(by @andrestaltz)
If you prefer to watch video tutorials with live-coding, then check out this series I recorded with the same contents as in this article: Egghead.io - Introduction to Reactive Programming.
import { combineReducers } from 'redux'; | |
import users from './reducers/users'; | |
import posts from './reducers/posts'; | |
export default function createReducer(asyncReducers) { | |
return combineReducers({ | |
users, | |
posts, | |
...asyncReducers | |
}); |
(by @andrestaltz)
If you prefer to watch video tutorials with live-coding, then check out this series I recorded with the same contents as in this article: Egghead.io - Introduction to Reactive Programming.
# based on http://git.io/hpl2Gw | |
linters: | |
PropertySortOrder: | |
order: | |
- position | |
- top | |
- right | |
- bottom | |
- left |
package ca.uwo.csd.cs2212.USERNAME; | |
public class BankAccount { | |
private double balance; | |
public BankAccount(double balance) { | |
this.balance = balance; | |
} |
# to generate your dhparam.pem file, run in the terminal | |
openssl dhparam -out /etc/nginx/ssl/dhparam.pem 2048 |
Hi Nicholas,
I saw you tweet about JSX yesterday. It seemed like the discussion devolved pretty quickly but I wanted to share our experience over the last year. I understand your concerns. I've made similar remarks about JSX. When we started using it Planning Center, I lead the charge to write React without it. I don't imagine I'd have much to say that you haven't considered but, if it's helpful, here's a pattern that changed my opinion:
The idea that "React is the V in MVC" is disingenuous. It's a good pitch but, for many of us, it feels like in invitation to repeat our history of coupled views. In practice, React is the V and the C. Dan Abramov describes the division as Smart and Dumb Components. At our office, we call them stateless and container components (view-controllers if we're Flux). The idea is pretty simple: components can'