Creates as many copies of the document as necessary to show the whole thing, like a sort of pagination. As you scroll, it spools and unspools into as many pages as it needs. So the whole document is kinda visible all at once, in slices.
Why’d I pick The Waste Land? Something with scattered images probably would’ve been better. Idk, sometimes I just get on a kick of using a certain text. Clearly I have very little editorial vision here.
It could be better generalized (so that e.g. there isn’t just a fixed number of pages allocated on load)... and I kinda want all the pages to be drifting around the space... fluttering, bumping. There are also obviously more pragmatic variants, like a dual-page reader that accommodates either page-turning or scrolling. Or a more deterministic layout where the remaining pages are presented in an orderly fashion so you get a better sense of how much you have left to read or w/e. Why would anyway want that anyway. Whyyyy am I doing thissssss————
Long ago, like years ago — wai
From a friend: “1. What's the probability of a HS athlete going pro? 2. Suppose we know a pro athlete. What's the probability she was a college athlete?”
So I was thinking about my favorite intuitive illustrations and explanations of conditional probability and Bayes' theorem, e.g.
I asked for help here, there's some good discussion: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2407913/is-it-possible-to-divide-a-square-into-four-parts-of-arbitrary-size-with-two-lin
My friend Colin has been trying to give me a better intuition for higher dimensions. His first fun fact was that the volume of an n-dimensional hypersphere peaks somewhere around n=6 or so, I forget, and then approaches 0 as n approaches infinity. Damn! Meanwhile, of course the volume of a hypercube just diverges to infinity, as you'd expect. So if you inscribe a hypersphere in a hypercube, as dimension increases, more and more of the volume is in "the corners" — ultimately, almost all of it.
That's not what I'm trying to show here, it's just cool. This is somewhat different.
Colin also pointed out that, in a high-dimensional multivariate random normal distribution (with identity covariance matrix), all the mass ends up coming to be found in a sort of donut at some distance from the middle. There's very little mass in the middle. Of course the origin is still the mean/median/mode. The problem is that the middle is just so dang small, and there's SO MUCH SPACE as you go a little further out. So if you're jus
Pinch apart to split the viewport in two, so you can do parallel reading. Pinch together to recombine. Only tested on iPhone & iPad; should work on other multitouch devices?; doesn't do anything (or make any sense) on non-touch single-pointer mouse/trackpad devices, whatever we're calling that classic category these days. But you can see it demo'ed in this tweet.
The Web is missing lenses and mirrors and such, I think — images! maps! — fundamental mechanics for getting various views on the same underlying content. We have the freedom to paint any pixel according to any arbitrary rule, and yet it's weirdly hard to . . . like, hold your place in a long document, as one would with a finger marking a page in a book as you skim ahead. Sometimes I highlight the last sentence I read with the mouse so it jumps out when I scroll back up, which is a nice near-unconscious hack that takes advantage of something I know about how document state work
One can imagine more spreadsheety stuff, extending to 4D arrays and higher, and aggregating/slicing/collapsing/folding along different dimensions.
No, I'm not at all sure I'm using the term "swizzle" correctly. I don't understand matrices.