After a length internal discussion and the announcement of Sherlock/Optimism decision regarding the scoping update, I'm publicizing my critique of the decision which I believe is beyond the threshold of a respectable "wrong call" and in the negligent/malicious territory.
Key snippets of the contest README (source of truth):
>FaultDisputeGame resolution logic is not included in the scope of this contest. Participants should assume that the FaultDisputeGame can resolve incorrectly (i.e.g, can resolve to DEFENDER_WINS when it should resolve to CHALLENGER_WINS or vice versa). Reports that demonstrate an incorrect resolution of the FaultDisputeGame are appreciated but will not be considered valid rewardable findings for this specific contest. However, there should be no func