Note: texts in brackets are my comments.
- more exercises to try
- make sure all commands work on all environments
- waiting until everyone was ready at the beginning (install' party?)
- use yellow post-it for questions too
- pace could be faster at certain chapters but generally nice
- Git/GitHub too exhausting (half a day was probably not enough)
- glass bottles instead of plastic ones
- not all stuff on GitHub is totally clear yet
- last exercise not finished, waiting for the solutions to be posted (will be sent by email at +10 days)
- more shorter exercises
- short outile of the upcoming distinct lessons would have been nice
- morning lecture was a bit too fast
- having to do evaluations all the time (refers to red/greed post-its)
- exercises with specific problems from audience
- examples on how not so-technical biologists use GitHub for .doc, .ppt, etc.
- one more break in the afternoon would be nice (on day 1, we did it on day 2)
- a little bit too much focus on GitHub (1h / 3h30 spent on GitHub)
- use the same system for all (Jupyter Notebook was used for Python, it is better during the workshop, but harder for the attendees to reuse their new skills after)
vi
was confusing (Git Bash does not havenano
installed, onlyvi
)- would have been nice if everyone had installed Ubuntu
- if linux or nano are required, attendees should know about it
- no time for questions (day 1 morning, we finished too late and did not ask for questions at the very end, but we asked right after lunch)
- too fast at the end (day 1 morning, cf. previous point)
- too repetitive at the end (day 1 afternoon, about git/github)
- better explain
git checkout
- a bit slow in the beginning
- introduce basic terms like variables a bit slower (second day)
- more mathplotlib if possible
- some very basic commands would have been explained a little quicker (complicated with absolute beginners)
- better structure for 2nd day
- introduction too fast (day 2 morning, about python)
- more structure to introduce basics of programming
- more time for the agenda, 3 days instead of 2 (we also think that, with complete beginners, it is complicated to teach Bash/Git/Python in 2 days)
- more time to introduce variables and files
- well explained
- help provided as needed
- inspirations for practicing
- very friendly attitude
- very good introduction for absolute beginners as advertised
- great helping during the workshop
- showing how to use shortcuts is useful (likely related to the UNIX shell)
- very helpful
- very interactive and informative
- good pace
- challenging python exercises with great individual help and good general explanations
- good introduction for beginners
- good to include exercises
- exercises are good
- would be nice if there was a 2nd workshop
- exercises, workbook (Jupyter Notebook I would say)
- exercises, patience
- exercises were very useful
- nice exercises, clearly explained. They gave an opportunity to see how functions work and how to work the outcome (related to Python)
- nice pace for python
- really liked the practical examples from Bioinformatics
- the exercises are good, difficulty level is just right
- good amount of instructors, help can be provided quickly and efficient (we were 4 instructors)
- very nice basic introduction, even for complete starters
- I have used python before and was happy about the short intro and higher speed
- basic content for the people who are not familiar with unix
- the organization
- the usb sticks to help with installing ubuntu for those who had not done it
- slow speed and many repetitions
- workshop was good, especially the second half
- very good pace and explanations
- nice introduction on git and github
- nice hands-on exercises
- everything was nicely and clearly explained and understandable
- very nice intro on the basic commands (unix)
- enough people to help with a problem right away
- very good pace and understandable explanations
- fast help of the team is wonderful
- interesting topics and easy to find the utilities
- not too slow/fast, nice people, good environment, good food and drinks
- everything was smooth and fine
- teaching speed is great
- nicely done
- step by step was perfect to follow
- good team work, interesting
- very interactive environment
- found the speed sweet spot, not too slow, not too fast
- nicely explained
- really liked the interaction
- clearly and slow enough explained
- step-by-step :)
- everything
- good introduction, plenty of time for questions in the beginning
- good explanation, not too fast/slow, questions could be asked and answered immediately
- I did like the speed, explanations and immediate help
- questions answered immediately