Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@zack-anthropic

zack-anthropic/gist:4908799c205208d04fc43f20a9d4eb91

Created July 31, 2023 21:39
Show Gist options
  • Save zack-anthropic/4908799c205208d04fc43f20a9d4eb91 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save zack-anthropic/4908799c205208d04fc43f20a9d4eb91 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Download ZIP
prompt eng interview mc q&a
Raw
gistfile1.txt
,chunk,question,randomized_answers,correct_answer_letter
71," 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Notice of Intent To Extend and Revise a Previously Approved Information Collection
AGENCY:
National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA.
ACTION:
Notice and request for comments.
SUMMARY:
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regulations, this notice announces the National Institute of Food and Agriculture's (NIFA) intention to extend and revise a previously approved information collection entitled “
Children, Youth, and Families at Risk (CYFAR) Year End Report.
”
DATES:
Written comments on this notice must be received by September 11, 2023 to be assured of consideration. Comments received after that date will be considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES:
You may submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions:
All comments received will be posted without change to
https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONCTACT:
Laura Givens, 816–527–5379,
Laura.Givens@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection:
Children, Youth, and Families at Risk (CYFAR) Year End Report.
OMB Control Number:
0524–0043.
Expiration Date of Current Approval:
12/31/2023.
Type of Request:
Notice of intent to extend and revise a previously approved information collection for three years.
Abstract:
Funding for the Children, Youth, and Families at Risk (CYFAR) community project grants is authorized under section 3(d) of the Smith-Lever Act (7 U.S.C. 341
et seq.
), as amended, and other relevant authorizing legislation, which provide jurisdictional basis for the establishment and operation of Extension educational work for benefit of youth and families in communities.
CYFAR funding supports community programs serving children, youth, and families in at-risk environments.
CYFAR funds are intended to support the development of high quality, effective programs based on research and to document the impact of programs on intended audiences. The CYFAR Year End Report collects demographic and impact data from each community site to conduct impact evaluations of the programs on its intended audience. The collection of information serves several purposes. It allows NIFA staff to gauge if the program is reaching the target audience and make programmatic improvements. This collection also allows program staff to demonstrate the impacts and capacity that is developed in the locales where federal assistance is provided.
The evaluation processes of CYFAR are consistent with the requirements of Congressional legislation and OMB. The Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) of 1993 (Pub. L. 103–62), the Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act (FAIR) (Pub. L. 105–270), and the Agricultural, Research, Extension and Education Reform Act (AREERA) of 1998 (Pub. L. 105–185), together with OMB requirements, support the reporting requirements requested in this information collection. One of the five Presidential Management Agenda evaluations to be conducted to determine whether federally funded agricultural research, extension, and education programs result in public goods that have national or multi-state significance. The immediate need of this information collection is to provide a means for satisfying accountability requirements. The long-term objective is to provide a means to enable the evaluation and assessment of the effectiveness of programs receiving federal funds and to fully satisfy requirements of performance and accountability legislation in GPRA, the FAIR Act, and AREERA.
NIFA is proposing revisions to the currently approved collection. Specifically, NIFA proposes integrating new CYFAR Common Measures (survey questions) into the online CYFAR Suite Survey Builder application. The new questions will serve to consolidate participant audiences (reducing number of groups from five to three), unify measures across all programs, and link pre- and post-test survey data for reduced administrative burden. The CYFAR Suite will also improve automatic reporting by summarizing data.
Estimate of Burden:
The total annual estimated burden for this information collection is 1,173 hours. This includes the time needed for participant education; survey creation and administration; data entry, aggregation, and reporting; and preparation, review, and submission of CYFAR program plans. The only respondents are not-for-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
51.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent:
1.
Estimated Burden per Response:
23 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents:
1,173 hours.
Comments:
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the request to OMB for approval. All comments will become a matter of public record.
Obtaining a Copy of the Information Collection:
A copy of the information collection and related instructions may be obtained free of charge by contacting Laura Givens as directed above.
Done at Washington, DC, this day of July 7, 2023.
Dionne F. Toombs,
Associate Director for Programs, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
[FR Doc. 2023–14853 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What Act provides authorization for the CYFAR community project grants?,"['A. The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act'
'B. The Government Performance and Results Act' 'C. The Smith-Lever Act'
'D. The Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Reform Act']",C
250," 4150–37–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of Closed Meetings
Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee:
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Review of NIEHS Pathway to Independence Award K99/R00.
Date:
August 8, 2023.
Time:
11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
Agenda:
To review and evaluate grant applications.
Place:
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Keystone Building, 530 Davis Drive, Durham, NC 27709 (Virtual Meeting).
Contact Person:
Alfonso R. Latoni, Ph.D., Chief and Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research and Training, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, 984–287–3279,
alfonso.latoni@nih.gov.
Name of Committee:
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Time-Sensitive Research Opportunities in Environmental Health Sciences.
Date:
August 11, 2023.
Time:
11:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
Agenda:
To review and evaluate grant applications.
Place:
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Keystone Building, 530 Davis Drive, Durham, NC 27709 (Virtual Meeting).
Contact Person:
Alfonso R. Latoni, Ph.D., Chief and Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research and Training, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, 984–287–3279,
alfonso.latoni@nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.115, Biometry and Risk Estimation—Health Risks from Environmental Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety Training; 93.143, NIEHS Superfund Hazardous Substances—Basic Research and Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower Development in the Environmental Health Sciences; 93.113, Biological Response to Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied Toxicological Research and Testing, National Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: July 10, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023–14846 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What Institute within the Department of Health and Human Services issued the notice of closed meetings?,"['A. The National Institute on Drug Abuse'
'B. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute'
'C. The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences'
'D. The National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health']",C
192," 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Combined Notice of Filings
Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural Gas & Oil Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:
Filings Instituting Proceedings
Docket Numbers:
RP23–885–000.
Applicants:
Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
Description:
§ 4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates—Colonial eff 7–7–23 to be effective 7/7/2023.
Filed Date:
7/7/23.
Accession Number:
20230707–5050.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 7/19/23.
Docket Numbers:
RP23–886–000.
Applicants:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
Description:
Compliance filing: Pro Forma—IT Feeder to FT—McMullen Lateral to be effective N/A.
Filed Date:
7/7/23.
Accession Number:
20230707–5055.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 7/19/23.
Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system (
https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp
) by querying the docket number.
eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at:
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf.
For other information, call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659.
For other information, call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502–6595 or
OPP@ferc.gov.
Dated: July 7, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–14864 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What is the deadline for interventions and protests for the Texas Eastern and Transco filings?,"['A. 10 a.m. Eastern Time on July 21, 2023'
'B. 5 p.m. Central Time on July 18, 2023'
'C. 12 noon Eastern Time on July 20, 2023'
'D. 5 p.m. Eastern Time on July 19, 2023']",D
393," 4520–43–C
Based on MSHA's experience, NIOSH research, and effective respirable dust controls currently available and in use in the mining industry, MSHA preliminarily finds that the baseline conditions include various combinations of existing engineering controls selected and installed by individual mines to address respirable crystalline silica generated during mining operations.
d. Respirable Crystalline Silica Exposure Controls Available to Mines
Under the proposal, the mine operator must install, use, and maintain feasible engineering controls, supplemented by administrative controls, when necessary, to keep each miner's exposure at or below the proposed PEL. Engineering controls reduce or prevent miners' exposure to hazards.
50
Administrative controls establish work practices that reduce the duration, frequency, or intensity of miners' exposures (although rotation of miners would be prohibited under the proposed rule).
50
 Control measures that reduce respirable crystalline silica can also reduce exposures to other hazardous particulates, such as RCMD, metals, asbestos, and diesel exhaust. Operator enclosures and process enclosures also reduce hazardous levels of noise by creating a barrier between the operator and the noise source.
MSHA data and experience show that mine operators already have numerous engineering and administrative control options to control miners' exposures to respirable crystalline silica. These control options are widely recognized and used throughout the mining industry. NIOSH has extensively researched and documented engineering and administrative controls for respirable crystalline silica in mines. As noted previously, NIOSH has published a series on reducing respirable dust in mines (NIOSH, 2019b; NIOSH, 2021a).
(1) Engineering controls
Examples of existing engineering controls used at mines and commercially available engineering controls that MSHA considered include:
• Wetting or water sprays that prevent, capture, or redirect dust;
• Ventilation systems that capture dust at its source and transport it to a dust collection device (
e.g.,
filter or bag house), dilute dust already in the air, or “scrub” (cleanse) dust from the air in the work area;
• Process enclosures that restrict dust from migrating outside of the enclosed area, sometimes used with an attached ventilation system to improve effectiveness (
e.g.,
crushing equipment and associated dump hopper enclosure, with curtains and mechanical ventilation to keep dust inside);
• Operator enclosures, such as mobile equipment cabs or control booths, which provide an environment with clean air for an equipment operator to work safely;
• Protective features on mining process equipment to help prevent process failures and associated dust releases (
e.g.,
skirtboards on conveyors, which protect the conveyor system from damage and prevent material on the conveyor from falling off, which generates airborne dust);
• Preventive maintenance conducted on engineering controls and mining equipment that can influence dust levels at a mine, to keep them functioning optimally; and
• Instrumentation and other equipment to assist mine operators and miners in evaluating engineering control
effectiveness and recognizing control failures or other conditions that need corrective action.
51
51
 These instruments include dust monitors; water, air, and differential air pressure gauges; pitot tubes and air velocity meters; and video camera (NIOSH recommends software that pairs video with a dust monitor to track conditions that could lead to elevated exposures if not corrected). These instruments are discussed in NIOSH's best practices guides and dust control handbooks.
(2) Administrative controls
Administrative controls include practices that change the way tasks are performed to reduce a miner's exposure. Administrative controls can be very effective and can even prevent exposure entirely. MSHA has preliminarily determined that various administrative controls are readily available to provide supplementary support to engineering controls. Examples of administrative controls would include housekeeping procedures; proper work positions of miners; walking around the outside of a dusty process area rather than walking through it; cleaning of spills; and measures to prevent or minimize contamination of clothing to help decrease miners' exposure to respirable crystalline silica. However, these control methods depend on human behavior and intervention and are less reliable than properly designed, installed, and maintained engineering controls. Therefore, administrative controls would be permitted only as supplementary measures, with engineering controls required as the primary means of protection. Nevertheless, administrative controls play an important role in reducing miners' exposure to respirable crystalline silica.
52
52
 Proposed paragraph 60.11(b) prohibits the use of rotation of miners as an administrative control used for compliance with this part.
(3) Combinations of Controls
Various control options can also be used in combinations. NIOSH has documented in detail most control methods and has confirmed that they are currently used in mines, both individually and in combination with each other (2019b, 2021a).
e. Maintenance
MSHA preliminarily finds that a strong and feasible preventive maintenance program plays an important role in achieving consistently lower respirable crystalline silica exposure levels. MSHA has observed that when engineering controls are installed and maintained in working condition, respirable dust exposures tend to be below the existing exposure limits. When engineering controls are not maintained, dust control efficiency declines and exposure levels rise. When engineering controls fail due to a lack of proper maintenance, a marked rise in exposures can occur, resulting in noncompliance with MSHA's existing exposure limits. Some examples of the impact that proper maintenance can have on respirable dust levels include:
•
Water spray maintenance:
An experiment using water spray bars that could be turned on or off showed that dust reduction was less effective each time additional spray nozzles were deactivated. A 10 percent decrease occurred when three of 21 sprays were shut off, but a 50 percent decrease occurred when 12 out of the 21 sprays were shut off. Decreased total water spray volume and gaps in the spray pattern (due to deactivated nozzles) were both partially responsible for the decreased dust control (Seaman
et al.,
2020).
•
Water added to drill bailing air:
When introduced into the drill hole (with the bailing air through a hollow drill bit), water mixes with and moistens the drill dust ejected from the hole and can reduce respirable dust by more than 90% (NIOSH 2021a, 2019b). NIOSH reports that this same control measure, and others, are similarly effective for MNM and surface coal mine drills preparing the blasting holes used to expose the material below (whether ore or coal).
•
Ventilation system maintenance:
The amount of air cleaned by an air scrubber is decreased by up to one-third (33 percent) after one continuous mining machine cut. Cleaning the scrubber screens restores scrubber efficacy, but this maintenance must be performed after every cut. Spare scrubber screens make frequent cleaning practical without slowing production (NIOSH, 2021a).
•
Operator enclosure maintenance:
Tests with mining equipment showed that maintenance activities including repairing weather stripping and replacing clogged and missing cab ventilation system filters (intake, recirculation, final filters) increased miner protection, by up to 95 percent (NIOSH 2019b, 2021a).
•
Filter selection during maintenance:
Airflow is as important as filtration and pressurization in operator enclosures; during maintenance, filter selection can influence all three factors. Performing serial end-shift testing of enclosed cabs (on a face drill and a roof/rock bolter) at an underground crushed limestone mine, NIOSH compared installed HEPA filters and an alternative (MERV 16 filters). The latter provided an equal level of filtration and better overall miner protection by allowing greater airflow and cab pressurization. As an added advantage, NIOSH showed that these filters cost less and required less-frequent replacement, reducing maintenance expenses in this mining environment (Cecala
et al.,
2016; NIOSH 2021a, 2019b).
53 54
53
 NIOSH believes this study, like many of its other mining studies on operator enclosures and surface drill dust controls, is relevant to both MNM mining and coal mining. NIOSH reports on this study, conducted at an underground limestone mine, in detail in both its Dust control handbook for industrial minerals mining and processing (second edition) (2019b) and its best practices for dust control in coal mining (second edition) (2021a).
54
 Acronyms: High efficiency particulate air (HEPA). Minimum efficiency reporting value (MERV).
•
Proper design and installation—foundation for effective maintenance:
A new replacement equipment operator enclosure (control booth) installed adjacent to the primary crusher at a granite stone quarry initially provided 50 to 96 percent respirable dust reduction, even with inadequate pressurization. The protection it offered miners tripled after the booth's second pressurization/filtration unit was activated (Organiscak
et al.,
2016).
MSHA has observed that when engineering controls are properly maintained, exposure levels decrease or stay low. Metal mines, which typically have substantial controls already installed, primarily need reliable preventive maintenance programs to achieve the proposed PEL. It is also important to repair equipment damage that contributes to dust exposure (for example, damage to conveyor skirtboards that protect the conveyor system from damage and prevent spillage which generates airborne dust). Maintenance and repair programs must ensure that dust control equipment is functioning properly.
3. Feasibility Determination of Control Technologies
MSHA is proposing a PEL of 50 μg/m
3
for MNM and coal mines. As NIOSH has documented, the mining industry has a wide range of options for controlling dust exposure that are already in various configurations in mines (2019b; 2021a). NIOSH has carefully evaluated most of the dust controls used in the mining industry and found that many of the controls may be used in combinations with other control options. NIOSH has documented protective factors and exposure reductions of 30 to 90 percent or higher for many engineering and administrative controls.
MSHA also preliminarily finds that maintaining (including adjusting) or repairing existing controls would help achieve exposures at or below 50 μg/m
3
. For example, NIOSH found that performing maintenance on an operator enclosure can restore enclosure pressurization and reduce the respirable dust exposure of a miner by 90 to 98.9 percent (
e.g.,
by maintaining weather stripping, reseating or replacing leaking or clogged filters, and upgrading filtration) (NIOSH, 2019b). When an equipment operator remains inside a well-maintained enclosure for a portion of a shift (for example 75 percent of an 8-hour shift), the cab can reduce the exposure of the operator proportionally, to a level of 50 μg/m
3
(or lower). This point is demonstrated by the following example involving a bulk loading equipment operator in a poorly maintained booth, exposed to respirable crystalline silica near the existing exposure limit (in the MNM sectors, 100 μg/m
3
, as ISO 8-hour TWA value; in the Coal sector, 85.7 μg/m
3
ISO, calculated as an 8-hour TWA). During the 25 percent of their shift (two hours of an eight-hour shift) that the operator was working in the poorly maintained enclosure, their exposure would continue to be 100 μg/m
3
, while for the other six hours (operating mobile equipment with a fully refurbished protective cab), the exposure level would be 90 percent lower, or 10 μg/m
3
, resulting in an 8-hour TWA exposure of 33 μg/m
3
for that miner's shift.
55
Greater exposure reductions could also be achieved by repairing or replacing the poorly maintained enclosure, or modifying the miner's schedule so that the miner works seven hours, rather than six, inside of the well-maintained enclosure.
55
 Calculating the exposure for the shift: 8-hour TWA = [(10 μg/m
3
× 6 hours) + (100 μg/m
3
× 2 hours)]/8 hours = 33 μg/m
3
.
Other engineering controls (
e.g.,
process enclosure, water dust suppression, dust suppression hopper, ventilation systems) could reduce dust concentrations in the area surrounding the poorly maintained enclosure, which would reduce the exposure of the operator inside. For example, if the poorly maintained enclosure was an open-air control booth (windows do not close) at a truck loading station, adding a dust suppression hopper (which reduces respirable dust exposure by 39 to 88 percent during bulk loading) (NIOSH, 2019b), would lead to lower exposure during the two hours the miner was inside the open-air booth. The calculated respirable crystalline silica 8-hour TWA exposure of that miner could be reduced from 33 μg/m
3
(with improved operator enclosure alone) to 23 μg/m
3
(improved operator enclosure plus dust suppression hopper).
56
As an added benefit, any helper or utility worker in the truck loading area would also experience reduced exposure.
56
 Calculating the exposure with both the well-maintained operator enclosure (6 hours) and dust suppression hopper, assuming only the minimum documented respirable dust concentration reduction (39 percent): [(10 μg/m
3
× 6 hours) + (100 μg/m
3
× (1–0.39) × 2 hours)]/8 hours = 23 μg/m
3
.
Similarly, considering an example for a coal miner helper who spends 90 minutes (1.5 hours) per 8-hour shift assisting a drilling rig operator (in a protective operator's cab) drilling blast holes. The combination of controls used to control drilling dust (including water added to the bailing air, which can reduce airborne respirable dust emissions by up to 96 percent) usually maintain the helper's respirable crystalline silica exposure in the range of 35 μg/m
3
(ISO) as an 8-hour TWA. If, however, the drill's on-board water tank runs dry due to poor maintenance, the respirable crystalline silica concentration near the drill will rise by 95 percent, meaning that the concentration is 20 times greater than the usual level (NIOSH 2021a). If the drill operator idles the drill and calls for water resupply, the helper will not experience an elevated exposure. If instead the drill is operated dry for another 30 minutes until water resupply arrives, the helper will experience a respirable crystalline silica exposure of 77 μg/m
3
(ISO) as an 8-hour TWA. If dry drilling continued for 1.5 hours, the helper would have an exposure of 160 μg/m
3
ISO as an 8-hour TWA.
57
After water is delivered, drill respirable dust emissions will return to their normal level once water is again introduced into the drill bailing air.
57
 The 8-hour TWA exposure level of the helper, including the 30-minute period of elevated exposure, is calculated as: [(35 μg/m
3
× 7.5 hours) + (35 μg/m
3
× 20 × 0.5 hours)]/8 hours = 77 μg/m
3
. Drill bits designed for use with water may need to be replaced sooner if used dry.
Based on these examples and the wide range of effective exposure control options available to the mining industry, MSHA preliminarily finds that control technologies capable of reducing miners' respirable crystalline silica exposures are available, proven, effective, and transferable between mining commodities; however, they must be well-designed and consistently used and maintained.
a. Feasibility Findings for the Proposed PEL
Based on the exposure profiles in Table VIII–2 and Table VIII–3 for MNM mines, and in Table VIII–4 and VIII–5 for coal mines, and the examples in the previous section that demonstrate the beneficial effect of combined controls, MSHA preliminarily finds that the proposed PEL of 50 μg/m
3
is technologically feasible for all mines.
Table VIII–7 summarizes the technological feasibility of control technologies available to the mining industry, by commodity. MSHA preliminarily finds that control technologies are technologically feasible for all six commodities and their respective activity groups. Under baseline conditions, mines in each commodity category have already achieved respirable crystalline silica exposures at or below 50 μg/m
3
for most of the miners represented by MSHA's 57,769 samples for MNM miners and 63,127 samples for coal miners.
","How much could maintaining the weather stripping on an equipment operator's protective cab reduce respirable crystalline silica exposure for that miner, according to MSHA's analysis?","['A. 75 to 85 percent' 'B. 50 to 75 percent' 'C. 10 to 25 percent'
'D. 90 to 98.9 percent']",D
383," 4520–43–P
Table VI–6 presents MSHA's estimates of lifetime excess risk per 1,000 miners at exposure levels equal to the existing standards, the proposed PEL, and the proposed action level. These estimates are adjusted for FTE ratios and thus utilize cumulative exposures that more closely reflect the average hours worked per year.
21
For an MNM miner who is presently exposed at the existing PEL of 100 μg/m
3
(and given the weighted average FTE ratio of 0.87), implementing the proposed PEL would lower the miner's lifetime excess risk of death by 58.8 percent for silicosis, 45.6 percent for NMRD (not including silicosis), 52.0 percent for lung cancer, and 19.9 percent for ESRD. The MNM miner's risk of acquiring a non-fatal case of silicosis (would decrease by 80.4 percent).
21
 The FTE ratios used in these calculations are a weighted average of the FTE ratio for production employees and the FTE ratio for contract miners.
For a coal miner who is currently exposed at the existing exposure limit of 85.7 μg/m
3
(and given the weighted average FTE ratio of 0.99), implementing the proposed PEL would lower the miner's lifetime excess risk of death by 42.3 percent for silicosis mortality, 40.2 percent for NMRD mortality (not including silicosis), 43.5 percent for lung cancer mortality, and 15.8 percent for ESRD mortality. The coal miner's lifetime excess risk of acquiring non-fatal silicosis would decrease by 73.8 percent. While even greater reductions would be achieved at exposures equal to the proposed action level (25 μg/m
3
), some residual risks do remain at exposures of 25 μg/m
3
. Notably, at the proposed action level, ESRD risk is still 20.7 per 1,000 MNM miners and 21.6 per 1,000 coal miners. At the proposed action level, risk of non-fatal silicosis is 16.3 per 1,000 MNM miners and 16.9 per 1,000 coal miners.
EP13JY23.022
",What does the passage say about health risks at the proposed action level of 25 μg/m3 compared to the proposed PEL?,"['A. Some residual risks remain at 25 μg/m3.'
'B. Risks are 5 times lower at 25 μg/m3 than the proposed PEL.'
'C. Only silicosis risk declines at 25 μg/m3, other risks persist unchanged.'
'D. Risks are completely eliminated at 25 μg/m3.']",A
99," 3510–DS–P
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection, Comment Request: Governance Requirements for Derivatives Clearing Organizations
AGENCY:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY:
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) is announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain information by the agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (“PRA”), Federal agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of information, including proposed extension of an existing collection of information, and to allow 60 days for public comment. This notice is being published concurrently with the publication and adoption of the final rule titled “Governance Requirements for Derivatives Clearing Organizations” (“Final Rule”).
DATES:
Comments must be submitted on or before September 11, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
You may submit comments, identified by “Requirements for Derivatives Clearing Organizations OMB Control No. 3038–0076” by any of the following methods:
•
CFTC Website: https://comments.cftc.gov/.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments through the website.
•
Mail:
Christopher Kirkpatrick, Secretary of the Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW, Washington, DC 20581.
•
Hand Delivery/Courier:
Same as Mail, above.
Please submit your comments using only one method.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Opron, Special Counsel, Division of Clearing and Risk, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, (312) 596–0653; email:
jopron@cftc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Under the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.,
Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor. “Collection of Information” is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3 and includes agency requests or requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the
Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension of an existing collection of information, before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this requirement, the CFTC is publishing notice of the proposed collection of information listed below. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Title:
Requirements for Derivatives Clearing Organizations, OMB Control No. 3038–0076. This is a request for a revision of a currently approved information collection.
Abstract:
Concurrently with this notice, the Commission published the Final Rule adopting amendments that included new information collection requirements. The revised rules require a DCO to create and maintain minutes of each Risk Management Committee Meeting and to maintain written policies and procedures to make certain that its RMC includes at least two clearing member representatives and, if applicable, at least two representatives of customers of clearing members. The revised rules also require a DCO to adopt written policies and procedures related to the formation and role of each RWG, and to include in those policies and procedures requirements for the DCO to document and provide to the RMC, at a minimum, a summary of the topics discussed and the main points raised during each meeting of the RWG.
With respect to each new collection of information, the CFTC invites comments on:
• Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information will have a practical use;
• The accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
• Ways to enhance the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden of collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of
information technology;
e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of responses.
All comments must be submitted in English, or if not, accompanied by an English translation. Comments will be posted as received to
https://www.cftc.gov.
You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. If you wish the Commission to consider information that you believe is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, a petition for confidential treatment of the exempt information may be submitted according to the procedures established in § 145.9 of the Commission's regulations.
1
1
 17 CFR 145.9.
The Commission reserves the right, but shall have no obligation, to review, pre-screen, filter, redact, refuse or remove any or all of your submission from
https://www.cftc.gov
that it may deem to be inappropriate for publication, such as obscene language. All submissions that have been redacted or removed that contain comments on the merits of the ICR will be retained in the public comment file and will be considered as required under the Administrative Procedure Act and other applicable laws, and may be accessible under the Freedom of Information Act.
Burden Statement:
The Commission is revising its burden estimate for OMB control number 3038–0076 to account for the amendments described above. Specifically, the Commission believes that the burden under this clearance will increase because the 15 DCOs subject to these requirements will be required under § 39.24(b)(11) to create and maintain minutes of each RMC meeting, and under § 39.24(b)(12) to document and provide to the RMC, at a minimum, a summary of the topics discussed and the main points raised during each meeting of the RWG. The Commission estimates a DCO will spend an average of four hours creating minutes of each RMC meeting and four hours documenting a summary of the topics discussed and the main points raised during each meeting of the RWG, which includes attending the meeting, taking notes, and putting the notes into the required format following the meeting. The Commission estimates that a DCO's RMC and RWG will each need to hold an average of six meetings per year to satisfy the § 39.24(b)(11) and (12) requirements that a DCO's RMC and RWG address all matters that could materially affect the risk profile of the DCO. Based upon the above, the estimated hour burden for this collection is calculated as follows:
Estimated number of respondents:
15.
2
2
 The Commission notes that while new § 39.24(d) provides that a DCO may satisfy the requirements of paragraphs (b)(11), (b)(12), (c)(1)(iv), and (c)(3) by having rules that permit it to clear only fully collateralized positions, such DCOs are included in the total estimated number of respondents because these DCOs would still be required to develop and disclose governance arrangements required by the other provisions of § 39.24. The Commission's estimate is therefore conservative to the extent that these DCOs are not required to prepare and maintain minutes of each RMC meeting, and document and provide to the RMC, at a minimum, a summary of the topics discussed and the main points raised during each meeting of the RWG.
Estimated number of reports per respondent:
18.
Average number of hours per report:
4.
Estimated gross annual reporting burden:
1,080.
There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection.
(Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.
)
Dated: July 3, 2023.
Christopher Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023–14358 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",How many derivatives clearing organizations are estimated to be subject to the new requirements?,['A. 37' 'B. 15' 'C. 25' 'D. 8'],B
241," 4165–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services Administration
Enhancing Systems of Care for Children With Medical Complexity Coordinating Center Funding Supplement
AGENCY:
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Department of Health and Human Services.
ACTION:
Announcing supplemental funding for Enhancing Systems of Care for Children with Medical Complexity Coordinating Center.
SUMMARY:
HRSA will provide supplemental funding to the Enhancing Systems of Care for Children with Medical Complexity Coordinating Center during fiscal year 2023 to provide training, resources, and education to support states in their efforts to sustainably finance patient/family centered health care homes for children with medical complexity (CMC).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anna Maria Padlan, Public Health Analyst, Division of Services for Children with Special Health Needs, Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, at
APadlan@hrsa.gov
and 301–443–1737.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Intended Recipient(s) of the Award:
AcademyHealth.
Amount of Non-Competitive Award(s):
$450,000/year. Supplemental funding for similar activities may be considered in fiscal year 2024, subject to availability of funding for the activity and satisfactory performance of the recipient.
Project Period:
September 1, 2023, to August 31, 2024.
Assistance Listing (CFDA) Number:
93.110.
Award Instrument:
Supplement for Services.
Authority:
Social Security Act, Title V, Section§ 501(a)(2) (42 U.S.C. 701(a)(2).
Table 1—Recipient and Award Amount
Grant No.
Award recipient name
City, state
Award amount
UJ6MC45789
AcademyHealth
Washington, DC
$450,000
Justification:
The Enhancing Systems of Care for Children with Medical Complexity Coordinating Center provides national leadership through training, support, and education to five demonstration projects implementing patient/family centered models of care delivery. Additional funding is needed to create consistent and sustainable policies, strategies, and partnerships that every state can adapt when providing access to a patient and family centered health care home for all CMC and their families. Most CMC do not have access to high quality patient-centered care focused on their complex care needs and one key reason is lack of sustainable financing of these care models. As a result of this supplemental funding, (1) more states will receive training, education and resources to provide stable and sufficient financing for patient and family centered health care homes for all CMC; (2) common measures will be developed for use across federal programs; and (3) state and jurisdictional Title V programs will be better positioned to work with state Medicaid agencies regarding the needs of the maternal and child health population, especially children and youth with special health care needs/CMC. Because of the current grantee's work in Medicaid financing, implementation science, and the CMC population, they are best positioned to work with state Title V and Medicaid programs, as well as families, clinicians, health care organizations, and other stakeholders, to support state Medicaid and Title V agencies in their efforts.
HRSA will award $450,000 to the award recipient noted in Table I.
Carole Johnson,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2023–14870 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What organization is receiving the supplemental HRSA funding?,"['A. The National Association of Medicaid Directors, which will help states improve their Medicaid programs for children with special health needs.'
'B. The National Academy of Medicine, which will conduct a study on health systems improvement for children with medical complexity.'
'C. AcademyHealth'
'D. The American Academy of Pediatrics, which will use the funding to develop clinical guidelines for caring for children with medical complexity.']",C
17," 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2023–0503]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Anchor Bay Bass, Brew, and BBQ Fireworks, Lake St. Clair; Chesterfield, MI
AGENCY:
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION:
Temporary final rule.
SUMMARY:
The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for navigable waters on Lake St. Clair in Chesterfield, MI. The safety zone is necessary and intended to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards associated with fireworks displays created by the Anchor Bay Chamber of Commerce. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Detroit, or his designated representative.
DATES:
This rule is effective from 9:30 p.m. on July 28, 2023, through 10:30 p.m. on July 29, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov,
type USCG–2023–
0503 in the “SEARCH” box and click “SEARCH.” Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
If you have questions on this rule, call or email Tracy Girard, Waterways Department, Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone (313) 568–9564, email
Tracy.M.Girard@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those procedures are “impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.” Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because the event sponsor notified the Coast Guard with insufficient time to publish an NPRM and immediate action is necessary to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment on Lake St. Clair. It is impracticable and contrary to the public interest to publish a NPRM because we must establish this safety zone by July 28, 2023.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register
. For the same reasons discussed in the preceding paragraph, delaying the effective date of this rule would be impracticable because immediate action is needed to respond to the potential safety hazards associated with a fireworks display.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port Detroit (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with fireworks displays will be a safety concern for anyone within a 200-yard radius of the launch site. The likely combination of recreational vessels, darkness punctuated by bright flashes of light, and fireworks debris falling into the water presents risks of collisions which could result in serious injuries or fatalities. This rule is necessary to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable waters within the safety zone during the fireworks display.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone from 9:30 through 10:30 p.m. on July 28, 2023. In the case of inclement weather on July 28, 2023, this safety zone will be enforced from 10 through 10:30 p.m. on July 29, 2023. The safety zone will encompass all U.S. navigable waters of Lake St. Clair within a 200-yard radius of the fireworks launch site located 42°39′55.69″ N, 082°45′23.58″ W, near Brandenburg Park, in Chesterfield, MI. The duration of the zone is intended to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in these navigable waters during the fireworks display. Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Detroit or his designated representative. The Captain of the Port Detroit or his designated representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we discuss first amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. This rule has not been designated a “significant regulatory action,” under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size, location, and duration of the safety zone. Vessel traffic will be able to safely transit around this safety zone which would impact a small, designated area of Lake St. Clair one hours during the evening when vessel traffic is normally low. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF–FM Marine Channel 16 about the zone, and the rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term “small entities” comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132.
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal Government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a safety zone lasting only 1 hour that will prohibit entry within 200-yard radius of where the fireworks display will be conducted. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L[60] of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES
section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority:
46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
2. Add § 165.T09–0503 to read as follows:
§ 165.T09–0503
Safety Zone; Anchor Bay Bass, Brew, and BBQ Fireworks, Lake St. Clair; Chesterfield, MI.
(a)
Location.
The following area is a temporary safety zone: all U.S. navigable waters of Lake St. Clair within a within a 200-yard radius of the fireworks launch site located at position 42°39′55.69″ N, 082°45′23.58″ W. All geographic coordinates are North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
(b)
Enforcement Period.
This regulation will be enforced from 9:30 through 10:30 p.m. on July 28, 2023. In the case of inclement weather on July 28, 2023, this safety zone will be enforced from 10 through 10:30 p.m. on July 29, 2023. The Captain of the Port Detroit or a designated representative may suspend enforcement of the safety zone at any time.
(c)
Definitions.
As used in this section,
designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Detroit (COTP) in the enforcement of the safety zone.
(d)
Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general regulations in § 165.23, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Detroit or his designated representative.
(2) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Detroit or his designated representative to obtain permission to do so. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety zone must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of the Port Detroit or his designated representative. The COTP Detroit or his designated representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
Dated: July 7, 2023.
Richard P. Armstrong,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2023–14847 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",On what date will the safety zone be enforced from 9:30 pm to 10:30 pm?,"['A. July 27, 2023' 'B. August 1, 2023' 'C. July 29, 2023'
'D. July 28, 2023']",D
251," 4150–37–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of Closed Meetings
Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee:
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Review of NIEHS Pathway to Independence Award K99/R00.
Date:
August 8, 2023.
Time:
11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
Agenda:
To review and evaluate grant applications.
Place:
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Keystone Building, 530 Davis Drive, Durham, NC 27709 (Virtual Meeting).
Contact Person:
Alfonso R. Latoni, Ph.D., Chief and Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research and Training, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, 984–287–3279,
alfonso.latoni@nih.gov.
Name of Committee:
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Time-Sensitive Research Opportunities in Environmental Health Sciences.
Date:
August 11, 2023.
Time:
11:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
Agenda:
To review and evaluate grant applications.
Place:
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Keystone Building, 530 Davis Drive, Durham, NC 27709 (Virtual Meeting).
Contact Person:
Alfonso R. Latoni, Ph.D., Chief and Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research and Training, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, 984–287–3279,
alfonso.latoni@nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.115, Biometry and Risk Estimation—Health Risks from Environmental Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety Training; 93.143, NIEHS Superfund Hazardous Substances—Basic Research and Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower Development in the Environmental Health Sciences; 93.113, Biological Response to Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied Toxicological Research and Testing, National Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: July 10, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023–14846 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
","What city and state will the NIEHS Special Emphasis Panel meet in virtually on August 11, 2023?","['A. Durham, North Carolina' 'B. Bethesda, Maryland' 'C. Atlanta, Georgia'
'D. Chicago, Illinois']",A
399," 4520–43–C
b. Feasibility Findings for the Proposed Action Level
MSHA believes that mine operators can achieve exposure levels at or below the proposed action level of 25 μg/m
3
, for most miners by implementing additional engineering controls and more flexible and innovative administrative controls, in addition to the existing control methods already discussed in this technological feasibility analysis. MSHA notes that the exposure profiles in Table VIII–2 and Table VIII–3 for MNM mines, and Table VIII–4 and VIII–5 for coal mines indicate that mine operators have already achieved the proposed action level for at least half of the miners who MSHA has sampled in each commodity category. However, to do so reliably for all miners, operators would need to upgrade equipment and facility designs, particularly in mines with higher respirable crystalline silica concentrations, that may be due to an elevated silica content in materials.
One control option would be increased automation, such as expanding the use of existing autonomous or remote-controlled drilling rigs, roof bolters, stone cutting equipment, and packaging/bagging equipment. This type of automation can reduce exposures by increasing the distance between the equipment operator and the dust source. Other options include completely enclosing most processes and ventilating the enclosures with dust extraction equipment or controlling the speed of mining equipment (
e.g.,
longwall shearers, conveyors, dump truck emptying) and process equipment (
e.g.,
crushers, mills) to reduce turbulence that increases dust concentrations in air. Additionally, where compatible with the material, exposure levels can be reduced by increased wetting to constantly maintain the material, equipment, and mine facility surfaces damp through added water sprays and frequent housekeeping (
i.e.,
hosing down surfaces as often as necessary). In addition, vacuuming will minimize the amount of dust that becomes airborne and prevent dust that does settle on a surface from being resuspended in air.
Mines that only occasionally work with higher-silica-content materials may not be equipped with the controls required to achieve the proposed action level of 25 μg/m
3
, or they may not currently have procedures to ensure miners are protected when they do work with these materials. Examples of these activities include cutting roof or floor rock with a continuous mining machine in underground coal mines; packaging operations that involve materials from an unfamiliar supplier, including another mine; and rebuilding or repairing kilns. To address these activities, under the proposed rule, mine operators would have to add engineering controls to address any foreseeable respirable crystalline silica overexposures. Examples of additional controls include pre-testing batches of new raw materials; improving hazard communication when batches of incoming raw materials contain higher concentrations of crystalline silica, and
augmenting enclosure and ventilation (
e.g.,
adding ventilation to all crushing and screening equipment, increasing mine facility ventilation to 30 air changes per hour, and fully enclosing and ventilating all conveyor transfer locations). NIOSH (2019b, 2021a) describes all of the dust control methods described in this section, which are already used in mines, although to a less rigorous extent than would be necessary to reliably achieve exposure levels of 25 μg/m
3
or lower for all miners.
MSHA preliminarily finds that the proposed action level of 25 μg/m
3
is technologically feasible for most mines. This finding is based on the exposure profiles, presented in Table VIII–2 and Table VIII–3 for MNM mines, and Table VIII–4 and VIII–5 for coal mines, which shows that within each commodity category, the exposure levels are at or below 25 μg/m
3
for at least half of the miners sampled. MSHA's finding is also based on the extensive control options documented by NIOSH, which can be used in combinations to achieve additional control of respirable crystalline silica. Although most mines would need to adopt and rigorously implement a number of the control options mentioned in this section, the technology exists to achieve this level and is already in use in mines.
C. Technological Feasibility of Respiratory Protection (Within Proposed Part 60)
Under the proposed rule, respiratory protection would only be allowed for temporary, non-routine use. MSHA has preliminarily determined that it is technologically feasible to limit respirator use to temporary, non-routine activities based on the Agency's knowledge of and experience with the mining industry, evidence presented by NIOSH (2019b, 2020a), and Tables VIII–2 through VIII–5 (exposure profiles for MNM and coal mines). These tables indicate that the proposed PEL (50 μg/m
3
) has already been achieved for approximately 82 percent of the MNM miners and approximately 93 percent of the coal miners sampled by MSHA.
Proposed § 60.14(b) requires that any miner unable to wear a respirator must receive a temporary job transfer to an area or to an occupation at the same mine where respiratory protection is not required. The proposed paragraph would also require that an affected miner continue to receive compensation at no less than the regular rate of pay in the occupation held by that miner immediately prior to the transfer. MNM mine operations have complied with the job transfer provisions under the existing standard in § 57.5060(d)(7) that states miners unable to wear a respirator must be transferred to work in an existing position in an area of the mine where respiratory protection is not required. Proposed § 60.14(b) is similar to these existing requirements. MSHA anticipates that mine operators would have a similar experience implementing the job transfer provisions of proposed § 60.14(b). Therefore, MSHA preliminarily finds that the proposed requirement in § 60.14(b) is technologically feasible.
For miners who would need to wear respiratory protection on a temporary and non-routine basis, proposed § 60.14(c)(1) would require the mine operator to provide NIOSH-approved atmosphere-supplying respirators or NIOSH-approved air-purifying respirators equipped with high-efficiency particulate filters in one of the following NIOSH classifications under 42 CFR part 84: 100 series or High Efficiency (HE). As previously discussed, MSHA preliminarily finds that particulate respirators meeting these criteria would offer the best filtration efficiency (99.97 percent) and protection for miners exposed to respirable crystalline silica and are widely available and used by most industries. This finding is based on the suitability of the three particulate classifications for respirable size particle filtration and the broad commercial availability of these NIOSH-approved particulate respirators.
58
NIOSH publishes a list of approved respirator models along with manufacturer/supplier information. In November 2022, the NIOSH-approved list contained 221 records on atmosphere-supplying respirator models, 160 records on elastomeric respirators with P–100 classification, and 23 records on filtering facepiece respirators with P–100 classification (NIOSH, 2022 list P–100 elastomeric, P–100 filtering facepiece, and atmosphere-supplying respirator models).
59
Based on this information, MSHA preliminarily finds that proposed § 60.14(c)(1) is technologically feasible.
58
 Class 100 particulate respirators (currently the most widely used respirator filter specification in the U.S.) are available from numerous sources including respirator manufacturers, online safety supply companies, mine equipment suppliers, and local retail hardware stores.
59
 The NIOSH list of approved models does not guarantee that each model is currently manufactured. However, the list does not include obsolete models, and the more popular models are widely available, including in bulk quantities.
Proposed § 60.14(c)(2) would incorporate the
ASTM F3387–19 “Standard Practice for Respiratory Protection”
to ensure that the most current and protective respiratory protection practices would be implemented by operators who temporarily use respiratory protection to control miners' exposures to respirable crystalline silica. The Agency is also incorporating this respiratory protection consensus standard under §§ 56.5005, 57.5005, and 72.710. This proposed update is also addressed in the next section (see Technological feasibility of updated respiratory protection standards). Based on the information contained in that section, MSHA preliminarily finds that the proposed § 60.14(c)(2) is technologically feasible.
Based on information contained in this section, MSHA preliminarily finds that proposed § 60.14 is technologically feasible.
D. Technological Feasibility of Updated Respiratory Protection Standards (Amendments to 30 CFR Parts 56, 57, and 72)
1. Incorporation by Reference
Respirators are commonly used by miners as a means of protection against a multitude of respiratory hazards, including particulates, gases, and vapors. Respirators are needed in immediately life-threatening (
i.e.,
IDLH) situations as well as operations where engineering controls and administrative controls do not provide sufficient protection against respiratory hazards. Where respirators are used, they must seal and isolate the miner's respiratory system from the contaminated environment. The risk that a miner will experience an adverse health effect from a contaminant when relying on respiratory protection is a function of the toxicity or hazardous nature of the air contaminants present, the concentrations of the contaminants in the air, the duration of exposure, and the degree of protection provided by the respirator. When respirators fail to provide the proper protection, there is an increased risk of adverse health effects. Therefore, it is critical that respirators perform as they are designed.
Accordingly, MSHA is proposing to incorporate by reference ASTM F3387–19 under 30 CFR 56.5005, 30 CFR 57.5005, and 30 CFR 72.710. With this action, the Agency intends to assist mine operators in developing effective respiratory protection practices and programs that meet current industry standards. This proposed revision would better protect miners who temporarily wear respiratory protection.
The
American National Standards Practices for Respiratory Protection ANSI Z88.2–1969
is currently incorporated by reference in 30 CFR 56.5005, 30 CFR 57.5005, and 30 CFR
72.710.
60
Since MSHA issued these standards, respirator technology and knowledge on respirator protection have advanced and as a result, changes in respiratory protection standard practices have occurred. ASTM F3387–19 is based on the most recent consensus standard and provides more comprehensive and detailed guidance. MSHA believes that most mines that use respiratory protection are already following current respiratory protection practices and standards such as ANSI/ASSE Z88.2—2015 “
Practices for Respiratory Protection
” standard, its similar ASTM replacement (the F3387–19 standard), or OSHA 29 CFR 1910.134—
Respiratory protection.
ASTM F3387–19 standard practices are substantially similar to the standard practices included in ANSI/ASSE Z88.2–2015 or OSHA's respiratory standards.
60
 ASTM 3387–19 is the revised version of ANSI/ASSE Z88.2–2015. In 2017, the Z88 respirator standards were transferred from ANSI/ASSE to ASTM International (source: F3387–19, Appendix XI).
2. Availability of Respirators
The updated respiratory protection standard reflects current practice at many mines that currently use respiratory protection and does not require the use of new technology. Thus, MSHA preliminarily finds that the proposed update is technologically feasible for affected mines of all sizes.
3. Respiratory Protection Practices
By incorporating the updated respiratory protection consensus standard (ASTM F3387–19), MSHA intends that mine operators would develop effective respiratory protection practices that meet the updated consensus standard and that would better protect miners from respirable hazards not yet controlled by other methods.
MSHA presumes that most mines with respiratory protection programs, and particularly those MNM mines that have operations under both MSHA and OSHA jurisdiction, are already following either the ANSI/ASSE Z88.2—2015 standard, the ASTM F3387–19 standard, or OSHA 1910.134. The respiratory protection program elements under ASTM F3387–19 are largely similar to those in the existing standard.
MSHA expects that some operators may need to adjust their current respiratory protection practices and standard operating procedures to reflect ASTM F3387–19 standard practices. Examples of adjustments include formalizing fit testing and respirator training annually; updating the training qualifications of respirator trainers, managers, supervisors, and others responsible for the respiratory protection program; reviewing the information exchanged with the physician or other licensed health care professional (PLHCP); and formalizing internal and external respiratory protection program reviews or audits.
Overall, MSHA preliminarily finds that the proposed amendments to existing parts 56, 57, and 72 are technologically feasible because the requirements of ASTM F3378–19 are already implemented at some mines.
E. Technological Feasibility of Medical Surveillance (Within Proposed Part 60)
Under the proposed rule, mine operators would be required to provide periodic medical examinations for each MNM miner, at no cost to the miner. The proposed medical surveillance standards would extend to MNM miners similar protections available to coal miners under 30 CFR 72.100. The requirements in proposed § 60.15 are consistent with the Mine Act's mandate to provide maximum health protection for miners.
Under the proposed standards, MNM miners new to the mining industry would receive an initial examination, within 30 days. If they are not new to mining, they are categorized as belonging to a group of workers who are eligible for an examination every 5 years. Workers who are new to mining, after they have their initial examination, would be provided another follow-up examination within 3 years. If the 3-year follow-up examination indicates any medical concerns associated with chest X-ray findings or decreased lung function, these miners are eligible to have another follow-up exam in 2 years. After this additional 2-year follow-up exam, or if the 3-year follow-up examination indicates no medical concerns associated with chest X-ray findings or decreased lung function, these miners will enter the category of miners eligible for periodic 5-year exams.
MSHA is proposing that medical examinations would be performed by a PLHCP or specialist. A medical examination would include a review of the miner's medical and work history and physical examination. The medical and work history would cover a miner's present and past work exposures, illnesses, and any symptoms indicating respirable crystalline silica-related diseases and compromised lung function. The medical examination would include a chest X-ray. The required chest X-ray would be required to be classified by a NIOSH-certified B Reader, in accordance with the Guidelines for the Use of the International Labour Office (ILO) International Classification of Radiographs of Pneumoconioses. The ILO recently made additional standard digital radiographic images available and has published guidelines on the classification of digital radiographic images (ILO 2022). These guidelines provide standard practices for detecting changes of pneumoconiosis, including silicosis, in chest X-rays. The proposed rule would also require spirometry test be part of the medical examination.
MSHA has preliminarily determined that it is technologically feasible for MNM mine operators to provide periodic examinations. The procedures required for initial and periodic medical examination are commonly conducted in the general population (
i.e.,
medical history, physical examination, chest X-ray, spirometry test) by a wide range of practitioners with varying medical backgrounds. Because the proposed medical examinations consist of procedures conducted in the general population and because MSHA would be giving MNM mine operators maximum flexibility in selecting a PLHCP who would be able to offer these services, MSHA anticipates that operators would not experience difficulty in finding PLHCPs who are licensed to provide these services.
In addition, in the case of classifying chest X-rays, MSHA has preliminarily determined that the availability of digital X-ray technology allows for electronic submission to remotely located B Readers for interpretation; therefore, MSHA anticipates that the limited number of B Readers in certain geographic locations would not be an obstacle for MNM operators. Overall, MSHA preliminarily finds that the proposed medical surveillance provisions are technologically feasible.
F. Conclusions
Based on MSHA's technological feasibility analysis, MSHA has determined that all elements of the proposed rule on
Lowering Miners' Exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica and Improving Respiratory Protection
are technologically feasible.
IX. Summary of Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis and Regulatory Alternatives
A. Introduction
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. E.O.s 12866 and 13563 require that regulatory agencies assess both the costs and benefits of regulations.
A regulatory action is considered “significant” if it is likely to “have an annual effect on the economy of $200 million or more . . .” under E.O. 12866 Section 3(f)(1), as amended by E.O. 14094. The proposed rule “Lowering Miners' Exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica and Improving Respiratory Protection” is a significant rule. To comply with E.O.s 12866 and 13563, MSHA has prepared a standalone PRIA for this proposed rule. A summary of the PRIA is presented below. The standalone PRIA contains detailed supporting data and explanation for the summary materials presented here, including the mining industry, costs and benefits, and economic feasibility. The standalone PRIA can be accessed electronically at
http://www.msha.gov
and has been placed in the rulemaking docket at
www.regulations.gov,
docket number MSHA–2023–0001. MSHA requests comments on all estimates of costs and benefits presented in this PRIA and on the data, assumptions, and methodologies the Agency used to develop the cost and benefit estimates.
B. Miners and Mining Industry
The proposed rule would affect mine operators and miners. This section provides information on the structure of the Metal/Nonmetal (MNM) and coal mining industries, including the revenue, number, employment by commodity and size; economic characteristics of MNM and coal mines; and the respirable crystalline silica exposure profiles for miners across different occupations in the MNM and coal industry. The data come from the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI), U.S. Geological Survey (USGS); U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), Educational Policy and Development and Program Evaluation and Information Resources; the Statistics of US Businesses (SUSB); and the Energy Information Administration (EIA).
1. Structure of the Mining Industry
The mining industry can be divided into two major sectors based on commodity: (1) Metal/Nonmetal mines (hereafter referred to as MNM mines) and (2) coal mines with further distinction made regarding type of operation (
e.g.,
underground coal mines or surface coal mines). The MNM mining sector is made up of metal mines (copper, iron ore, gold, silver, etc.) and nonmetal mines. Nonmetal mines can be categorized into four commodity groups: (1) nonmetal (mineral) materials such as clays, potash, soda ash, salt, talc, and pyrophyllite; (2) sand and gravel, including industrial sand; (3) stone including granite, limestone, dolomite, sandstone, slate, and marble; and (4) crushed limestone.
MSHA categorizes mines by size based on employment. For purposes of this industry profile, MSHA has categorized mines into the following four groups for analytical purposes 
61
—mines that employ: (1) 1–20 miners (Emp ≤20); (2) 21 to 100 miners (20< Emp ≤100); (3) 101 to 500 miners (100< Emp ≤500); and (4) 501 or more miners (500< Emp).
61
 Miner employment is based on the information submitted quarterly through the MSHA Form 7000–2, excluding Subunit 99—Office (professional and clerical employees at the mine or plant working in an office);
https://www.msha.gov/sites/default/files/Support_Resources/Forms/7000-2_0.pdf
.
MSHA tracks mine characteristics and maintains a database containing the number of mines by commodity and size, number of employees, and employee hours worked. MSHA also collects data on the number of mining contractors, their employees, and employee hours. While contractors are issued a unique MSHA contractor identification number, they may work at any mine.
Table IX–1 presents an overview of the mining industry, including the number of MNM and coal mines, their employment, excluding contractors, and revenues by commodity and size. All data are current in reference to the year 2019. In 2019, the MNM mining sector of 11,525 mines employed 169,070 individuals, of which 150,928 were miners and 18,142 were office workers. There were 1,106 coal mines that reported production and that employed 52,966 individuals, of which 51,573 were miners and 1,393 were office workers.
",What types of data does MSHA collect on mining contractors?,"['A. Number of employees and employee hours worked'
'B. Equipment rented and fuel consumed'
'C. Revenue generated and taxes paid'
'D. Tons of overburden removed and minerals extracted']",A
288," 4334–63–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–WASO–NRSS–NPS0035687; PPWONRADE3, PPMRSNR1Y.NM0000 (223); OMB Control Number 1024–NEW]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Socioeconomic Monitoring Study of National Park Service Visitors
AGENCY:
National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION:
Notice of information collection; request for comment.
SUMMARY:
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we, the National Park Service (NPS), are proposing a new information collection.
DATES:
Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before August 14, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to
https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Find this particular information collection by selecting “Currently under Review—Open for Public Comments” or by using the search function. Please provide a copy of your comments to Phadrea Ponds, NPS Information Collection Clearance Officer, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive (MS–242) Reston, VA 20192; or
phadrea_ponds@nps.gov
(email). Please reference Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number 1024–NEW (SEM) in the subject line of your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
To request additional information about this ICR, contact Bret Meldrum by email
at
bret_meldrum@nps.gov
(email) or at 970–267–7295 (telephone). Individuals in the United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services. Individuals outside the United States should use the relay services offered within their country to make international calls to the point of contact in the United States. You may also view the ICR at
https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.)
and 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), all information collections require approval under the PRA. As part of our continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burdens, we invite the public and other Federal agencies to comment on new, proposed, revised, and continuing collections of information. This helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. It also helps the public understand our information collection requirements and provide the requested data in the desired format.
A
Federal Register
notice with a 60-day public comment period soliciting comments on this collection of information was published on August 27, 2021 (86 FR 48244). A comment requesting a copy of the survey instruments was received. Copies of the surveys were sent to the commenter. No additional comments were received.
As part of our continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burdens, we are again soliciting comments from the public and other Federal agencies on the proposed ICR that is described below. We are especially interested in public comment addressing the following:
(1) Whether or not the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether or not the information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of our estimate of the burden for this collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(4) How might the agency minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology,
e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of response.
Comments that you submit in response to this notice are a matter of public record. We will include or summarize each comment in our request to OMB to approve this ICR. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Abstract:
The National Park Service (NPS) Social Science Program (SSP) is authorized by 54 U.S.C. 100701 to collect information that will improve the ability of the NPS to provide state-of the-art management, protection, and interpretation of, and research on, the resources of the System. However, the data currently available from survey research is insufficient for generalizing findings across all national park units in the System with regards to visitor experiences, attitudes, and spending behaviors. Past and present socioeconomic research in NPS units do not allow for comparison across units or against a regional and nationwide benchmark of information. Without this data, local, regional, and national-level NPS managers lack a comprehensive understanding of visitor demographics, economic contribution, and visitation related experiences in park units needed to monitor how well the System is serving the public. In 2016, the NPS SSP conducted a pilot study in 14 NPS units to identify and better understand the need for more advanced socioeconomic monitoring. The pilot study produced and verified a study design that will allow SSP to fully implement a Socioeconomic Monitoring Study (SEM). Building on the findings from the pilot study, the SEM will collect information from visitors at 30 National Park units annually to provide generalizable results for NPS managers and planners across the System to understand and monitor: visitor demographics, economic contribution, services, facilities, and infrastructure investments. Park units will be able to compare their unit data with regional and national-level data to make informed decisions in future planning and management efforts.
Title of Collection:
Socioeconomic Monitoring Study of National Park Service Visitors.
OMB Control Number:
1024–NEW.
Form Number:
None.
Type of Review:
New.
Respondents/Affected Public:
General Public; any person visiting a national park during the sampling period.
Total Estimated Number of Annual Respondents:
58,544. (36,936 intercept survey respondents, 8,310 non-response survey respondents, and 13,298 mail-back survey respondents).
Estimated Completion Time per Response:
Intercept survey: 5 minutes; Non-response survey: 2 minutes; and Mail-back survey: 20 minutes.
Total Estimated Number of Annual Burden Hours:
7,788 hours.
Respondent's Obligation:
Voluntary.
Frequency of Collection:
Annually.
Total Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden Cost:
None.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
The authority for this action is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.
).
Phadrea Ponds,
Information Collections Clearance Officer, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–14889 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",Who will be the respondents providing information for the proposed collection?,"['A. Outdoor recreation industry representatives'
'B. National Park Service employees' 'C. State tourism agencies'
'D. Members of the general public visiting national parks during the sampling period']",D
123," 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No. ED–2023–SCC–0100]
Identifying Burden Across Department of Education Information Collection Requests; Request for Public Input
AGENCY:
Office of the Chief Data Officer (OCDO), Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development (OPEPD), Department of Education.
ACTION:
Request for public input.
SUMMARY:
The U.S. Department of Education (Department) is seeking comments from the public on how it can reduce the burden associated with its information collection requests (ICRs) on State, local, territorial, and Tribal governments, educational institutions, nonprofits, and individuals, while maintaining data, information, and analyses critical to fulfill the Department's mission. This effort will help the Department identify improvements, redundancies in information collections, and inefficiencies in collections in order to improve the value and use of data.
DATES:
Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before August 14, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
Comments submitted in response to this notice should be submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://
www.regulations.gov.
If this site is not available to the public for any reason, the Department will temporarily accept comments at
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov.
If comments cannot be submitted electronically, please submit by postal mail or delivery to the following address: Manager of the Strategic Collections and Clearance Team, Governance and Strategy Division, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave. SW, LBJ, Room 4C210, Washington, DC 20202–8240. A list of active ICRs is available on
reginfo.gov
. Find the list of current information collections by selecting “Department of Education” from the Select Agency picklist under “Current Inventory,” and click “Submit.” Please reference the OMB control number when submitting comments regarding a specific ICR. Comments submitted after the comment period will not be accepted.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For specific questions related to collection activities, please contact Joanne Bogart,
joanne.bogart@ed.gov
and 202–205–7855.
If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability and wish to access telecommunications relay services, please dial 7–1–1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation:
Interested persons are invited to comment on this notice by submitting written data, views, or arguments using the method identified in the
ADDRESSES
section.
Instructions:
All submissions must include the agency name and docket number for this notice. All comments received will be posted without change to
http://www.regulations.gov.
Please exclude any personally identifiable information.
Docket:
For access to the docket to read comments, go to
http://www.regulations.gov.
Background
The Department collects information to support and advance its mission and respond to regulatory and statutory requirements. Information collection requests can include grant and financial aid applications, performance reports, studies, and statistical information that promote transparency and advances the field. The Department is now examining existing data collections to ensure that they generate benefits to students, families, educators, institutions, and the public that are commensurate with the effort involved with providing the information. To inform this work, the Department is soliciting public input to (1) better understand how specific ICRs may impose unnecessary burdens on State, local, territorial, and Tribal governments, educational institutions, nonprofits, and individuals, and (2) collect suggestions for improving ICRs to reduce burden while balancing the important purpose of the collections. This effort will support the Department in addressing requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act (Pub. L. 104–13), including but not limited to minimizing paperwork burden on the public and ensuring the greatest public benefit from information created, collected, maintained, used, shared, and disseminated by or for the Federal Government. It will also inform the Department's work to address priorities outlined in Office of Management and Budget (OMB) memorandum M22–10 “Improving Access to Public Benefits Programs Through the Paperwork Reduction Act,” which provides guidance for Federal agencies on (1) more completely and transparently articulating burdens and associated costs experienced by the public when accessing essential public benefits programs, and (2) using an analysis of the submissions to “minimize the Federal information collection burden, with particular emphasis on those individuals and entities most adversely affected.”
Request For Public Input
A. Importance of Public Feedback
To achieve the objectives outlined in this document, it is critical that public input informs improvements in strategies, processes, and planning. The Department's ICRs affect many different individuals and entities, all of whom are likely to have useful information, data, and perspectives on the benefits and burdens of our existing processes. Given that unique knowledge, public feedback will play a significant role in improving the information collection process.
B. Maximizing the Value of Public Feedback
This notice contains a list of questions, the answers to which will assist the Department in identifying potential information collection processes and burdens that may benefit from review. The goals of this request are to reduce burdens on the affected groups, saving costs and time for both the affected groups and the Government while maintaining the critical purposes of the collections, increasing navigability, reducing redundancy, promoting simplification, improving efficiency, and removing barriers that unnecessarily impede access to resources. The Department encourages public comment on these questions and seeks any other information or data relevant to this notice. Public feedback that simply states that a stakeholder feels strongly that the Department should change its processes regarding information collections may not be as useful as feedback that contains specific information on changes that should be considered, or how a proposed change may reduce burden or otherwise improve existing submission processes.
Commenters should consider the principles below as they provide feedback on this notice:
• If a comment is about a specific OMB approved information collection, identify the collection by providing the OMB number, which can typically be found on the first page of a form or in the burden statement, and any data elements. You can also find this information in
reginfo.gov
under current inventory for the Department of Education. The links to individual ICRs can be obtained from that list.
• Explain why you recommend that a form, information collection, or submission process be modified or streamlined.
• To the extent feasible, illustrate the costs and time, burdens, and your perspective on the utility of respective collections and how proposed changes could reduce costs and burdens or increase the utility to the Department or the public.
• Focus on processes considered burdensome that have been in effect for enough time to warrant a fair evaluation (
i.e.,
at least a year, in most cases).
C. Questions for Commenters
The non-exhaustive list of questions below is meant to assist members of the public in formulating comments and is not intended to restrict the feedback that members of the public may provide:
(1) Do some Department information collections or processes place a more significant burden on certain types of respondents, particularly individuals and entities that could be more adversely affected? If so, what impact could this have on these respondents in accessing public benefits?
(2) Do some Department information collection requests contain questions that the commenter might perceive as having limited value or utility? If so, please identify specific data elements when recommending burden reduction solutions.
(3) Do some Department information collections request duplicative information? If so, please recommend solutions (for example, eliminating duplicative questions in a specific collection or consolidating multiple collections)?
(4) What data-linkage or data-sharing activities can the Department engage in to reduce the burden of information collections?
(5) The Department recognizes that burden can be reduced by improving the usability of forms. How might the Department reduce burden by improving the usability of forms, independent of eliminating data collections or data elements?
(6) What additional feedback would you like to share regarding challenges, barriers, or suggested improvements for obtaining benefits from the Department?
Review of Public Feedback
The Department will use the public's feedback to inform an action plan for reducing burden, pursuant to OMB's memorandum. The Department will also use the public's feedback to consider reduction of administrative burdens more broadly. This notice is issued solely for information and program-planning purposes. Public input provided in response to this notice does not bind the Department to any further actions, including publishing a formal response or agreeing to initiate a recommended change. The Department will consider the feedback and make changes or improvements at its sole discretion.
Accessible Format:
On request to the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
, individuals with disabilities can obtain this document in an accessible format. The Department will provide the requestor with an accessible format that may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 file, braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc, or other accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is the document published in the
Federal Register
. You may access the official edition of the
Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations at
www.govinfo.gov.
At this site you can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the
Federal Register
, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF, you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register
by using the article search feature at
www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced search feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published by the Department.
Roberto J. Rodriguez,
Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development.
[FR Doc. 2023–14888 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",How can comments be submitted if regulations.gov is unavailable?,"['A. Via postal mail or delivery to the Office of Civil Rights'
'B. Comments cannot be submitted if regulations.gov is unavailable'
'C. Via phone call to the IT helpdesk'
'D. Via email to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov']",D
97," 3510–DS–P
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection, Comment Request: Governance Requirements for Derivatives Clearing Organizations
AGENCY:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY:
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) is announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain information by the agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (“PRA”), Federal agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of information, including proposed extension of an existing collection of information, and to allow 60 days for public comment. This notice is being published concurrently with the publication and adoption of the final rule titled “Governance Requirements for Derivatives Clearing Organizations” (“Final Rule”).
DATES:
Comments must be submitted on or before September 11, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
You may submit comments, identified by “Requirements for Derivatives Clearing Organizations OMB Control No. 3038–0076” by any of the following methods:
•
CFTC Website: https://comments.cftc.gov/.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments through the website.
•
Mail:
Christopher Kirkpatrick, Secretary of the Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW, Washington, DC 20581.
•
Hand Delivery/Courier:
Same as Mail, above.
Please submit your comments using only one method.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Opron, Special Counsel, Division of Clearing and Risk, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, (312) 596–0653; email:
jopron@cftc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Under the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.,
Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor. “Collection of Information” is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3 and includes agency requests or requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the
Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension of an existing collection of information, before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this requirement, the CFTC is publishing notice of the proposed collection of information listed below. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Title:
Requirements for Derivatives Clearing Organizations, OMB Control No. 3038–0076. This is a request for a revision of a currently approved information collection.
Abstract:
Concurrently with this notice, the Commission published the Final Rule adopting amendments that included new information collection requirements. The revised rules require a DCO to create and maintain minutes of each Risk Management Committee Meeting and to maintain written policies and procedures to make certain that its RMC includes at least two clearing member representatives and, if applicable, at least two representatives of customers of clearing members. The revised rules also require a DCO to adopt written policies and procedures related to the formation and role of each RWG, and to include in those policies and procedures requirements for the DCO to document and provide to the RMC, at a minimum, a summary of the topics discussed and the main points raised during each meeting of the RWG.
With respect to each new collection of information, the CFTC invites comments on:
• Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information will have a practical use;
• The accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
• Ways to enhance the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden of collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of
information technology;
e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of responses.
All comments must be submitted in English, or if not, accompanied by an English translation. Comments will be posted as received to
https://www.cftc.gov.
You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. If you wish the Commission to consider information that you believe is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, a petition for confidential treatment of the exempt information may be submitted according to the procedures established in § 145.9 of the Commission's regulations.
1
1
 17 CFR 145.9.
The Commission reserves the right, but shall have no obligation, to review, pre-screen, filter, redact, refuse or remove any or all of your submission from
https://www.cftc.gov
that it may deem to be inappropriate for publication, such as obscene language. All submissions that have been redacted or removed that contain comments on the merits of the ICR will be retained in the public comment file and will be considered as required under the Administrative Procedure Act and other applicable laws, and may be accessible under the Freedom of Information Act.
Burden Statement:
The Commission is revising its burden estimate for OMB control number 3038–0076 to account for the amendments described above. Specifically, the Commission believes that the burden under this clearance will increase because the 15 DCOs subject to these requirements will be required under § 39.24(b)(11) to create and maintain minutes of each RMC meeting, and under § 39.24(b)(12) to document and provide to the RMC, at a minimum, a summary of the topics discussed and the main points raised during each meeting of the RWG. The Commission estimates a DCO will spend an average of four hours creating minutes of each RMC meeting and four hours documenting a summary of the topics discussed and the main points raised during each meeting of the RWG, which includes attending the meeting, taking notes, and putting the notes into the required format following the meeting. The Commission estimates that a DCO's RMC and RWG will each need to hold an average of six meetings per year to satisfy the § 39.24(b)(11) and (12) requirements that a DCO's RMC and RWG address all matters that could materially affect the risk profile of the DCO. Based upon the above, the estimated hour burden for this collection is calculated as follows:
Estimated number of respondents:
15.
2
2
 The Commission notes that while new § 39.24(d) provides that a DCO may satisfy the requirements of paragraphs (b)(11), (b)(12), (c)(1)(iv), and (c)(3) by having rules that permit it to clear only fully collateralized positions, such DCOs are included in the total estimated number of respondents because these DCOs would still be required to develop and disclose governance arrangements required by the other provisions of § 39.24. The Commission's estimate is therefore conservative to the extent that these DCOs are not required to prepare and maintain minutes of each RMC meeting, and document and provide to the RMC, at a minimum, a summary of the topics discussed and the main points raised during each meeting of the RWG.
Estimated number of reports per respondent:
18.
Average number of hours per report:
4.
Estimated gross annual reporting burden:
1,080.
There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection.
(Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.
)
Dated: July 3, 2023.
Christopher Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023–14358 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What types of new records will derivatives clearing organizations be required to create and maintain under the regulation?,"['A. Minutes of Risk Management Committee meetings and documentation of Risk Working Group meetings.'
'B. Compensation records for all employees and executives.'
'C. Records of all trades executed, including digital asset transactions.'
'D. Cybersecurity audit reports and testing results.']",A
380," 4520–43–P
Table VI–6 presents MSHA's estimates of lifetime excess risk per 1,000 miners at exposure levels equal to the existing standards, the proposed PEL, and the proposed action level. These estimates are adjusted for FTE ratios and thus utilize cumulative exposures that more closely reflect the average hours worked per year.
21
For an MNM miner who is presently exposed at the existing PEL of 100 μg/m
3
(and given the weighted average FTE ratio of 0.87), implementing the proposed PEL would lower the miner's lifetime excess risk of death by 58.8 percent for silicosis, 45.6 percent for NMRD (not including silicosis), 52.0 percent for lung cancer, and 19.9 percent for ESRD. The MNM miner's risk of acquiring a non-fatal case of silicosis (would decrease by 80.4 percent).
21
 The FTE ratios used in these calculations are a weighted average of the FTE ratio for production employees and the FTE ratio for contract miners.
For a coal miner who is currently exposed at the existing exposure limit of 85.7 μg/m
3
(and given the weighted average FTE ratio of 0.99), implementing the proposed PEL would lower the miner's lifetime excess risk of death by 42.3 percent for silicosis mortality, 40.2 percent for NMRD mortality (not including silicosis), 43.5 percent for lung cancer mortality, and 15.8 percent for ESRD mortality. The coal miner's lifetime excess risk of acquiring non-fatal silicosis would decrease by 73.8 percent. While even greater reductions would be achieved at exposures equal to the proposed action level (25 μg/m
3
), some residual risks do remain at exposures of 25 μg/m
3
. Notably, at the proposed action level, ESRD risk is still 20.7 per 1,000 MNM miners and 21.6 per 1,000 coal miners. At the proposed action level, risk of non-fatal silicosis is 16.3 per 1,000 MNM miners and 16.9 per 1,000 coal miners.
EP13JY23.022
",What categories of health effects does MSHA estimate for miners exposed to respirable crystalline silica?,"['A. Bone fractures, gastrointestinal illness, infectious disease, and psychological distress.'
'B. Silicosis, nonmalignant respiratory disease, lung cancer, and end stage renal disease.'
'C. Eye irritation, skin rash, impaired lung function, and chronic bronchitis.'
'D. Hearing loss, leukemia, reproductive effects, and neurological deficits.']",B
134," 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
DOE/NSF High Energy Physics Advisory Panel
AGENCY:
Office of Science, Department of Energy.
ACTION:
Notice of open meeting.
SUMMARY:
This notice announces a virtual meeting of the DOE/NSF High Energy Physics Advisory Panel (HEPAP). The Federal Advisory Committee Act requires that public notice of these meetings be announced in the
Federal Register
.
DATES:
Monday, August 7, 2023, 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. EDT.
ADDRESSES:
This meeting is open to the public. This meeting will be held digitally via Zoom. Information on how to participate can be found on the website closer to the meeting date at
https://science.osti.gov/hep/hepap/meetings/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
John Kogut, Executive Secretary; High Energy Physics Advisory Panel (HEPAP); U.S. Department of Energy; Office of Science; SC–35/Germantown Building, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585; Telephone: (301) 903–1298; Email:
John.Kogut@science.doe.gov
.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of Meeting:
To introduce new HEPAP members, discuss the ongoing International Benchmarking study and discuss the progress and plan for a new Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel (P5) report.
Tentative Agenda:
• Brief update from DOE—Glen Crawford
• Brief update from NSF—Jim Shank
• Discussion of International Benchmarking Study—Patricia McBride
• Discussion of the P5 Process and Timeline—Hitoshi Murayama
• Discussion
Public Participation:
The meeting is open to the public. A webcast of this meeting will be available. Please check the website below for updates and information on how to view the meeting. If you would like to file a written statement with the Committee, you may do so either before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral statements regarding any of these items on the agenda, you should contact John Kogut, (301) 903–1298, or by email at
John.Kogut@science.doe.gov.
You must make your request for an oral statement at least five business days before the meeting. Reasonable provision will be made to include the scheduled oral statements on the agenda. The Chairperson of the Panel will conduct the meeting to facilitate the orderly conduct of business. Public comment will follow the 10-minute rule.
Minutes:
The minutes of the meeting will be available on the High Energy Physics Advisory Panel website at
https://science.osti.gov/hep/hepap/meetings/.
Signed in Washington, DC, on July 7, 2023.
LaTanya Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023–14813 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",How many minutes will each member of the public have for an oral statement during the open comment period at the meeting?,"['A. 5 minutes' 'B. 10 minutes'
'C. There is no open comment period for oral public statements.'
'D. 2 minutes']",B
13," 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Parts 100 and 165
[Docket Number USCG–2023–0464]
RIN 1625–AA08; AA00
Special Local Regulation and Safety Zone; Back River, Baltimore County, MD
AGENCY:
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION:
Temporary final rule.
SUMMARY:
The Coast Guard is establishing temporary regulations for certain waters of the Back River. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters near Baltimore County, MD, during a fireworks display on July 15, 2023, (alternate date on July 16, 2023). This regulation prohibits persons and vessels from being in the regulated area and safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Maryland-National Capital Region or a designated representative.
DATES:
This rule is effective from 8 to 10:30 p.m. on July 15, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov,
type USCG–2023–0464 in the search box and click “Search.” Next, in the Document Type column, select “Supporting & Related Material.”
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
If you have questions on this rule, call or email CDR Samuel M. Danus, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region; telephone 410–576–2519, email
MDNCRMarineEvents@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
PATCOM Patrol Commander
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
On June 7, 2023, Fantastic Fireworks, on behalf of Tiki Lee's Dock Bar, notified the Coast Guard that it will be conducting a fireworks display between 9 and 10 p.m. on July 15, 2023, as a part of the “Shootout on the River” event activities. The fireworks are to be launched from a barge in the Back River located near Tiki Lee's Dock Bar in Sparrows Point, MD. In the event of inclement weather on July 15, 2023, the fireworks display will be conducted between 9 and 10 p.m. on July 16, 2023. Hazards from firework displays include accidental discharge of fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and falling hot embers or other debris. The Captain of the Port, Maryland-National Capital Region (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with the fireworks to be used in this display would be a safety concern for anyone within a 600 foot radius of the barge. The Coast Guard anticipates a large spectator fleet for these events.
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those procedures are “impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.” Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because immediate action is needed to respond to the potential safety hazards associated with fireworks debris and the anticipated large spectator fleet.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register
. Due to the date of the event, it would be impracticable to make the regulation effective 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register
. Delaying the effective date of this rule would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest because it would delay the safety measures necessary to respond to potential safety hazards associated with this fireworks event. Hazards include explosive materials, dangerous projectiles, and falling debris. The fireworks fall out zone extends across the navigable channel.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034 and 46 U.S.C. 70041. The Captain of the Port, Sector Maryland-National Capital Region (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with the fireworks to be used in the July 15, 2023, display will be a safety concern for anyone intending to operate within certain waters of Back River in Baltimore County, MD, in or near the event area.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a special local regulation for the area in the Back River in which spectating vessels will transit and gather. The regulated area covers all navigable waters of Back River within an area bounded by a line connecting the following points: From the shoreline at Lynch Point at latitude 39°14′46″ N, longitude 076°26′23″ W, thence northeast to Porter Point at latitude 39°15′13″ N, longitude 076°26′11″ W, thence north along the shoreline to Walnut Point at latitude 39°17′06″ N, longitude 076°27′04″ W, thence southwest to the shoreline at latitude 39°16′41″ N, longitude 076°27′31″ W, thence south along the shoreline to the point of origin, located in Baltimore County, MD. The regulated area is approximately 4,200 yards in length and 1,200 yards in width.
In addition to establishing a special local regulation, the COTP is establishing a temporary safety zone around the fireworks discharge site, in approximate position latitude 39°15′35.54″ N, longitude 76°26′56.62″ W. The safety zone covers all navigable waters within 600 feet of a fireworks barge in the Back River located near Tiki Lee's Dock Bar in Sparrow's Point, MD. The duration of the zone is intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these navigable waters before, during, and after the scheduled fireworks display. No vessel or person would be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. This rule has not been designated a “significant regulatory action,” under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size, duration, and time-of-day of the special local regulation and safety zone, which would impact a small designated area of the Back River
for a total of no more than 2.5 enforcement-hours, during the evening when vessel traffic is normally low. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue Local Notices to Mariners and a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel 16 about the zones.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term “small entities” comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the regulated area or safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A above, this rule would not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of Government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves implementation of regulations within 33 CFR part 100 applicable to organized marine events on the navigable waters of the United States that could negatively impact the safety of waterway users and shore side activities in the event area, and within 33 CFR part 165 establishing a temporary safety zone that would prohibit entry within 600 feet of a fireworks barge, both lasting a total of 2.5 consecutive hours. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L61 and L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES
section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Parts 100 and 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR parts 100 and 165 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority:
46 U.S.C. 70041; 33 CFR 1.05–1.
2. Add § 100.501T05–0464 to read as follows:
§ 100.501T05–0464
2023 Tiki Lee's Shootout on the River Fireworks, Back River, Baltimore County, MD.
(a)
Locations.
All coordinates are based on datum NAD 1983.
(1)
Regulated area.
All navigable waters of Back River, within an area bounded by a line connecting the following points: From the shoreline at Lynch Point at latitude 39°14′46″ N, longitude 076°26′23″ W, thence northeast to Porter Point at latitude 39°15′13″ N, longitude 076°26′11″ W, thence north along the shoreline to Walnut Point at latitude 39°17′06″ N, longitude 076°27′04″ W, thence southwest to the shoreline at latitude 39°16′41″ N, longitude 076°27′31″ W, thence south along the shoreline to and terminating at the point of origin.
(2) [Reserved]
(b)
Definitions.
As used in this section:
Captain of the Port (COTP) Maryland-National Capital Region
means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region or
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been authorized by the COTP to act on his behalf.
Event Patrol Commander or Event PATCOM
means a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has been designated by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region.
Official patrol
means any vessel assigned or approved by Commander, Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region with a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast Guard ensign.
Participant
means a person or vessel registered with the event sponsor as participating in the “2023 Tiki Lee's Shootout on the River Fireworks” event, or otherwise designated by the event sponsor as having a function tied to the event.
Spectator
means a person or vessel not registered with the event sponsor as participants or assigned as official patrols.
(c)
Special local regulations.
(1) The COTP Maryland-National Capital Region or Event PATCOM may forbid and control the movement of all vessels and persons, including event participants, in the regulated area described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. When hailed or signaled by an official patrol, a vessel or person in the regulated area shall immediately comply with the directions given by the patrol. Failure to do so may result in the Coast Guard expelling the person or vessel from the area, issuing a citation for failure to comply, or both. The COTP Maryland-National Capital Region or Event PATCOM may terminate the event, or a participant's operations at any time the COTP Maryland-National Capital Region or Event PATCOM believes it necessary to do so for the protection of life or property.
(2) Except for participants and vessels already at berth, a person or vessel within the regulated area at the start of enforcement of this section must immediately depart the regulated area.
(3) A spectator must contact the Event PATCOM to request permission to either enter or pass through the regulated area. The Event PATCOM and official patrol vessels enforcing this regulated area can be contacted on marine band radio VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz) and channel 22A (157.1 MHz). If permission is granted, the spectator must enter a designated spectator area or pass directly through the regulated area as instructed by Event PATCOM. A vessel within the regulated area must operate at safe speed that minimizes wake. A spectator vessel must not loiter within the navigable channel while within the regulated area.
(4) A person or vessel that desires to transit, moor, or anchor within the regulated area must obtain authorization from the COTP Maryland-National Capital Region or Event PATCOM. A person or vessel seeking such permission can contact the COTP Maryland-National Capital Region at telephone number 410–576–2693 or on Marine Band Radio, VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz) or the Event PATCOM on Marine Band Radio, VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(5) The Coast Guard will publish a notice in the Fifth Coast Guard District Local Notice to Mariners and issue a marine information broadcast on VHF–FM marine band radio announcing specific event dates and times.
(d)
Enforcement officials.
The Coast Guard may be assisted with marine event patrol and enforcement of the regulated area by other federal, state, and local agencies.
(e)
Enforcement period.
This section will be enforced from 8 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on July 15, 2023.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
3. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority:
46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
4. Add § 165.T05–0464 to read as follows:
§ 165.T05–0464
Safety Zone; Back River, Baltimore County, MD.
(a)
Location.
The following area is a safety zone: All navigable waters of the Back River within 600 feet of the fireworks barge in approximate position latitude 39°15′35.54″ N, longitude 76°26′56.62″ W. These coordinates are based on datum NAD 1983.
(b)
Definitions.
As used in this section:
Captain of the Port (COTP)
means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region.
Designated representative
means any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region to assist in enforcing the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section.
(c)
Regulations.
(1) Under the general safety zone regulations in subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's representative by telephone at 410–576–2693 or on Marine Band Radio VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard vessels enforcing this section can be contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(3) Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
(d)
Enforcement officials.
The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and local agencies.
(e)
Enforcement period.
This section will be enforced from 8 to 10:30 p.m. on July 15, 2023, and, if necessary due to inclement weather on July 15, 2023, from 8 to 10:30 p.m. on July 16, 2023.
Dated: July 5, 2023.
David E. O'Connell,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Maryland-National Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2023–14816 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",How can a spectator request permission to enter the regulated area for the fireworks display?,"['A. A spectator must contact the fire department to request permission to enter the regulated area.'
'B. A spectator must contact the Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region to request permission to enter the regulated area.'
'C. A spectator must contact the Baltimore Harbor Master to request permission to enter the regulated area.'
'D. A spectator must contact the Event PATCOM to request permission to enter the regulated area.']",D
82," 3410–XV–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
[Docket No. RBS–23–Business–0018]
Notice of Request for Approval of a New Information Collection
AGENCY:
Rural Housing Service, and Rural Business-Cooperative Service, USDA.
ACTION:
Notice and request for comments.
SUMMARY:
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice announces the intention of the Rural Business-Cooperative Service, and Rural Housing Service, agencies of the Rural Development mission area within the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), hereinafter collectively referred to as the Agency to request approval for a new information collection in support of compliance with applicable acts for planning and performing construction and other development work.
DATES:
Comments on this notice must be received by September 11, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
Comments may be submitted by the following method:
•
Federal eRulemaking Portal:
This website provides the ability to type short comments directly into the comment field on this web page or attach a file for lengthier comments. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions at that site for submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lynn Gilbert, Rural Development Innovation Center—Regulations Management Division, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, South Building, Washington, DC 20250–1522. Telephone: (202) 690–2682. Email
lynn.gilbert@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) regulation (5 CFR part 1320) implementing provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13) requires that interested members of the public and affected agencies have an opportunity to comment on information collection and recordkeeping activities (see 5 CFR 1320.8(d)). This notice identifies an information collection that Rural Development is submitting to OMB for a new collection.
Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) The accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Comments may be sent by the Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov
and, in the lower “Search Regulations and Federal Actions” box, select “RBS” from the agency drop-down menu, then click on “Submit.” In the Docket ID column, select RBS–23–Business–0018 to submit or view public comments and to view supporting and related materials available electronically. Information on using
Regulations.gov
, including instructions for accessing documents, submitting comments, and viewing the docket after the close of the comment period, is available through the site's “User Tips” link.
Title:
7 CFR 1980—Common Forms Package for Guaranteed Loan Forms.
OMB Number:
0570–New.
Expiration Date of Approval:
Three years from approval date.
Type of Request:
New information collection.
Abstract:
The information collection under OMB Number 0575–New will enable the Agencies to effectively administer the policies, methods, and responsibilities for the funding and transmittal of post-award Federal funding for approved programs and projects.
The purpose of this information collection is to obtain information necessary to efficiently set up a functional system for the transmittal of payments after an applicant has been awarded funding.
Information for the RD forms and their usage in this collection package are included in this supporting statement.
Information will be collected by the field offices from applicants, consultants, lenders, and public entities. The collection of information is considered the minimum necessary to effectively evaluate the overall scope of the project.
Failure to collect information could have an adverse impact on effectively carrying out the mission, administration, processing, and program requirements.
Estimate of Burden:
RD is requesting approval for one respondent and a one-hour place holder in order for OMB to issue a control number for these forms. The burden for each of the forms will be accounted for within the individual Rural Development program collection packages using the form(s).
Respondents:
Respondents for this data are lending institutions and for-profit businesses but also include individuals and corporations.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent per Form in package:
 
Form No.
Responses per
respondent
1980–19
1
1980–41
1
1980–43
1
1980–44
1
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will become a matter of public record.
Karama Neal,
Administrator, Rural Business-Cooperative Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–14827 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What types of entities might provide responses for the new information collection?,"['A. Agricultural producers, farmer cooperatives, and rural small business owners'
'B. Tribal governments, federally recognized tribes, and tribal housing entities'
'C. Lending institutions, for-profit businesses, individuals, and corporations'
'D. State and local housing authorities, non-profit housing providers, and homeowners']",C
148," 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER23–2321–000]
Dunns Bridge Energy Storage, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization
This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of Dunns Bridge Energy Storage, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene, or protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant.
Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability, is July 27, 2022.
The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at
http://www.ferc.gov.
To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the intervention or protests.
Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register
, the Commission provides all interested persons an opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the internet through the Commission's Home Page (
http://www.ferc.gov
) using the “eLibrary” link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time, the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID–19), issued by the President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov
or call toll-free, (886) 208–3676 or TYY, (202) 502–8659.
The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports meaningful public engagement and participation in
Commission proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502–6595 or
OPP@ferc.gov.
Dated: July 7, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–14863 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",Where should hand deliveries of documents in this docket be made?,"['A. - Department of Energy Headquarters, 1000 Independence Ave SW, Washington, DC 20585'
'B. - Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426'
'C. - U.S. Courthouse, 333 Constitution Ave NW, Washington, DC 20001'
'D. - Health and Human Services, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852']",D
424," 4520–43–P
EP13JY23.054
Attachment 1. MNM Samples Analyzed for Cristobalite
Cristobalite is one of the three polymorphs of respirable crystalline silica analyzed by MSHA's Laboratory upon request that is included in this proposed rule. At the request of the inspector, MNM 
85
respirable dust samples that contain at least 0.050 mg of respirable dust are analyzed for cristobalite. Of the 57,769 retained MNM samples that contained at least 0.050 mg of respirable dust, 0.6 percent (or 359 samples) were analyzed for cristobalite. Coal respirable dust samples are not analyzed for cristobalite.
86
85
 See Attachment 2. Technical Background about Measuring Respirable Crystalline Silica, for more information.
86
 See Attachment 2. Technical Background about Measuring Respirable Crystalline Silica, for more information.
EP13JY23.055
While the samples that were analyzed for cristobalite were assigned to all four contaminant codes seen in this dataset, the majority were assigned contaminant code 523.
EP13JY23.056
The distribution of the 359 samples by cristobalite mass can be seen in Table A1–3.
87
87
 Of the 369 samples that were analyzed for cristobalite, 334 had a value for cristobalite mass that was less than the limit of detection (LOD) for cristobalite, 10 µg. As such these samples were assigned a value of 5 µg of cristobalite, one half the LOD. See Attachment 2. Technical Background about Measuring Respirable Crystalline Silica, for more information.
EP13JY23.057
The mass of each sample was then used to calculate a cristobalite concentration by dividing the mass of cristobalite by the volume of air sampled (0.816 m
3
). The calculated concentrations ranged from 6 µg/m
3
to 53 µg/m
3
.
88
88
 One sample had a cristobalite concentration of 53 µg/m
3
. It was sampled in July of 2011 at Mine ID 4405407 and cassette number 610892. The commodity being mined was Stone: Crushed, Broken Quartzite. The occupation of the miner being sampled was Miners in Other Occupations: Job Code 513—Building and Maintenance.
EP13JY23.058
",How many of the MNM samples analyzed for cristobalite had values below the limit of detection?,"['A. 57,769' 'B. 25' 'C. 334' 'D. 359']",C
388," 4520–43–P
EP13JY23.026
EP13JY23.027
EP13JY23.028
EP13JY23.029
c. Existing Dust Controls in Mines (Baseline Conditions)
MNM and coal mines are controlling dust containing respirable crystalline silica in various ways. As shown in Tables VIII–2 through VIII–5, respirable crystalline silica exposures exceeded the proposed PEL of 50 μg/m
3
in about 18 percent of all MNM samples collected. Of all coal samples, exposure levels exceeded the proposed PEL in about seven percent of the samples. Overall, metal mines and sand and gravel mines had higher exposure levels than other commodity mines.
Despite the extensive dust control methods available, dust control measures have been implemented in some commodity categories to a greater degree than in others. This is partly because some commodity categories tend to have larger mines. MSHA has found that the larger the amount (tonnage) of material a mine moves (including overburden and other waste rock), the faster the mine tends to operate its equipment (
i.e.,
closer to the equipment capacity), creating more air turbulence and therefore generating more respirable crystalline silica. The amount of material moved also influences the number of miners employed at a mine, and therefore, the number of miners can be indirectly correlated to the amount of dust generated. MSHA has observed that in large mines, dusty conditions typically prompt more control efforts, usually in the form of added engineering controls.
MSHA has also found that metal mines, which are typically large operations with higher numbers of miners, tend to have available engineering controls for dust management. On the other hand, sand and gravel mines, which generally employ fewer miners and handle modest amounts of material, have very limited, if any, dust control measures. This is because most of the mined material is a commodity that only requires washing and screening into various sizes of product stockpiles, generating little waste material. Nonmetal, stone, and crushed limestone mines occupy the middle range in terms of employment, existing engineering controls, and maintenance practices.
Over the years, staff from multiple MSHA program areas have worked alongside miners and mine operators to improve safety and health by inspecting, evaluating, and researching mine conditions, equipment, and operations. These key programs, each of which has an onsite presence, include (but are not limited to) Mine Safety and Health Enforcement; Directorate of Educational Policy and Development which includes the National Mine Health and Safety Academy and the Educational Field and Small Mine Services; and the Directorate of Technical Support, which is comprised of the Approval and Certification Center and the Pittsburgh Safety and Health Technology Center (including its Health Field Division, National Air and Dust Laboratory, Ventilation Division, and other specialized divisions). Table VIII–6 reflects the collective observations of these MSHA programs, presented in terms of existing dust control (baseline conditions) and the classes of additional control measures that would provide those mines with the greatest benefit to reduce exposures below the proposed PEL and action level.
Table VIII–6 shows MSHA's assessment of existing dust controls in mines (baseline conditions) and additional controls needed to meet the proposed PEL for each commodity category, including the need for frequent scheduled maintenance. By conducting frequent scheduled maintenance, mine operators can reduce the concentration of respirable crystalline silica. Table VIII–6 shows that metal mines have adopted extensive dust controls, while sand and gravel mines tend to have minimal engineering controls, if any.
EP13JY23.030
",What percentage of metal and nonmetal mine samples had respirable crystalline silica exposures exceeding the proposed PEL of 50 μg/m3?,"['A. About 18 percent' 'B. About 23 percent' 'C. About 7 percent'
'D. About 15 percent']",A
215," 6820–27–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery
AGENCY:
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY:
This notice announces the intention of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approve the proposed information collection project “
Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery.
”
DATES:
Comments on this notice must be received by September 11, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
Written comments should be submitted to: Doris Lefkowitz, Reports Clearance Officer, AHRQ, by email at
doris.lefkowitz@AHRQ.hhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports Clearance Officer, (301) 427–1477, or by email at
doris.lefkowitz@AHRQ.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Project
Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery
The information collection activity will garner qualitative customer and stakeholder feedback in an efficient, timely manner, in accordance with the Administration's commitment to improving service delivery. By qualitative feedback we mean information that provides useful insights on perceptions and opinions, but are not statistical surveys that yield quantitative results that can be generalized to the population of study. This feedback will provide insights into customer or stakeholder perceptions, experiences, and expectations, provide an early warning of issues with service, or focus attention on areas where communication, training or changes in operations might improve delivery of products or services. These collections will allow for ongoing, collaborative and actionable communications between the Agency and its customers and stakeholders. It will also allow feedback to contribute directly to the improvement of program management. The current clearance was approved on November 2, 2020 (OMB Control Number 0935–0179) and will expire on November 30, 2023. Feedback collected under this generic clearance will provide useful information, but it will not yield data that can be generalized to the overall population. This type of generic clearance for qualitative information will not be used for quantitative information collections that are designed to yield reliably actionable results, such as monitoring trends over time or documenting program performance. Such data uses require more rigorous designs that address: (1) the target population to which generalizations will be made; (2) the sampling frame; (3) the sample design (including stratification and clustering); (4) the precision requirements or power calculations that justify the proposed sample size; (5) the expected response rate; (6) methods for assessing potential nonresponse bias; (7) the protocols for data collection; (8) and any testing procedures that were or will be undertaken prior to fielding the study. Depending on the degree of influence the results are likely to have, such collections may still be eligible for submission for other generic mechanisms that are designed to yield quantitative results.
Below we provide AHRQ's projected average annual estimates for the next three years:
Current Actions:
New collection of information.
Type of Review:
New Collection.
Affected Public:
Individuals and Households, Businesses and Organizations, State, Local or Tribal Government.
Average Expected Annual Number of Activities:
10.
Respondents:
10,900.
Annual Responses:
10,900.
Frequency of Response:
Once per request.
The total number of respondents across all 10 activities each year is 10,900.
Average Minutes per Response:
19.
Burden Hours:
3,383.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.
Request for Comments
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, comments on AHRQ's information collection are requested with regard to any of the following: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of AHRQ healthcare research and healthcare information dissemination functions, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of AHRQ's estimate of burden (including hours and costs) of the proposed collection(s) of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information upon the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and included in the Agency's subsequent request for OMB approval of the proposed information collection. All comments will become a matter of public record.
Dated: July 10, 2023.
Marquita Cullom,
Associate Director.
[FR Doc. 2023–14869 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What agency is requesting approval for this information collection project?,"['A. The National Institutes of Health (NIH)'
'B. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)'
'C. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)'
'D. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC)']",C
367," 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
United States Mint
Request for Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee Membership Applications
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY:
The United States Mint is accepting applications for appointment to the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee (CCAC) as a member to represent the interests of the general public in the coinage of the United States.
DATES:
Application Deadline:
5 p.m. (EDT), September 11, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
Receipt of Applications:
Any member of the public wishing to be considered for appointment to the CCAC should submit a resume and cover letter describing his or her reasons for seeking and qualifications for membership, by email to
info@ccac.gov,
Attn: Jennifer Warren. The deadline to email submissions is no later than 5 p.m. (EDT) on September 11, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Warren, United States Mint Liaison to the CCAC;
jennifer.warren@usmint.treas.gov
or 202–354–7208.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The CCAC was established to:
Advise the Secretary of the Treasury on any theme or design proposals relating to circulating coinage, bullion coinage, Congressional Gold Medals, and national and other medals produced by the United States Mint.
Advise the Secretary of the Treasury with regard to the events, persons, or places that the CCAC recommends to be commemorated by the issuance of commemorative coins in each of the five calendar years succeeding the year in which a commemorative coin designation is made.
Make recommendations with respect to the mintage level for any commemorative coin recommended.
Total membership consists of 11 voting members appointed by the Secretary of the Treasury:
One person specially qualified by virtue of his or her education, training, or experience as nationally or internationally recognized curator in the United States of a numismatic collection;
One person specially qualified by virtue of his or her experience in the medallic arts or sculpture;
One person specially qualified by virtue of his or her education, training, or experience in American history;
One person specially qualified by virtue of his or her education, training, or experience in numismatics;
Three persons who can represent the interests of the general public in the coinage of the United States; and
Four persons appointed by the Secretary of the Treasury on the basis of the recommendations by the House and Senate leadership.
Members are appointed for a term of four years. No individual may be appointed to the CCAC while serving as
an officer or employee of the Federal Government, and applicants must be a United States citizen.
The CCAC is subject to the direction of the Secretary of the Treasury. Meetings of the CCAC are open to the public and are held approximately four to six times per year. The United States Mint is responsible for providing the necessary support, technical services, and advice to the CCAC. CCAC members are not paid for their time or services; however, consistent with Federal Travel Regulations, members are reimbursed for their travel and lodging expenses to attend meetings. Members are Special Government Employees and are subject to the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch (5 CFR part 2653).
The United States Mint will review all submissions and will forward its recommendations to the Secretary of the Treasury for appointment consideration. Candidates should include specific skills, abilities, talents, and credentials to support their applications. The United States Mint is interested in candidates who have demonstrated interest and a commitment to actively participate in meetings and activities, and a demonstrated understanding of the role of the CCAC and the obligations of a Special Government Employee; possess demonstrated leadership skills in their fields of expertise or discipline; possess a demonstrated desire for public service and have a history of honorable professional and personal conduct, as well as successful standing in their communities; and who are free of professional, political, or financial interests that could negatively affect their ability to provide impartial advice.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 5135(b))
Eric Anderson,
Executive Secretary United States Mint.
[FR Doc. 2023–14808 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What is the deadline to submit applications by email for appointment to the CCAC?,"['A. 5 p.m. EDT on September 18, 2023'
'B. 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 15, 2023'
'C. 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 30, 2023'
'D. 5 p.m. EDT on September 11, 2023']",D
11," 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Parts 100 and 165
[Docket Number USCG–2023–0464]
RIN 1625–AA08; AA00
Special Local Regulation and Safety Zone; Back River, Baltimore County, MD
AGENCY:
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION:
Temporary final rule.
SUMMARY:
The Coast Guard is establishing temporary regulations for certain waters of the Back River. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters near Baltimore County, MD, during a fireworks display on July 15, 2023, (alternate date on July 16, 2023). This regulation prohibits persons and vessels from being in the regulated area and safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Maryland-National Capital Region or a designated representative.
DATES:
This rule is effective from 8 to 10:30 p.m. on July 15, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov,
type USCG–2023–0464 in the search box and click “Search.” Next, in the Document Type column, select “Supporting & Related Material.”
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
If you have questions on this rule, call or email CDR Samuel M. Danus, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region; telephone 410–576–2519, email
MDNCRMarineEvents@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
PATCOM Patrol Commander
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
On June 7, 2023, Fantastic Fireworks, on behalf of Tiki Lee's Dock Bar, notified the Coast Guard that it will be conducting a fireworks display between 9 and 10 p.m. on July 15, 2023, as a part of the “Shootout on the River” event activities. The fireworks are to be launched from a barge in the Back River located near Tiki Lee's Dock Bar in Sparrows Point, MD. In the event of inclement weather on July 15, 2023, the fireworks display will be conducted between 9 and 10 p.m. on July 16, 2023. Hazards from firework displays include accidental discharge of fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and falling hot embers or other debris. The Captain of the Port, Maryland-National Capital Region (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with the fireworks to be used in this display would be a safety concern for anyone within a 600 foot radius of the barge. The Coast Guard anticipates a large spectator fleet for these events.
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those procedures are “impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.” Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because immediate action is needed to respond to the potential safety hazards associated with fireworks debris and the anticipated large spectator fleet.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register
. Due to the date of the event, it would be impracticable to make the regulation effective 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register
. Delaying the effective date of this rule would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest because it would delay the safety measures necessary to respond to potential safety hazards associated with this fireworks event. Hazards include explosive materials, dangerous projectiles, and falling debris. The fireworks fall out zone extends across the navigable channel.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034 and 46 U.S.C. 70041. The Captain of the Port, Sector Maryland-National Capital Region (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with the fireworks to be used in the July 15, 2023, display will be a safety concern for anyone intending to operate within certain waters of Back River in Baltimore County, MD, in or near the event area.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a special local regulation for the area in the Back River in which spectating vessels will transit and gather. The regulated area covers all navigable waters of Back River within an area bounded by a line connecting the following points: From the shoreline at Lynch Point at latitude 39°14′46″ N, longitude 076°26′23″ W, thence northeast to Porter Point at latitude 39°15′13″ N, longitude 076°26′11″ W, thence north along the shoreline to Walnut Point at latitude 39°17′06″ N, longitude 076°27′04″ W, thence southwest to the shoreline at latitude 39°16′41″ N, longitude 076°27′31″ W, thence south along the shoreline to the point of origin, located in Baltimore County, MD. The regulated area is approximately 4,200 yards in length and 1,200 yards in width.
In addition to establishing a special local regulation, the COTP is establishing a temporary safety zone around the fireworks discharge site, in approximate position latitude 39°15′35.54″ N, longitude 76°26′56.62″ W. The safety zone covers all navigable waters within 600 feet of a fireworks barge in the Back River located near Tiki Lee's Dock Bar in Sparrow's Point, MD. The duration of the zone is intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these navigable waters before, during, and after the scheduled fireworks display. No vessel or person would be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. This rule has not been designated a “significant regulatory action,” under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size, duration, and time-of-day of the special local regulation and safety zone, which would impact a small designated area of the Back River
for a total of no more than 2.5 enforcement-hours, during the evening when vessel traffic is normally low. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue Local Notices to Mariners and a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel 16 about the zones.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term “small entities” comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the regulated area or safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A above, this rule would not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of Government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves implementation of regulations within 33 CFR part 100 applicable to organized marine events on the navigable waters of the United States that could negatively impact the safety of waterway users and shore side activities in the event area, and within 33 CFR part 165 establishing a temporary safety zone that would prohibit entry within 600 feet of a fireworks barge, both lasting a total of 2.5 consecutive hours. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L61 and L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES
section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Parts 100 and 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR parts 100 and 165 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority:
46 U.S.C. 70041; 33 CFR 1.05–1.
2. Add § 100.501T05–0464 to read as follows:
§ 100.501T05–0464
2023 Tiki Lee's Shootout on the River Fireworks, Back River, Baltimore County, MD.
(a)
Locations.
All coordinates are based on datum NAD 1983.
(1)
Regulated area.
All navigable waters of Back River, within an area bounded by a line connecting the following points: From the shoreline at Lynch Point at latitude 39°14′46″ N, longitude 076°26′23″ W, thence northeast to Porter Point at latitude 39°15′13″ N, longitude 076°26′11″ W, thence north along the shoreline to Walnut Point at latitude 39°17′06″ N, longitude 076°27′04″ W, thence southwest to the shoreline at latitude 39°16′41″ N, longitude 076°27′31″ W, thence south along the shoreline to and terminating at the point of origin.
(2) [Reserved]
(b)
Definitions.
As used in this section:
Captain of the Port (COTP) Maryland-National Capital Region
means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region or
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been authorized by the COTP to act on his behalf.
Event Patrol Commander or Event PATCOM
means a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has been designated by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region.
Official patrol
means any vessel assigned or approved by Commander, Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region with a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast Guard ensign.
Participant
means a person or vessel registered with the event sponsor as participating in the “2023 Tiki Lee's Shootout on the River Fireworks” event, or otherwise designated by the event sponsor as having a function tied to the event.
Spectator
means a person or vessel not registered with the event sponsor as participants or assigned as official patrols.
(c)
Special local regulations.
(1) The COTP Maryland-National Capital Region or Event PATCOM may forbid and control the movement of all vessels and persons, including event participants, in the regulated area described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. When hailed or signaled by an official patrol, a vessel or person in the regulated area shall immediately comply with the directions given by the patrol. Failure to do so may result in the Coast Guard expelling the person or vessel from the area, issuing a citation for failure to comply, or both. The COTP Maryland-National Capital Region or Event PATCOM may terminate the event, or a participant's operations at any time the COTP Maryland-National Capital Region or Event PATCOM believes it necessary to do so for the protection of life or property.
(2) Except for participants and vessels already at berth, a person or vessel within the regulated area at the start of enforcement of this section must immediately depart the regulated area.
(3) A spectator must contact the Event PATCOM to request permission to either enter or pass through the regulated area. The Event PATCOM and official patrol vessels enforcing this regulated area can be contacted on marine band radio VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz) and channel 22A (157.1 MHz). If permission is granted, the spectator must enter a designated spectator area or pass directly through the regulated area as instructed by Event PATCOM. A vessel within the regulated area must operate at safe speed that minimizes wake. A spectator vessel must not loiter within the navigable channel while within the regulated area.
(4) A person or vessel that desires to transit, moor, or anchor within the regulated area must obtain authorization from the COTP Maryland-National Capital Region or Event PATCOM. A person or vessel seeking such permission can contact the COTP Maryland-National Capital Region at telephone number 410–576–2693 or on Marine Band Radio, VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz) or the Event PATCOM on Marine Band Radio, VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(5) The Coast Guard will publish a notice in the Fifth Coast Guard District Local Notice to Mariners and issue a marine information broadcast on VHF–FM marine band radio announcing specific event dates and times.
(d)
Enforcement officials.
The Coast Guard may be assisted with marine event patrol and enforcement of the regulated area by other federal, state, and local agencies.
(e)
Enforcement period.
This section will be enforced from 8 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on July 15, 2023.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
3. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority:
46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
4. Add § 165.T05–0464 to read as follows:
§ 165.T05–0464
Safety Zone; Back River, Baltimore County, MD.
(a)
Location.
The following area is a safety zone: All navigable waters of the Back River within 600 feet of the fireworks barge in approximate position latitude 39°15′35.54″ N, longitude 76°26′56.62″ W. These coordinates are based on datum NAD 1983.
(b)
Definitions.
As used in this section:
Captain of the Port (COTP)
means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region.
Designated representative
means any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region to assist in enforcing the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section.
(c)
Regulations.
(1) Under the general safety zone regulations in subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's representative by telephone at 410–576–2693 or on Marine Band Radio VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard vessels enforcing this section can be contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(3) Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
(d)
Enforcement officials.
The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and local agencies.
(e)
Enforcement period.
This section will be enforced from 8 to 10:30 p.m. on July 15, 2023, and, if necessary due to inclement weather on July 15, 2023, from 8 to 10:30 p.m. on July 16, 2023.
Dated: July 5, 2023.
David E. O'Connell,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Maryland-National Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2023–14816 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What is the purpose of the temporary regulations for the Back River?,"['A. The regulations are to provide for safety during dredging operations on the Back River from July 15-31, 2023.'
'B. The regulations are to provide for safety during a fireworks display on the Back River on July 15, 2023.'
'C. The regulations are to provide for safety during a sailboat regatta on the Back River on July 15, 2023.'
'D. The regulations are to provide for safety during bridge maintenance work on the Back River from July 15-31, 2023.']",B
138," 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. NJ23–12–001]
Vermont Electric Cooperative, Inc.; Notice of Filing
Take notice that on June 30, 2023, Vermont Electric Cooperative, Inc. submits tariff filing: VEC HQUS Transfer Agreement to be effective July 1, 2023.
Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register
, the Commission provides all interested persons an opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the internet through the Commission's Home Page (
http://www.ferc.gov
) using the “eLibrary” link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time, the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID–19), issued by the President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov
or call toll-free, (886) 208–3676 or TYY, (202) 502–8659.
The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments, protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at
http://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502–6595 or
OPP@ferc.gov.
Comment Date:
5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 21, 2023.
Dated: July 7, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–14859 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What is the deadline for filing motions to intervene or protests regarding the tariff filing?,"['A. The deadline is July 7, 2023, one week from the date of the notice.'
'B. The comment date of July 21, 2023.'
'C. Protests must be filed within 60 days of the filing, by August 29, 2023.'
'D. The intervention deadline is August 15, 2023, 30 days after the filing date.']",B
163," 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER23–2346–000]
Oak Ridge Solar, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization
This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of Oak Ridge Solar, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene, or protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant.
Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability, is July 27, 2022.
The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at
http://www.ferc.gov.
To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the intervention or protests.
Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register
, the Commission provides all interested persons an opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the internet through the Commission's Home Page (
http://www.ferc.gov
) using the “eLibrary” link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time, the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID–19), issued by the President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov
or call toll-free, (886) 208–3676 or TYY, (202) 502–8659.
The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is encouraged to
contact OPP at (202) 502–6595 or
OPP@ferc.gov.
Dated: July 7, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–14860 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What methods does the notice provide for submitting interventions or protests?,"['A. Only electronic filing through eFiling is permitted'
'B. Electronically through eFiling, mail, or hand delivery'
'C. Email, fax, or phone' 'D. U.S. mail or overnight courier']",B
299," 4310–VH–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1347]
Certain Location-Sharing Systems, Related Software, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review Three Initial Determinations Terminating the Investigation as to Certain Respondents and in Its Entirety; Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY:
U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY:
Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review three initial determinations (“IDs”) of the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”) that terminate the above-captioned investigation as to: (1) respondent OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. based on settlement (Order No. 24); (2) respondents Xiaomi Corporation, Xiaomi H.K. Ltd., Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd., and Xiaomi Inc. based on settlement (Order No. 25); and (3) the remaining respondents based on withdrawal of the complaint (Order No. 26). The investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard P. Hadorn, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3179. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at
https://edis.usitc.gov.
For help accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov.
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal, telephone (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Commission instituted this investigation on December 30, 2022, based on a complaint filed by Advanced Ground Information Systems, Inc. of Jupiter, Florida and AGIS Software Development LLC of Marshall, Texas (collectively, “AGIS”). 87 FR 80568–69 (Dec. 30, 2022). The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based on the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain location-sharing systems, related software, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,213,970 (“the '970 patent”); 9,445,251 (“the '251 patent”); 9,467,838 (“the '838 patent”); 9,749,829 (“the '829 patent”); and 9,820,123 (“the '123 patent”).
Id.
at 80568. The complaint further alleges that a domestic industry exists.
Id.
The notice of investigation named 26 respondents: (1) Kyocera Corporation (“Kyocera”) of Kyoto, Japan; (2) OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“OnePlus”) of Shenzhen, Guangdong, China; (3) Xiaomi Corporation of Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands; Xiaomi H.K. Ltd. of Kowloon City, Hong Kong; Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd. of Beijing, China; and Xiaomi Inc. of Beijing, China (collectively, “Xiaomi”); and (4) Google LLC of Mountain View, California; Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. of Suwon, Republic of Korea; Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey; TCL Technology Group Corporation of Huizhou, Guangdong, China; TCL Electronics Holdings Limited of Hong Kong Science Park, Hong Kong; TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited of Hong Kong Science Park, Hong Kong; TCT Mobile (US) Inc. of Irvine, California; Lenovo Group Ltd. of Beijing, China; Lenovo (United States) Inc. of Morrisville, North Carolina; Motorola Mobility LLC of Chicago, Illinois; HMD Global of Espoo, Finland; HMD Global OY of Espoo, Finland; HMD America, Inc. of Miami, Florida; Sony Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Sony Mobile Communications, Inc. of Tokyo, Japan; ASUSTek Computer Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan; ASUS Computer International of Fremont, California; BLU Products of Doral, Florida; Panasonic Corporation of Osaka, Japan; Panasonic Corporation of North America of Secaucus, New Jersey (collectively, the “Remaining Respondents”).
Id.
at 80569. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (“OUII”) is also named as a party.
Id.
On February 17, 2023, the Commission amended the complaint and notice of investigation to substitute Panasonic Holdings Corporation of Osaka, Japan, in place of named respondent Panasonic Corporation. Order No. 7 (Feb. 1, 2023),
unreviewed by
88 FR 11477 (Feb. 23, 2023).
On June 6, 2023, the Commission terminated the investigation as to the following asserted claims based on withdrawal: (i) claim 2 of the '970 patent; (ii) claims 1–2, 7–8, 23, 25, 29–30, and 35 of the '251 patent; (iii) claims 3, 5–8, 10, 16, 19, 38, 40, 55–56, 61–64, 68, 71–72, 80 and 84 of the '838 patent; (iv) claims 1, 8, 34, and 41 of the '829 patent; and (v) claim 14 of the '123 patent. Order No. 16 (May 17, 2023),
unreviewed by
Comm'n Notice (June 6, 2023).
On June 27, 2023, the Commission terminated the investigation as to Kyocera based on settlement. Order No. 19,
unreviewed by
Comm'n Notice (June 27, 2023).
On June 14, 2023, AGIS and OnePlus filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation as to OnePlus based on a settlement agreement. On June 16, 2023, OUII filed a response supporting the motion. No other responses to the motion were filed.
On June 15, 2023, AGIS and Xiaomi filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation as to Xiaomi based on a settlement agreement. On June 16, 2023, OUII filed a response supporting the motion. No other responses to the motion were filed.
On June 15, 2023, AGIS filed a motion to terminate the investigation as to the Remaining Respondents based on withdrawal of the complaint. On June 16, 2023, OUII filed a response supporting the motion. On June 20, 2023, the Remaining Respondents filed a response stating that they do not oppose the motion. No other responses to the motion were filed.
On June 20, 2023, the ALJ issued all three subject IDs (Order Nos. 24, 25, and 26). Order Nos. 24 and 25 grant the unopposed joint motions to terminate the investigation as to OnePlus and Xiaomi, respectively, finding that the motions comply with the requirements of Commission Rule 210.21(b)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(b)(1)), and that the proposed settlements do not adversely affect the public interest in accordance with Commission Rule 210.50(b)(2) (19 CFR 210.50(b)(2)). Order No. 24 at 2–3; Order No. 25 at 2–3. Order No. 26 grants the unopposed motion to terminate the
investigation as to the Remaining Respondents and thus in its entirety, finding that the motion complies with the requirements of Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(a)(1)), and that “no extraordinary circumstances exist that would prevent the requested termination of this Investigation.” Order No. 26 at 2–3. No petitions for review of the subject IDs were filed.
The Commission has determined not to review the subject IDs. The investigation is terminated as to OnePlus, Xiaomi, and the Remaining Respondents and, thus, in its entirety.
The Commission vote for this determination took place on July 7, 2023.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 10, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023–14840 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
","What happened in the investigation with respect to respondent OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.?","['A. OnePlus petitioned for and was granted a license to the asserted patents.'
'B. OnePlus was found to infringe the asserted patents.'
'C. The investigation was terminated as to OnePlus based on a settlement agreement.'
'D. The Administrative Law Judge found OnePlus in default.']",C
284," 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–HQ–FAC–2023–N048; FXFR131109WFHS0–234–FF09F12000; OMB Control Number 1018–0078]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget; Injurious Wildlife; Importation Certification for Live Fish and Fish Eggs
AGENCY:
Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION:
Notice of information collection; request for comment.
SUMMARY:
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), are proposing to renew an information collection with revisions.
DATES:
Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before August 14, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this
notice to
https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Find this particular information collection by selecting “Currently under Review—Open for Public Comments” or by using the search function. Please provide a copy of your comments to the Service Information Collection Clearance Officer, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MS: PRB (JAO/3W), 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041–3803 (mail); or by email to
Info_Coll@fws.gov.
Please reference “1018–0078” in the subject line of your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Madonna L. Baucum, Service Information Collection Clearance Officer, by email at
Info_Coll@fws.gov,
or by telephone at (703) 358–2503. Individuals in the United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services. Individuals outside the United States should use the relay services offered within their country to make international calls to the point-of-contact in the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.
) and its implementing regulations at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), all information collections require approval under the PRA. We may not conduct or sponsor and you are not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
On February 14, 2023, we published in the
Federal Register
(88 FR 9532) a notice of our intent to request that OMB approve this information collection. In that notice, we solicited comments for 60 days, ending on April 17, 2023. In an effort to increase public awareness of, and participation in, our public commenting processes associated with information collection requests (ICR), the Service also published the
Federal Register
notice on
Regulations.gov
(Docket No. FWS–HQ–FAC–2023–0002) to provide the public with an additional method to submit comments (in addition to the typical
Info_Coll@fws.gov
email and U.S. mail submission methods). We received no comments in response to that notice.
As part of our continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burdens, we invite the public and other Federal agencies to comment on new, proposed, revised, and continuing collections of information. This helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. It also helps the public understand our information collection requirements and provide the requested data in the desired format.
We are especially interested in public comment addressing the following:
(1) Whether or not the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether or not the information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of our estimate of the burden for this collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(4) How might the agency minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology,
e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of response.
Comments that you submit in response to this notice are a matter of public record. We will include or summarize each comment in our request to OMB to approve this ICR. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Abstract:
The Lacey Act (Act; 18 U.S.C. 42) prohibits the importation of any animal deemed to be and prescribed by regulation to be injurious to:
• Human beings;
• The interests of agriculture, horticulture, and forestry; or
• Wildlife or the wildlife resources of the United States.
Implementation and enforcement of the Lacey Act are the responsibility of the Department of the Interior. The implementing regulations at 50 CFR 16.13 allow for the importation of dead uneviscerated salmonids (family Salmonidae), live salmonids, live fertilized eggs, or gametes of salmonid fish into the United States. To effectively carry out our responsibilities and protect the aquatic resources of the United States, we must collect information regarding the source, destination, and health status of salmonid fish and their reproductive parts. Moreover, in order to evaluate import requests, we must be able to ascertain that the collected information is accurate. Individuals who provide the fish health data and sign the health certificates must demonstrate professional qualifications and be approved as Title 50 Certifiers by the Fish and Wildlife Service through an application process.
We use three forms to collect this Title 50 Certifier application information:
• FWS Form 3–2273 (Title 50 Certifying Official Form)—New applicants and those seeking recertification as a title 50 certifying official provide information so that we can assess their qualifications.
• FWS Form 3–2274 (Title 50 Certification Form)—Certifying officials use this form to affirm the health status of the fish or fish reproductive products to be imported.
• FWS Form 3–2275 (Title 50 Importation Request Form)—We use the information on this form to track and control importations and to ensure the safety of shipments.
Proposed Revisions
With this submission, we propose to modify Forms 3–2274 and 3–2275 to add fields to collect email addresses and contact phone numbers with each submission. We do not plan to revise Form 3–2273, which already collects this information. We also plan to begin publishing, with OMB approval, the results of this information collection for Form 3–2273 on a publicly accessible, Service-managed web page to inform importers of Certified Signing Officials by country of origin.
The public may request copies of any form or document contained in this information collection by sending a request to the Service Information Collection Clearance Officer in
ADDRESSES
, above.
Title of Collection:
Injurious Wildlife; Importation Certification for Live Fish and Fish Eggs (50 CFR 16.13).
OMB Control Number:
1018–0078.
Form Numbers:
3–2273, 3–2274, and 3–2275.
Type of Review:
Revision of a currently approved collection.
Respondents/Affected Public:
Aquatic animal health professionals seeking to be certified title 50 inspectors; certified title 50 inspectors who perform health certifications on live salmonids; and any entity wishing to import live salmonids or salmonid reproductive products into the United States.
Respondent's Obligation:
Required to obtain or retain a benefit.
Frequency of Collection:
On occasion.
Total Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden Cost:
None.
 
Requirement
Annual
number of
respondents
Total annual responses
Completion time per response
Total annual burden hours
FWS Form 3–2273 (Title 50 Certifying Official Form)
Private Sector
9
9
1 hour
9
Government
7
7
1 hour
7
FWS Form 3–2274 (U.S. Title 50 Health Certification Form)
Private Sector
10
20
30 minutes
10
Government
15
30
30 minutes
15
FWS Form 3–2275 (Title 50 Importation Request Form)
Private Sector
10
20
15 minutes
5
Government
15
30
15 minutes
8
Totals
66
116
54
An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
The authority for this action is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.
).
Madonna Baucum,
Information Collection Clearance Officer, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–14833 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
","According to the notice, how many total annual burden hours are estimated for this information collection?","['A. 116' 'B. 426' 'C. 3,220' 'D. 54']",D
48," 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2023–1528; Airspace Docket No. 23–ASW–9]
RIN 2120–AA66
Amendment of VOR Federal Airways V–20, V–222, V–289, V–552, V–569 and V–574, and Establishment of United States Area Navigation (RNAV) Routes T–483 and T–485 in the Vicinity of Beaumont, TX
AGENCY:
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
SUMMARY:
This action proposes to amend Very High Frequency (VHF) Omnidirectional Range (VOR) Federal airways V–20, V–222, V–289, V–552, V–569, and V–574, and establish United States Area Navigation (RNAV) routes T–483 and T–485. The FAA is proposing this action due to the planned decommissioning of the VOR portion of the Beaumont, TX (BPT), VOR/Distance Measuring Equipment (VOR/DME) navigational aid (NAVAID). The Beaumont VOR is being decommissioned in support of the FAA's VOR Minimum Operational Network (MON) program.
DATES:
Comments must be received on or before August 28, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
Send comments identified by FAA Docket No. FAA–2023–1528
and Airspace Docket No. 23–ASW–9 using any of the following methods:
*
Federal eRulemaking Portal:
Go to
www.regulations.gov
and follow the online instructions for sending your comments electronically.
*
Mail:
Send comments to Docket Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12–140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
*
Hand Delivery or Courier:
Take comments to Docket Operations in Room W12–140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
*
Fax:
Fax comments to Docket Operations at (202) 493–2251.
Docket:
Background documents or comments received may be read at
www.regulations.gov
at any time. Follow the online instructions for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12–140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at
www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/.
You may also contact the Rules and Regulations Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267–8783.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colby Abbott, Rules and Regulations Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority as it would modify the National Airspace System (NAS) as necessary to preserve the safe and efficient flow of air traffic.
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested persons to participate in this rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic, environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters should submit only one time if comments are filed electronically, or commenters should send only one copy of written comments if comments are filed in writing.
The FAA will file in the docket all comments it receives, as well as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this proposal, the FAA will consider all comments it receives on or before the closing date for comments. The FAA will consider comments filed after the comment period has closed if it is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. The FAA may change this proposal in light of the comments it receives.
Privacy:
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov,
as described in the system of records notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy
Availability of Rulemaking Documents
An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the internet at
www.regulations.gov.
Recently published rulemaking documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at
www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets Operations office (see
ADDRESSES
section for address, phone number, and hours of operations). An informal docket may also be examined during normal business hours at the office of the Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX, 76177.
Incorporation by Reference
VOR Federal airways are published in paragraph 6010(a) and United States Area Navigation Routes (T-routes) are published in paragraph 6011 of FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 on an annual basis. This document proposes to amend the current version of that order, FAA Order JO 7400.11G, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September 15, 2022. These updates would be published in the next update to FAA Order JO 7400.11. That order is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES
section of this document.
FAA Order JO 7400.11G lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and reporting points.
Background
The FAA is planning to decommission the Beaumont, TX, VOR in March 2024. The Beaumont VOR was one of the candidate VORs identified for discontinuance by the FAA's VOR MON program and listed in the final policy statement notice, “Provision of Navigation Services for the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) Transition to Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) (Plan for Establishing a VOR Minimum Operational Network),” published in the
Federal Register
on July 26, 2016 (81 FR 48694), Docket No. FAA–2011–1082.
Although the VOR portion of the Beaumont, TX, VOR/DME is planned for decommissioning, the co-located DME portion of the NAVAID is being retained to support NextGen PBN flight procedure requirements.
The VOR Federal airways affected by the Beaumont VOR decommissioning are V–20, V–222, V–289, V–552, V–569, and V–574. With the planned decommissioning of the Beaumont VOR, the remaining ground-based NAVAID coverage in the area is insufficient to enable the continuity of the affected airways. As such, proposed modifications to V–20 and V–222 would result in gaps in those airways and to V–289, V–552, V–569, and V–574 would result in the airways being shortened.
To address the proposed modifications to the affected VOR Federal airways, instrument flight rules (IFR) traffic could use portions of adjacent VOR Federal airways V–70, V–194, V–306, and V–407, or receive air traffic control (ATC) radar vectors to fly through or around the affected area. Additionally, IFR pilots operating aircraft equipped with RNAV
capabilities could also use RNAV routes T–224 and T–254 or navigate point to point using the existing fixes and waypoints that would remain in place to support continued operations though the affected area. Visual flight rules pilots who elect to navigate via the affected ATS routes could also take advantage of the adjacent ATS routes or ATC services listed previously.
Further, the FAA proposes to establish two new RNAV routes, T–483 and T–485, that pilots of aircraft equipped with RNAV capabilities could use to navigate point to point in support of continued operations though the affected area. RNAV route T–483 would mitigate the proposed removal of the affected V–289 airway segment and RNAV route T–485 would mitigate the proposed removal of the affected V–569 airway segment. The new T-routes would provide RNAV equipped aircraft ATS route alternatives between the SHWNN, TX, waypoint (WP) located near the Beaumont, TX, VOR/DME and the Lufkin, TX, VOR/Tactical Air Navigation (VORTAC), reduce ATC sector workload and complexity, reduce pilot-to-controller communication, and support the FAA's continued NextGen efforts to modernize the NAS navigation system from a ground-based system to a satellite-based system.
The Proposal
The FAA is proposing to amend 14 CFR part 71 to amend VOR Federal airways V–20, V–222, V–289, V–552, V–569, and V–574, and establish RNAV routes T–483 and T–485. The ATS route amendments and establishments are due to the planned decommissioning of the VOR portion of the Beaumont, TX, VOR/DME. The proposed ATS route actions are described below.
V–20:
V–20 currently extends between the McAllen, TX, VOR/DME and the Palacios, TX, VORTAC; between the Beaumont, TX, VOR/DME and the Montgomery, AL, VORTAC; and between the Athens, GA, VOR/DME and the Richmond, VA, VORTAC. The airspace on the main airway above 14,000 feet MSL from Mc Allen to 49 miles northeast and the airspace within Mexico is excluded. The FAA proposes to remove the airway segment between the Beaumont VOR/DME and the Lake Charles, LA, VORTAC. Additionally, the exclusion for the airspace on the main airway above 14,000 feet MSL from Mc Allen to 49 miles northeast would be removed as it has not been required since the V–20 south alternate airway was removed in 1994 and there is no operational requirement to retain it. Further, the exclusion for the airspace within Mexico would be removed as the airway does not extend into Mexico's airspace. As amended, the airway would extend between the McAllen VOR/DME and the Palacios VORTAC, between the Lake Charles VORTAC and the Montgomery VORTAC, and between the Athens VOR/DME and the Richmond VORTAC.
V–222:
V–222 currently extends between the El Paso, TX, VORTAC and the intersection of the LaGrange, GA, VORTAC 048° and Rome, GA, VORTAC 166° radials (TIROE fix). The FAA proposes to remove the airway segment between the Humble, TX, VORTAC and the Lake Charles, LA, VORTAC. As amended, the airway would extend between the El Paso VORTAC and the Humble VORTAC and between the Lake Charles VORTAC and the intersection of the LaGrange VORTAC 048° and Rome VORTAC 166° radials (TIROE fix).
V–289:
V–289 currently extends between the Beaumont, TX, VOR/DME and the Vichy, MO, VOR/DME. The FAA proposes to remove the airway segment between the Beaumont VOR/DME and the Lufkin, TX, VORTAC. As amended, the airway would extend between the Lufkin VORTAC and Vichy VOR/DME.
V–552:
V–552 currently extends between the Beaumont, TX, VOR/DME and the Monroeville, AL, VORTAC. The airspace within restricted area R–4403F is excluded during its times of use. The FAA proposes to remove the airway segment between the Beaumont VOR/DME and the Lake Charles, LA, VORTAC. As amended, the airway would extend between the Lake Charles VORTAC and the Monroeville VORTAC.
V–569:
V–569 currently extends between the Beaumont, TX, VOR/DME and the Cedar Creek, TX, VORTAC. The FAA proposes to remove the airway segment between the Beaumont VOR/DME and the Lufkin, TX, VORTAC. As amended, the airway would extend between the Lufkin VORTAC and the Cedar Creek VORTAC.
V–574:
V–574 currently extends between the Centex, TX, VORTAC and the Lake Charles, LA, VORTAC. The FAA proposes to remove the airway segment between the Daisetta, TX, VORTAC and the Lake Charles VORTAC. As amended, the airway would extend between the Centex VORTAC and the Daisetta VORTAC.
T–483:
T–483 is a new RNAV route proposed to extend between the SHWNN, TX, WP, located near the Beaumont, TX, VOR/DME and the Lufkin, TX (LFK), VORTAC. The proposed T–483 would provide mitigation for the proposed removal of the V–289 airway segment between the Beaumont VOR/DME and the Lufkin VORTAC. The full T–483 route description is listed in the amendments to part 71 as set forth below.
T–485:
T–485 is a new RNAV route proposed to extend between the SHWNN, TX, WP, located near the Beaumont, TX, VOR/DME and the Lufkin, TX (LFK), VORTAC. The proposed T–485 would provide mitigation for the proposed removal of the V–569 airway segment between the Beaumont VOR/DME and the Lufkin VORTAC. The full T–485 route description is listed in the amendments to part 71 as set forth below.
The NAVAID radials listed in the VOR Federal airway descriptions in the Proposed Amendment section below are unchanged and stated in degrees True north.
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. It, therefore: (1) is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a “significant rule” under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Environmental Review
This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, “Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures” prior to any FAA final regulatory action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as follows:
Authority:
49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September 15, 2022, is amended as follows:
Paragraph 6010(a) Domestic VOR Federal Airways.
V–20 [Amended]
From Mc Allen, TX; INT Mc Allen 038° and Corpus Christi, TX, 178° radials; 10 miles 8 miles wide, 37 miles 7 miles wide (3 miles E and 4 miles W of centerline), Corpus Christi; INT Corpus Christi 054° and Palacios, TX, 226° radials; to Palacios. From Lake Charles, LA; Lafayette, LA; Reserve, LA; INT Reserve 084° and Gulfport, MS, 247° radials; Gulfport; Semmes, AL; INT Semmes 048° and Monroeville, AL, 231° radials; Monroeville; to Montgomery, AL. From Athens, GA; Electric City, SC; Sugarloaf Mountain, NC; Barretts Mountain, NC; South Boston, VA; to Richmond, VA.
V–222 [Amended]
From El Paso, TX; Salt Flat, TX; Fort Stockton, TX; 20 miles, 116 miles, 55 MSL, Junction, TX; Stonewall, TX; INT Stonewall 113° and Industry, TX, 267° radials; Industry; INT Industry 101° and Humble, TX, 259° radials; to Humble. From Lake Charles, LA; McComb, MS; Eaton, MS; Monroeville, AL; Montgomery, AL; LaGrange, GA; to INT LaGrange 048° and Rome, GA, 166° radials.
V–289 [Amended]
From Lufkin, TX; Gregg County, TX; Texarkana, AR; Fort Smith, AR; Harrison, AR; Dogwood, MO; INT Dogwood 058° and Vichy, MO, 204° radials; to Vichy.
V–552 [Amended]
From Lake Charles, LA; INT Lake Charles 064° and Lafayette, LA, 281° radials; Lafayette; Tibby, LA; Harvey, LA; Picayune, MS; Semmes, AL; INT Semmes 063° and Monroeville, AL, 216° radials; to Monroeville. The airspace within restricted area R–4403F is excluded during its times of use.
V–569 [Amended]
From Lufkin, TX; Frankston, TX; to Cedar Creek, TX.
V–574 [Amended]
From Centex, TX; INT Centex 116° and Navasota, TX, 258° radials; Navasota; Humble, TX; to Daisetta, TX.
Paragraph 6011 United States Area Navigation Routes.
 
 
 
 
T–483 SHWNN, TX to Lufkin, TX (LFK) [New]
SHWNN, TX
WP
(Lat. 29°56′45.94″ N, long. 094°00′57.73″ W)
HONEE, TX
FIX
(Lat. 30°24′21.96″ N, long. 094°24′59.99″ W)
Lufkin, TX (LFK)
VORTAC
(Lat. 31°09′44.79″ N, long. 094°43′00.60″ W)
 
*         *         *         *         *         *         *
T–485 SHWNN, TX to Lufkin, TX (LFK) [New]
SHWNN, TX
WP
(Lat. 29°56′45.94″ N, long. 094°00′57.73″ W)
ROMER, TX
FIX
(Lat. 30°44′47.33″ N, long. 094°23′33.01″ W)
Lufkin, TX (LFK)
VORTAC
(Lat. 31°09′44.79″ N, long. 094°43′00.60″ W)
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 10, 2023.
Karen L. Chiodini,
Acting Manager, Airspace Rules and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2023–14839 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What will happen to VOR Federal airway V-289 under this proposal?,"['A. The widths will be increased to accommodate high-traffic volume.'
'B. It will be extended westward to provide a continuous route between Lufkin, TX and Wichita, KS.'
'C. The segment between Beaumont VOR/DME and Lufkin VORTAC will be removed.'
'D. Exclusions will be added for special use airspace along the route.']",C
83," 3410–XV–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
[Docket No. RBS–23–Business–0018]
Notice of Request for Approval of a New Information Collection
AGENCY:
Rural Housing Service, and Rural Business-Cooperative Service, USDA.
ACTION:
Notice and request for comments.
SUMMARY:
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice announces the intention of the Rural Business-Cooperative Service, and Rural Housing Service, agencies of the Rural Development mission area within the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), hereinafter collectively referred to as the Agency to request approval for a new information collection in support of compliance with applicable acts for planning and performing construction and other development work.
DATES:
Comments on this notice must be received by September 11, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
Comments may be submitted by the following method:
•
Federal eRulemaking Portal:
This website provides the ability to type short comments directly into the comment field on this web page or attach a file for lengthier comments. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions at that site for submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lynn Gilbert, Rural Development Innovation Center—Regulations Management Division, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, South Building, Washington, DC 20250–1522. Telephone: (202) 690–2682. Email
lynn.gilbert@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) regulation (5 CFR part 1320) implementing provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13) requires that interested members of the public and affected agencies have an opportunity to comment on information collection and recordkeeping activities (see 5 CFR 1320.8(d)). This notice identifies an information collection that Rural Development is submitting to OMB for a new collection.
Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) The accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Comments may be sent by the Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov
and, in the lower “Search Regulations and Federal Actions” box, select “RBS” from the agency drop-down menu, then click on “Submit.” In the Docket ID column, select RBS–23–Business–0018 to submit or view public comments and to view supporting and related materials available electronically. Information on using
Regulations.gov
, including instructions for accessing documents, submitting comments, and viewing the docket after the close of the comment period, is available through the site's “User Tips” link.
Title:
7 CFR 1980—Common Forms Package for Guaranteed Loan Forms.
OMB Number:
0570–New.
Expiration Date of Approval:
Three years from approval date.
Type of Request:
New information collection.
Abstract:
The information collection under OMB Number 0575–New will enable the Agencies to effectively administer the policies, methods, and responsibilities for the funding and transmittal of post-award Federal funding for approved programs and projects.
The purpose of this information collection is to obtain information necessary to efficiently set up a functional system for the transmittal of payments after an applicant has been awarded funding.
Information for the RD forms and their usage in this collection package are included in this supporting statement.
Information will be collected by the field offices from applicants, consultants, lenders, and public entities. The collection of information is considered the minimum necessary to effectively evaluate the overall scope of the project.
Failure to collect information could have an adverse impact on effectively carrying out the mission, administration, processing, and program requirements.
Estimate of Burden:
RD is requesting approval for one respondent and a one-hour place holder in order for OMB to issue a control number for these forms. The burden for each of the forms will be accounted for within the individual Rural Development program collection packages using the form(s).
Respondents:
Respondents for this data are lending institutions and for-profit businesses but also include individuals and corporations.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent per Form in package:
 
Form No.
Responses per
respondent
1980–19
1
1980–41
1
1980–43
1
1980–44
1
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will become a matter of public record.
Karama Neal,
Administrator, Rural Business-Cooperative Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–14827 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What form will respondents need to fill out multiple times in the new information collection?,"['A. Form 1980-22, Accounting System and Financial Capability Analysis'
'B. Form 1980-56, Quarterly Performance Report' 'C. Form 1980-44'
'D. Form 1980-36, Change Order Request and Approval']",C
80," 3410–XV–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
[Docket No. RBS–23–Business–0018]
Notice of Request for Approval of a New Information Collection
AGENCY:
Rural Housing Service, and Rural Business-Cooperative Service, USDA.
ACTION:
Notice and request for comments.
SUMMARY:
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice announces the intention of the Rural Business-Cooperative Service, and Rural Housing Service, agencies of the Rural Development mission area within the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), hereinafter collectively referred to as the Agency to request approval for a new information collection in support of compliance with applicable acts for planning and performing construction and other development work.
DATES:
Comments on this notice must be received by September 11, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
Comments may be submitted by the following method:
•
Federal eRulemaking Portal:
This website provides the ability to type short comments directly into the comment field on this web page or attach a file for lengthier comments. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions at that site for submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lynn Gilbert, Rural Development Innovation Center—Regulations Management Division, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, South Building, Washington, DC 20250–1522. Telephone: (202) 690–2682. Email
lynn.gilbert@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) regulation (5 CFR part 1320) implementing provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13) requires that interested members of the public and affected agencies have an opportunity to comment on information collection and recordkeeping activities (see 5 CFR 1320.8(d)). This notice identifies an information collection that Rural Development is submitting to OMB for a new collection.
Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) The accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Comments may be sent by the Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov
and, in the lower “Search Regulations and Federal Actions” box, select “RBS” from the agency drop-down menu, then click on “Submit.” In the Docket ID column, select RBS–23–Business–0018 to submit or view public comments and to view supporting and related materials available electronically. Information on using
Regulations.gov
, including instructions for accessing documents, submitting comments, and viewing the docket after the close of the comment period, is available through the site's “User Tips” link.
Title:
7 CFR 1980—Common Forms Package for Guaranteed Loan Forms.
OMB Number:
0570–New.
Expiration Date of Approval:
Three years from approval date.
Type of Request:
New information collection.
Abstract:
The information collection under OMB Number 0575–New will enable the Agencies to effectively administer the policies, methods, and responsibilities for the funding and transmittal of post-award Federal funding for approved programs and projects.
The purpose of this information collection is to obtain information necessary to efficiently set up a functional system for the transmittal of payments after an applicant has been awarded funding.
Information for the RD forms and their usage in this collection package are included in this supporting statement.
Information will be collected by the field offices from applicants, consultants, lenders, and public entities. The collection of information is considered the minimum necessary to effectively evaluate the overall scope of the project.
Failure to collect information could have an adverse impact on effectively carrying out the mission, administration, processing, and program requirements.
Estimate of Burden:
RD is requesting approval for one respondent and a one-hour place holder in order for OMB to issue a control number for these forms. The burden for each of the forms will be accounted for within the individual Rural Development program collection packages using the form(s).
Respondents:
Respondents for this data are lending institutions and for-profit businesses but also include individuals and corporations.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent per Form in package:
 
Form No.
Responses per
respondent
1980–19
1
1980–41
1
1980–43
1
1980–44
1
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will become a matter of public record.
Karama Neal,
Administrator, Rural Business-Cooperative Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–14827 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What agency is requesting approval for a new information collection related to compliance with applicable acts for planning and construction work?,"['A. Rural Housing Service and Rural Business-Cooperative Service of the USDA'
""B. The Department of Housing and Urban Development's Office of Public and Indian Housing""
""C. The Small Business Administration's Office of Government Contracting and Business Development""
""D. The General Services Administration's Public Buildings Service""]",A
352," 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No.: FAA–2023–0584; Summary Notice No. 2023–24]
Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received; Executive Jet Management, Inc.
AGENCY:
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY:
This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief from specified requirements of Federal Aviation Regulations. The purpose of this notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, the FAA's exemption process. Neither publication of this notice nor the inclusion nor omission of information in the summary is intended to affect the legal status of the petition or its final disposition.
DATES:
Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket number and must be received on or before August 2, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
Send comments identified by docket number FAA–2023–0584 using any of the following methods:
•
Federal eRulemaking Portal:
Go to
https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the online instructions for sending your comments electronically.
•
Mail:
Send comments to Docket Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12–140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
•
Hand Delivery or Courier:
Take comments to Docket Operations in Room W12–140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590–0001, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
•
Fax:
Fax comments to Docket Operations at (202) 493–2251.
Privacy:
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information the commenter provides, to
http://www.regulations.gov,
as described in the system of records notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.
Docket:
Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov
at any time. Follow the online instructions for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12–140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590–0001, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jimeca Callaham, (202) 267–0312, Office of Rulemaking, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591.
This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.
Issued in Washington, DC.
Angela O. Anderson,
Director, Regulatory Support Division, Office of Rulemaking.
Petition for Exemption
Docket No.:
FAA–2023–0584.
Petitioner:
Executive Jet Management.
Section(s) of 14 CFR Affected:
§§ 135.337(a)(1), 135.337(b)(1), 135.337(b)(2), 135.339(e)(3), and 135.339(e)(4).
Description of Relief Sought:
Executive Jet Management, Inc. (EJM) has requested an exemption from 14 CFR 135.337(a)(1), 135.337(b)(1), 135.337(b)(2), 135.339(e)(3), and 135.339(e)(4) to the extent necessary to permit authorized Company Check Pilots to conduct Section 135.299 Pilot in Command Line Checks from any EJM aircraft's observation seat station.
[FR Doc. 2023–14883 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What is the purpose of publishing the notice in the Federal Register?,"[""A. To improve public awareness of and participation in the FAA's exemption process""
'B. To solicit comments on a proposal to increase safety inspections of regional air carriers'
'C. To summarize an airworthiness directive issued for a specific aircraft make and model'
'D. To announce proposed changes to flight crew training requirements']",A
336," 7710–FW–P
POSTAL SERVICE
Product Change—Priority Mail, First-Class Package Service & Parcel Select Negotiated Service Agreement
AGENCY:
Postal Service
TM
.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY:
The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.
DATES:
Date of required notice:
July 13, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sean C. Robinson, 202–268–8405.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on July 7, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail, First-Class Package Service & Parcel Select Contract 33 to Competitive Product List.
Documents are available at
www.prc.gov,
Docket Nos. MC2023–181, CP2023–185.
Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023–14821 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",When did the Postal Service file the request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add the contract to the Competitive Products List?,"['A. August 3, 2023' 'B. June 30, 2023' 'C. July 7, 2023'
'D. September 12, 2023']",C
24," 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2022–0972; FRL–10529–02–R9]
Second 10-Year Maintenance Plan for the Coso Junction PM–10 Planning Area; California
AGENCY:
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action to approve the “Coso Junction PM
10
Planning Area Second 10-Year Maintenance Plan” (“Coso Junction Second Maintenance Plan” or “Plan”) as a revision to the state implementation plan (SIP) for the State of California. The Coso Junction Second Maintenance Plan includes, among other elements, a base year emissions inventory, a maintenance demonstration, and contingency provisions. The EPA is finalizing this action because the SIP revision meets the applicable statutory and regulatory requirements for such plans. The EPA is also taking final action to find the contribution of motor vehicle emissions to the area's continued attainment of the 1987 PM
10
standards to be insignificant. Once this insignificance finding is finalized, the area will not have to complete a regional emissions analysis for any transportation conformity determinations necessary for the Coso Junction Planning Area (CJPA).
DATES:
This rule is effective August 14, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA- EPA–R09–OAR–2022–0972. All documents in the docket are listed on the
https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available,
e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through
https://www.regulations.gov,
or please contact the person identified in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information. If you need assistance in a language other than English or if you are a person with a disability who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact the person identified in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lindsay Wickersham, Planning Section (AIR–2–1), EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, (415) 947–4192, or by email at
wickersham.lindsay@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Summary of Proposed Rule
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. Air Quality Conditions Since Proposal
IV. Environmental Justice Considerations
V. Final Action
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Summary of Proposed Rule
On March 30, 2023, the EPA proposed to approve the Coso Junction Second Maintenance Plan prepared by the Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District (GBUAPCD) and submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) on October 21, 2021, as a revision to the California SIP.
1
In doing so, we proposed to find that the Coso Junction Second Maintenance Plan adequately demonstrates that the CJPA will maintain the 1987 annual national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS or “standards”) for particulate matter of ten microns or less (PM
10
) through the year 2030 (
i.e.,
for more than 10 years beyond the first 10-year maintenance period), with the maintenance period ending on October 4, 2030. We also proposed to find that the Plan includes sufficient contingency provisions to promptly correct any violation of the PM
10
standards that may occur. Lastly, we proposed to find that motor vehicle related PM
10
emissions do not contribute significantly to the PM
10
air quality problem in the CJPA based on consideration of the factors identified in § 93.109(f) of the EPA's transportation conformity regulations.
2
1
 88 FR 19034.
2
 40 CFR part 93.
The EPA announced the availability of the Plan and motor vehicle emissions insignificance finding on the EPA's transportation conformity website on April 3, 2023, and requested comments by May 3, 2023. We received no comments in response to the adequacy review posting.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period that ended on May 1, 2023. We received no comments on our proposal during the comment period.
III. Air Quality Conditions Since Proposal
As part of our proposal, we evaluated complete, quality-assured, and certified, data available at the time (
i.e.,
through 2021).
3
These data indicated that there had been four exceedances of the PM
10
NAAQS in the CJPA between 2018 and 2020. The District and CARB provided information to the EPA about the September 7, 2020 exceedance that explained that the exceedance was not within the State's control.
4
As conveyed in the EPA's concurrence letter, we concurred that, based on the weight of evidence, the September 7, 2020 exceedance was caused by an exceptional event due to the Creek Fire in the Sierra National Forest and the SQF Complex wildfire in the Sequoia National Forest.
5
Based on a review of air quality data during the three-year period covered by the Plan (2018–2020) and excluding the exceedance flagged by CARB and GBUAPCD and concurred with by the EPA as an exceptional event, we find that the 2020 design value for the Coso Junction PM
10
nonattainment area is 1.0 and that the area maintained the PM
10
standards in that year.
3
 88 FR 19034, 19036.
4
 Email dated August 24, 2021, from Candace Clawson, CARB, to Michael Benjamin, CARB, Subject: “CARB letter to EPA GBUAPCD PM
10
NEE_signed, EPA Cvr Ltr—2021 2nd Maint. Plan-EE Submittal-2021073_signed and GBUAPCD Exceptional Event Demonstration September 7 2020 FINAL,” with three attachments. While submitted by CARB, the demonstrations and addendums were developed through a joint effort by CARB and the GBUAPCD.
5
 Email dated July 12, 2022, from Anna Mebust, EPA Region IX, to Sylvia Vanderspek, CARB, Subject: “EPA Concurrence on 2020 PM10 Wildfire Exceptional Event,” with attachments, “DD_Concurrence_Letter.pdf;” “CosoJunctionWildfirePM
10
_ConcurrenceTSD.pdf.”
In 2021, there were three additional exceedances of the PM
10
NAAQS in the area. These additional exceedances in 2021 caused the number of exceedances recorded at the air monitor averaged over three consecutive years (
i.e.,
2019–2021) to be greater than 1.05. However, we do not think these data contradict the EPA's finding that the State's plan provides for maintenance of the PM
10
NAAQS under section 175A(b) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The District and CARB provided information to the EPA about the six exceedances that occurred in 2019–2021 that explained that three of the exceedances were not within the State's nor District's control.
6
The information provided indicates that the September 7, 2020, September 19, 2021, and September 27, 2021 exceedances were all caused by wildfire smoke. The EPA has reviewed the information provided by the State regarding the 2019–2021 exceedances, and we agree that this information does not call into question the EPA's proposed approval of the Coso Junction Second Maintenance Plan as providing for maintenance of the PM
10
NAAQS. We note as well that the State's analysis and the EPA's evaluation are consistent with the proposed changes to the maintenance plan that the EPA is approving in this final action to evaluate data that may have been influenced by certain events in determining whether contingency provisions should be triggered.
6
 Submitted via email on September 1, 2022, from Sylvia Vanderspek, CARB to Gwen Yoshimura, EPA Region IX, Subject: “FW: Coso Junction Initial Notification Forms for 2nd PM
10
MP Contingency,” with attachments, “INI 2010–2020 Coso Junction PM
10
.pdf,” “Discussion of PM
10
Exceedances at Coso Junction 2010 through 2021.pdf,” “INI 2021 Coso Junction PM
10
.pdf,” and “Coso Junction 2021 Wildfire Smoke Exceedances.pdf.”
As part of this final action, we evaluated complete, quality-assured, and certified data available for 2022.
7
These data indicated that there had been one exceedance of the PM
10
NAAQS in the CJPA in 2022.
8
Given the EPA's agreement that the 2021 exceedances do not call into question the EPA's proposal to approve the Coso Junction Second Maintenance Plan as providing for maintenance of the NAAQS, the State is not required at this time to submit additional information and analyses for the 2022 exceedance, because such exceedance, without the 2021 exceedances, would not on its own cause a violation of the NAAQS. Upon the effective date of this final action, if additional exceedances occur in 2023 or a later year such that the number of exceedances averaged over three
consecutive years is greater than 1.05, per Section 7 of the Plan, the State will be required to submit information regarding those exceedances if it wishes to request that the exceedances be excluded from the contingency trigger calculation. The EPA will review such information and will notify the State whether the contingency provisions have been triggered per the schedule outlined in the Plan.
7
 Email dated May 1, 2023, from Fletcher Clover, EPA Region IX, to Chris Howard, GBUAPCD, Subject: “RE: Great Basin Unified APCD Ambient Air Monitoring Data Certification for 2022,” with attachments, “Great Basin 2022 AQS data certification—AMP450NC_2102387 with EPA concurrence flags.pdf” and “Great Basin 2022 AQS data certification—AMP600_2102385 with EPA concurrence flags.pdf.”
8
 EPA Air Quality System Design Value Report, AMP480, accessed May 9, 2023 (User ID: STSAI, Report Request ID: 2104344).
IV. Environmental Justice Considerations
As described in detail in our proposal, the EPA reviewed demographic data, which provides an assessment of individual demographic groups of the populations living within the southwest portions of Inyo County.
9
The EPA then compared the data to the corresponding data for the United States as a whole for each of the demographic groups. The results of this analysis are being provided for informational and transparency purposes.
9
 88 FR 19034, 19044.
This final action approves the Coso Junction Second Maintenance Plan, which provides for the continued maintenance of the PM
10
NAAQS. We expect that this action will generally be neutral or contribute to reduced environmental and health impacts on all populations in the CJPA, including people of color and low-income populations. Further, there is no information in the record indicating that this action is expected to have disproportionately high or adverse human health or environmental effects on a particular group of people.
V. Final Action
For the reasons discussed in our proposed action and herein, the EPA is taking final action to approve the Coso Junction Second Maintenance Plan, submitted by CARB on October 20, 2021, as a revision to the California SIP. We are approving the maintenance demonstration and contingency provisions as meeting all of the applicable requirements for maintenance plans and related contingency provisions in CAA section 175A, and we are finalizing an insignificance finding for motor vehicle emissions in the CJPA.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 14094 (88 FR 21879, April 11, 2023);
• Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.
);
• Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.
);
• Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
• Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) because it approves a State program;
• Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
• Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA.
In addition, there are no areas of Indian country within the CJPA, and the State plan is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629, Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address “disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects” of their actions on minority populations and low-income populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law. The EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as “the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.” The EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean that “no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and commercial operations or programs and policies.”
The air agency did not evaluate EJ considerations as part of its SIP submittal; the CAA and applicable implementing regulations neither prohibit nor require such an evaluation. The EPA's evaluation of environmental justice is described in the section of this document titled, “Environmental Justice Considerations.” The analysis was done for the purpose of providing additional context and information about this rulemaking to the public, not as a basis of the action. Due to the nature of the action being taken here, this action is expected to have a neutral to positive impact on the air quality of the affected area. In addition, there is no information in the record upon which this decision is based that is inconsistent with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of achieving environmental justice for people of color, low-income populations, and Indigenous peoples.
This action is subject to the Congressional Review Act, and the EPA will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 11, 2023. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Ammonia, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur dioxide, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority:
42 U.S.C. 7401
et seq.
Dated: July 3, 2023.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental Protection Agency amends part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority:
42 U.S.C. 7401
et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(603) to read as follows:
§ 52.220
Identification of plan—in part.
(c) * * *
(604) The following plan was submitted electronically on October 21, 2021, by the Governor's designee as an attachment to a letter dated October 20, 2021.
(i) [Reserved]
(ii)
Additional materials.
(A) Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District.
(
1
) Coso Junction PM
10
Planning Area Second 10-Year Maintenance Plan, adopted on September 23, 2021.
(
2
) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2023–14688 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
","How many exceedances of the PM10 standard occurred in the Coso Junction area in 2022, according to the data reviewed by the EPA?",['A. 1' 'B. 3' 'C. 4' 'D. 2'],A
298," 4310–VH–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1347]
Certain Location-Sharing Systems, Related Software, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review Three Initial Determinations Terminating the Investigation as to Certain Respondents and in Its Entirety; Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY:
U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY:
Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review three initial determinations (“IDs”) of the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”) that terminate the above-captioned investigation as to: (1) respondent OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. based on settlement (Order No. 24); (2) respondents Xiaomi Corporation, Xiaomi H.K. Ltd., Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd., and Xiaomi Inc. based on settlement (Order No. 25); and (3) the remaining respondents based on withdrawal of the complaint (Order No. 26). The investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard P. Hadorn, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3179. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at
https://edis.usitc.gov.
For help accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov.
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal, telephone (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Commission instituted this investigation on December 30, 2022, based on a complaint filed by Advanced Ground Information Systems, Inc. of Jupiter, Florida and AGIS Software Development LLC of Marshall, Texas (collectively, “AGIS”). 87 FR 80568–69 (Dec. 30, 2022). The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based on the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain location-sharing systems, related software, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,213,970 (“the '970 patent”); 9,445,251 (“the '251 patent”); 9,467,838 (“the '838 patent”); 9,749,829 (“the '829 patent”); and 9,820,123 (“the '123 patent”).
Id.
at 80568. The complaint further alleges that a domestic industry exists.
Id.
The notice of investigation named 26 respondents: (1) Kyocera Corporation (“Kyocera”) of Kyoto, Japan; (2) OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“OnePlus”) of Shenzhen, Guangdong, China; (3) Xiaomi Corporation of Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands; Xiaomi H.K. Ltd. of Kowloon City, Hong Kong; Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd. of Beijing, China; and Xiaomi Inc. of Beijing, China (collectively, “Xiaomi”); and (4) Google LLC of Mountain View, California; Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. of Suwon, Republic of Korea; Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey; TCL Technology Group Corporation of Huizhou, Guangdong, China; TCL Electronics Holdings Limited of Hong Kong Science Park, Hong Kong; TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited of Hong Kong Science Park, Hong Kong; TCT Mobile (US) Inc. of Irvine, California; Lenovo Group Ltd. of Beijing, China; Lenovo (United States) Inc. of Morrisville, North Carolina; Motorola Mobility LLC of Chicago, Illinois; HMD Global of Espoo, Finland; HMD Global OY of Espoo, Finland; HMD America, Inc. of Miami, Florida; Sony Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Sony Mobile Communications, Inc. of Tokyo, Japan; ASUSTek Computer Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan; ASUS Computer International of Fremont, California; BLU Products of Doral, Florida; Panasonic Corporation of Osaka, Japan; Panasonic Corporation of North America of Secaucus, New Jersey (collectively, the “Remaining Respondents”).
Id.
at 80569. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (“OUII”) is also named as a party.
Id.
On February 17, 2023, the Commission amended the complaint and notice of investigation to substitute Panasonic Holdings Corporation of Osaka, Japan, in place of named respondent Panasonic Corporation. Order No. 7 (Feb. 1, 2023),
unreviewed by
88 FR 11477 (Feb. 23, 2023).
On June 6, 2023, the Commission terminated the investigation as to the following asserted claims based on withdrawal: (i) claim 2 of the '970 patent; (ii) claims 1–2, 7–8, 23, 25, 29–30, and 35 of the '251 patent; (iii) claims 3, 5–8, 10, 16, 19, 38, 40, 55–56, 61–64, 68, 71–72, 80 and 84 of the '838 patent; (iv) claims 1, 8, 34, and 41 of the '829 patent; and (v) claim 14 of the '123 patent. Order No. 16 (May 17, 2023),
unreviewed by
Comm'n Notice (June 6, 2023).
On June 27, 2023, the Commission terminated the investigation as to Kyocera based on settlement. Order No. 19,
unreviewed by
Comm'n Notice (June 27, 2023).
On June 14, 2023, AGIS and OnePlus filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation as to OnePlus based on a settlement agreement. On June 16, 2023, OUII filed a response supporting the motion. No other responses to the motion were filed.
On June 15, 2023, AGIS and Xiaomi filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation as to Xiaomi based on a settlement agreement. On June 16, 2023, OUII filed a response supporting the motion. No other responses to the motion were filed.
On June 15, 2023, AGIS filed a motion to terminate the investigation as to the Remaining Respondents based on withdrawal of the complaint. On June 16, 2023, OUII filed a response supporting the motion. On June 20, 2023, the Remaining Respondents filed a response stating that they do not oppose the motion. No other responses to the motion were filed.
On June 20, 2023, the ALJ issued all three subject IDs (Order Nos. 24, 25, and 26). Order Nos. 24 and 25 grant the unopposed joint motions to terminate the investigation as to OnePlus and Xiaomi, respectively, finding that the motions comply with the requirements of Commission Rule 210.21(b)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(b)(1)), and that the proposed settlements do not adversely affect the public interest in accordance with Commission Rule 210.50(b)(2) (19 CFR 210.50(b)(2)). Order No. 24 at 2–3; Order No. 25 at 2–3. Order No. 26 grants the unopposed motion to terminate the
investigation as to the Remaining Respondents and thus in its entirety, finding that the motion complies with the requirements of Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(a)(1)), and that “no extraordinary circumstances exist that would prevent the requested termination of this Investigation.” Order No. 26 at 2–3. No petitions for review of the subject IDs were filed.
The Commission has determined not to review the subject IDs. The investigation is terminated as to OnePlus, Xiaomi, and the Remaining Respondents and, thus, in its entirety.
The Commission vote for this determination took place on July 7, 2023.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 10, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023–14840 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",How many respondents were originally named in the notice of investigation when it was instituted?,['A. 21' 'B. 18' 'C. 26' 'D. 33'],C
308," 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–576–577 and 731–TA–1362–1367 (Review)]
Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing From China, Germany, India, Italy, South Korea, and Switzerland; Scheduling of Full Five-Year Reviews
AGENCY:
United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY:
The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of full reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the
Act”) to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty orders on certain cold-drawn mechanical tubing of carbon and alloy steel (“cold-drawn mechanical tubing”) from China and India and the antidumping duty orders on cold-drawn mechanical tubing from China, Germany, India, Italy, South Korea, and Switzerland would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days.
DATES:
July 7, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (
https://www.usitc.gov
). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at
https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.
—On April 10, 2023, the Commission determined that responses to its notice of institution of the subject five-year reviews were such that full reviews should proceed (88 FR 24442, April 20, 2023); accordingly, full reviews are being scheduled pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)). A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements are available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission's website.
Participation in the reviews and public service list.
—Persons, including industrial users of the subject merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in these reviews as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11 of the Commission's rules, by 45 days after publication of this notice. A party that filed a notice of appearance following publication of the Commission's notice of institution of the reviews need not file an additional notice of appearance. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the reviews.
For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
Please note the Secretary's Office will accept only electronic filings during this time. Filings must be made through the Commission's Electronic Document Information System (EDIS,
https://edis.usitc.gov.
) No in-person paper-based filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until further notice.
Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and BPI service list.
—Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission's rules, the Secretary will make BPI gathered in these reviews available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the reviews, provided that the application is made by 45 days after publication of this notice. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the reviews. A party granted access to BPI following publication of the Commission's notice of institution of the reviews need not reapply for such access. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO.
Staff report.
—The prehearing staff report in the reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on November 13, 2023, and a public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.64 of the Commission's rules.
Hearing.
—The Commission will hold an in-person hearing in connection with the reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on November 28, 2023. Requests to appear at the hearing should be filed in writing with the Secretary to the Commission on or before November 20, 2023. Any requests to appear as a witness via videoconference must be included with your request to appear. Requests to appear via videoconference must include a statement explaining why the witness cannot appear in person; the Chairman, or other person designated to conduct the reviews, may in their discretion for good cause shown, grant such a request. Requests to appear as remote witness due to illness or a positive COVID–19 test result may be submitted by 3 p.m. the business day prior to the hearing. Further information about participation in the hearing will be posted on the Commission's website at
https://www.usitc.gov/calendarpad/calendar.html.
A nonparty who has testimony that may aid the Commission's deliberations may request permission to present a short statement at the hearing. All parties and nonparties desiring to appear at the hearing and make oral presentations should attend a prehearing conference, if deemed necessary, to be held at 9:30 a.m. on November 22, 2023. Parties shall file and serve written testimony and presentation slides in connection with their presentation at the hearing by no later than 4:00 p.m. on November 27, 2023. Oral testimony and written materials to be submitted at the public hearing are governed by sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), and 207.24 of the Commission's rules. Parties must submit any request to present a portion of their hearing testimony
in camera
no later than 7 business days prior to the date of the hearing.
Written submissions.
—Each party to the reviews may submit a prehearing brief to the Commission. Prehearing briefs must conform with the provisions of section 207.65 of the Commission's rules; the deadline for filing is 5:15 p.m. November 20, 2023. Parties shall also file written testimony in connection with their presentation at the hearing, and posthearing briefs, which must conform with the provisions of section 207.67 of the Commission's rules. The deadline for filing posthearing briefs is 5:15 p.m. on December 5, 2023. In addition, any person who has not entered an appearance as a party to the reviews may submit a written statement of information pertinent to the subject of the reviews on or before 5:15 p.m. on December 5, 2023. On January 5, 2024, the Commission will make available to parties all information on which they have not had an opportunity to comment. Parties may submit final comments on this information on or before 5:15 p.m. on January 10, 2024, but such final comments must not contain new factual information and must otherwise comply with section 207.68 of the Commission's rules. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission's rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. The Commission's
Handbook on Filing Procedures,
available on the Commission's website at
https://www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf,
elaborates
upon the Commission's procedures with respect to filings.
Additional written submissions to the Commission, including requests pursuant to section 201.12 of the Commission's rules, shall not be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such submissions, or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request by a Commissioner or Commission staff.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission's rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service.
The Commission has determined that these reviews are extraordinarily complicated and therefore has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority:
These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 10, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023–14873 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",By when must persons wishing to participate in the reviews as parties file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission?,"[""A. Within 45 days after publication of the Commission's notice.""
'B. No later than the prehearing conference.' 'C. By September 30, 2023.'
'D. Entry of appearance is not required to participate.']",A
92," 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–073, C–570–074]
Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders; Aluminum Sheet Further Processed in the Republic of Korea
AGENCY:
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY:
In response to a request from the Aluminum Association Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet Trade Enforcement Working Group and its individual members (the domestic industry), the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is initiating a company-specific circumvention inquiry to determine whether imports of common alloy aluminum sheet (CAAS) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) produced by Gwangyang Aluminum Industries Co., Ltd. (Gwangyang Aluminum), which is completed or assembled using non-subject flat rolled aluminum having a thickness greater than 6.3 millimeters (mm) produced by Henan Mingtai Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd. (Henan Mingtai) or Zhengzhou Mingtai Industry Co., Ltd. (Zhengzhou Mingtai) in the People's Republic of China (China), is circumventing the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on CAAS from China.
DATES:
Applicable July 13, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frank Schmitt, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4880.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 23, 2023, the domestic industry 
1
filed a circumvention inquiry
request alleging that CAAS from Korea produced by Gwangyang Aluminum, assembled or completed using flat rolled aluminum having a thickness greater than 6.3 mm (aluminum plated) produced by Henan Mingtai 
2
in China, is circumventing the AD and CVD orders on CAAS from China 
3
and, accordingly, should be included in the scope of the
Orders.
4
The domestic industry alleges that the further processing in Korea is minor or insignificant and otherwise meets the circumvention criteria set forth in section 781(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.226(i).
1
 The individual members of the Aluminum Association Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet Trade
Enforcement Working Group are: Arconic Corporation; Commonwealth Rolled Products, Inc.; Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood, LLC; Jupiter Aluminum Corporation; JW Aluminum Company; and Novelis Corporation.
2
 Commerce previously determined that Henan Mingtai and Zhengzhou Mingtai are a single entity.
See Antidumping Duty Investigation of Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People's Republic of China: Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less-Than-Fair Value, Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, and Postponement of Final Determination,
83 FR 29088 (June 2022, 2018), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 19, unchanged at
Antidumping Duty Investigation of Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People's Republic of China: Affirmative Final Determination of Sales at Less-Than-Fair Value,
83 FR 57421 (November 15, 2018). Accordingly, for the purposes of this circumvention inquiry, we will consider aluminum plate produced by Henan Mingtai and Zhengzhou Mingtai (collectively, Mingtai).
3
 
See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People's Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order,
84 FR 2157 (February 6, 2019); and
Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order,
84 FR 2813 (February 8, 2019) (collectively,
Orders
).
4
 
Id.
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise covered by the
Orders
is aluminum common alloy sheet (common alloy sheet), which is a flat-rolled aluminum product having a thickness of 6.3 mm or less, but greater than 0.2 mm, in coils or cut-to-length, regardless of width. A full description of the scope of the
Orders
is provided in the Initiation Checklist.
5
5
 
See
Checklist, “Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People's Republic of China,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Initiation Checklist).
Merchandise Subject to the Circumvention Inquiry
The circumvention inquiry covers CAAS from Korea produced by Gwangyang Aluminum, assembled or completed using flat rolled aluminum having a thickness greater than 6.3 mm produced by Mingtai in China, and exported to the United States.
Statutory and Regulatory Framework
Section 351.226(d) of Commerce's regulations states that if Commerce determines that a request for a circumvention inquiry satisfies the requirements of 19 CFR 351.226(c), then Commerce “will accept the request and initiate a circumvention inquiry.” Section 351.226(c)(1) of Commerce's regulations, in turn, requires that each request for a circumvention inquiry allege “that the elements necessary for a circumvention determination under section 781 of the Act exist” and be “accompanied by information reasonably available to the interested party supporting these allegations.” The domestic industry alleged circumvention pursuant to section 781(b) of the Act (merchandise completed or assembled in other foreign countries).
Section 781(b)(1) of the Act provides that Commerce may find circumvention of an AD or CVD order when merchandise of the same class or kind subject to the order is completed or assembled in a foreign country other than the country to which the order applies. In conducting circumvention inquiries, under section 781(b)(1) of the Act, Commerce relies on the following criteria: (A) merchandise imported into the United States is of the same class or kind as any merchandise produced in a foreign country that is the subject of an antidumping or countervailing duty order or finding; (B) before importation into the United States, such imported merchandise is completed or assembled in another foreign country from merchandise which is subject to the order or merchandise which is produced in the foreign country that is subject to the order; (C) the process of assembly or completion in the foreign country referred to in section (B) is minor or insignificant; (D) the value of the merchandise produced in the foreign country to which the AD or CVD order applies is a significant portion of the total value of the merchandise exported to the United States; and (E) the administering authority determines that action is appropriate to prevent evasion of such order or finding.
In determining whether or not the process of assembly or completion in a third country is minor or insignificant under section 781(b)(1)(C) of the Act, section 781(b)(2) of the Act directs Commerce to consider: (A) the level of investment in the foreign country; (B) the level of research and development in the foreign country; (C) the nature of the production process in the foreign country; (D) the extent of production facilities in the foreign country and (E) whether or not the value of processing performed in the foreign country represents a small proportion of the value of the merchandise imported into the United States. However, no single factor, by itself, controls Commerce's determination of whether the process of assembly or completion in a third country is minor or insignificant.
6
Accordingly, it is Commerce's practice to evaluate each of these five factors as they exist in the third country, depending on the totality of the circumstances of the particular circumvention inquiry.
7
6
 
See
Statement of Administrative Action Accompanying the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, H.R. Doc. No. 103–316, Vol. 1 (1994), at 893.
7
 
See Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty Order,
83 FR 65626 (December 21, 2018), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at 4.
In addition, section 781(b)(3) of the Act sets forth additional factors to consider in determining whether to include merchandise assembled or completed in a third country within the scope of an AD and/or CVD order. Specifically, Commerce shall take into account such factors as: (A) the pattern of trade, including sourcing patterns; (B) whether the manufacturer or exporter of the merchandise is affiliated with the person who, in the third country, uses the merchandise to complete or assemble the merchandise which is subsequently imported into the United States; and (C) whether imports of the merchandise into the third country have increased after the initiation of the investigation that resulted in the issuance of such order or finding.
Analysis
Based on our analysis of the domestic industry's circumvention request, we determine that the domestic industry satisfied the criteria under 19 CFR 351.226(c); thus, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.226(d)(1)(ii), we have accepted the request and are initiating the requested circumvention inquiry.
8
8
 
See
Initiation Checklist.
The domestic industry requests that Commerce initiate this inquiry on a company-specific basis, with respect to Gwangyang Aluminum only. The information provided by the domestic industry is centered on Gwangyang Aluminum and does not warrant initiating this circumvention inquiry on a country-wide basis. Therefore, Commerce is initiating this circumvention inquiry with respect to Gwangyang Aluminum.
Commerce intends to establish a schedule for questionnaires and
comments on the issues related to this inquiry. A company's failure to respond completely to Commerce's requests for information may result in the application of partial or total facts available, pursuant to section 776(a) of the Act, which may include adverse inferences, pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act.
Suspension of Liquidation
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.226(l)(1), Commerce will notify U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) of its initiation of the requested circumvention inquiry and direct CBP to continue the suspension of liquidation of entries of products subject to the circumvention inquiry that were already subject to the suspension of liquidation under the
Orders
and to apply the cash deposit rates that would be applicable if the products were determined to be covered by the scope of the
Orders.
Should Commerce issue a preliminary or final circumvention determination, Commerce will follow the suspension of liquidation rules under 19 CFR 351.226(l)(2)–(4).
Notification to Interested Parties
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.226(d) and section 781(b) of the Act, Commerce determines that the domestic industry's request for a circumvention inquiry satisfies the requirements of 19 CFR 351.226(c). Accordingly, Commerce is notifying all interested parties of the initiation of this circumvention inquiry to determine whether CAAS from Korea produced by Gwangyang Aluminum, assembled or completed using aluminum plate produced by Mingtai in China, and exported to the United States, is circumventing the
Orders.
We included a description of the products that are subject to the circumvention inquiry, and an explanation of the reasons for Commerce's decision to initiate this inquiry, in the accompanying Initiation Checklist.
9
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.226(e)(1), Commerce intends to issue its preliminary determination in this circumvention proceeding no later than 150 days from the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register
.
9
 
Id.
This notice is published in accordance with section 781(b) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.226(d)(1)(ii).
Dated: July 7, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2023–14875 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What statute provides the authority for Commerce to conduct circumvention inquiries?,"['A. Section 781 of the Tariff Act of 1930'
'B. Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962'
'C. Section 337 of the Trade Act of 1974'
'D. Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974']",A
306," 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–576–577 and 731–TA–1362–1367 (Review)]
Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing From China, Germany, India, Italy, South Korea, and Switzerland; Scheduling of Full Five-Year Reviews
AGENCY:
United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY:
The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of full reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the
Act”) to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty orders on certain cold-drawn mechanical tubing of carbon and alloy steel (“cold-drawn mechanical tubing”) from China and India and the antidumping duty orders on cold-drawn mechanical tubing from China, Germany, India, Italy, South Korea, and Switzerland would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days.
DATES:
July 7, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (
https://www.usitc.gov
). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at
https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.
—On April 10, 2023, the Commission determined that responses to its notice of institution of the subject five-year reviews were such that full reviews should proceed (88 FR 24442, April 20, 2023); accordingly, full reviews are being scheduled pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)). A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements are available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission's website.
Participation in the reviews and public service list.
—Persons, including industrial users of the subject merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in these reviews as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11 of the Commission's rules, by 45 days after publication of this notice. A party that filed a notice of appearance following publication of the Commission's notice of institution of the reviews need not file an additional notice of appearance. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the reviews.
For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
Please note the Secretary's Office will accept only electronic filings during this time. Filings must be made through the Commission's Electronic Document Information System (EDIS,
https://edis.usitc.gov.
) No in-person paper-based filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until further notice.
Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and BPI service list.
—Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission's rules, the Secretary will make BPI gathered in these reviews available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the reviews, provided that the application is made by 45 days after publication of this notice. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the reviews. A party granted access to BPI following publication of the Commission's notice of institution of the reviews need not reapply for such access. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO.
Staff report.
—The prehearing staff report in the reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on November 13, 2023, and a public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.64 of the Commission's rules.
Hearing.
—The Commission will hold an in-person hearing in connection with the reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on November 28, 2023. Requests to appear at the hearing should be filed in writing with the Secretary to the Commission on or before November 20, 2023. Any requests to appear as a witness via videoconference must be included with your request to appear. Requests to appear via videoconference must include a statement explaining why the witness cannot appear in person; the Chairman, or other person designated to conduct the reviews, may in their discretion for good cause shown, grant such a request. Requests to appear as remote witness due to illness or a positive COVID–19 test result may be submitted by 3 p.m. the business day prior to the hearing. Further information about participation in the hearing will be posted on the Commission's website at
https://www.usitc.gov/calendarpad/calendar.html.
A nonparty who has testimony that may aid the Commission's deliberations may request permission to present a short statement at the hearing. All parties and nonparties desiring to appear at the hearing and make oral presentations should attend a prehearing conference, if deemed necessary, to be held at 9:30 a.m. on November 22, 2023. Parties shall file and serve written testimony and presentation slides in connection with their presentation at the hearing by no later than 4:00 p.m. on November 27, 2023. Oral testimony and written materials to be submitted at the public hearing are governed by sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), and 207.24 of the Commission's rules. Parties must submit any request to present a portion of their hearing testimony
in camera
no later than 7 business days prior to the date of the hearing.
Written submissions.
—Each party to the reviews may submit a prehearing brief to the Commission. Prehearing briefs must conform with the provisions of section 207.65 of the Commission's rules; the deadline for filing is 5:15 p.m. November 20, 2023. Parties shall also file written testimony in connection with their presentation at the hearing, and posthearing briefs, which must conform with the provisions of section 207.67 of the Commission's rules. The deadline for filing posthearing briefs is 5:15 p.m. on December 5, 2023. In addition, any person who has not entered an appearance as a party to the reviews may submit a written statement of information pertinent to the subject of the reviews on or before 5:15 p.m. on December 5, 2023. On January 5, 2024, the Commission will make available to parties all information on which they have not had an opportunity to comment. Parties may submit final comments on this information on or before 5:15 p.m. on January 10, 2024, but such final comments must not contain new factual information and must otherwise comply with section 207.68 of the Commission's rules. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission's rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. The Commission's
Handbook on Filing Procedures,
available on the Commission's website at
https://www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf,
elaborates
upon the Commission's procedures with respect to filings.
Additional written submissions to the Commission, including requests pursuant to section 201.12 of the Commission's rules, shall not be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such submissions, or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request by a Commissioner or Commission staff.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission's rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service.
The Commission has determined that these reviews are extraordinarily complicated and therefore has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority:
These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 10, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023–14873 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What action is the US International Trade Commission taking regarding the reviews of the countervailing and antidumping duty orders?,"['A. Referring the reviews to the Department of Commerce for reassessment of duties.'
'B. Postponing the reviews pending further investigation into the impact of the orders.'
'C. Scheduling full five-year reviews to determine if revocation of the orders would lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury.'
'D. Terminating the reviews and revoking the orders immediately due to lack of industry support.']",C
196," 6717–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
[OMB 3060–0501; FR ID 154208]
Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission
AGENCY:
Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION:
Notice and request for comments.
SUMMARY:
As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collections. Comments are requested concerning: whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
DATES:
Written comments should be submitted on or before September 11, 2023. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the contacts below as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES:
Direct all PRA comments to Cathy Williams, FCC, via email
PRA@fcc.gov
and to
Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For additional information about the information collection, contact Cathy Williams at (202) 418–2918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid OMB control number.
As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, and as required by the PRA of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), the FCC invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collections. Comments are requested concerning: whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
OMB Control Number:
3060–0501.
Title:
Section 73.1942 Candidates Rates; Section 76.206 Candidate Rates; Section 76.1611, Political Cable Rates and Classes of Time.
Type of Review:
Extension of a currently approved collection.
Respondents:
Business or other for-profit entities.
Number of Respondents and Responses:
17,561 respondents; 403,610 responses.
Estimated Time per Response:
0.5 hours to 20 hours.
Frequency of Response:
Recordkeeping requirement; On occasion reporting requirement; Semi-annual requirement; Third party disclosure requirement.
Obligation to Respond:
Required to obtain or retain benefits. The statutory authority for this collection of information is contained in Sections 154(i) and 315 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
Total Annual Burden:
927,269 hours.
Total Annual Cost:
No cost.
Needs and Uses:
Section 315 of the Communications Act directs broadcast stations and cable operators to charge political candidates the “lowest unit charge of the station” for the same class and amount of time for the same period, during the 45 days preceding a primary or runoff election and the 60 days preceding a general or special election.
The information collection requirements contained in 47 CFR 73.1942 require broadcast licensees and the requirements contained in 47 CFR 76.206 require cable television systems to disclose any station practices offered to commercial advertisers that enhance the value of advertising spots and different classes of time (immediately preemptible, preemptible with notice, fixed, fire sale, and make good). These rule sections also require licensees and cable TV systems to calculate the lowest unit charge. Broadcast stations and cable systems are also required to review their advertising records throughout the election period to determine whether compliance with these rule sections require that candidates receive rebates or credits.
The information collection requirements contained in 47 CFR 76.1611 require cable systems to disclose to candidates information about rates, terms, conditions and all value-enhancing discount privileges offered to commercial advertisers.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–14818 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What regulation requires broadcast stations to disclose practices offered to commercial advertisers that enhance the value of advertising spots?,"['A. 47 CFR 54.1611' 'B. 47 CFR 76.501' 'C. 47 CFR 315.206'
'D. 47 CFR 73.1942']",D
420," 4520–43–P
EP13JY23.054
Attachment 1. MNM Samples Analyzed for Cristobalite
Cristobalite is one of the three polymorphs of respirable crystalline silica analyzed by MSHA's Laboratory upon request that is included in this proposed rule. At the request of the inspector, MNM 
85
respirable dust samples that contain at least 0.050 mg of respirable dust are analyzed for cristobalite. Of the 57,769 retained MNM samples that contained at least 0.050 mg of respirable dust, 0.6 percent (or 359 samples) were analyzed for cristobalite. Coal respirable dust samples are not analyzed for cristobalite.
86
85
 See Attachment 2. Technical Background about Measuring Respirable Crystalline Silica, for more information.
86
 See Attachment 2. Technical Background about Measuring Respirable Crystalline Silica, for more information.
EP13JY23.055
While the samples that were analyzed for cristobalite were assigned to all four contaminant codes seen in this dataset, the majority were assigned contaminant code 523.
EP13JY23.056
The distribution of the 359 samples by cristobalite mass can be seen in Table A1–3.
87
87
 Of the 369 samples that were analyzed for cristobalite, 334 had a value for cristobalite mass that was less than the limit of detection (LOD) for cristobalite, 10 µg. As such these samples were assigned a value of 5 µg of cristobalite, one half the LOD. See Attachment 2. Technical Background about Measuring Respirable Crystalline Silica, for more information.
EP13JY23.057
The mass of each sample was then used to calculate a cristobalite concentration by dividing the mass of cristobalite by the volume of air sampled (0.816 m
3
). The calculated concentrations ranged from 6 µg/m
3
to 53 µg/m
3
.
88
88
 One sample had a cristobalite concentration of 53 µg/m
3
. It was sampled in July of 2011 at Mine ID 4405407 and cassette number 610892. The commodity being mined was Stone: Crushed, Broken Quartzite. The occupation of the miner being sampled was Miners in Other Occupations: Job Code 513—Building and Maintenance.
EP13JY23.058
",What is cristobalite?,"['A. A type of pneumatic drill bit used in tunneling'
'B. An industrial cleaning agent used in mines'
""C. One of the three polymorphs of respirable crystalline silica analyzed by MSHA's Laboratory""
'D. A chemical used in processing quartzite stone']",C
214," 6714–01–P
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
[Notice–MRB–2023–03; Docket No. 2023–0001; Sequence No. 22]
Regulatory Information Systems Center; Announcement of Public Listening Sessions
AGENCY:
Office of Government-wide Policy, General Services Administration (GSA).
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY:
To assist with the Regulatory Information website (
Reginfo.gov
) user experience research, the Regulatory Information Systems Center (RISC) will be hosting public listening sessions. The purpose of these listening sessions is to collect public input on the usability of
Reginfo.gov.
In turn, RISC will use the input to inform future enhancements to
Reginfo.gov.
DATES:
RISC will hold web-based public listening sessions on Tuesday, August 8, 2023, from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST) and on Thursday, August 10, 2023, from 10 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. EST.
ADDRESSES:
The virtual listening sessions will be open to the public and held via the Zoom Webinar Platform. Virtual attendance information will be provided upon registration. Registration information is located on Eventbrite:
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/risc-presents-reginfo-public-comment-session-tickets-668851050497.
In addition to the listening sessions, written public comments are being accepted via email. To submit a written public comment, send an email to
risc@gsa.gov.
Please include “Reginfo.gov Public Comment” in the subject line. In the body of the email, please include your name, company name (if applicable), and years of
Reginfo.gov
usage.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Please contact Mr. Wesley Weston, Senior Program Analyst, RISC, 202–251–7769 or by email at
wesley.weston@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Reginfo.gov
assists users who want to find federal regulatory information and provides a variety of graphical displays constituting a “Regulatory Dashboard.” Users can select and identify rules under review by agency, economic significance, stage of rulemaking, or other characteristics, and compare the results for different agencies.
Reginfo.gov
provides information on the following areas:
• Federal regulatory agendas and regulatory plans to include brief synopsis and timetables for action on rules that Federal departments and agencies are considering.
• Rules under review by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) prior to initial publication or final adoption are listed.
• OIRA reviews of information collections, such as forms and surveys, under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), are listed together with a complete inventory of currently approved information collections.
Reginfo.gov
gives the public searchable access to this information to make more transparent the activities of OIRA and Federal agencies in rulemaking and information collection.
Specifically, RISC invites public comment on the following questions:
1. On the homepage, do you find the visual graphs helpful? If not, what other tool would you recommend to present the information?
2. How do you feel about the overall navigation of the site? Do you feel the main navigation covers what you are looking for when visiting the site?
3. Do you find the current search options useful? Have you had difficulty using the search option based on its current location?
4. Do you feel the “Contact us” information or “Getting help” is easily found when visiting the site?
5. Have you been able to find answers to questions you were looking for? Did you have to use another site? Please explain.
6. How would you like real time information presented?
7. Have you used the mobile app which is available to both android and
IOS users? If so, what has been your experience with the app?
8. Overall, what information is missing when visiting this site?
9. Overall, what improvements would you suggest to make the site better?
Meeting Registration
This meeting is open to the public and will be accessible by webcast. All public attendees will need to register to obtain the meeting webcast information. All registrants will be asked to provide their name, affiliation, and email address. After registration, individuals will receive webcast access information via email.
Public Participation
The public listening sessions will start at 1:00 p.m. EST, on August 8, 2023, and 10:00 a.m. EST on August 10, 2023. The RISC team first will provide opening remarks. The meetings will then transition to public comments. Any oral comments presented should be brief and limited to the subjects described in this Notice so all participants will have an opportunity to speak.
Members of the public who wish to present oral comments must notify RISC no later than Monday, August 7, 2023, via email at
risc@gsa.gov.
The email should (1) identify specific subject(s) on which you wish to provide comments; and (2) state the organization or entity you are representing or that you are speaking as a member of the public.
Boris Arratia,
Regulatory Information Service Center Director, Office of Government-wide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023–14842 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",How many specific questions does RISC invite public comment on regarding Reginfo.gov?,['A. 5' 'B. 9' 'C. 11' 'D. 7'],B
391," 4520–43–C
Based on MSHA's experience, NIOSH research, and effective respirable dust controls currently available and in use in the mining industry, MSHA preliminarily finds that the baseline conditions include various combinations of existing engineering controls selected and installed by individual mines to address respirable crystalline silica generated during mining operations.
d. Respirable Crystalline Silica Exposure Controls Available to Mines
Under the proposal, the mine operator must install, use, and maintain feasible engineering controls, supplemented by administrative controls, when necessary, to keep each miner's exposure at or below the proposed PEL. Engineering controls reduce or prevent miners' exposure to hazards.
50
Administrative controls establish work practices that reduce the duration, frequency, or intensity of miners' exposures (although rotation of miners would be prohibited under the proposed rule).
50
 Control measures that reduce respirable crystalline silica can also reduce exposures to other hazardous particulates, such as RCMD, metals, asbestos, and diesel exhaust. Operator enclosures and process enclosures also reduce hazardous levels of noise by creating a barrier between the operator and the noise source.
MSHA data and experience show that mine operators already have numerous engineering and administrative control options to control miners' exposures to respirable crystalline silica. These control options are widely recognized and used throughout the mining industry. NIOSH has extensively researched and documented engineering and administrative controls for respirable crystalline silica in mines. As noted previously, NIOSH has published a series on reducing respirable dust in mines (NIOSH, 2019b; NIOSH, 2021a).
(1) Engineering controls
Examples of existing engineering controls used at mines and commercially available engineering controls that MSHA considered include:
• Wetting or water sprays that prevent, capture, or redirect dust;
• Ventilation systems that capture dust at its source and transport it to a dust collection device (
e.g.,
filter or bag house), dilute dust already in the air, or “scrub” (cleanse) dust from the air in the work area;
• Process enclosures that restrict dust from migrating outside of the enclosed area, sometimes used with an attached ventilation system to improve effectiveness (
e.g.,
crushing equipment and associated dump hopper enclosure, with curtains and mechanical ventilation to keep dust inside);
• Operator enclosures, such as mobile equipment cabs or control booths, which provide an environment with clean air for an equipment operator to work safely;
• Protective features on mining process equipment to help prevent process failures and associated dust releases (
e.g.,
skirtboards on conveyors, which protect the conveyor system from damage and prevent material on the conveyor from falling off, which generates airborne dust);
• Preventive maintenance conducted on engineering controls and mining equipment that can influence dust levels at a mine, to keep them functioning optimally; and
• Instrumentation and other equipment to assist mine operators and miners in evaluating engineering control
effectiveness and recognizing control failures or other conditions that need corrective action.
51
51
 These instruments include dust monitors; water, air, and differential air pressure gauges; pitot tubes and air velocity meters; and video camera (NIOSH recommends software that pairs video with a dust monitor to track conditions that could lead to elevated exposures if not corrected). These instruments are discussed in NIOSH's best practices guides and dust control handbooks.
(2) Administrative controls
Administrative controls include practices that change the way tasks are performed to reduce a miner's exposure. Administrative controls can be very effective and can even prevent exposure entirely. MSHA has preliminarily determined that various administrative controls are readily available to provide supplementary support to engineering controls. Examples of administrative controls would include housekeeping procedures; proper work positions of miners; walking around the outside of a dusty process area rather than walking through it; cleaning of spills; and measures to prevent or minimize contamination of clothing to help decrease miners' exposure to respirable crystalline silica. However, these control methods depend on human behavior and intervention and are less reliable than properly designed, installed, and maintained engineering controls. Therefore, administrative controls would be permitted only as supplementary measures, with engineering controls required as the primary means of protection. Nevertheless, administrative controls play an important role in reducing miners' exposure to respirable crystalline silica.
52
52
 Proposed paragraph 60.11(b) prohibits the use of rotation of miners as an administrative control used for compliance with this part.
(3) Combinations of Controls
Various control options can also be used in combinations. NIOSH has documented in detail most control methods and has confirmed that they are currently used in mines, both individually and in combination with each other (2019b, 2021a).
e. Maintenance
MSHA preliminarily finds that a strong and feasible preventive maintenance program plays an important role in achieving consistently lower respirable crystalline silica exposure levels. MSHA has observed that when engineering controls are installed and maintained in working condition, respirable dust exposures tend to be below the existing exposure limits. When engineering controls are not maintained, dust control efficiency declines and exposure levels rise. When engineering controls fail due to a lack of proper maintenance, a marked rise in exposures can occur, resulting in noncompliance with MSHA's existing exposure limits. Some examples of the impact that proper maintenance can have on respirable dust levels include:
•
Water spray maintenance:
An experiment using water spray bars that could be turned on or off showed that dust reduction was less effective each time additional spray nozzles were deactivated. A 10 percent decrease occurred when three of 21 sprays were shut off, but a 50 percent decrease occurred when 12 out of the 21 sprays were shut off. Decreased total water spray volume and gaps in the spray pattern (due to deactivated nozzles) were both partially responsible for the decreased dust control (Seaman
et al.,
2020).
•
Water added to drill bailing air:
When introduced into the drill hole (with the bailing air through a hollow drill bit), water mixes with and moistens the drill dust ejected from the hole and can reduce respirable dust by more than 90% (NIOSH 2021a, 2019b). NIOSH reports that this same control measure, and others, are similarly effective for MNM and surface coal mine drills preparing the blasting holes used to expose the material below (whether ore or coal).
•
Ventilation system maintenance:
The amount of air cleaned by an air scrubber is decreased by up to one-third (33 percent) after one continuous mining machine cut. Cleaning the scrubber screens restores scrubber efficacy, but this maintenance must be performed after every cut. Spare scrubber screens make frequent cleaning practical without slowing production (NIOSH, 2021a).
•
Operator enclosure maintenance:
Tests with mining equipment showed that maintenance activities including repairing weather stripping and replacing clogged and missing cab ventilation system filters (intake, recirculation, final filters) increased miner protection, by up to 95 percent (NIOSH 2019b, 2021a).
•
Filter selection during maintenance:
Airflow is as important as filtration and pressurization in operator enclosures; during maintenance, filter selection can influence all three factors. Performing serial end-shift testing of enclosed cabs (on a face drill and a roof/rock bolter) at an underground crushed limestone mine, NIOSH compared installed HEPA filters and an alternative (MERV 16 filters). The latter provided an equal level of filtration and better overall miner protection by allowing greater airflow and cab pressurization. As an added advantage, NIOSH showed that these filters cost less and required less-frequent replacement, reducing maintenance expenses in this mining environment (Cecala
et al.,
2016; NIOSH 2021a, 2019b).
53 54
53
 NIOSH believes this study, like many of its other mining studies on operator enclosures and surface drill dust controls, is relevant to both MNM mining and coal mining. NIOSH reports on this study, conducted at an underground limestone mine, in detail in both its Dust control handbook for industrial minerals mining and processing (second edition) (2019b) and its best practices for dust control in coal mining (second edition) (2021a).
54
 Acronyms: High efficiency particulate air (HEPA). Minimum efficiency reporting value (MERV).
•
Proper design and installation—foundation for effective maintenance:
A new replacement equipment operator enclosure (control booth) installed adjacent to the primary crusher at a granite stone quarry initially provided 50 to 96 percent respirable dust reduction, even with inadequate pressurization. The protection it offered miners tripled after the booth's second pressurization/filtration unit was activated (Organiscak
et al.,
2016).
MSHA has observed that when engineering controls are properly maintained, exposure levels decrease or stay low. Metal mines, which typically have substantial controls already installed, primarily need reliable preventive maintenance programs to achieve the proposed PEL. It is also important to repair equipment damage that contributes to dust exposure (for example, damage to conveyor skirtboards that protect the conveyor system from damage and prevent spillage which generates airborne dust). Maintenance and repair programs must ensure that dust control equipment is functioning properly.
3. Feasibility Determination of Control Technologies
MSHA is proposing a PEL of 50 μg/m
3
for MNM and coal mines. As NIOSH has documented, the mining industry has a wide range of options for controlling dust exposure that are already in various configurations in mines (2019b; 2021a). NIOSH has carefully evaluated most of the dust controls used in the mining industry and found that many of the controls may be used in combinations with other control options. NIOSH has documented protective factors and exposure reductions of 30 to 90 percent or higher for many engineering and administrative controls.
MSHA also preliminarily finds that maintaining (including adjusting) or repairing existing controls would help achieve exposures at or below 50 μg/m
3
. For example, NIOSH found that performing maintenance on an operator enclosure can restore enclosure pressurization and reduce the respirable dust exposure of a miner by 90 to 98.9 percent (
e.g.,
by maintaining weather stripping, reseating or replacing leaking or clogged filters, and upgrading filtration) (NIOSH, 2019b). When an equipment operator remains inside a well-maintained enclosure for a portion of a shift (for example 75 percent of an 8-hour shift), the cab can reduce the exposure of the operator proportionally, to a level of 50 μg/m
3
(or lower). This point is demonstrated by the following example involving a bulk loading equipment operator in a poorly maintained booth, exposed to respirable crystalline silica near the existing exposure limit (in the MNM sectors, 100 μg/m
3
, as ISO 8-hour TWA value; in the Coal sector, 85.7 μg/m
3
ISO, calculated as an 8-hour TWA). During the 25 percent of their shift (two hours of an eight-hour shift) that the operator was working in the poorly maintained enclosure, their exposure would continue to be 100 μg/m
3
, while for the other six hours (operating mobile equipment with a fully refurbished protective cab), the exposure level would be 90 percent lower, or 10 μg/m
3
, resulting in an 8-hour TWA exposure of 33 μg/m
3
for that miner's shift.
55
Greater exposure reductions could also be achieved by repairing or replacing the poorly maintained enclosure, or modifying the miner's schedule so that the miner works seven hours, rather than six, inside of the well-maintained enclosure.
55
 Calculating the exposure for the shift: 8-hour TWA = [(10 μg/m
3
× 6 hours) + (100 μg/m
3
× 2 hours)]/8 hours = 33 μg/m
3
.
Other engineering controls (
e.g.,
process enclosure, water dust suppression, dust suppression hopper, ventilation systems) could reduce dust concentrations in the area surrounding the poorly maintained enclosure, which would reduce the exposure of the operator inside. For example, if the poorly maintained enclosure was an open-air control booth (windows do not close) at a truck loading station, adding a dust suppression hopper (which reduces respirable dust exposure by 39 to 88 percent during bulk loading) (NIOSH, 2019b), would lead to lower exposure during the two hours the miner was inside the open-air booth. The calculated respirable crystalline silica 8-hour TWA exposure of that miner could be reduced from 33 μg/m
3
(with improved operator enclosure alone) to 23 μg/m
3
(improved operator enclosure plus dust suppression hopper).
56
As an added benefit, any helper or utility worker in the truck loading area would also experience reduced exposure.
56
 Calculating the exposure with both the well-maintained operator enclosure (6 hours) and dust suppression hopper, assuming only the minimum documented respirable dust concentration reduction (39 percent): [(10 μg/m
3
× 6 hours) + (100 μg/m
3
× (1–0.39) × 2 hours)]/8 hours = 23 μg/m
3
.
Similarly, considering an example for a coal miner helper who spends 90 minutes (1.5 hours) per 8-hour shift assisting a drilling rig operator (in a protective operator's cab) drilling blast holes. The combination of controls used to control drilling dust (including water added to the bailing air, which can reduce airborne respirable dust emissions by up to 96 percent) usually maintain the helper's respirable crystalline silica exposure in the range of 35 μg/m
3
(ISO) as an 8-hour TWA. If, however, the drill's on-board water tank runs dry due to poor maintenance, the respirable crystalline silica concentration near the drill will rise by 95 percent, meaning that the concentration is 20 times greater than the usual level (NIOSH 2021a). If the drill operator idles the drill and calls for water resupply, the helper will not experience an elevated exposure. If instead the drill is operated dry for another 30 minutes until water resupply arrives, the helper will experience a respirable crystalline silica exposure of 77 μg/m
3
(ISO) as an 8-hour TWA. If dry drilling continued for 1.5 hours, the helper would have an exposure of 160 μg/m
3
ISO as an 8-hour TWA.
57
After water is delivered, drill respirable dust emissions will return to their normal level once water is again introduced into the drill bailing air.
57
 The 8-hour TWA exposure level of the helper, including the 30-minute period of elevated exposure, is calculated as: [(35 μg/m
3
× 7.5 hours) + (35 μg/m
3
× 20 × 0.5 hours)]/8 hours = 77 μg/m
3
. Drill bits designed for use with water may need to be replaced sooner if used dry.
Based on these examples and the wide range of effective exposure control options available to the mining industry, MSHA preliminarily finds that control technologies capable of reducing miners' respirable crystalline silica exposures are available, proven, effective, and transferable between mining commodities; however, they must be well-designed and consistently used and maintained.
a. Feasibility Findings for the Proposed PEL
Based on the exposure profiles in Table VIII–2 and Table VIII–3 for MNM mines, and in Table VIII–4 and VIII–5 for coal mines, and the examples in the previous section that demonstrate the beneficial effect of combined controls, MSHA preliminarily finds that the proposed PEL of 50 μg/m
3
is technologically feasible for all mines.
Table VIII–7 summarizes the technological feasibility of control technologies available to the mining industry, by commodity. MSHA preliminarily finds that control technologies are technologically feasible for all six commodities and their respective activity groups. Under baseline conditions, mines in each commodity category have already achieved respirable crystalline silica exposures at or below 50 μg/m
3
for most of the miners represented by MSHA's 57,769 samples for MNM miners and 63,127 samples for coal miners.
",What does MSHA propose mines must do regarding engineering and administrative controls for respirable crystalline silica exposure?,"['A. MSHA proposes that mines should discontinue use of existing engineering controls and instead implement unproven new technologies to limit respirable crystalline silica exposures.'
""B. MSHA proposes that mines must install, use, and maintain feasible engineering controls, supplemented by administrative controls when necessary, to limit miners' exposures at or below the proposed PEL.""
""C. MSHA proposes that mines only use administrative controls like rotation of miners to comply with the proposed rule's respirable crystalline silica exposure limit.""
'D. MSHA proposes that mines do not need to implement engineering or administrative controls for respirable crystalline silica and can rely on personal protective equipment.']",B
119," 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Tests Determined To Be Suitable for Use in the National Reporting System for Adult Education
AGENCY:
Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education, Department of Education.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY:
The Secretary announces tests, test forms, and delivery formats that the Secretary determines to be suitable for use in the National Reporting System for Adult Education (NRS). This notice relates to the approved information collections under OMB control numbers 1830–0027 and 1830–0567.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
John LeMaster, Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 10–223, Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC 20202–7240. Telephone: (202) 245–6218. Email:
John.LeMaster@ed.gov.
If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability and wish to access telecommunications relay services, please dial 7–1–1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
On January 14, 2008, and as amended on August 19, 2016, we published in the
Federal Register
final regulations for 34 CFR part 462, Measuring Educational Gain in the National Reporting System for Adult Education (NRS regulations) (73 FR 2305, January 14, 2008, as amended at 81 FR 55552, August 19, 2016). The NRS regulations established the process the Secretary uses to determine the suitability of tests for use in the NRS by States and local eligible providers. We annually publish in the
Federal Register
, and post on the internet at
www.nrsweb.org,
a list of the names of tests and the educational functioning levels the tests are suitable to measure in the NRS as required by § 462.12(c)(2).
On August 7, 2020, the Secretary published in the
Federal Register
(85 FR 47952) an annual notice consolidating information from previous notices that announced tests determined to be suitable for use in the NRS, in accordance with § 462.13 (August 2020 notice). Also, in the August 2020 notice, the Secretary announced that ESL tests and test forms approved for an extended period through February 2, 2021, are approved for an additional extended period through February 2, 2023, and that an Adult Basic Education (ABE) test and test forms previously approved for a three-year period through March 7, 2021, are approved for an extended period through March 7, 2023.
On December 6, 2021, the Secretary published in the
Federal Register
(86 FR 69021), an annual notice with the same list of approved tests and test forms as was published in the August 2020 notice (December 2021 notice).
On September 23, 2022, the Secretary published in the
Federal Register
(87 FR 58078) an annual notice announcing that English as a Second Language (ESL) tests and test forms previously approved for an extended period through February 2, 2023, are approved for an additional extended period through February 2, 2024, and that an ABE test and test forms previously approved for an extended period through March 7, 2023, are approved for an additional extended period through March 7, 2024.
In this notice, the Secretary announces new tests that have been determined to be suitable for use in the NRS, in accordance with § 462.13. Three tests measure the NRS educational functioning levels for ABE at the ABE levels specified in this notice, and four tests measure the new NRS educational functioning levels for ESL at the ESL levels specified in this notice. With the Secretary's approval of the new ESL tests in this notice, the new educational functioning levels for ESL described in Appendix A of Measures and Methods for the National Reporting System for Adult Education (OMB Control Number: 1830–0027) are now implemented.
The new tests announced in this notice have been determined to be suitable for use in the NRS for a period of either seven or three years. A seven-year approval requires no additional action on the part of the publisher, unless the Department later determines that the information the publisher submitted as a basis for the Secretary's review was inaccurate or that the test has been substantially revised. A three-year approval is issued with a set of conditions that must be met by the completion of the three-year time period. If these conditions are met, the test is approved for continued use in the NRS. If these conditions are not met, the test will not be approved for continued use in the NRS.
Under the transition rules in § 462.4, the Secretary also announces in this notice a list of tests with NRS approvals expiring on February 2, 2024, and March 7, 2024, which States and local eligible providers may continue to use during a sunset period ending on June 30, 2024. The ESL educational functioning level descriptors to which the ESL tests with expiring NRS approvals are aligned will be retired on June 30, 2024. Until that time, for the program year which begins on July 1, 2023, and ends on June 30, 2024, both the current ESL educational functioning level descriptors and the new ESL educational functioning level descriptors will be in effect. States must use an ESL assessment that is aligned to the appropriate ESL educational functioning level descriptors.
Adult education programs must use only the forms and computer-based delivery formats for the tests approved in this notice. If a particular test form or computer delivery format is not explicitly specified for a test in this notice, it is not approved to measure educational gain in the NRS.
TESTS DETERMINED TO BE SUITABLE FOR USE IN THE NRS FOR A SEVEN-YEAR PERIOD FROM THE PUBLICATION DATE OF THIS NOTICE:
The Secretary has determined that the following test is suitable for use in Mathematics at all ABE levels of the NRS for a period of seven years from the publication date of this notice:
Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment System (CASAS) Math GOALS Series.
Forms 921/922, 923/924, 925/926, 927/928, and 929/930 are approved for use on paper and through a computer-based delivery format. Publisher: CASAS, 5151 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite 220, San Diego, CA 92123–4339. Telephone: (800) 255–1036. Internet:
www.casas.org/.
The Secretary has determined that the following tests are suitable for use at all ESL levels of the NRS for a period of seven years from the publication date of this notice:
(1)
Basic English Skills Test (BEST) Plus 3.0.
Forms 1 and 2 are approved for use on paper and through a computer-based delivery format with adaptive (Part A) and fixed form (Part B) sections. Publisher: Center for Applied Linguistics, 4646 40th Street NW, Washington, DC 20016–1859. Telephone: (202) 362–0700. Internet:
www.cal.org.
(2)
Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment System (CASAS) Listening STEPS.
The Locator Test and Forms 621/622, 623/624, 625/626, 627/628, and 629/630 are approved for use through paper-based testing and CDs, and through a computer-based delivery format. Publisher: CASAS, 5151 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite 220, San Diego, CA 92123–4339. Telephone: (800) 255–1036. Internet:
www.casas.org/.
(3)
Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment System (CASAS) Reading STEPS.
The Locator Test and Forms 621/622, 623/624, 625/626, 627/628, and 629/630 are approved for use through paper-based testing and through a computer-based delivery format. Publisher: CASAS, 5151 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite 220, San Diego, CA 92123–4339. Telephone: (800) 255–1036. Internet:
www.casas.org/.
The Secretary has determined that the following test is suitable for use at ESL levels 1 through 4 of the NRS for a period of seven years from the publication date of this notice:
Basic English Skills Test (BEST) Literacy 2.0.
Forms 1, 2, and 3 are approved for use in paper delivery format. Publisher: Center for Applied Linguistics, 4646 40th Street NW, Washington, DC 20016–1859. Telephone: (202) 362–0700. Internet:
www.cal.org.
TESTS DETERMINED TO BE SUITABLE FOR USE IN THE NRS FOR A THREE-YEAR PERIOD FROM THE
PUBLICATION DATE OF THIS NOTICE:
The Secretary has determined that the following test is suitable for use in Mathematics at all ABE levels of the NRS for a period of three years from the publication date of this notice:
ACT WorkKeys Applied Math.
Forms 014, 015, 016, and 017 are approved for use on paper and through a computer-based delivery format. Publisher: ACT, 500 ACT Drive, Iowa City, Iowa 52243–0168. Telephone: (319) 337–1270. Internet:
www.act.org.
The Secretary has determined that the following test is suitable for use in Literacy/English Language Arts at ABE levels 2 through 6 of the NRS for a period of three years from the publication date of this notice:
ACT WorkKeys Workplace Documents.
Forms 018, 019, 020, and 021 are approved for use on paper and through a computer-based delivery format. Publisher: ACT, 500 ACT Drive, Iowa City, Iowa 52243–0168. Telephone: (319) 337–1270. Internet:
www.act.org.
TESTS WITH NRS APPROVALS EXPIRING ON FEBRUARY 2, 2024, THAT MAY BE USED IN THE NRS DURING A SUNSET PERIOD ENDING ON JUNE 30, 2024:
The Secretary has determined that the following tests may be used at all ESL levels of the NRS during a sunset period ending on Jun 30, 2024:
(1)
Basic English Skills Test (BEST) Literacy.
Forms B, C, and D are approved for use on paper. Publisher: Center for Applied Linguistics, 4646 40th Street NW, Washington, DC 20016–1859. Telephone: (202) 362–0700. Internet:
www.cal.org.
(2)
Basic English Skills Test (BEST) Plus 2.0.
Forms D, E, and F are approved for use on paper and through the computer-adaptive delivery format. Publisher: Center for Applied Linguistics, 4646 40th Street NW, Washington, DC 20016–1859. Telephone: (202) 362–0700. Internet:
www.cal.org.
(3)
Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment Systems (CASAS) Life and Work Listening Assessments (LW Listening).
Forms 981L, 982L, 983L, 984L, 985L, and 986L are approved for use on paper and through the computer-based delivery format. Publisher: CASAS, 5151 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite 220, San Diego, CA 92123–4339. Telephone: (800) 255–1036. Internet:
www.casas.org.
(4)
Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment Systems (CASAS) Reading Assessments (Life and Work, Life Skills, Reading for Citizenship, Reading for Language Arts—Secondary Level).
Forms 27, 28, 81, 82, 81X, 82X, 83, 84, 85, 86, 185, 186, 187, 188, 310, 311, 513, 514, 951, 952, 951X, and 952X of this test are approved for use on paper and through the computer-based delivery format. Publisher: CASAS, 5151 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite 220, San Diego, CA 92123–4339. Telephone: (800) 255–1036. Internet:
www.casas.org.
(5)
Tests of Adult Basic Education Complete Language Assessment System-English (TABE/CLAS–E).
Forms A and B are approved for use on paper and through a computer-based delivery format. Publisher: Data Recognition Corporation—CTB, 13490 Bass Lake Road, Maple Grove, MN 55311. Telephone: (800) 538–9547. Internet:
www.tabetest.com.
TEST WITH NRS APPROVAL EXPIRING ON MARCH 7, 2024, THAT MAY BE USED IN THE NRS DURING A SUNSET PERIOD ENDING ON JUNE 30, 2024:
The Secretary has determined that the following test may be used in Mathematics at all ABE levels of the NRS during a sunset period ending on June 30, 2024:
Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment System (CASAS) Math GOALS Series.
Forms 900, 913, 914, 917, and 918 are approved for use on paper and through a computer-based delivery format. Publisher: CASAS, 5151 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite 220, San Diego, CA 92123–4339. Telephone: (800) 255–1036. Internet:
www.casas.org/.
REVOCATION OF TESTS:
Under certain circumstances—
i.e.,
a determination by the Secretary either that the information the publisher submitted as a basis for the Secretary's review of the test was inaccurate or that a test has been substantially revised—the Secretary may revoke the determination that a test is suitable after following the procedures in § 462.12(e). If the Secretary revokes the determination of suitability, the Secretary announces the revocation, as well as the date by which States and local eligible providers must stop using the revoked test, through a notice published in the
Federal Register
and posted on the internet at
www.nrsweb.org.
Accessible Format:
On request to the program contact person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
, individuals with disabilities can obtain this document in an accessible format. The Department will provide the requestor with an accessible format that may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 file, braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc, or other accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is the document published in the
Federal Register
. You may access the official edition of the
Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations at
www.govinfo.gov.
At this site you can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the
Federal Register
, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register
by using the article search feature at
www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced search feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published by the Department.
Program Authority:
29 U.S.C. 3292.
Amy Loyd,
Assistant Secretary for Career, Technical, and Adult Education.
[FR Doc. 2023–14825 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",Until what date can States continue to use ESL tests aligned to the old ESL functioning levels that are expiring?,"['A. December 31, 2023' 'B. March 7, 2024' 'C. February 2, 2024'
'D. June 30, 2024']",D
180," 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER23–2336–000]
Vineyard Wind 1 LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization
This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of Vineyard Wind 1 LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene, or protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant.
Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability, is July 27, 2022.
The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at
http://www.ferc.gov.
To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the intervention or protests.
Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC
20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register
, the Commission provides all interested persons an opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the internet through the Commission's Home Page (
http://www.ferc.gov
) using the “eLibrary” link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time, the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID–19), issued by the President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov
or call toll-free, (886) 208–3676 or TYY, (202) 502–8659.
The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502–6595 or
OPP@ferc.gov.
Dated: July 7, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–14861 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What federal agency is Vineyard Wind 1 LLC applying to for market-based rate authority?,"['A. The Federal Aviation Administration.'
'B. The Small Business Administration.'
'C. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.'
'D. The Federal Communications Commission.']",C
287," 4334–63–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–WASO–NRSS–NPS0035687; PPWONRADE3, PPMRSNR1Y.NM0000 (223); OMB Control Number 1024–NEW]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Socioeconomic Monitoring Study of National Park Service Visitors
AGENCY:
National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION:
Notice of information collection; request for comment.
SUMMARY:
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we, the National Park Service (NPS), are proposing a new information collection.
DATES:
Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before August 14, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to
https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Find this particular information collection by selecting “Currently under Review—Open for Public Comments” or by using the search function. Please provide a copy of your comments to Phadrea Ponds, NPS Information Collection Clearance Officer, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive (MS–242) Reston, VA 20192; or
phadrea_ponds@nps.gov
(email). Please reference Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number 1024–NEW (SEM) in the subject line of your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
To request additional information about this ICR, contact Bret Meldrum by email
at
bret_meldrum@nps.gov
(email) or at 970–267–7295 (telephone). Individuals in the United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services. Individuals outside the United States should use the relay services offered within their country to make international calls to the point of contact in the United States. You may also view the ICR at
https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.)
and 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), all information collections require approval under the PRA. As part of our continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burdens, we invite the public and other Federal agencies to comment on new, proposed, revised, and continuing collections of information. This helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. It also helps the public understand our information collection requirements and provide the requested data in the desired format.
A
Federal Register
notice with a 60-day public comment period soliciting comments on this collection of information was published on August 27, 2021 (86 FR 48244). A comment requesting a copy of the survey instruments was received. Copies of the surveys were sent to the commenter. No additional comments were received.
As part of our continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burdens, we are again soliciting comments from the public and other Federal agencies on the proposed ICR that is described below. We are especially interested in public comment addressing the following:
(1) Whether or not the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether or not the information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of our estimate of the burden for this collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(4) How might the agency minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology,
e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of response.
Comments that you submit in response to this notice are a matter of public record. We will include or summarize each comment in our request to OMB to approve this ICR. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Abstract:
The National Park Service (NPS) Social Science Program (SSP) is authorized by 54 U.S.C. 100701 to collect information that will improve the ability of the NPS to provide state-of the-art management, protection, and interpretation of, and research on, the resources of the System. However, the data currently available from survey research is insufficient for generalizing findings across all national park units in the System with regards to visitor experiences, attitudes, and spending behaviors. Past and present socioeconomic research in NPS units do not allow for comparison across units or against a regional and nationwide benchmark of information. Without this data, local, regional, and national-level NPS managers lack a comprehensive understanding of visitor demographics, economic contribution, and visitation related experiences in park units needed to monitor how well the System is serving the public. In 2016, the NPS SSP conducted a pilot study in 14 NPS units to identify and better understand the need for more advanced socioeconomic monitoring. The pilot study produced and verified a study design that will allow SSP to fully implement a Socioeconomic Monitoring Study (SEM). Building on the findings from the pilot study, the SEM will collect information from visitors at 30 National Park units annually to provide generalizable results for NPS managers and planners across the System to understand and monitor: visitor demographics, economic contribution, services, facilities, and infrastructure investments. Park units will be able to compare their unit data with regional and national-level data to make informed decisions in future planning and management efforts.
Title of Collection:
Socioeconomic Monitoring Study of National Park Service Visitors.
OMB Control Number:
1024–NEW.
Form Number:
None.
Type of Review:
New.
Respondents/Affected Public:
General Public; any person visiting a national park during the sampling period.
Total Estimated Number of Annual Respondents:
58,544. (36,936 intercept survey respondents, 8,310 non-response survey respondents, and 13,298 mail-back survey respondents).
Estimated Completion Time per Response:
Intercept survey: 5 minutes; Non-response survey: 2 minutes; and Mail-back survey: 20 minutes.
Total Estimated Number of Annual Burden Hours:
7,788 hours.
Respondent's Obligation:
Voluntary.
Frequency of Collection:
Annually.
Total Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden Cost:
None.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
The authority for this action is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.
).
Phadrea Ponds,
Information Collections Clearance Officer, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–14889 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What type of review is being done for the proposed information collection?,['A. Reinstatement' 'B. Renewal' 'C. New' 'D. Revision'],C
207," 6712–01–P
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
[OMB No. 3064–0057; –0061; –0087]
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection Renewal; Comment Request
AGENCY:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
ACTION:
Notice and request for comment.
SUMMARY:
The FDIC, as part of its obligations under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the request to renew the existing information collections described below (OMB Control No. 3064–0057; –0061; –0087). The notices of the proposed renewal for these information collections were previously published in the
Federal Register
on May 3, 2023, allowing for a 60-day comment period.
DATES:
Comments must be submitted on or before August 14, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to the FDIC by any of the following methods:
•
Agency Website: https://www.fdic.gov/resources/regulations/federal-register-publications/.
•
Email: comments@fdic.gov.
Include the name and number of the collection in the subject line of the message.
•
Mail:
Manny Cabeza (202–898–3767), Regulatory Counsel, MB–3128, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20429.
•
Hand Delivery:
Comments may be hand-delivered to the guard station at the rear of the 17th Street NW building (located on F Street NW), on business days between 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Find this particular information collection by selecting “Currently under 30-day Review—Open for Public Comments” or by using the search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Manny Cabeza, Regulatory Counsel, 202–898–3767,
mcabeza@fdic.gov,
MB–3128, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20429.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposal to renew the following currently approved collection of information:
1.
Title:
Certified Statement for Semiannual Deposit Insurance Assessment.
OMB Number:
3064–0057.
Forms:
None.
Affected Public:
FDIC-insured depository institutions.
Burden Estimate:
Summary of Estimated Annual Burden
[OMB No. 3064–0057]
Information collection
(obligation to respond)
Type of burden
(frequency of response)
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Time per
response
(HH:MM)
Annual burden
(hours)
1. Quarterly Certified Statement Invoice for Deposit Insurance Assessment, 12 CFR part 327 (Mandatory)
Reporting (Quarterly)
4,755
4
00:20
6,340
Total Annual Burden (Hours)
6,340
Source: FDIC.
General Description of Collection:
The FDIC collects deposit insurance assessments on a quarterly basis. Each quarterly assessment is based on an insured depository institution's quarterly report of condition for the prior calendar quarter. The FDIC collects the quarterly assessment payments by means of direct debits through the Automated Clearing House network. The information collection consists of the reporting requirement associated with certifying the review by officials of the insured institutions to confirm that the assessment data are accurate and, in cases of inaccuracy, submission of corrected data. There is no change in the substance or methodology of this information collection. The change in burden is due solely to the decrease in the estimated number of respondents by 671 from the estimated 7,011 annual respondents in the currently-approved information collection to the current estimate of 6,340. The decrease in estimated respondents is the result of the drop in the total number of insured depository institutions.
2.
Title:
Summary of Deposits.
OMB Number:
3064–0061.
Forms:
None.
Affected Public:
FDIC-insured depository institutions.
Burden Estimate:
Summary of Estimated Annual Burden
[OMB No. 3064–0061]
Information collection
(obligation to respond)
Type of burden
(frequency of response)
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Time per
response
(HH:MM)
Annual burden
(hours)
1. Summary of Deposits (Mandatory)
Recordkeeping (Annual)
3,870
1
3:00
11,610
Total Annual Burden (Hours)
11,610
General Description of Collection:
The Summary of Deposits (SOD) is the annual survey of branch office deposits as of June 30 for all FDIC-insured institutions, including insured U.S. branches of foreign banks. All FDIC-insured institutions that operate a main office and one or more branch locations (including limited service drive-thru locations) as of June 30 each year are required to file the SOD Survey. Insured branches of foreign banks are also required to file. All data collected on the SOD submission are available to the public. The survey data provides a basis for measuring the competitive impact of bank mergers and has additional use in research on banking. There is no change in the substance or methodology of this information collection. The change in burden is due solely to the decrease in the estimated number of respondents by 429 from the estimated 4,299 annual respondents in the currently-approved information collection to the current estimate of 3,870.
3.
Title:
Procedures for Monitoring Bank Secrecy Act Compliance.
OMB Number:
3064–0087.
Forms:
None.
Affected Public:
Insured State Nonmember Banks and Savings Associations.
Burden Estimate:
Summary of Estimated Annual Burden
[OMB No. 3064–0087]
Information collection
(obligation to respond)
Type of burden
(frequency of response)
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Time per
response
(HH:MM)
Annual burden
(hours)
1. Procedures for monitoring BSA compliance, small institutions (<$500 million in total assets), 12 CFR 326.8(b)(1) and (c) (Mandatory)
Recordkeeping (Annual)
2,013
1
35:00
70,455
2. Procedures for monitoring BSA compliance, medium institutions ($500 million to $10 billion in total assets), 12 CFR 326.8(b)(1) and (c)(Mandatory)
Recordkeeping (Annual)
964
1
250:00
241,000
3. Procedures for monitoring BSA compliance, large institutions (>$10 billion in total assets), 12 CFR 326.8(b)(1) and (c) (Mandatory)
Recordkeeping (Annual)
61
1
450:00
27,450
Total Annual Burden (Hours)
338,905
Source: FDIC.
General Description of Collection:
Respondents must establish and maintain procedures designed to monitor and ensure their compliance with the requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act and the implementing regulations promulgated by the Department of Treasury at 31 CFR chapter X. Respondents must also keep records evidencing that they have provided training for appropriate personnel. There is no change in the method or substance of the collection. The overall increase in burden hours is a result of economic fluctuation. In particular, the total number of respondents has increased while the hours per response remain the same.
Request for Comment
Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the FDIC's functions, including whether the information has practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the estimates of the burden of the information collection, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. All comments will become a matter of public record.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Dated at Washington, DC, on July 7, 2023.
James P. Sheesley,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–14823 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
","According to the notice, what has caused the change in estimated burden hours for the Procedures for Monitoring Bank Secrecy Act Compliance collection?","['A. Fewer respondents due to bank mergers and acquisitions.'
'B. New reporting requirements mandated by the Department of the Treasury.'
'C. Changes in the method and substance of the collection.'
'D. Economic fluctuation resulting in an increased total number of respondents.']",D
347," 8011–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property at the Colorado Air and Space Port, Watkins, Colorado
AGENCY:
Federal Aviation Administration, (FAA), DOT.
ACTION:
Notice of request to release airport property.
SUMMARY:
The FAA proposes to rule and invite public comment on the release and sale of a 17,803 square foot parcel of land at the Colorado Air and Space Port.
DATES:
Comments are due within 30 days of the date of the publication of this notice in the
Federal Register
. Emailed comments can be provided to Mr. Todd Minnich, Civil Engineer, Denver Airports District Office,
todd.e.minnich@faa.gov,
(303) 342–1279.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Jeff Kloska, Director, Colorado Air and Space Port, 5200 Front Range Parkway, Watkins, CO 80137,
JKloska@adcogov.org,
(720) 523–7310; or Mr. Todd Minnich, Civil Engineer, Denver Airports District Office,
todd.e.minnich@faa.gov,
(303) 342–1279. Documents reflecting this FAA action may be reviewed at the above locations.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The FAA invites public comment on the request to release property at the Colorado Air and Space Port under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 47107(h)(2). The proposal consists of 17,803 square feet of land located on the North side of the airport, shown as Parcel 7B on the Airport Layout Plan. The parcel lies on the Northeast corner of East 56th Avenue and Imboden Road. The FAA concurs that the parcel is no longer needed for airport purposes. The proposed use of this property is compatible with existing airport operations in accordance with FAA's Policy and Procedures Concerning the Use of Airport Revenue, as published in the
Federal Register
on February 16, 1999.
Issued in Denver, Colorado.
June 28, 2023.
John P. Bauer,
Manager, Denver Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. 2023–14871 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What date was given for when public comments on the proposal are due?,"['A. 60 days after the proposal is announced on the FAA website'
'B. 30 days after the notice is published in the Federal Register'
'C. No specific due date was given'
'D. 45 days after the notice is sent to local government officials']",B
330," 4410–18–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. MC2023–181 and CP2023–185]
New Postal Products
AGENCY:
Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY:
The Commission is noticing a recent Postal Service filing for the Commission's consideration concerning a negotiated service agreement. This notice informs the public of the filing, invites public comment, and takes other administrative steps.
DATES:
Comments are due:
July 17, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing Online system at
http://www.prc.gov.
Those who cannot submit comments electronically should contact the person identified in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section by telephone for advice on filing alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
I. Introduction
The Commission gives notice that the Postal Service filed request(s) for the Commission to consider matters related to negotiated service agreement(s). The request(s) may propose the addition or removal of a negotiated service agreement from the Market Dominant or the Competitive product list, or the modification of an existing product currently appearing on the Market Dominant or the Competitive product list.
Section II identifies the docket number(s) associated with each Postal Service request, the title of each Postal Service request, the request's acceptance date, and the authority cited by the Postal Service for each request. For each request, the Commission appoints an officer of the Commission to represent the interests of the general public in the proceeding, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505 (Public Representative). Section II also establishes comment deadline(s) pertaining to each request.
The public portions of the Postal Service's request(s) can be accessed via the Commission's website (
http://www.prc.gov
). Non-public portions of the Postal Service's request(s), if any, can be accessed through compliance with the requirements of 39 CFR 3011.301.
1
1
 
