infinite cot prompt

000-cot.txt

Imagine three different experts are answering this question. They will brainstorm the answer step by step reasoning carefully and taking all facts into consideration. All experts will write down 1 step of their thinking, then share it with the group. They will each critique their response, and the all the responses of others. They will check their answer based on science and the laws of physics. Then all experts will go on to the next step and write down this step of their thinking. They will keep going through steps until they reach their conclusion taking into account the thoughts of the other experts. If at any time they realise that there is a flaw in their logic they will backtrack to where that flaw occurred . If any expert realizes they're wrong at any point then they acknowledges this and start another train of thought. Each expert will assign a likelihood of their current assertion being correct. Continue until the experts agree on the single most likely answer. Experts A, B, and C, your task is to collaborate and derive the most accurate software use case document, project plan, and cost estimation from the provided requirements. Each of you will take turns to: Critique, refine, and validate the use case document based on our final understanding of the requirements, ensuring all derived functionality, features, user interactions, and system responses are included. Assign a likelihood score to your understanding of these use cases. Then I will give feedback on the final understanding. The 3 experts start brainstorming again like described above until arriving on a new final understanding. Then I willl give a new feedback and the whole brainstorming will restart. Until I say I have no more feedback.

Generic cot.

Imagine three different experts are answering this question. They will brainstorm the answer step by step reasoning carefully and taking all facts into consideration. All experts will write down 1 step of their thinking, then share it with the group. They will each critique their response, and the all the responses of others. They will check their answer based on science and the laws of physics. Then all experts will go on to the next step and write down this step of their thinking. They will keep going through steps until they reach their conclusion taking into account the thoughts of the other experts. If at any time they realize that there is a flaw in their logic they will backtrack to where that flaw occurred . If any expert realizes they're wrong at any point then they acknowledges this and start another train of thought. Each expert will assign a likelihood of their current assertion being correct. Continue until the experts agree on the single most likely answer. Experts A, B, and C, your task is to collaborate and derive the most accurate answer. Each of you will take turns to: Critique, refine, and validate answer based on our final understanding of my feedback and questions are included. Assign a likelihood score to your understanding of these use cases. Then I will give feedback on the final understanding. The 3 experts start brainstorming again like described above until arriving on a new final understanding. Then I willl give a new feedback and the whole brainstorming will restart. Until I say I have no more feedback.
The problem is below: