references cited in this manuscript
peerj_reviews_txt/2088.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2089.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/209.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2090.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2091.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2092.txt: dealing with reproq that they cite as validated in previous publications as well as the who responsiveness model
peerj_reviews_txt/2093.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2094.txt: embedded above
peerj_reviews_txt/2095.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2096.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2097.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2098.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2099.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/21.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/210.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2100.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2101.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2102.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2103.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2104.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2105.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2106.txt: clear on the lack of a directional prediction
peerj_reviews_txt/2107.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2108.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2109.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/211.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2110.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2111.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2112.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2113.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2114.txt: reporting on nf, a specific type of brief intervention, a brief description of what brief interventions are would be useful for the reader unfamiliar with them
peerj_reviews_txt/2115.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2116.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2117.txt: rather reluctant in providing references to primary literature - duellman
peerj_reviews_txt/2117.txt: arguing
peerj_reviews_txt/2117.txt: providing
peerj_reviews_txt/2117.txt: providing
peerj_reviews_txt/2118.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2119.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/212.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2120.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2121.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2122.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2123.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2124.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2125.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2126.txt: assuming a direct and positive relationship between birds perch frequency and the quantity of seeds being delivered underneath such perches, despite being possible that such a relation exists it is not proved not even supported with literature
peerj_reviews_txt/2126.txt: following they try to determine deposition probability as explained above and then relate such deposition patterns with the
peerj_reviews_txt/2127.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2128.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2129.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/213.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2130.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2131.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2132.txt: referred to the following article
peerj_reviews_txt/2133.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2134.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2135.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2136.txt: requested to address the following issue
peerj_reviews_txt/2137.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2138.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2139.txt: willing to make the changes, i can review the paper again
peerj_reviews_txt/214.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2140.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2141.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2142.txt: requested to comment on their data in relation to previously published studies, including the observation that the ablation of mmp14 causes severe malnutrition due to jaw defects that prevent feeding
peerj_reviews_txt/2142.txt: cautioned regarding statements such as on lines 237-239 suggesting mmp14 inhibition as a therapy for metabolic syndrome
peerj_reviews_txt/2143.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2144.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2145.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2146.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2147.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2148.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2149.txt: suggested to propose a scientific question based on some rationales or mechanism background in terms of the importance or the physiological significance in salinity adaptation of the species
peerj_reviews_txt/215.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2150.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2151.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2152.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2153.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2154.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2155.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2156.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2157.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2158.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2159.txt: attempting to draw
peerj_reviews_txt/216.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2160.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2161.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2162.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2163.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2164.txt: very thorough in their presentation of the experimental design
peerj_reviews_txt/2164.txt: congratulated on a significant amount of work that combines many state-of-the-art techniques
peerj_reviews_txt/2165.txt: clear that the model will need further comparison with data but are plausible
peerj_reviews_txt/2166.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2167.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2168.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2169.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/217.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2170.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2171.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2172.txt: doing
peerj_reviews_txt/2172.txt: examining the impact of how the source trees are merged within the superfine pipeline
peerj_reviews_txt/2172.txt: only looking at the accuracy of the scm tree, and not of the final tree returned after the second step
peerj_reviews_txt/2173.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2174.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2175.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2176.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2177.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2178.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2179.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/218.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2180.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2181.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2182.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2183.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2184.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2185.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2186.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2187.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2188.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2189.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/219.txt: not easy to interpret with reference to overly general hypotheses, but that is only to be expected from something as complex as the cerrado, which is actually a mosaic of landscapes with varying geological histories
peerj_reviews_txt/2190.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2191.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2192.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2193.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2194.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2195.txt: trying to convey
peerj_reviews_txt/2195.txt: trying to convey to the readers
peerj_reviews_txt/2196.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2197.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2198.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2199.txt: right to state there have been few experimental
peerj_reviews_txt/22.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/220.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2200.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2201.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2202.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2203.txt: encouraged to take professional help to improve the manuscript to avoid grammatical errors and to improve the overall presentation
peerj_reviews_txt/2204.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2205.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2206.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2207.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2208.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2209.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/221.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2210.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2211.txt: limited by existing data, that is the situation in all research and method development
peerj_reviews_txt/2212.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2213.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2214.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2215.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2216.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2217.txt: showing double traces in each panel in fig 1
peerj_reviews_txt/2218.txt: trying to make here with the insertion
peerj_reviews_txt/2219.txt: interested in applied entomology and they try to conclude about practical aspects, rather than on mechanisms
peerj_reviews_txt/222.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2220.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2221.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2222.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2223.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2224.txt: given for two spider species mentioned in lines 216, 218, but not for species mentioned on lines 226, 227
peerj_reviews_txt/2225.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2226.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2227.txt: right that the prevalence of branching trees suggests that concurrent mutations are common, but the presence of a branching tree by itself is not definitive proof in any single case
peerj_reviews_txt/2227.txt: arguing that if there is a single mutation that reaches substantial frequency without any other identified mutation, it must be beneficial
peerj_reviews_txt/2227.txt: drawing are almost certainly correct
peerj_reviews_txt/2228.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2229.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/223.txt: recording the erps in one subject while watching either own species faces
peerj_reviews_txt/223.txt: limiting their review to the chimpanzee literature but they may want to cite a review from tsao about the neural network involved in face processing in macaques which present also a lot of similarities with the human system
peerj_reviews_txt/223.txt: not making any clear prediction in term of erps
peerj_reviews_txt/223.txt: mentioning the difference between own
peerj_reviews_txt/2230.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2231.txt: to be commended on good experimental design, and their development and validation of a successful treatment innovation
peerj_reviews_txt/2232.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2233.txt: uncovering a really interesting phenomenon and distribution pattern here, and it would in my view render it more palatable to non-specialists if these results are put in a somewhat wider framework in this way
peerj_reviews_txt/2234.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2235.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2236.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2237.txt: valid and important
peerj_reviews_txt/2238.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2239.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/224.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2240.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2241.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2242.txt: doing themselves a disservice by not clearly articulating
peerj_reviews_txt/2242.txt: well-aware, the overall material properties of a complex structure such as the head is more than its component parts, and in fem validating the model is of great import
peerj_reviews_txt/2243.txt: very general with the use of the word
peerj_reviews_txt/2244.txt: right in saying that there are many others papers on this subject that are completely
peerj_reviews_txt/2244.txt: free to pursue any avenue of research but they must be, in my opinion, asked
peerj_reviews_txt/2244.txt: linking their findings to broader applied ecological concepts and examples here, but i feel they are pushing things a little with the data presented here
peerj_reviews_txt/2245.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2246.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2247.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2248.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2249.txt: standard methods and have been applied properly
peerj_reviews_txt/2249.txt: well aware of the problem
peerj_reviews_txt/225.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2250.txt: missing a chance to really highlight what is unique about their study
peerj_reviews_txt/2251.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2252.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2253.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2254.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2255.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2256.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2257.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2258.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2259.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/226.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2260.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2261.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2262.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2263.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2264.txt: echoing the perspective of the pay it forward members
peerj_reviews_txt/2265.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2266.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2267.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2268.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2269.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/227.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2270.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2271.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2272.txt: supported by rna-seq data
peerj_reviews_txt/2272.txt: still trying to oversell their finding, which make them focusing on points or performing analyses that are not really relevant
peerj_reviews_txt/2273.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2274.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2275.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2276.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2277.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2278.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2279.txt: trying to show molecular tools in plant pathology and make them available to other research communities
peerj_reviews_txt/228.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2280.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2281.txt: carefully treating the advantage of the normalisation method focused on both performance and cost
peerj_reviews_txt/2282.txt: refering to, the methodology is that of delta delta ct
peerj_reviews_txt/2282.txt: basing these fold differences on no effects at 10 um a-hgs and
peerj_reviews_txt/2283.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2284.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2285.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2286.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2287.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2288.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2289.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/229.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2290.txt: examining this trait across genotypes or species
peerj_reviews_txt/2290.txt: from there, but the readers always appreciate a more general view
peerj_reviews_txt/2291.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2292.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2293.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2294.txt: encourage rather to focus on determining what minimum imaging protocol will suffice to a
peerj_reviews_txt/2295.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2296.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2297.txt: to be commended for this as these are not easy experiments
peerj_reviews_txt/2298.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2299.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/23.txt: enriching the microcosm atmosphere
peerj_reviews_txt/230.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2300.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2301.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2302.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2303.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2304.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2305.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2306.txt: encouraged to make reversions and answer these comments one point by one point
peerj_reviews_txt/2307.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2308.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2309.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/231.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2310.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2311.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2312.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2313.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2314.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2315.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2316.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2317.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2318.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2319.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/232.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2320.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2321.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2322.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2323.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2324.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2325.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2326.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2327.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2328.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2329.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/233.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2330.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2331.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2332.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2333.txt: asking general questions about
peerj_reviews_txt/2334.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2335.txt: attempting to make their research appear more novel than it actually is
peerj_reviews_txt/2336.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2337.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2338.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2339.txt: still not making this clear
peerj_reviews_txt/2339.txt: trying to respond to concerns of the reviewers, these details also need to appear in the manuscript
peerj_reviews_txt/2339.txt: referring to in the supplementary table
peerj_reviews_txt/234.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2340.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2341.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2342.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2343.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2344.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2345.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2346.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2347.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2348.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2349.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/235.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2350.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2351.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2352.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2353.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2354.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2355.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2356.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2357.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2358.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2359.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/236.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2360.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2361.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2362.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2363.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2364.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2365.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2366.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2367.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2368.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2369.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/237.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2370.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2371.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2372.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2373.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2374.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2375.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2376.txt: trying to answer an important question in built environment microbiology, and they present some compelling findings, the experimental design of this study limits the scope and impact of those findings
peerj_reviews_txt/2376.txt: wary of rarifying their dataset to an even level because so many sequences would be dropped in the process
peerj_reviews_txt/2376.txt: describing are not adequately reported
peerj_reviews_txt/2377.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2378.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2379.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/238.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2380.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2381.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2382.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2383.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2384.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2385.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2386.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2387.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2388.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2389.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/239.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2390.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2391.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2392.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2393.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2394.txt: fitting their models, then why are the data presented with what looks like a linear fit in all of the figures
peerj_reviews_txt/2395.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2396.txt: appropriate
peerj_reviews_txt/2397.txt: attempting to convey in introduction and background is also not clear
peerj_reviews_txt/2397.txt: trying to state in the final sentence
peerj_reviews_txt/2398.txt: using, true-random samples are unlikely, although they document indistinguishable probability of detection
peerj_reviews_txt/2398.txt: using aucs as a method to evaluate models
peerj_reviews_txt/2398.txt: capable of rewriting doing the following
peerj_reviews_txt/2399.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/24.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/240.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2400.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2401.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2402.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2403.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2404.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2405.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2406.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2407.txt: referring to
