vilobhmm

sudo systemctl list-units 

sudo journalctl -u etcd --no-pager 

sudo iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o `ROUTE=\`ip route get 8.8.8.8\`; DEVICE=${ROUTE#*dev}; echo $DEVICE | awk '{print $1}'` -j MASQUERADE

tracepath www.google.com

/etc/resolv.conf

vilobhmm

proposed a spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/138607/  under https://review.openstack.org/#/c/138607/10/specs/liberty/approved/service-group-using-tooz.rst is "specs/liberty/approved" right place for new specs to be put for review ?
11:59 dansmith, mriedem, melwitt : ^^^
mriedem
12:01 vilobhmm1: yes
mriedem
12:01 even though they aren't approved yet, which is confusing
vilobhmm1
12:01 mriedem : yep that was the confusing part as it two dir "approved" and "implemented"
12:02 thanks mriedem
dansmith

vilobhmm

[root@openstack-hv5 vilobhmm]# time sh -c "dd if=/dev/zero of=ddfile bs=8k count=250000 && sync"; rm ddfile
250000+0 records in
250000+0 records out
2048000000 bytes (2.0 GB) copied, 1.67513 s, 1.2 GB/s

real	0m4.661s
user	0m0.030s
sys	0m1.669s
[root@openstack-hv5 vilobhmm]#

vilobhmm

e.
[vilobhmm@swallowhollow fab]$ fab run_iozone_local
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using libgmp >= 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability.
  _warn("Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using libgmp >= 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability.", PowmInsecureWarning)
[10.90.148.69] Executing task 'run_iozone_local'
[10.90.148.69] run: rm -rf /home/vilobhmm/local
[10.90.148.69] run: mkdir /home/vilobhmm/local
[10.90.148.69] run: mkdir /home/vilobhmm/local/outdir/
[10.90.148.69] run: ./iozone -R -b /home/vilobhmm/local/outdir/out.xls -s 2g -r 8k -i 0 /home/vilobhmm/local/benchmark_test
[10.90.148.69] out: 	Iozone: Performance Test of File I/O

vilobhmm

Slow
71
72 
89 
74 
75 
76 
77
78
79