Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@LPMatrix
Created August 22, 2023 21:45
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save LPMatrix/d1d5476153fe4be121a7cb125e873688 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save LPMatrix/d1d5476153fe4be121a7cb125e873688 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
A sample show how to write a blameless postmortem document

Blameless Postmortem: Double Debit Incident

Incident Summary

On [Date and Time], our fintech platform experienced an incident where some users were debited twice for a single transaction. This led to customer dissatisfaction and concerns about the reliability of our services. This postmortem document aims to provide a detailed analysis of the incident, its root causes, and recommended actions to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Timeline of Events

[Timestamp]: Incident was first reported by customers experiencing double debits.

[Timestamp]: Technical team received alerts and initiated investigation.

[Timestamp]: Issue identified as a software glitch affecting a specific payment gateway.

[Timestamp]: Payment gateway was temporarily disabled to prevent further double debits.

[Timestamp]: Communication sent to affected users acknowledging the issue and assuring resolution.

[Timestamp]: Technical team identified the root cause as an unexpected interaction between a recent code deployment and the payment gateway API.

[Timestamp]: Payment gateway's configuration rolled back to a stable state.

[Timestamp]: All affected transactions were identified, and duplicate debits were manually refunded.

[Timestamp]: Communication sent to affected users confirming refunds and explaining the incident.

Impact Assessment

The incident resulted in:

Approximately [Number] of users being double-debited.

[Percentage]% of affected users expressing dissatisfaction and raising support tickets.

[Amount] total monetary impact due to refunds and potential loss of customer trust.

Root Cause Analysis

The root cause of the incident was traced back to an unintended interaction between a recent code deployment and the payment gateway API. The following contributing factors were identified:

The code change introduced a new validation step that was not correctly integrated with the payment gateway's response handling. The payment gateway's API behavior for certain error conditions was not well-documented or anticipated during development. Lack of comprehensive integration testing that simulated real-world scenarios involving the payment gateway.

Lessons Learned

Thorough Integration Testing: It's imperative to conduct comprehensive integration tests that simulate real-world scenarios, including error conditions, when working with external APIs.

Documentation: Ensure that interactions with external services are well-documented, especially error responses and edge cases, to anticipate potential issues.

Code Review and Validation: Implement robust code review processes to catch any unforeseen interactions between new code changes and existing system components.

Communication: Swift and transparent communication with users during incidents is vital to maintain trust and minimize customer dissatisfaction.

Action Items

Code Review Enhancements: Implement a mandatory peer review process for code changes involving third-party integrations. This will help catch potential integration issues before deployment.

Integration Test Suite: Develop an integration test suite that covers a wide range of scenarios, including error conditions, for all major external services.

Documentation Update: Review and enhance documentation for all external service interactions, detailing expected responses and potential error cases.

Incident Communication Protocol: Define a clear communication protocol for notifying and updating users during incidents, ensuring accurate and timely information dissemination.

Preventive Measures

The implementation of enhanced code review and comprehensive integration testing will be incorporated into our development workflow to catch integration issues before deployment.

The integration test suite will be regularly updated to ensure it covers new scenarios and maintains relevance as the system evolves.

Documentation for external service interactions will be centralized and continuously updated as part of our knowledge management efforts.

A standardized incident communication protocol will be established, outlining the steps to take during incidents to ensure clear and timely communication with affected users.

Communication Plan

The findings and recommendations from this postmortem will be communicated to all relevant teams, including developers, testers, and customer support. A summary of the incident and the actions taken will be shared with stakeholders to ensure transparency and alignment.

Continuous Improvement

This incident serves as a reminder of the need for continuous improvement in our development, testing, and communication practices. We will foster a culture of learning from incidents to ensure that our systems become more resilient and customer-centric.

Conclusion

This blameless postmortem highlights the importance of careful integration testing, thorough documentation, and effective communication during incidents. By embracing these lessons and taking concrete actions, we aim to prevent similar incidents and reinforce our commitment to providing reliable and trustworthy financial services to our users.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment