Justin yojoots

## animated-gradient-line-icons-css-only.markdown

      
              5 files
            
          
              0 forks
            
          
              0 comments
            
          
              0 stars
            
          
                yojoots
                / animated-gradient-line-icons-css-only.markdown
            
            
              Created
              October 12, 2020 03:49
            
              
                Animated Gradient Line Icons (CSS only)
              
          
    Animated Gradient Line Icons (CSS only)

A Pen by Medialoot on CodePen.
License.

  
## gist:7f4af4ee8fb9be1b34038f0409f5ca29
Tweet #1: https://twitter.com/yojoots/status/1225313674631503872
"The obvious counter is a PoW algorithm swapout. All who have a stake in BTC have commensurate incentive to follow the functional side of the fork."
The point: if a party has any stake in BTC, they have commensurate incentive to follow along on the branch of any given fork that continues to function.

Tweet #2: https://twitter.com/evoskuil/status/1225352981811347458
"Nope." (link to https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin-system/wiki/Proof-of-Work-Fallacy)
From the included link: "There is a theory that mining services are subservient... According to this theory miners then suffer a catastrophic loss due to the unrecoverable capital investment in highly-specialized hardware."

Note: this link, and the reasoning it contains, is not relevant to the point raised in Tweet #1. In fact, Tweet #1 does *not* argue in any way that users can "foist a capital loss" on miners. The link is entirely irrelevant to Tweet #1 and the point that it makes. In othe
	Tweet #1: https://twitter.com/yojoots/status/1225313674631503872
	"The obvious counter is a PoW algorithm swapout. All who have a stake in BTC have commensurate incentive to follow the functional side of the fork."
	The point: if a party has any stake in BTC, they have commensurate incentive to follow along on the branch of any given fork that continues to function.

	Tweet #2: https://twitter.com/evoskuil/status/1225352981811347458
	"Nope." (link to https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin-system/wiki/Proof-of-Work-Fallacy)
	From the included link: "There is a theory that mining services are subservient... According to this theory miners then suffer a catastrophic loss due to the unrecoverable capital investment in highly-specialized hardware."

	Note: this link, and the reasoning it contains, is not relevant to the point raised in Tweet #1. In fact, Tweet #1 does not argue in any way that users can "foist a capital loss" on miners. The link is entirely irrelevant to Tweet #1 and the point that it makes. In othe