See
Docket No. RM2018–3, Order Adopting Final Rules Relating to Non-Public Information, June 27, 2018, Attachment A at 19–22 (Order No. 4679).
The Commission invites comments on whether the Postal Service's request(s) in the captioned docket(s) are consistent with the policies of title 39. For request(s) that the Postal Service states concern Market Dominant product(s), applicable statutory and regulatory requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3622, 39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3030, and 39 CFR part 3040, subpart B. For request(s) that the Postal Service states concern Competitive product(s), applicable statutory and regulatory requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3632, 39 U.S.C. 3633, 39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3035, and 39 CFR part 3040, subpart B. Comment deadline(s) for each request appear in section II.
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
1.
Docket No(s).:
MC2023–181 and CP2023–185;
Filing Title:
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail, First-Class Package Service & Parcel Select Contract 33 to Competitive Product List and Notice of Filing Materials Under Seal;
Filing Acceptance Date:
July 7, 2023;
Filing Authority:
39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 3040.130 through 3040.135, and 39 CFR 3035.105;
Public Representative:
Christopher C. Mohr;
Comments Due:
July 17, 2023.
This Notice will be published in the
Federal Register
.
Erica A. Barker,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–14872 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What federal agency published the notice about new postal products?,"['A. The notice was published by the Intergalactic Parcel Transport Authority, an organization dedicated to facilitating mail delivery between planets. IPTA recently announced new ""cosmic delivery"" products allowing packages to be sent via wormhole to Orion\'s Belt and beyond.'
'B. Postal Regulatory Commission'
'C. It was published by the Postal Rate Authority, the predecessor agency to the Postal Regulatory Commission. The PRA suggested radical privatization of the mail system before being disbanded in 2006.'
'D. The notice comes from the Committee on Postal Planning, a little-known advisory group within the executive branch that provides guidance on optimizing mail service. The CPP has been pushing the Postal Service to expand into teleportation services for decades.']",B
12," 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Parts 100 and 165
[Docket Number USCG–2023–0464]
RIN 1625–AA08; AA00
Special Local Regulation and Safety Zone; Back River, Baltimore County, MD
AGENCY:
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION:
Temporary final rule.
SUMMARY:
The Coast Guard is establishing temporary regulations for certain waters of the Back River. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters near Baltimore County, MD, during a fireworks display on July 15, 2023, (alternate date on July 16, 2023). This regulation prohibits persons and vessels from being in the regulated area and safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Maryland-National Capital Region or a designated representative.
DATES:
This rule is effective from 8 to 10:30 p.m. on July 15, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov,
type USCG–2023–0464 in the search box and click “Search.” Next, in the Document Type column, select “Supporting & Related Material.”
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
If you have questions on this rule, call or email CDR Samuel M. Danus, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region; telephone 410–576–2519, email
MDNCRMarineEvents@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
PATCOM Patrol Commander
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
On June 7, 2023, Fantastic Fireworks, on behalf of Tiki Lee's Dock Bar, notified the Coast Guard that it will be conducting a fireworks display between 9 and 10 p.m. on July 15, 2023, as a part of the “Shootout on the River” event activities. The fireworks are to be launched from a barge in the Back River located near Tiki Lee's Dock Bar in Sparrows Point, MD. In the event of inclement weather on July 15, 2023, the fireworks display will be conducted between 9 and 10 p.m. on July 16, 2023. Hazards from firework displays include accidental discharge of fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and falling hot embers or other debris. The Captain of the Port, Maryland-National Capital Region (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with the fireworks to be used in this display would be a safety concern for anyone within a 600 foot radius of the barge. The Coast Guard anticipates a large spectator fleet for these events.
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those procedures are “impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.” Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because immediate action is needed to respond to the potential safety hazards associated with fireworks debris and the anticipated large spectator fleet.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register
. Due to the date of the event, it would be impracticable to make the regulation effective 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register
. Delaying the effective date of this rule would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest because it would delay the safety measures necessary to respond to potential safety hazards associated with this fireworks event. Hazards include explosive materials, dangerous projectiles, and falling debris. The fireworks fall out zone extends across the navigable channel.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034 and 46 U.S.C. 70041. The Captain of the Port, Sector Maryland-National Capital Region (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with the fireworks to be used in the July 15, 2023, display will be a safety concern for anyone intending to operate within certain waters of Back River in Baltimore County, MD, in or near the event area.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a special local regulation for the area in the Back River in which spectating vessels will transit and gather. The regulated area covers all navigable waters of Back River within an area bounded by a line connecting the following points: From the shoreline at Lynch Point at latitude 39°14′46″ N, longitude 076°26′23″ W, thence northeast to Porter Point at latitude 39°15′13″ N, longitude 076°26′11″ W, thence north along the shoreline to Walnut Point at latitude 39°17′06″ N, longitude 076°27′04″ W, thence southwest to the shoreline at latitude 39°16′41″ N, longitude 076°27′31″ W, thence south along the shoreline to the point of origin, located in Baltimore County, MD. The regulated area is approximately 4,200 yards in length and 1,200 yards in width.
In addition to establishing a special local regulation, the COTP is establishing a temporary safety zone around the fireworks discharge site, in approximate position latitude 39°15′35.54″ N, longitude 76°26′56.62″ W. The safety zone covers all navigable waters within 600 feet of a fireworks barge in the Back River located near Tiki Lee's Dock Bar in Sparrow's Point, MD. The duration of the zone is intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these navigable waters before, during, and after the scheduled fireworks display. No vessel or person would be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. This rule has not been designated a “significant regulatory action,” under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size, duration, and time-of-day of the special local regulation and safety zone, which would impact a small designated area of the Back River
for a total of no more than 2.5 enforcement-hours, during the evening when vessel traffic is normally low. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue Local Notices to Mariners and a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel 16 about the zones.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term “small entities” comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the regulated area or safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A above, this rule would not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of Government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves implementation of regulations within 33 CFR part 100 applicable to organized marine events on the navigable waters of the United States that could negatively impact the safety of waterway users and shore side activities in the event area, and within 33 CFR part 165 establishing a temporary safety zone that would prohibit entry within 600 feet of a fireworks barge, both lasting a total of 2.5 consecutive hours. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L61 and L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES
section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Parts 100 and 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR parts 100 and 165 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority:
46 U.S.C. 70041; 33 CFR 1.05–1.
2. Add § 100.501T05–0464 to read as follows:
§ 100.501T05–0464
2023 Tiki Lee's Shootout on the River Fireworks, Back River, Baltimore County, MD.
(a)
Locations.
All coordinates are based on datum NAD 1983.
(1)
Regulated area.
All navigable waters of Back River, within an area bounded by a line connecting the following points: From the shoreline at Lynch Point at latitude 39°14′46″ N, longitude 076°26′23″ W, thence northeast to Porter Point at latitude 39°15′13″ N, longitude 076°26′11″ W, thence north along the shoreline to Walnut Point at latitude 39°17′06″ N, longitude 076°27′04″ W, thence southwest to the shoreline at latitude 39°16′41″ N, longitude 076°27′31″ W, thence south along the shoreline to and terminating at the point of origin.
(2) [Reserved]
(b)
Definitions.
As used in this section:
Captain of the Port (COTP) Maryland-National Capital Region
means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region or
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been authorized by the COTP to act on his behalf.
Event Patrol Commander or Event PATCOM
means a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has been designated by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region.
Official patrol
means any vessel assigned or approved by Commander, Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region with a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast Guard ensign.
Participant
means a person or vessel registered with the event sponsor as participating in the “2023 Tiki Lee's Shootout on the River Fireworks” event, or otherwise designated by the event sponsor as having a function tied to the event.
Spectator
means a person or vessel not registered with the event sponsor as participants or assigned as official patrols.
(c)
Special local regulations.
(1) The COTP Maryland-National Capital Region or Event PATCOM may forbid and control the movement of all vessels and persons, including event participants, in the regulated area described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. When hailed or signaled by an official patrol, a vessel or person in the regulated area shall immediately comply with the directions given by the patrol. Failure to do so may result in the Coast Guard expelling the person or vessel from the area, issuing a citation for failure to comply, or both. The COTP Maryland-National Capital Region or Event PATCOM may terminate the event, or a participant's operations at any time the COTP Maryland-National Capital Region or Event PATCOM believes it necessary to do so for the protection of life or property.
(2) Except for participants and vessels already at berth, a person or vessel within the regulated area at the start of enforcement of this section must immediately depart the regulated area.
(3) A spectator must contact the Event PATCOM to request permission to either enter or pass through the regulated area. The Event PATCOM and official patrol vessels enforcing this regulated area can be contacted on marine band radio VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz) and channel 22A (157.1 MHz). If permission is granted, the spectator must enter a designated spectator area or pass directly through the regulated area as instructed by Event PATCOM. A vessel within the regulated area must operate at safe speed that minimizes wake. A spectator vessel must not loiter within the navigable channel while within the regulated area.
(4) A person or vessel that desires to transit, moor, or anchor within the regulated area must obtain authorization from the COTP Maryland-National Capital Region or Event PATCOM. A person or vessel seeking such permission can contact the COTP Maryland-National Capital Region at telephone number 410–576–2693 or on Marine Band Radio, VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz) or the Event PATCOM on Marine Band Radio, VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(5) The Coast Guard will publish a notice in the Fifth Coast Guard District Local Notice to Mariners and issue a marine information broadcast on VHF–FM marine band radio announcing specific event dates and times.
(d)
Enforcement officials.
The Coast Guard may be assisted with marine event patrol and enforcement of the regulated area by other federal, state, and local agencies.
(e)
Enforcement period.
This section will be enforced from 8 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on July 15, 2023.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
3. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority:
46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
4. Add § 165.T05–0464 to read as follows:
§ 165.T05–0464
Safety Zone; Back River, Baltimore County, MD.
(a)
Location.
The following area is a safety zone: All navigable waters of the Back River within 600 feet of the fireworks barge in approximate position latitude 39°15′35.54″ N, longitude 76°26′56.62″ W. These coordinates are based on datum NAD 1983.
(b)
Definitions.
As used in this section:
Captain of the Port (COTP)
means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region.
Designated representative
means any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region to assist in enforcing the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section.
(c)
Regulations.
(1) Under the general safety zone regulations in subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's representative by telephone at 410–576–2693 or on Marine Band Radio VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard vessels enforcing this section can be contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(3) Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
(d)
Enforcement officials.
The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and local agencies.
(e)
Enforcement period.
This section will be enforced from 8 to 10:30 p.m. on July 15, 2023, and, if necessary due to inclement weather on July 15, 2023, from 8 to 10:30 p.m. on July 16, 2023.
Dated: July 5, 2023.
David E. O'Connell,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Maryland-National Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2023–14816 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What specific area will be designated as a safety zone around the fireworks barge?,"['A. All navigable waters within a 1 mile radius of the fireworks barge will be a safety zone.'
'B. All navigable waters within 300 yards of the fireworks barge will be a safety zone.'
'C. All navigable waters within 600 feet of the fireworks barge will be a safety zone.'
'D. All navigable waters within 200 meters of the fireworks barge will be a safety zone.']",C
169," 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Combined Notice of Filings #3
Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt wholesale generator filings:
Docket Numbers:
EG23–222–000.
Applicants:
Orlando CoGen Limited, L.P.
Description:
Orlando CoGen Limited, L.P. submits Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status.
Filed Date:
7/7/23.
Accession Number:
20230707–5016.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 7/28/23.
Take notice that the Commission received the following electric rate filings:
Docket Numbers:
ER10–1858–012; ER10–1862–040; ER10–1870–012; ER10–1889–012; ER10–1893–040; ER10–1895–012; ER10–1934–040; ER10–1938–041; ER10–1942–038; ER10–1944–012; ER10–2029–016; ER10–2036–015; ER10–2040–014; ER10–2041–014; ER10–2042–046; ER10–2043–014; ER10–2044–014; ER10–2051–014; ER10–2985–044; ER10–3049–045; ER10–3051–045; ER10–3260–014; ER11–4369–025; ER13–1401–012; ER14–2931–012; ER16–2218–026; ER17–696–026; ER18–1321–007; ER20–1939–005; ER23–944–004.
Applicants:
Calpine Community Energy, LLC, Calpine Northeast Development, LLC, Calpine Mid-Merit II, LLC, Calpine Energy Solutions, LLC, North American Power Business, LLC, Calpine Fore River Energy Center, LLC, Westbrook Energy Center, LLC, North American Power and Gas, LLC, Granite Ridge Energy, LLC, Champion Energy, LLC, Champion Energy Services, LLC, Champion Energy Marketing LLC, Calpine Bethlehem, LLC, Zion Energy LLC, Calpine Mid-Atlantic Generation, LLC, Calpine Energy Services, L.P., Calpine Mid Merit, LLC, Calpine New Jersey Generation, LLC, Calpine Vineland Solar, LLC, Calpine Mid-Atlantic Marketing, LLC, Bethpage Energy Center 3, LLC, Calpine Construction Finance Co., L.P., Calpine Power America—CA, LLC, CES Marketing IX, LLC, KIAC Partners, CES Marketing X, LLC, CPN Bethpage 3rd Turbine, Inc., Nissequogue Cogen Partners, Power Contract Financing, L.L.C., TBG Cogen Partners.
Description:
Triennial Market Power Analysis for Northeast Region of TBG Cogen Partners, et al.
Filed Date:
6/30/23.
Accession Number:
20230630–5459.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 8/29/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER10–1987–005.
Applicants:
Ontario Power Generation Energy Trading, Inc.
Description:
Triennial Market Power Analysis for Southeast Region of Ontario Power Generation Energy Trading, Inc.
Filed Date:
6/30/23.
Accession Number:
20230630–5469.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 8/29/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER10–2201–005; ER13–291–004; ER14–1468–015; ER15–1471–014; ER15–1672–013; ER16–2010–008.
Applicants:
Hancock Wind, LLC, Evergreen Wind Power II, LLC, Blue Sky West, LLC, KMC Thermo, LLC, EnergyMark, LLC, Marina Energy, LLC.
Description:
Triennial Market Power Analysis for Northeast Region of Marina Energy, LLC, et al.
Filed Date:
6/30/23.
Accession Number:
20230630–5477.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 8/29/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER10–2398–014; ER10–2399–014; ER10–2406–015; ER10–2408–009; ER10–2409–014; ER10–2410–014; ER10–2411–015; ER10–2412–015; ER11–2935–016; ER13–1816–020; ER14–1933–014; ER16–1152–007; ER16–1724–012; ER17–1314–006; ER18–1189–009; ER19–1282–007; ER20–2714–005; ER22–2115–002; ER22–2116–002; ER23–1585–001.
Applicants:
Riverstart Solar Park III LLC, Blue Harvest Solar Park LLC, Timber Road Solar Park LLC, Headwaters Wind Farm II LLC, Paulding Wind Farm IV LLC, Meadow Lake Wind Farm VI LLC, Arkwright Summit Wind Farm LLC, Paulding Wind Farm III LLC, Jericho Rise Wind Farm LLC, Headwaters Wind Farm LLC, Sustaining Power Solutions LLC, Paulding Wind Farm II LLC, Meadow Lake Wind Farm IV LLC, Meadow Lake Wind Farm III LLC, Meadow Lake Wind Farm II LLC, Meadow Lake Wind Farm LLC, Marble River, LLC, High Trail Wind Farm, LLC, Blackstone Wind Farm II LLC, Blackstone Wind Farm, LLC.
Description:
Triennial Market Power Analysis for Northeast Region of Blackstone Wind Farm, LLC, et al.
Filed Date:
6/30/23.
Accession Number:
20230630–5489.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 8/29/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER10–2435–022; ER10–2440–014; ER12–2510–012; ER12–2512–012; ER15–2013–015; ER15–2014–009; ER15–2022–008; ER15–2026–008; ER18–2252–004; ER19–481–005.
Applicants:
LMBE Project Company LLC, MC Project Company LLC, Susquehanna Nuclear, LLC, Montour, LLC, Brunner Island, LLC, Talen Energy Marketing, LLC, H.A. Wagner LLC, Brandon Shores LLC, Dartmouth Power Associates Limited Partnership, Camden Plant Holdings, L.L.C.
Description:
Triennial Market Power Analysis for Northeast Region of Talen Energy Marketing, LLC, et al.
Filed Date:
6/30/23.
Accession Number:
20230630–5490.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 8/29/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER10–2984–063.
Applicants:
Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc.
Description:
Triennial Market Power Analysis for Northeast Region of Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc.
Filed Date:
6/30/23.
Accession Number:
20230630–5484.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 8/29/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER11–2335–019; ER11–3859–024; ER11–4634–011; ER14–1699–014; ER15–748–008; ER15–1456–011; ER15–1457–011; ER17–436–010; ER18–920–013; ER19–464–004; ER19–967–004; ER19–968–005.
Applicants:
Manchester Street, L.L.C., Fairless Energy, L.L.C., Vermillion Power, L.L.C., Marco DM Holdings, L.L.C., Marcus Hook Energy, L.P., Syracuse, L.L.C., Beaver Falls, L.L.C., Garrison Energy Center LLC, Milford Power, LLC, Hazleton Generation LLC, Dighton Power, LLC, Dynegy Services Plum Point, LLC.
Description:
Triennial Market Power Analysis for Northeast Region of Plum Point Services Company, LLC, et al.
Filed Date:
6/30/23.
Accession Number:
20230630–5481.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 8/29/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER17–1037–004; ER17–1603–003; ER17–2245–003; ER19–1741–002.
Applicants:
Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc., Moffett Solar 1, LLC, Dominion Energy Generation Marketing, Inc., Innovative Solar 37, LLC.
Description:
Triennial Market Power Analysis for Southeast Region of Innovative Solar 37, LLC, et al.
Filed Date:
6/30/23.
Accession Number:
20230630–5478.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 8/29/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER17–1315–012; ER17–2087–010; ER20–2746–006.
Applicants:
Riverstart Solar Park LLC, Hog Creek Wind Project, LLC, Meadow Lake Wind Farm V LLC.
Description:
Triennial Market Power Analysis for Northeast Region of Meadow Lake Wind Farm V LLC, et al.
Filed Date:
6/30/23.
Accession Number:
20230630–5486.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 8/29/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER17–2558–002; ER18–974–003.
Applicants:
Carolina Power Partners, LLC, Ohio Power Partners, LLC.
Description:
Triennial Market Power Analysis for Northeast Region of Ohio Power Partners, LLC, et al.
Filed Date:
6/30/23.
Accession Number:
20230630–5492.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 8/29/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER18–552–005.
Applicants:
Clean Energy Future-Lordstown, LLC.
Description:
Triennial Market Power Analysis for Northeast Region of Clean Energy Future-Lordstown, LLC.
Filed Date:
6/30/23.
Accession Number:
20230630–5485.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 8/29/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER21–1225–005; ER22–867–002.
Applicants:
Long Ridge Retail Electric Supplier LLC, Long Ridge Energy Generation LLC.
Description:
Triennial Market Power Analysis for Northeast Region of Long Ridge Energy Generation LLC, et al.
Filed Date:
6/30/23.
Accession Number:
20230630–5475.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 8/29/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER23–1598–000; ER23–1598–001.
Applicants:
Versant Power.
Description:
Versant Power submits Response to FERC's June 5, 2023, Deficiency Letter.
Filed Date:
7/5/23.
Accession Number:
20230705–5063.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 7/26/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER23–2351–000.
Applicants:
Idaho Power Company.
Description:
§ 205(d) Rate Filing: Legacy Agreement Clean Up to be effective 12/18/2012.
Filed Date:
7/6/23.
Accession Number:
20230706–5106.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 7/27/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER23–2352–000.
Applicants:
Interstate Power and Light Company.
Description:
§ 205(d) Rate Filing: IPL-Chickasaw Wind RLBAA Filing to be effective 9/6/2023.
Filed Date:
7/7/23.
Accession Number:
20230707–5027.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 7/28/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER23–2353–000.
Applicants:
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Description:
§ 205(d) Rate Filing: Interim ISA and CSA, SA Nos. 5885 & 6969; Queue No. AF1–123/AF1–124/AF1–125 to be effective 6/7/2023.
Filed Date:
7/7/23.
Accession Number:
20230707–5028.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 7/28/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER23–2354–000.
Applicants:
Interstate Power and Light Company.
Description:
§ 205(d) Rate Filing: Prescott Wind LBA to be effective 9/6/2023.
Filed Date:
7/7/23.
Accession Number:
20230707–5029.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 7/28/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER23–2355–000.
Applicants:
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Description:
§ 205(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to ISA, SA No. 5833; Queue No. AC2–100/AD1–131 (amend) to be effective 9/6/2023.
Filed Date:
7/7/23.
Accession Number:
20230707–5036.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 7/28/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER23–2356–000.
Applicants:
FPL Energy Wyman IV LLC.
Description:
Petition of FPL Energy Wyman IV LLC for Waiver of the Transmission, Markets, and Services Tariff of ISO New England, LLC.
Filed Date:
7/6/23.
Accession Number:
20230706–5146.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 7/27/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER23–2357–000.
Applicants:
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Description:
Tariff Amendment: Notice of Cancellation of ISA, SA No. 6715; Queue No. AE2–111 to be effective 1/18/2023.
Filed Date:
7/7/23.
Accession Number:
20230707–5045.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 7/28/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER23–2358–000.
Applicants:
Wildflower Solar, LLC.
Description:
§ 205(d) Rate Filing: Shared Facilities and Co-Tenancy Agreement to be effective 9/6/2023.
Filed Date:
7/7/23.
Accession Number:
20230707–5067.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 7/28/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER23–2359–000.
Applicants:
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Description:
§ 205(d) Rate Filing: Original ISA, SA No. 6967 and ICSA, SA No. 6968; Queue Nos. AD2–100/AD2–131 to be effective 9/6/2023.
Filed Date:
7/7/23.
Accession Number:
20230707–5071.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 7/28/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER23–2360–000.
Applicants:
Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Mississippi Power Company.
Description:
§ 205(d) Rate Filing: Alabama Power Company submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): PowerSouth NITSA Amendment (Add Holly Hills DP) to be effective 6/7/2023.
Filed Date:
7/7/23.
Accession Number:
20230707–5074.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 7/28/23.
Docket Numbers:
ER23–2361–000.
Applicants:
Public Service Company of Colorado.
Description:
§ 205(d) Rate Filing: 2023–07–07—PSCoM—NITS—463—Amnd 3 to be effective 8/1/2023.
Filed Date:
7/7/23.
Accession Number:
20230707–5121.
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 7/28/23.
Take notice that the Commission received the following electric securities filings:
Docket Numbers:
ES23–55–000
Applicants:
SR DeSoto III, LLC
Description:
Application Under Section 204 of the Federal Power Act for Authorization to Issue Securities of SR DeSoto III, LLC.
Filed Date:
7/6/23
Accession Number:
20230706–5144
Comment Date:
5 p.m. ET 7/27/23.
The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system (
https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp
) by querying the docket number.
Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at:
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf.
For other information, call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659.
The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502–6595 or
OPP@ferc.gov.
Dated: July 7, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–14866 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",What is the deadline for interventions or protests for the filing by Interstate Power and Light Company regarding the Prescott Wind balancing authority area?,"['A. 5 p.m. ET on July 28, 2023' 'B. 5 p.m. ET on August 7, 2023'
'C. 5 p.m. ET on July 29, 2023' 'D. 5 p.m. ET on August 28, 2023']",A
264," 9111–97–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
[OMB Control Number 1615–0057]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Extension, Without Change, of a Currently Approved Collection: Application for Certificate of Citizenship
AGENCY:
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION:
60-Day notice.
SUMMARY:
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment upon this proposed extension of a currently approved collection of information. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, the information collection notice is published in the
Federal Register
to obtain comments regarding the nature of the information collection, the categories of respondents, the estimated burden (
i.e.,
the time, effort, and resources used by the respondents to respond), the estimated cost to the respondent, and the actual information collection instruments.
DATES:
Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 60 days until September 11, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
All submissions received must include the OMB Control Number 1615–0057 in the body of the letter, the agency name and Docket ID USCIS–2006–0023. Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal website at
https://www.regulations.gov
under e-Docket ID number USCIS–2006–0023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
USCIS, Office of Policy and Strategy, Regulatory Coordination Division, Samantha Deshommes, Chief, telephone number (240) 721–3000 (This is not a toll-free number. Comments are not accepted via telephone message). Please note contact information provided here is solely for questions regarding this notice. It is not for individual case status inquiries. Applicants seeking information about the status of their individual cases can check Case Status Online, available at the USCIS website at
https://www.uscis.gov,
or call the USCIS Contact Center at 800–375–5283 (TTY 800–767–1833).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments
You may access the information collection instrument with instructions or additional information by visiting the Federal eRulemaking Portal site at:
https://www.regulations.gov
and entering USCIS–2006–0023 in the search box. All submissions will be posted, without change, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov,
and will include any personal information you provide. Therefore, submitting this information makes it public. You may wish to consider limiting the amount of personal information that you provide in any voluntary submission you make to DHS. DHS may withhold information provided in comments from public viewing that it determines may impact the privacy of an individual or is offensive. For additional information, please read the Privacy Act notice that is available via the link in the footer of
https://www.regulations.gov.
Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies should address one or more of the following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology,
e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of responses.
Overview of This Information Collection
(1)
Type of Information Collection:
Extension, Without Change, of a Currently Approved Collection.
(2)
Title of the Form/Collection:
Application for Certificate of Citizenship.
(3)
Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the DHS sponsoring the collection:
N–600; USCIS.
(4)
Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary:
Form N–600 collects information from applicants who are requesting a Certificate of Citizenship because they acquired United States citizenship either by birth abroad to a U.S. citizen parent(s), adoption by a U.S. citizen parent(s), or after meeting eligibility requirements including the naturalization of a foreign-born parent. Form N–600 can also be filed by a parent or legal guardian on behalf of a minor child. The form standardizes requests for the benefit and ensures that basic information required to assess eligibility is provided by applicants. USCIS uses the information collected on Form N–600 to determine if a Certificate of Citizenship can be issued to the applicant. Citizenship acquisition laws have changed over time and different laws apply to determine whether the applicant automatically became a U.S. citizen depending on the dates of relevant events, such as the child's date of birth. USCIS may request that applicants who reside within the United States attend an appointment at a USCIS Application Support Center to have a photograph taken. USCIS may also require applicants to submit additional biometrics under 8 CFR 103.2(b)(9).
(5)
An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond:
The estimated total number of respondents for the information collection N–600 (paper-filed) is 26,810 and the estimated hour burden per response is 1.5 hours; the estimated total number of respondents for the information collection N–600 (online filing) is 28,190 and the estimated hour burden per response is 0.75 hours; the estimated total number of respondents for the information collection biometrics submission is 36,500 and the estimated hour burden per response is 1.17 hours.
(6)
An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection:
The total estimated annual hour burden associated with this collection is 104,063 hours.
(7)
An estimate of the total public burden (in cost) associated with the collection:
The estimated total annual cost burden associated with this collection of information is $7,081,250.00.
Dated: July 7, 2023.
Samantha L. Deshommes,
Chief, Regulatory Coordination Division, Office of Policy and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2023–14815 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
",Who may be required to submit additional biometrics under this information collection?,"['A. Only applicants who are in immigration court proceedings.'
'B. Only applicants who reside outside the United States.'
'C. Only applicants who have committed immigration violations in the past.'
'D. Applicants who reside within the United States.']",D
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment