Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@andymckay
Last active September 20, 2019 14:37
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save andymckay/d82f4cde9e4e693a7f40b7e5e83e88e3 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save andymckay/d82f4cde9e4e693a7f40b7e5e83e88e3 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Subject: We don't need Uber
Cc: BCLiberalCaucus@leg.bc.ca, Greencaucus@leg.bc.ca, Minister.Transportation@gov.bc.ca
bcc: BCridesharing@uber.com
In this week of climate strikes, Uber is asking people to email the Liberal caucus asking people to lobby on its behalf. Uber is not a transportation option we need.
Ride sharing decreases public transit use:
https://www.govtech.com/fs/transportation/Study-Ride-Sharing-Decreases-Public-Transit-Use.html
https://thebolditalic.com/ubers-goal-is-not-to-operate-alongside-public-transit-but-to-replace-it-c76e48d8d317
"Uber is taking riders from public transit, which is reducing the quality of transit and could potentially lead to less investment because of lower ridership numbers, creating a downward spiral in Uber’s favor."
Uber increases congestion:
https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2017/10/the-ride-hailing-effect-more-cars-more-trips-more-miles/542592/
A comprehensive survey in major U.S. cities finds Uber and Lyft aren’t living up to climate-friendly promises.
Its hard to see how this matches with our need to reduce carbon emissions in the face of our climate emergency.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment