Filter | Description | Example |
---|---|---|
allintext | Searches for occurrences of all the keywords given. | allintext:"keyword" |
intext | Searches for the occurrences of keywords all at once or one at a time. | intext:"keyword" |
inurl | Searches for a URL matching one of the keywords. | inurl:"keyword" |
allinurl | Searches for a URL matching all the keywords in the query. | allinurl:"keyword" |
intitle | Searches for occurrences of keywords in title all or one. | intitle:"keyword" |
A list of useful commands for the FFmpeg command line tool.
Download FFmpeg: https://www.ffmpeg.org/download.html
Full documentation: https://www.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg.html
I was at Amazon for about six and a half years, and now I've been at Google for that long. One thing that struck me immediately about the two companies -- an impression that has been reinforced almost daily -- is that Amazon does everything wrong, and Google does everything right. Sure, it's a sweeping generalization, but a surprisingly accurate one. It's pretty crazy. There are probably a hundred or even two hundred different ways you can compare the two companies, and Google is superior in all but three of them, if I recall correctly. I actually did a spreadsheet at one point but Legal wouldn't let me show it to anyone, even though recruiting loved it.
I mean, just to give you a very brief taste: Amazon's recruiting process is fundamentally flawed by having teams hire for themselves, so their hiring bar is incredibly inconsistent across teams, despite various efforts they've made to level it out. And their operations are a mess; they don't real