Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@timcdlucas
Created April 8, 2020 10:54
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save timcdlucas/acc7df24da656d8401f1c47882eb09d0 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save timcdlucas/acc7df24da656d8401f1c47882eb09d0 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Does having a weird seed mess up neural networks
library(nnet)
library(dplyr)
set.seed(20200408)
diamonds <- diamonds %>%
select(carat, price, depth, table, x, y, z) %>%
scale
# Kinda dumb. I want reaosnable size datasets with no overlap
train_ii <- sample(nrow(diamonds), 1000)
test_ii <- sample(nrow(diamonds), 3000)
test_ii <- test_ii[!(test_ii %in% train_ii)]
train <- diamonds[train_ii, ]
test <- diamonds[test_ii, ]
test_y <- diamonds[, 'price'][test_ii]
mae <- rep(NA, 200)
for(i in 1:200){
m <- nnet(price ~ depth + table + carat + x + y + z, data = train, size = 100, linout = TRUE)
preds <- predict(m, newdata = test)
mae[i] <- mean(abs(preds - test_y))
}
set.seed(2631)
m <- nnet(price ~ depth + table + carat + x + y + z, data = train, size = 100, linout = TRUE)
preds <- predict(m, newdata = test)
mae_odd <- mean(abs(preds - test_y))
hist(mae)
abline(v = mae_odd)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment