Created
February 9, 2024 14:30
-
-
Save zamazan4ik/2cd369f47356b4c4f4b68c9fb1203b41 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
needletail: PGO optimized compared to Release
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Running benches/benchmark.rs (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/deps/benchmark-0f982501a0eb9bec) | |
Benchmarking Kmerizing/Kmer | |
Benchmarking Kmerizing/Kmer: Warming up for 3.0000 s | |
Benchmarking Kmerizing/Kmer: Collecting 10 samples in estimated 5.3554 s (605 iterations) | |
Benchmarking Kmerizing/Kmer: Analyzing | |
Kmerizing/Kmer time: [8.9013 ms 8.9027 ms 8.9038 ms] | |
change: [-8.7062% -7.7161% -7.0741%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05) | |
Performance has improved. | |
Found 2 outliers among 10 measurements (20.00%) | |
1 (10.00%) low severe | |
1 (10.00%) high mild | |
Benchmarking Kmerizing/Bitkmer | |
Benchmarking Kmerizing/Bitkmer: Warming up for 3.0000 s | |
Benchmarking Kmerizing/Bitkmer: Collecting 10 samples in estimated 5.1578 s (550 iterations) | |
Benchmarking Kmerizing/Bitkmer: Analyzing | |
Kmerizing/Bitkmer time: [9.3717 ms 9.3750 ms 9.3795 ms] | |
change: [-19.051% -18.666% -18.451%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05) | |
Performance has improved. | |
Benchmarking FASTA parsing/RustBio | |
Benchmarking FASTA parsing/RustBio: Warming up for 3.0000 s | |
Benchmarking FASTA parsing/RustBio: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.2541 s (15k iterations) | |
Benchmarking FASTA parsing/RustBio: Analyzing | |
FASTA parsing/RustBio time: [346.11 µs 346.17 µs 346.23 µs] | |
change: [-11.715% -11.407% -11.228%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05) | |
Performance has improved. | |
Found 10 outliers among 100 measurements (10.00%) | |
2 (2.00%) low severe | |
1 (1.00%) low mild | |
4 (4.00%) high mild | |
3 (3.00%) high severe | |
Benchmarking FASTA parsing/SeqIO | |
Benchmarking FASTA parsing/SeqIO: Warming up for 3.0000 s | |
Benchmarking FASTA parsing/SeqIO: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.1238 s (20k iterations) | |
Benchmarking FASTA parsing/SeqIO: Analyzing | |
FASTA parsing/SeqIO time: [271.33 µs 276.30 µs 279.70 µs] | |
change: [+71.933% +73.692% +75.258%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05) | |
Performance has regressed. | |
Found 4 outliers among 100 measurements (4.00%) | |
4 (4.00%) low severe | |
Benchmarking FASTA parsing/Needletail | |
Benchmarking FASTA parsing/Needletail: Warming up for 3.0000 s | |
Benchmarking FASTA parsing/Needletail: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0280 s (30k iterations) | |
Benchmarking FASTA parsing/Needletail: Analyzing | |
FASTA parsing/Needletail | |
time: [171.55 µs 173.39 µs 175.39 µs] | |
change: [-8.0588% -4.9362% -1.8932%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05) | |
Performance has improved. | |
Found 10 outliers among 100 measurements (10.00%) | |
3 (3.00%) high mild | |
7 (7.00%) high severe | |
Benchmarking FASTQ parsing/RustBio | |
Benchmarking FASTQ parsing/RustBio: Warming up for 3.0000 s | |
Benchmarking FASTQ parsing/RustBio: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 6.2944 s (20k iterations) | |
Benchmarking FASTQ parsing/RustBio: Analyzing | |
FASTQ parsing/RustBio time: [312.36 µs 312.42 µs 312.50 µs] | |
change: [-16.991% -16.916% -16.860%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05) | |
Performance has improved. | |
Found 9 outliers among 100 measurements (9.00%) | |
1 (1.00%) low severe | |
2 (2.00%) low mild | |
2 (2.00%) high mild | |
4 (4.00%) high severe | |
Benchmarking FASTQ parsing/SeqIO | |
Benchmarking FASTQ parsing/SeqIO: Warming up for 3.0000 s | |
Benchmarking FASTQ parsing/SeqIO: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.1503 s (45k iterations) | |
Benchmarking FASTQ parsing/SeqIO: Analyzing | |
FASTQ parsing/SeqIO time: [113.32 µs 113.35 µs 113.38 µs] | |
change: [-18.567% -18.489% -18.409%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05) | |
Performance has improved. | |
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%) | |
1 (1.00%) high severe | |
Benchmarking FASTQ parsing/Needletail | |
Benchmarking FASTQ parsing/Needletail: Warming up for 3.0000 s | |
Benchmarking FASTQ parsing/Needletail: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.4725 s (45k iterations) | |
Benchmarking FASTQ parsing/Needletail: Analyzing | |
FASTQ parsing/Needletail | |
time: [120.74 µs 120.80 µs 120.88 µs] | |
change: [-16.342% -16.270% -16.213%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05) | |
Performance has improved. | |
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%) | |
1 (1.00%) high mild |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment