Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@RubenVerborgh

RubenVerborgh/proposal.md

Last active May 19, 2017 19:28
Show Gist options
  • Star 1 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save RubenVerborgh/caa5d9784b584b0f6aea0a1469f73b70 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save RubenVerborgh/caa5d9784b584b0f6aea0a1469f73b70 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Download ZIP
Discussion proposal ESWC2017 workshop on Enabling Decentralised Scholarly Communication
Raw
proposal.md

Best practices for self-publishing scholarly metadata

For the ESWC2017 workshop on Enabling Decentralised Scholarly Communication, I'm proposing a discussion session on with the following topic: How to best mark up scholarly articles and webpages that we publish ourselves, in order to result in maximally useful data? I aim to discuss questions such as those I presented at LDOW2017, which include the following:

  • How do we prioritize what to publish as RDF?
  • What data belongs in a FOAF profile, and what data on a webpage?
  • What ontologies should we use?
  • Should we describe the same concepts using multiple ontologies?
  • Should we reuse identifiers, mint our own, or both?
  • Should we publish data in named RDF graphs?

The proposed outcome would be (a way to) a guidance document for self-publishers of scholarly metadata.

@rhiaro
Copy link

rhiaro commented May 19, 2017

Oh I see, I think I misunderstood slightly.. no we can work around what you have said. We can turn the first discussion session into a proactive session as you describe, led by you, that's no problem. Seems very useful to do what you suggest and come up with a list. I'll update the discussion session title to reflect that.

@RubenVerborgh
Copy link
Author

Looks excellent, thanks a lot!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment