Created
June 8, 2020 11:55
-
-
Save zajdee/82df23ae498e966b4ac813492bfe2bd8 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
The answers to questions that popped up as part of my talk on RIPE NCC::Educa 2020
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
> -------------------------- | |
> Open Questions (8) | |
> -------------------------- | |
> 1. Colin: Any idea of plan or roadmap for when other browers will support HE V2? | |
> 2. Colin: browsers :-) | |
We have to request it from browser vendors and explain the benefits so that they want to implement it. As far as I know, v2 is not on any browser vendor's roadmap. | |
> 3. Christian Bretterhofer: can we persuade to get a browser plugin to switch from happy eyballs to ipv6 only and back? | |
Not sure why would anyone want to do that; additionally the browser plugins have become less powerful over time - I'm not a plugin developer, but from what I know I assume it's not possible for a plugin to override DNS or the connection attempts of the browser. | |
> 4. david yasler 2: who is monitoring "happy Eye Balls" and do you need the addressing space or will it self discover | |
> 5. david yasler 2: dial up | |
> 6. david yasler 2: or wifi | |
No address space is needed for Happy Eyeballs, it's more about getting connected to the server as quickly as possible. The client uses addresses on his | |
> 7. david yasler 2: what problems did you have running dual stack | |
I don't know where to start. Connections breaking, IPv4 DHCP pool exhaustion, ... In general, every protocol has its pitfalls. | |
> 8. david yasler 2: did you work with German telecom installation | |
If we are talking about the German infrastructure, I was just an end-user of DTAG DSL line. |
If you have a tunnel for ipv6 and and native ipv4, happy eyeball may prevent you from testing in browsers, so it would be fine to have such feature
That is correct. But so far no protocol override has been implemented in any browser.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
If you have a tunnel for ipv6 and and native ipv4, happy eyeball may prevent you from testing in browsers, so it would be fine to have such feature