vietjtnguyen

{
 "metadata": {
  "name": "CS 596"
 },
 "nbformat": 3,
 "nbformat_minor": 0,
 "worksheets": [
  {
   "cells": [
    {

vietjtnguyen

vietjtnguyen

vietjtnguyen

vietjtnguyen

Causation implies correlation but not necessarily the other way around. Correlation can be a result of confounding variables (X and Y are correlated because some latent variable Z is causing both X and Y).

I think you'd enjoy a read of Judea Pearl's "Causality". If you could get your hands on the book and read just the first chapter that should suffice.

I'll attempt a sweeping blurb but I can't guarantee its correctness. I'm probably going to screw up some statistical concepts. Also, I'm going to ignore sampling effects (which can cause spurious correlations and stuff).

---

Anyway, say you're observing a system. It has two variables: X and Y. You collect observational data and fit a statistical model to your data. Say we find a correlation (dependence) between X and Y in the data.

vietjtnguyen

:loop
powershell -Command "&{ svn status | ? { $_ -match '^!\s+(.*)' } | %% { svn rm $Matches[1] }  }"
svn add --force * --auto-props --parents --depth infinity
svn commit -m "Autosave %date% %time%"
svn update
TIMEOUT /t 60
goto loop

vietjtnguyen

h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 {
    font-family: "STIX-Bold", serif;
}
p, ol, ul {
    font-family: "STIX-Regular", serif;
    font-size: 115%;
}
ul ul, li, ul li, li li {
    font-family: "STIX-Regular", serif;
    font-size: 100%;

vietjtnguyen

vietjtnguyen

vietjtnguyen