Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@zollman
Created April 29, 2014 19:52
Show Gist options
  • Save zollman/05e39749f67cf17c7540 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save zollman/05e39749f67cf17c7540 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
The Chief Justice on Fitbit, Riley v. California oral argument, 29 August 2014, p. 17
12 CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: What if you have a
13 device that doesn't have the broad information that a
14 smartphone has, but only a very limited, like a Fitbit
15 that tells you how many steps you've taken, and the
16 defendant says, I've been in my house all afternoon, and
17 they want to check and see if he's walked 4 miles. It's
18 not his whole life, which is a big part of your
19 objection. Is that something they can look at?
From http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/13-132_h315.pdf
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment