Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

# tonicebrian/GBT_CaliforniaHousing.py Created Nov 5, 2012

Gradient Boosting Trees using Python
 # ============= # Introduction # ============= # I've been doing some data mining lately and specially looking into `Gradient # Boosting Trees `_ since it is # claimed that this is one of the techniques with best performance out of the # box. In order to have a better understanding of the technique I've reproduced # the example of section *10.14.1 California Housing* in the book `The Elements of Statistical Learning `_. # Each point of this dataset represents the house value of a property with some # attributes of that house. You can get the data and the description of those # attributes from `here `_. # I know that the whole exercise here can be easily done with the **R** package # `gbm `_ but I wanted to # do the exercise using Python. Since learning several languages well enough is # difficult and time consuming I would prefer to stick all my data analysis to # Python instead doing it in R, even with R being superior on some cases. But # having only one language for doing all your scripting, systems programming and # prototyping *PLUS* your data analysis is a good reason for me. Your upfront # effort of learning the language, setting up your tools and editors, etc. is # done only once instead of twice. # # Data Preparation # ----------------- # The first thing to do is to load the data into a `Pandas `_ dataframe import numpy as np import pandas as pd columnNames = ['HouseVal','MedInc','HouseAge','AveRooms', 'AveBedrms','Population','AveOccup','Latitude','Longitud'] df = pd.read_csv('cadata.txt',skiprows=27, sep='\s+',names=columnNames) # Now we have to split the datasets into training and validation. The training # data will be used to generate the trees that will constitute the final # averaged model. import random X = df[df.columns - ['HouseVal']] Y = df['HouseVal'] rows = random.sample(df.index, int(len(df)*.80)) x_train, y_train = X.ix[rows],Y.ix[rows] x_test,y_test = X.drop(rows),Y.drop(rows) # We then fit a Gradient Tree Boosting model to the data using the # `scikit-learn `_ package. We will use 500 trees # with each tree having a depth of 6 levels. In order to get results similar to # those in the book we also use the `Huber loss function `_ . from sklearn.metrics import mean_squared_error,r2_score from sklearn.ensemble import GradientBoostingRegressor params = {'n_estimators': 500, 'max_depth': 6, 'learning_rate': 0.1, 'loss': 'huber','alpha':0.95} clf = GradientBoostingRegressor(**params).fit(x_train, y_train) # For me, the Mean Squared Error wasn't much informative and used instead the # :math:`R^2` **coefficient of determination**. This measure is a number # indicating how well a variable is able to predict the other. Numbers close to # 0 means poor prediction and numbers close to 1 means perfect prediction. In the # book, they claim a 0.84 against a 0.86 reported in the paper that created the # dataset using a highly tuned algorithm. I'm getting a good 0.83 without much # tunning of the parameters so it's a good out of the box technique. mse = mean_squared_error(y_test, clf.predict(x_test)) r2 = r2_score(y_test, clf.predict(x_test)) print("MSE: %.4f" % mse) print("R2: %.4f" % r2) # Let's plot how does it behave the training and testing error import matplotlib.pyplot as plt # compute test set deviance test_score = np.zeros((params['n_estimators'],), dtype=np.float64) for i, y_pred in enumerate(clf.staged_decision_function(x_test)): test_score[i] = clf.loss_(y_test, y_pred) plt.figure(figsize=(12, 6)) plt.subplot(1, 1, 1) plt.title('Deviance') plt.plot(np.arange(params['n_estimators']) + 1, clf.train_score_, 'b-', label='Training Set Deviance') plt.plot(np.arange(params['n_estimators']) + 1, test_score, 'r-', label='Test Set Deviance') plt.legend(loc='upper right') plt.xlabel('Boosting Iterations') plt.ylabel('Deviance') # As you can see in the previous graph, although the train error keeps going # down as we add more trees to our model, the test error remains more or less # constant and doesn't incur in overfitting. This is mainly due to the shrinkage # parameter and one of the good features of this algorithm. # When doing data mining as important as finding a good model is being able to # interpret it, because based on that analysis and interpretation preemptive # actions can be performed. Although base trees are easily interpretable when # you are adding several of those trees interpretation is more difficult. You # usually rely on some measures of the predictive power of each feature. Let's # plot feature importance in predicting the House Value. feature_importance = clf.feature_importances_ # make importances relative to max importance feature_importance = 100.0 * (feature_importance / feature_importance.max()) sorted_idx = np.argsort(feature_importance) pos = np.arange(sorted_idx.shape) + .5 plt.figure(figsize=(12, 6)) plt.subplot(1, 1, 1) plt.barh(pos, feature_importance[sorted_idx], align='center') plt.yticks(pos, X.columns[sorted_idx]) plt.xlabel('Relative Importance') plt.title('Variable Importance') plt.show() # Once variable importance has been identified we could try to investigate how # those variables interact between them. For instance, we can plot the # dependence of the target variable with another variable has been averaged over # the values of the other variables not being taken into consideration. Some # variables present a clear monotonic dependence with the target value, while # others seem not very related to the target variable even when they ranked high # in the previous plot. This could be signaling an interaction between variables # that could be further studied. from sklearn.ensemble.partial_dependence import plot_partial_dependence fig, axs = plot_partial_dependence(clf, x_train, features=[3,2,7,6], feature_names=x_train.columns, n_cols=2) fig.show() # The last step performed was to explore the capabilities of the Python # libraries when plotting data in a map. Here we are plotting the predicted # House Value in California using Latitude and Longitude as the axis for # plotting this data in the map. from mpl_toolkits.basemap import Basemap predDf = pd.DataFrame(x_test.copy()) predDf['y_pred'] = clf.predict(x_test) def california_map(ax=None, lllat=31.5,urlat=42.5, lllon=-124,urlon=-113): m = Basemap(ax=ax, projection='stere', lon_0=(urlon + lllon) / 2, lat_0=(urlat + lllat) / 2, llcrnrlat=lllat, urcrnrlat=urlat, llcrnrlon=lllon, urcrnrlon=urlon, resolution='f') m.drawstates() m.drawcountries() m.drawcoastlines(color='lightblue') return m plt.figure() m= california_map() predDf = predDf.sort('y_pred') # Useful for plotting x,y = m(predDf['Longitud'],predDf['Latitude']) serieA = (np.array(predDf['y_pred']) - predDf['y_pred'].min())/(predDf['y_pred'].max()-predDf['y_pred'].min()) # z = plt.cm.jet(serieA) z = np.array(predDf['y_pred'])/1000 m.scatter(x,y,c=z,s=60,alpha=0.5,edgecolors='none') c = m.colorbar(location='right') c.set_label("House Value (Thousands of \$)") m.plot() plt.show() # Addendum # -------- # This blog post was written using `Pylit `_ as the tool # for doing `Literate Programming `_. # I think that literate programming is way superior to other software # methodologies like TDD when coding algorithms for data analysis. The main # problem I find right now is the lack of tooling for really taking advantage of # literate programming, but this is a technique that I'm definitely going to # research deepe I think that literate programming is way superior to other # software methodologies like TDD when coding algorithms for data analysis. The # main problem I find right now is the lack of tooling for really taking # advantage of literate programming, but this is a technique that I'm definitely # going to research deeper.

### marksimi commented Mar 25, 2014

 Thanks for writing this up! I'm just getting into playing with GBT and needed a good tutorial.

### Mahendra1980 commented Jun 18, 2014

 Great Post ,please also advice to export it in PMML file Thanks Mahi

### johanwid commented Jun 5, 2017 • edited

 i know this is years after you wrote this tutorial, but is there any chance you have another link to the dataset? the link doesn't seem to be working any more. cheers, jw

### znelly commented Jul 21, 2017

 It doesn't let me download the "cadata.txt" data-set from the provided link.

### karthikziffer commented Dec 21, 2017

 znelly , You can get the dataset from here . https://github.com/ppw123/cs686/blob/master/data/cadata.csv
to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.