Benchmarking seems not to be a main focus of any specific academic field, although the problem has been addressed by many different groups in CS.
Some papers I found interesting:
# (ubuntu) | |
# add to end of .bashrc : | |
export PS1="\$(__git_ps1) "$PS1 | |
# gives e.g. (when in a repo): | |
(master) user@host:~$ | |
# more info: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15883416/adding-git-branch-on-the-bash-command-prompt |
Benchmarking seems not to be a main focus of any specific academic field, although the problem has been addressed by many different groups in CS.
Some papers I found interesting:
Q: what book should i use to learn ML? | |
A: use several, and find the one that speaks to you. | |
the list below assumes you know a bit of math but | |
are not very mathematical, and are interested in learning | |
enough to be practical. that is, it is not at the | |
mathematical level of MIJ's alleged list | |
(cf. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1055389 ) |
<html> | |
<head> | |
<title>Vega Object Constancy Issue Demo</title> | |
<script src="http://trifacta.github.com/vega/d3.v3.min.js"></script> | |
<script src="http://trifacta.github.com/vega/vega.js"></script> | |
</head> | |
<body> | |
<div id="vis"></div> | |
</body> | |
<script type="text/javascript"> |
[{"0500000US33009": 4.5, "0500000US38041": 3.5, "0500000US38043": 6.4, "0500000US39069": 9.7, "0500000US38045": 3.0, "0500000US38047": 3.0, "0500000US33001": 5.6, "0500000US33000": 5.4, "0500000US33003": 5.4, "0500000US33005": 5.3, "0500000US47159": 9.4, "0500000US33007": 7.6, "0500000US19175": 5.5, "0500000US19177": 7.1, "0500000US46095": 5.8, "0500000US19171": 6.9, "0500000US19173": 4.6, "0500000US24045": 9.0, "0500000US24047": 12.2, "0500000US24510": 10.5, "0500000US19179": 7.6, "0500000US48373": 9.7, "0500000US24043": 9.8, "0500000US46093": 5.0, "0500000US55103": 7.0, "0500000US46091": 6.6, "0500000US26009": 12.3, "0500000US31183": 3.6, "0500000US31181": 4.4, "0500000US31185": 4.5, "0500000US49041": 7.4, "0500000US49043": 6.1, "0500000US39067": 10.3, "0500000US49047": 5.1, "0500000US56000": 6.0, "0500000US18155": 7.0, "0500000US18157": 7.7, "0500000US18151": 10.2, "0500000US18153": 10.1, "0500000US29021": 7.4, "0500000US55029": 10.6, "0500000US29023": 8.2, "0500000US18159": 10.3, "0500000US29027": 7.5, "0 |
<!DOCTYPE html> | |
<html | |
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> | |
<head> | |
<title>Visualization</title> | |
<meta | |
charset="UTF-8" /> | |
<meta | |
http-equiv="Content-type" | |
content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" /> |
#!/bin/sh | |
hash brew &> /dev/null | |
if [ $? -eq 1 ]; then | |
echo 'Installing Homebrew ...' | |
ruby -e "$(curl -fsSL https://raw.github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/go/install)" | |
fi | |
# Ensure Homebrew formulae are updated | |
brew update |
; it's a bit cumbersome to set up and there's the unfortunate need to ignore the tag | |
; in the individual methods, but this allows you to leave the interpretation of open | |
; variants, well, *open* for extension by multimethod. | |
; dispatch off the first argument, which will be the tag | |
(defmethod command-multi (fn [tag & data] tag)) | |
; the first argument to the *method* is still the tag | |
(defmulti command-multi :print [_ val] (println val)) | |
(defmulti command-multi :read [_ fname] (slurp fname)) |
(comment ; Fun with transducers, v2 | |
;; Still haven't found a brief + approachable overview of Clojure 1.7's new | |
;; transducers in the particular way I would have preferred myself - so here goes: | |
;;;; Definitions | |
;; Looking at the `reduce` docstring, we can define a 'reducing-fn' as: | |
(fn reducing-fn ([]) ([accumulation next-input])) -> new-accumulation | |
;; (The `[]` arity is actually optional; it's only used when calling | |
;; `reduce` w/o an init-accumulator). |
#cython:boundscheck=False | |
#cython:wraparound=False | |
import numpy as np | |
from cython.parallel cimport prange | |
from libc.math cimport sqrt | |
cdef inline double dotp(int i, int j, int N, double[:, ::1] X) nogil: | |
cdef: | |
int k |