auremoser

Intro to Color

###Parsons: Journalism + Design ###Web Coding for Interactive Design October 21th, 2015

• Harris, J., Whale Hunt.
• Harris, J., I love your work.

curran

Pan and zoom in the map on the left to rotate the globe.

Click and drag the globe to pan on the map.

An example that shows a Chiasm plugin based on Leaflet.js alongside a Chiasm globe plugin based on the D3 example This is a Globe.

The Chiasm plugins demonstrated here are

bomberstudios

Design Hacking — Mi chapa del UX Spain 2015

Hola, mundo

Soy Ale Muñoz. Nací en Sevilla, aunque ahora vivo con mi mujer y mi hija en Madrid, donde trabajo para una empresa holandesa, con un equipo repartido por toda Europa, haciendo software que se usa en todos los rincones del mundo.

Me gusta diseñar, cocinar, y sentarme plácidamente a poner la mente en blanco sin hacer absolutamente nada.

Llevo muchos años ayudando a diseñadores y diseñadoras a trabajar menos, fabricando herramientas para automatizar tareas, definiendo procesos de trabajo, o gestionando proyectos de diseño. Si alguna vez habéis trabajado conmigo es posible que os haya contado algún truco para hacer algo más rápido

edrex

I store my documents in a Camlistore, with a local instance running on my workstation and sync to an s3 bucket and a fixed server. Since I set this up 2 years ago, I've been manually starting camlistored and cammount inside a tmux session each time I log in to OSX.

Today I finally got around to setting up these processes to to start using the native OSX facility, launchd plists.

Steps:

• camlistored and cammount should be in /usr/local/bin. I have them symlinked via

cd /usr/local/bin && ln -s ~/go/camlistore.org/bin/cam* . &&

chantastic

Hi Nicholas,

I saw you tweet about JSX yesterday. It seemed like the discussion devolved pretty quickly but I wanted to share our experience over the last year. I understand your concerns. I've made similar remarks about JSX. When we started using it Planning Center, I led the charge to write React without it. I don't imagine I'd have much to say that you haven't considered but, if it's helpful, here's a pattern that changed my opinion:

The idea that "React is the V in MVC" is disingenuous. It's a good pitch but, for many of us, it feels like in invitation to repeat our history of coupled views. In practice, React is the V and the C. Dan Abramov describes the division as Smart and Dumb Components. At our office, we call them stateless and container components (view-controllers if we're Flux). The idea is pretty simple: components can't

bobbygrace

Hello, visitors! If you want an updated version of this styleguide in repo form with tons of real-life examples… check out Trellisheets! https://github.com/trello/trellisheets

---

Trello CSS Guide

“I perfectly understand our CSS. I never have any issues with cascading rules. I never have to use !important or inline styles. Even though somebody else wrote this bit of CSS, I know exactly how it works and how to extend it. Fixes are easy! I have a hard time breaking our CSS. I know exactly where to put new CSS. We use all of our CSS and it’s pretty small overall. When I delete a template, I know the exact corresponding CSS file and I can delete it all at once. Nothing gets left behind.”

You often hear updog saying stuff like this. Who’s updog? Not much, who is up with you?

prakhar1989

Rich Hickey on becoming a better developer

Rich Hickey • 3 years ago

Sorry, I have to disagree with the entire premise here.

A wide variety of experiences might lead to well-roundedness, but not to greatness, nor even goodness. By constantly switching from one thing to another you are always reaching above your comfort zone, yes, but doing so by resetting your skill and knowledge level to zero.

Mastery comes from a combination of at least several of the following:

evancz

Towards Discussion Guidelines

I personally like to have discussions in the spirit of the Socratic method. Instead of declaring my opinion, I ask a relevant question. How about this situation? What about this case? This has two possible outcomes.

1. The other person explains to me how things work in that case. I realize that I misunderstood, and we both come out enriched and in agreement.
2. The other person realizes that those situations are not covered. They realize they misunderstood, and we both come out enriched and in agreement.

In both cases, it could have been a conflict, egos crashing together. But by asking questions, it becomes a collaboration to find the best answer. Even the simple act of asking a question in the first place says, "I care what you have to say, we can agree on this." That said, I have noticed that it is definitely still possible for things to go wrong within this framework. How can this happen?

There was a passage from [The

ncase

###Do & Show & Tell

Don't try to explain everything with something interactive. Use interactivity only when interactivity works best, otherwise, supplement it with text & images. Also keep in mind the overlaps of Do & Show & Tell: when text interacts with the diagrams (e.g. Tangle), and vice versa.

Text: Best at describing very abstract concepts.
Graphs: Best at showing broad relationships at a glance.
Animations: Best at showing temporal relationships.
Interactives: Best at showing processes, systems, models. (See final slide on Procedural Rhetoric)

staltz

The introduction to Reactive Programming you've been missing

(by @andrestaltz)

---

This tutorial as a series of videos

If you prefer to watch video tutorials with live-coding, then check out this series I recorded with the same contents as in this article: Egghead.io - Introduction to Reactive Programming.

---