peerj_reviews_txt/2408.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2409.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/241.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2410.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2411.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2412.txt: encouraged to include more information about the host animals with respect to relevant ecology and biology
peerj_reviews_txt/2412.txt: likely including the bacteria-associated with or in the diet in addition to what was part of the actual fish
peerj_reviews_txt/2413.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2414.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2415.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2416.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2417.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2418.txt: willing to introduce a significant biological question into the ms and address it, i encourage them to resubmit the ms to peerj
peerj_reviews_txt/2419.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/242.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2420.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2421.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2422.txt: not testing at all
peerj_reviews_txt/2422.txt: actually going to test hypotheses related to these statements but it is not the case
peerj_reviews_txt/2422.txt: trying to answer
peerj_reviews_txt/2422.txt: analyzing
peerj_reviews_txt/2422.txt: stating is true
peerj_reviews_txt/2422.txt: interested in fragmentation they should control for effects of amount of forest surrounding these fragments
peerj_reviews_txt/2423.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2424.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2425.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2426.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2427.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2428.txt: described including its source
peerj_reviews_txt/2429.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/243.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2430.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2431.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2432.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2433.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2434.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2435.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2436.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2437.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2438.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2439.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/244.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2440.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2441.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2442.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2443.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2444.txt: valid
peerj_reviews_txt/2445.txt: encouraged to provide explanations for this discrepancy
peerj_reviews_txt/2446.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2447.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2448.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2449.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/245.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2450.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2451.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2452.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2453.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2454.txt: suggested to add this discussion and cite these references to attract more readers and broaden the audience
peerj_reviews_txt/2455.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2456.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2457.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2458.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2459.txt: required to address all of these issues in the revision
peerj_reviews_txt/246.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2460.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2461.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2462.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2463.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2464.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2465.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2466.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2467.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2468.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2469.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/247.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2470.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2471.txt: fine to my opinion
peerj_reviews_txt/2472.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2473.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2474.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2475.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2476.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2477.txt: presenting an automated tool that predicts streptococcus pneunomiae serotypes
peerj_reviews_txt/2478.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2479.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/248.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2480.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2481.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2482.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2483.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2484.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2485.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2486.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2487.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2488.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2489.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/249.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2490.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2491.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2492.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2493.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2494.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2495.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2496.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2497.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2498.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2499.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/25.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/250.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2500.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2501.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2502.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2503.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2504.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2505.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2506.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2507.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2508.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2509.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/251.txt: dealing with correspond to the number of interactions observed across the total size of the upper triangular matrix
peerj_reviews_txt/2510.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2511.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2512.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2513.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2514.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2515.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2516.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2517.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2518.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2519.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/252.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2520.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2521.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2522.txt: evidence producers
peerj_reviews_txt/2523.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2524.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2525.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2526.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2527.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2528.txt: keen to prioritise aim
peerj_reviews_txt/2529.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/253.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2530.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2531.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2532.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2533.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2534.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2535.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2536.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2537.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2538.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2539.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/254.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2540.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2541.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2542.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2543.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2544.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2545.txt: referring to here, please clarify
peerj_reviews_txt/2545.txt: making lots of statistical comparisons between groups
peerj_reviews_txt/2545.txt: referring to here, please clarify
peerj_reviews_txt/2546.txt: asked to consider the following points before the manuscript can be accepted for publication
peerj_reviews_txt/2547.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2548.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2549.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/255.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2550.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2551.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2552.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2553.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2554.txt: able to address most of the issues raised by reviewer
peerj_reviews_txt/2555.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2556.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2557.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2558.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2559.txt: not mentioned in the text
peerj_reviews_txt/256.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2560.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2561.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2562.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2563.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2564.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2565.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2566.txt: trying accomplish with this study - nor is there any aprori hypothesis clear aside from they expect there to be a mathematical relationship
peerj_reviews_txt/2567.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2568.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2569.txt: referring to mass-specific
peerj_reviews_txt/257.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2570.txt: aware of the limitations of the work and have thought of alternatives
peerj_reviews_txt/2570.txt: only able to convincingly complement the ptodc3k deletion mutant
peerj_reviews_txt/2571.txt: using
peerj_reviews_txt/2571.txt: using
peerj_reviews_txt/2572.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2573.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2574.txt: operating with a fundamental misunderstanding of the phytochrome system, and this is more than a bit disconcerting
peerj_reviews_txt/2575.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2576.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2577.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2578.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2579.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/258.txt: welcome to address these points at their own discretion
peerj_reviews_txt/2580.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2581.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2582.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2583.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2584.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2585.txt: missing some key information and references in the field to put their research into context
peerj_reviews_txt/2586.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2587.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2588.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2589.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/259.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2590.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2591.txt: experts in this area having published multiple papers on similar topics
peerj_reviews_txt/2592.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2593.txt: commended for their previous revisions, however, i had difficulties tracking down the changes made by the authors to their manuscript, given that they did not provide a response letter that clearly identified the new line numbers in relation to the modifications
peerj_reviews_txt/2593.txt: confused and elusive about their dartseq approach
peerj_reviews_txt/2593.txt: doing in this study
peerj_reviews_txt/2594.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2595.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2596.txt: still concerned about autocorrelation, there is a new approach to creating home ranges that incorporates autocorrelation explicitly
peerj_reviews_txt/2597.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2598.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2599.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/26.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/260.txt: describing appears to be eog, a measurement of polarization differences across the eye, which will detect vertical eye movements rather than muscle contractions
peerj_reviews_txt/260.txt: able to address my concerns and provide appropriate information to enable further evaluation of the design, data scoring, and analysis techniques, i would be pleased to review again
peerj_reviews_txt/2600.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2601.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2602.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2603.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2604.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2605.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2606.txt: presenting a result about different plant genotypes, but only one genotype was used in this study
peerj_reviews_txt/2607.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2608.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2609.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/261.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2610.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2611.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2612.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2613.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2614.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2615.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2616.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2617.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2618.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2619.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/262.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2620.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2621.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2622.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2623.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2624.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2625.txt: the first group tried this method on soft coral, it is better to explain the result with caution
peerj_reviews_txt/2626.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2627.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2628.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2629.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/263.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2630.txt: using to espouse statistical significance, particularly if using criteria that differ from the mainstream
peerj_reviews_txt/2630.txt: presenting the results of the best-fit model, and then directing readers to the model averaged results presented in tables 1
peerj_reviews_txt/2631.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2632.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2633.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2634.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2635.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2636.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2637.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2638.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2639.txt: to be congratulated on an excellent revision of the original manuscript
peerj_reviews_txt/2639.txt: all sound
peerj_reviews_txt/264.txt: a well-established member of the symbiosis field and he always like everyone else in the field saw ank repeats as a hallmark of host-symbiont interactions
peerj_reviews_txt/2640.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2641.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2642.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2643.txt: correct in identifying it as a potential factor in l102-104, but it does not enter into the analysis as an independent factor despite the fact that the results and a previous paper in press show that the established community varies by nutrient and herbivore treatment, and the hypothesis of the present manuscript that propagule supply to tiles is probably affected by the established macroalgal community nearby
peerj_reviews_txt/2644.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2645.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2646.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2647.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2648.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2649.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/265.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2650.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2651.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2652.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2653.txt: using a reversible jump mcmc as developed by huelsenbeck et al
peerj_reviews_txt/2654.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2655.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2656.txt: admirably open about this issue and do include information in a supplementary table about what was applied to each field and when, and they devote a paragraph in the discussion to this issue, but i didn
peerj_reviews_txt/2657.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2658.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2659.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/266.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2660.txt: also to be commended for their refreshing straightforwardness regarding the limitations of the study and their appropriately narrow conclusions from the microbiome data
peerj_reviews_txt/2661.txt: modest about the possibilities this experiments are offering
peerj_reviews_txt/2662.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2663.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2664.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2665.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2666.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2667.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2668.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2669.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/267.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2670.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2671.txt: suggested to check them carefully
peerj_reviews_txt/2671.txt: welcome discuss or speculate plausible mechanisms underlying h2o2 can affect rls in more detail
peerj_reviews_txt/2672.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2673.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2674.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2675.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2676.txt: aware, there are a number of other information sources that do not neatly fit into a graph-based framework
peerj_reviews_txt/2677.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2678.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2679.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/268.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2680.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2681.txt: acceptable and were addressed appropriately
peerj_reviews_txt/2682.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2683.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2684.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2685.txt: not sound i my view
peerj_reviews_txt/2686.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2687.txt: not unreasonable, but, in my opinion, they need to be more thoroughly supported by additional data, as alternative explanations for the observations can not be ruled out
peerj_reviews_txt/2688.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2689.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/269.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2690.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2691.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2692.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2693.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2694.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2695.txt: recommended to use the more updated ipsc generation technique for generation of exogenous dna integration-fee ipsc, which will be more safe and efficient for further study
peerj_reviews_txt/2695.txt: recommended to use the more updated ipsc generation technique for generation of exogenous dna integration-fee ipsc, which will be more safe and efficient for further study
peerj_reviews_txt/2696.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2697.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2698.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2699.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/27.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/270.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2700.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2701.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2702.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2703.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2704.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2705.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2706.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2707.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2708.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2709.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/271.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2710.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2711.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2712.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2713.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2714.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2715.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2716.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2717.txt: on much firmer ground in asserting that it is more difficult to sterilize biofilms than bacteria in planktonic growth, and that biofilms contain a mixture of
peerj_reviews_txt/2718.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2719.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/272.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2720.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2721.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2722.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2723.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2724.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2725.txt: saying that the presence of contaminating cells is unlikely, but they then argue against nuclear stains by stating that it is
peerj_reviews_txt/2726.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2727.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2728.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2729.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/273.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2730.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2731.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2732.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2733.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2734.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2735.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2736.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2737.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2738.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2739.txt: encouraged to revise the following aspects to improve their manuscript
peerj_reviews_txt/2739.txt: encouraged to change it into
peerj_reviews_txt/2739.txt: encouraged to provide other possible mechanisms in their discussion
peerj_reviews_txt/274.txt: clear that their goals are not to address the issues that the latter approach could allow them to investigate
peerj_reviews_txt/2740.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2741.txt: found below
peerj_reviews_txt/2742.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2743.txt: trying to show
peerj_reviews_txt/2743.txt: exploring
peerj_reviews_txt/2744.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2745.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2746.txt: on fertile ground in that respect
peerj_reviews_txt/2746.txt: trying to focus on whether eurasian jays will copy the choices of others, but under the current descriptions provided, i see no reason to think that there is a difference between social and less social species
peerj_reviews_txt/2747.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2748.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2749.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/275.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2750.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2751.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2752.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2753.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2754.txt: suggested to add more discussions on the beneficial effects of bio-tofu in human health
peerj_reviews_txt/2755.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2756.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2757.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2758.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2759.txt: testing the species status of u
peerj_reviews_txt/276.txt: describing how the tool works and not results about the improvements of the tool
peerj_reviews_txt/2760.txt: in the process of acquiring samples the remaining bivalve superfamilies in order to complete the picture
peerj_reviews_txt/2761.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2762.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2763.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2764.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2765.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2766.txt: aware that when you make a tree using sequences of 1500 bp and sequences of only 300-400 bp, this gives biased results and cannot be done
peerj_reviews_txt/2767.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2768.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2769.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/277.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2770.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2771.txt: encouraged to revisit the comments of reviewer 2 and to improve the manuscript from its original version according to that reviewers comments
peerj_reviews_txt/2772.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2773.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2774.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2775.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2776.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2777.txt: saying that the most abundant family
peerj_reviews_txt/2778.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2779.txt: simplifying things too much
peerj_reviews_txt/278.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2780.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2781.txt: trying to focus the specific way of identification prevailing there in terms of bamboo or herbal product authentication, should be presented with specific reference accordingly
peerj_reviews_txt/2782.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2783.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2784.txt: correct that basic life history data is missing for many imperiled species, and collecting those data are vital to conservation efforts
peerj_reviews_txt/2785.txt: gathering evidence for aspects that are not their study issue
peerj_reviews_txt/2786.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2787.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2788.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2789.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/279.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2790.txt: recommended to emphasize the meanings of applying the pss to sports context, regardless of some instruments used in previous studies to measure stress
peerj_reviews_txt/2790.txt: suggested to add some research regarding the measurement of athletes
peerj_reviews_txt/2790.txt: suggested to not replicate the description same with the tables and to give solid descriptions to inform the readers about the results
peerj_reviews_txt/2791.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2792.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2793.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2794.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2795.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2796.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2797.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2798.txt: sufficient and enough to replicate
peerj_reviews_txt/2798.txt: requested to do some additional experiment
peerj_reviews_txt/2799.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/28.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/280.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2800.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2801.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2802.txt: advised to seek professional help to improve the quality of the english
peerj_reviews_txt/2803.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2804.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2805.txt: encouraging
peerj_reviews_txt/2805.txt: saying that a geometry scan of the dioxygen attack on several of the triplet surfaces leads to an excited state with the geometry of the intermediate and the electronics of the reactant
peerj_reviews_txt/2806.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2807.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2808.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2809.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/281.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2810.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2811.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2812.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2813.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2814.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2815.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2816.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2817.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2818.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2819.txt: able to address a number of issues mostly related to clarity and presentation of the results
peerj_reviews_txt/282.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2820.txt: trying to say
peerj_reviews_txt/2821.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2822.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2823.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2824.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2825.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2826.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2827.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2828.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2829.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/283.txt: commended for the very thorough revision performed
peerj_reviews_txt/283.txt: testing
peerj_reviews_txt/2830.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2831.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2832.txt: careful about the conclusions they draw and do not over-interpret their data
peerj_reviews_txt/2833.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2834.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2835.txt: the world experts on flora of arctic canada
peerj_reviews_txt/2836.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2837.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2838.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2839.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/284.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2840.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2841.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2842.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2843.txt: aware of the limited power that a targeted gene candidate approach has and hence formulate conclusions with appropriate caution
peerj_reviews_txt/2844.txt: relating 2 independent variables
peerj_reviews_txt/2844.txt: only connecting viruses with hosts based on crispr-based and nucleotide-based analyses and cannot state anything about the level of mortality from this data
peerj_reviews_txt/2844.txt: describing in each section
peerj_reviews_txt/2844.txt: examining microbial metagenomes
peerj_reviews_txt/2845.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2846.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2847.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2848.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2849.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/285.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2850.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2851.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2852.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2853.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2854.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2855.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2856.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2857.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2858.txt: encouraged to discuss these possibilities as limitations of the current study
peerj_reviews_txt/2858.txt: encouraged to include other possible mechanisms in their discussion
peerj_reviews_txt/2859.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/286.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2860.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2861.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2862.txt: suggesting a better understanding of which stimulus properties influence eft performance, and how such stimulus property manipulation might relate to neural mechanisms
peerj_reviews_txt/2862.txt: quite correct, in my opinion, when they say that few researchers have tried to determine what stimulus factors lead to hidden or embedded figures
peerj_reviews_txt/2863.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2864.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2865.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2866.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2867.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2868.txt: more interested in state measures than
peerj_reviews_txt/2868.txt: more satisfied with as a potential social index of wellbeing
peerj_reviews_txt/2869.txt: merely stating comparisons with previous studies
peerj_reviews_txt/287.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2870.txt: primarily referring to small, likely genetically encoded, metabolites rather than the more general fraction of dom that is usually referred to as lmw dom
peerj_reviews_txt/2871.txt: not specifying years it is confusing to know if they are referring to the bleaching event in 2010
peerj_reviews_txt/2872.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2873.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2874.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2875.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2876.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2877.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2878.txt: trying to make
peerj_reviews_txt/2878.txt: addressing a very interesting aspect of ciliate cell biology, with potentially broad implications for the evoution of autophagic mechanisms
peerj_reviews_txt/2879.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/288.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2880.txt: not trying to give a comprehensive overview of all the important studies on parsing heterogeneity, but it is not clear why the authors have been selective in choosing some studies to cite, but not others
peerj_reviews_txt/2880.txt: citing most of the main primary important studies in the literature
peerj_reviews_txt/2881.txt: only using inhibitors designed for human targets here as proof-of-concept but if they seen an effect there, it is reasonable to assume that there may also be effects in the other direction, once an inhibitor is optimized for lepidopterans
peerj_reviews_txt/2882.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2883.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2884.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2885.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2886.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2887.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2888.txt: missing a number of papers in the scrna-seq analysis domain of relevance to their method, including - http
peerj_reviews_txt/2889.txt: well stated, linked to original research question
peerj_reviews_txt/289.txt: not going to use the panas
peerj_reviews_txt/2890.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2891.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2892.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2893.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2894.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2895.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2896.txt: reporting in this manuscript
peerj_reviews_txt/2896.txt: referring to
peerj_reviews_txt/2897.txt: transparent about the fact that there were quite long delays in making the text disappear
peerj_reviews_txt/2897.txt: describing
peerj_reviews_txt/2898.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2899.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/29.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/290.txt: not willing to test that, please explain in the manuscript why this evaluation would not be necessary
peerj_reviews_txt/2900.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2901.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2902.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2903.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2904.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2905.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2906.txt: correct, it would be useful for those less familiar to the field to be pointed in the right direction
peerj_reviews_txt/2907.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2908.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2909.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/291.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2910.txt: assessing vertical resistance
peerj_reviews_txt/2910.txt: using a strain of alternaria solani from germany
peerj_reviews_txt/2911.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2912.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2913.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2914.txt: not familiar with the literature questioning the use of mass data and its variation in turtles due to gravidity, gut contents, health, etc
peerj_reviews_txt/2914.txt: referencing non-independence of mass and cl within closely related species
peerj_reviews_txt/2914.txt: compelled the addition of this study would be fantastic, but i leave this up to their discretion
peerj_reviews_txt/2915.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2916.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2917.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2918.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2919.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/292.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2920.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2921.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2922.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2923.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2924.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2925.txt: responsible for making materials, code, data and associated protocols available to readers without delay
peerj_reviews_txt/2925.txt: basing their conclusions on, but i am confused on how it was interpreted
peerj_reviews_txt/2925.txt: interpreting the results to suggest that cell death is pathology of bd and not an amphibian immune response
peerj_reviews_txt/2925.txt: analyzing the same data twice using different statistical methods
peerj_reviews_txt/2926.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2927.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2928.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2929.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/293.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2930.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2931.txt: reporting in main text
peerj_reviews_txt/2932.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2933.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2934.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2935.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2936.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2937.txt: encouraged to analyze infection rate among groups stratified by the number of symptoms such as no, one, two and more than two symptoms
peerj_reviews_txt/2938.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2939.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/294.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2940.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2941.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2942.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2943.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2944.txt: limited by not being able to witness interactions between fish, but some thought should be devoted to this complexity since they have extensive data
peerj_reviews_txt/2945.txt: trying but unable to reconcile their data, evident from the 10-page discussion and statements such as
peerj_reviews_txt/2946.txt: suggesting which is different
peerj_reviews_txt/2946.txt: to be commended for trying to bring some methodological rigor to the question of how eye movements vary with video sequences as opposed to static images
peerj_reviews_txt/2947.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2948.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2949.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/295.txt: also generally not present in the text
peerj_reviews_txt/2950.txt: the same
peerj_reviews_txt/2951.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2952.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2953.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2954.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2955.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2956.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2957.txt: suggesting here
peerj_reviews_txt/2958.txt: redundant in providing in vivo photographic images of h
peerj_reviews_txt/2959.txt: looking at many separate phages that have evolved to infect different staphylococcal species
peerj_reviews_txt/2959.txt: characterizing a highly uneven population given the relative numbers of viruses with
peerj_reviews_txt/296.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2960.txt: responsible for making materials, code, raw data and associated protocols relevant to the submission available without delay
peerj_reviews_txt/2961.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2962.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2963.txt: encouraged to go the next useful step in future studies
peerj_reviews_txt/2964.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2965.txt: not willing to implement a meliaceae calibrated dating, i ask the editor to handle this ms
peerj_reviews_txt/2965.txt: congratulated on a well constructed and interesting manuscript
peerj_reviews_txt/2966.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2967.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2968.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2969.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/297.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2970.txt: in an excellent place to answer that question in kerala or elsewhere in india, since a true evaluation of severity could be carried out, with the adequate controls
peerj_reviews_txt/2971.txt: specifically interested in testing geographical barriers to dispersal that have been reported for other species
peerj_reviews_txt/2971.txt: imposing their a priori hypothesis to the reader
peerj_reviews_txt/2972.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2973.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2974.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2975.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2976.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2977.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2978.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2979.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/298.txt: referring to m
peerj_reviews_txt/2980.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2981.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2982.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2983.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2984.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2985.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2986.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2987.txt: interested in the full latent trait, which may not be the purpose of the k6
peerj_reviews_txt/2988.txt: using the n50 metric to show how compact the assemblies are
peerj_reviews_txt/2989.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/299.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2990.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2991.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2992.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2993.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2994.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2995.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2996.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2997.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2998.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/2999.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/30.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/300.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3000.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3001.txt: careful to specify that the results apply to a small sample, but do not really spell out how this sample could be different to the general population of donkeys
peerj_reviews_txt/3001.txt: welcome to see any or all of these
peerj_reviews_txt/3002.txt: trying to say
peerj_reviews_txt/3003.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3004.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3005.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3006.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3007.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3008.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3009.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/301.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3010.txt: listed as corresponding authors
peerj_reviews_txt/3010.txt: making comparisons
peerj_reviews_txt/3011.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3012.txt: implying
peerj_reviews_txt/3013.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3014.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3015.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3016.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3017.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3018.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3019.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/302.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3020.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3021.txt: suggesting the use of the 4 ceis alone will have utility in identifying patients at risk of developing ra associated ild
peerj_reviews_txt/3022.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3023.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3024.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3025.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3026.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3027.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3028.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3029.txt: required to revise the manuscript thoroughly and clarify the methods
peerj_reviews_txt/303.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3030.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3031.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3032.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3033.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3034.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3035.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3036.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3037.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3038.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3039.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/304.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3040.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3041.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3042.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3043.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3044.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3045.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3046.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3047.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3048.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3049.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/305.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3050.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3051.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3052.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3053.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3054.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3055.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3056.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3057.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3058.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3059.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/306.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3060.txt: honest and transparent about the problems, but if there are issues in identification of males and females to their correct species, these need to be removed from the analyses
peerj_reviews_txt/3061.txt: right, however, there are several reports about the important role of conserved motifs in protein function
peerj_reviews_txt/3062.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3063.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3064.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3065.txt: knowledgeable of the subject matter
peerj_reviews_txt/3066.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3067.txt: not testing for differences between protected areas and harvested areas
peerj_reviews_txt/3067.txt: trying to say that urchins in protected areas are different than urchins in harvested areas
peerj_reviews_txt/3068.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3069.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/307.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3070.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3071.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3072.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3073.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3074.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3075.txt: really prudent stating conclusions
peerj_reviews_txt/3076.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3077.txt: trying to derive overarching patterns across a relatively balanced
peerj_reviews_txt/3077.txt: free to call these species extremely miniaturised if they please
peerj_reviews_txt/3078.txt: not supported by the results
peerj_reviews_txt/3079.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/308.txt: careful not to over-interpret their results
peerj_reviews_txt/3080.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3081.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3082.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3083.txt: trying to impart with this sentence
peerj_reviews_txt/3084.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3085.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3086.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3087.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3088.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3089.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/309.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3090.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3091.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3092.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3093.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3094.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3095.txt: presenting a methodology that is mixing peptide torsion angle and sequence alignment information to predict single and multi-label enzymatic function
peerj_reviews_txt/3095.txt: comparing results with previous ones
peerj_reviews_txt/3095.txt: expecting for the deep learning methods by including new information
peerj_reviews_txt/3095.txt: not using peptide graphs descriptors as invariant codification
peerj_reviews_txt/3096.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3097.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3098.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3099.txt: a very well-experienced researcher, so this reflects to the overall quality of the manuscript
peerj_reviews_txt/31.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/310.txt: right to point out that it is difficult to distinguish between demographic expansion and a selective sweep with this data
peerj_reviews_txt/3100.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3101.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3102.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3103.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3104.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3105.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3106.txt: recommended to explain how they decided to include 16 items as health symptoms, and 19 items as job demands
peerj_reviews_txt/3106.txt: suggested to clarify the validity of the measures regarding health symptoms, job demands, and self-efficacy
peerj_reviews_txt/3107.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3108.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3109.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/311.txt: very clear about the limitations of the study and its scope
peerj_reviews_txt/3110.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3111.txt: to be commended for applying such a well-designed experimental approach to their research question and for the quality of their writing
peerj_reviews_txt/3112.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3113.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3114.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3115.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3116.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3117.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3118.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3119.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/312.txt: anthropologists, the word political ecology isn
peerj_reviews_txt/312.txt: reading these papers from different disciplines and do not fully recognize the points being raised or discussed by them or what gets presented at ecological and conservation meetings
peerj_reviews_txt/312.txt: equating animal rights proponents with animal activists with individuals with interest in animal welfare
peerj_reviews_txt/312.txt: making are good ones but are not as well organized and expressed as they might be
peerj_reviews_txt/3120.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3121.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3122.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3123.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3124.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3125.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3126.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3127.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3128.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3129.txt: able to assess methodological quality only if the reporting was adequate in published reports
peerj_reviews_txt/313.txt: appropriated cautious on its conclusions, especially given the low numbers for some of the retracted paper categories
peerj_reviews_txt/3130.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3131.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3132.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3133.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3134.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3135.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3136.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3137.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3138.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3139.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/314.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3140.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3141.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3142.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3143.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3144.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3145.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3146.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3147.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3148.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3149.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/315.txt: presenting a tool to identify instances of linear motifs in the form of regular expressions or pssms along with their interacting domains, and enhance the specificity of the prediction by including network
peerj_reviews_txt/3150.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3151.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3152.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3153.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3154.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3155.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3156.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3157.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3158.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3159.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/316.txt: to be commended for examining nucleosidase function using rnai - the most rigorous and direct approach currently available for this kind of gene function study in schistosomes
peerj_reviews_txt/3160.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3161.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3162.txt: proposing that these 3 isolates
peerj_reviews_txt/3163.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3164.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3165.txt: not virologists themselves, and as someone who has worked on geminiviruses since the 1990
peerj_reviews_txt/3166.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3167.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3168.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3169.txt: investigating the impact of selected characteristics of caves on occurrence of eight animal species, that are not troglobionts
peerj_reviews_txt/317.txt: right to use mann-whitney test in this figure, which assumes non-normal distributions - this test is more reliable for the results presented in the figure 6
peerj_reviews_txt/317.txt: analyzing samples with n
peerj_reviews_txt/317.txt: describing in the figures
peerj_reviews_txt/3170.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3171.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3172.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3173.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3174.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3175.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3176.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3177.txt: required to strictly adhere with the format of the journal while drafting their manuscript starting from the affiliations and afterwards
peerj_reviews_txt/3178.txt: not sufficient familiar with the relevant literature
peerj_reviews_txt/3179.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/318.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3180.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3181.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3182.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3183.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3184.txt: trying to simulate a real life situation i believe the effects need to be studied in a carefully controlled laboratory setting first
peerj_reviews_txt/3185.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3186.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3187.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3188.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3189.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/319.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3190.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3191.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3192.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3193.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3194.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3195.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3196.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3197.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3198.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3199.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/32.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/320.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3200.txt: trying to determine causation, a simple and elegant way to do this would be to model the effect of dietary regime on rates of character evolution using phylogenetic regression
peerj_reviews_txt/3201.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3202.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3203.txt: expected to find an alternative fetuin family protein bj49a with antihemorrhagic activity and analyze its expression profile
peerj_reviews_txt/3204.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3205.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3206.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3207.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3208.txt: responsible for making materials, code, data and associated protocols available to readers without delay
peerj_reviews_txt/3209.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/321.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3210.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3211.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3212.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3213.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3214.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3215.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3216.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3217.txt: describing the current or past condition of the quarry, based on their work or the work of others
peerj_reviews_txt/3218.txt: addressing the issue of the use of chaperones and chauffeurs by doctors
peerj_reviews_txt/3219.txt: not reporting the roc curves
peerj_reviews_txt/322.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3220.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3221.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3222.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3223.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3224.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3225.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3226.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3227.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3228.txt: clear and report copious data
peerj_reviews_txt/3229.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/323.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3230.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3231.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3232.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3233.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3234.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3235.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3236.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3237.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3238.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3239.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/324.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3240.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3241.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3242.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3243.txt: trying to state that our current studies have only uncovered
peerj_reviews_txt/3244.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3245.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3246.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3247.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3248.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3249.txt: aggressively critisize previous work conducted by other research groups, in particular by durban et al
peerj_reviews_txt/325.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3250.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3251.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3252.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3253.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3254.txt: advised to mention that because this study is entirely in-silico, first we need to experimentally identify and characterize these bacterioicns and whether if they are true bcteriocins or not and their effectiveness
peerj_reviews_txt/3255.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3256.txt: also entitled to follow any phylogenetic hypothesis that is out there, but perhaps might like to acknowledge that there are competing ideas about pterosaur phylogeny - not only andres et al
peerj_reviews_txt/3257.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3258.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3259.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/326.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3260.txt: encourage to proof read the ms by a english-native speaker or any professional writer
peerj_reviews_txt/3260.txt: encouraged to indicate that the set of reference genes are intended for their use in
peerj_reviews_txt/3260.txt: encouraged to be more precise when describing
peerj_reviews_txt/3260.txt: encourage to perform at least one of these two options
peerj_reviews_txt/3261.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3262.txt: inconsistent in their application
peerj_reviews_txt/3262.txt: invalid unless they take into account all the relevant literature
peerj_reviews_txt/3263.txt: working on a more in-depth analysis of bat petrosal anatomy
peerj_reviews_txt/3264.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3265.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3266.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3267.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3268.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3269.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/327.txt: interested in comparing coral communities and their symbionts along a naturally occurring thermal gradient
peerj_reviews_txt/327.txt: not interested or in reality can not investigate the mechanism underlying community change
peerj_reviews_txt/327.txt: entitled to that position
peerj_reviews_txt/327.txt: overselling the applicability and significance of the study and the other reviewer was right to bring the limits of the approach to the authors attention
peerj_reviews_txt/3270.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3271.txt: careful with their language and the importance of the results are communicated well
peerj_reviews_txt/3272.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3273.txt: looking for inflammation according to the experimental design
peerj_reviews_txt/3274.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3275.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3276.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3277.txt: expected to provide point-by-point responses to the reviewers
peerj_reviews_txt/3277.txt: automatically reducing the ability to find any potential contamination
peerj_reviews_txt/3278.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3279.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/328.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3280.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3281.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3282.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3283.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3284.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3285.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3286.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3287.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3288.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3289.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/329.txt: going for here
peerj_reviews_txt/3290.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3291.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3292.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3293.txt: able to detect recombination events
peerj_reviews_txt/3294.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3295.txt: also suggested to add the brief context of roles of cumulus cells in oocyte meiosis and maturation in introduction or discussion part, for example, sheep
peerj_reviews_txt/3296.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3297.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3298.txt: able to address each one of the issues raised by reviewer
peerj_reviews_txt/3298.txt: of course not the only ones to have this problems, but there is an interesting field emerging that uses data from mobile sensors in the
peerj_reviews_txt/3299.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/33.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/330.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3300.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3301.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3302.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3303.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3304.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3305.txt: correctly labeled and easy to follow up and reveals the work done
peerj_reviews_txt/3306.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3307.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3308.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3309.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/331.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3310.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3311.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3312.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3313.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3314.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3315.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3316.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3317.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3318.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3319.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/332.txt: quite specific about which versions of the dependent software works with ls-bsr
peerj_reviews_txt/3320.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3321.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3322.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3323.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3324.txt: correct when they state that they have access to a unique dataset
peerj_reviews_txt/3325.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3326.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3327.txt: making the
peerj_reviews_txt/3327.txt: also an estimate given that we have the perfect helix approximation and the assumption of regular backbones
peerj_reviews_txt/3328.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3329.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/333.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3330.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3331.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3332.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3333.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3334.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3335.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3336.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3337.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3338.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3339.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/334.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3340.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3341.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3342.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3343.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3344.txt: asking about the restoration of the second trophic level, and the effect of the third and this gives the work a rather novel perspective
peerj_reviews_txt/3345.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3346.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3347.txt: using blast to assign taxonomy to edna
peerj_reviews_txt/3348.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3349.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/335.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3350.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3351.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3352.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3353.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3354.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3355.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3356.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3357.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3358.txt: able to address the points listed above i am happy to recommend the paper for publication
peerj_reviews_txt/3359.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/336.txt: also encouraged to cite more recent papers related to various wastewaters treated by anammox process
peerj_reviews_txt/3360.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3361.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3362.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3363.txt: 
peerj_reviews_txt/3364.txt: 
peerj_