Last active
March 7, 2022 18:42
-
-
Save vnprc/090ef4b49d898393466a5e855d89d742 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
issues with zcash | |
- corporation is a single point of failure | |
- The feds operated a completely compromised, highly influential cryptography company for years. They can do it again | |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crypto_AG | |
- unfair launch | |
- I believe it is a mistake to treat a currency like a software startup. Money is not a company. It needs to be a truly | |
neutral arbiter with extremely minimal ties to human organizations. In my view, breaking this norm fundamentally compromises | |
trust in a currency. Low trust => low adoption => no network effect | |
- A founder's reward is anathema to a fair launch. The founder's reward was adjusted in 2020 | |
(https://help.slushpool.com/en/support/solutions/articles/77000423686-what-is-a-zcash-founder-reward-), but this is too | |
little too late. The logarithmically declining zcash emission schedule gives the largest payouts early. These were delivered | |
to founders and early investors. This misstep compromises my trust in zcash as a form of money. I believe that the | |
technology behind zcash is probably sound but it bears too many similarities to an ICO scam for me to be comfortable using | |
it for an extremely sensitive use case like a privacy coin. | |
- protocol updates are unsupported by academic research | |
- based on the peer-reviewed Zerocash paper, which was published in 2014. But after the genesis block "updates to the | |
protocol are not generally peer-reviewed" https://z.cash/support/faq/ | |
- anonymity set is all shielded transactions happening at the same time, not all txs ever. Zcash shielded txs have low usage | |
and therefore, a small anonymity set | |
case in point: why do darknets use monero and not zcash? | |
zcash steelman arguments: | |
Apparently the crypto is better/stronger/harder/faster. (Ok, maybe not faster.) I am not a cryptography expert but this seems | |
to be the general sentiment (I think this is what @valkenburgh is alluding to when he states his preference for zcash). | |
Monero is playing a shell game to hide transactions, which is a strategy that is fundamentally at odds with a public | |
blockchain where every transaction is publicly and indelibly recorded. So your txs are arguably only private for a limited | |
time. I expect the capability of the feds to deanonymize transactions will grow steadily with time, so monero is playing a | |
perpetual cat and mouse game. </steelman> | |
But the monero shell game seems to be working presently. My long term hope is that bitcoin/LN privacy achieves levels suitable | |
for most uses, making monero and zcash largely obsolete. Given the shortcomings of zcash and the (hopefully) limited time | |
window where a non-bitcoin privacy coin is necessary, I trust Monero over ZCash. | |
I try my damnedest to maintain an open mind on all topics. I am open to changing my opinion on this topic but, given the | |
above, it seems a herculean task at this point. I welcome good faith rebuttals to all of the above arguments. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment