Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@benjamingr
Last active December 19, 2015 01:28
Show Gist options
  • Save benjamingr/5875704 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save benjamingr/5875704 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

###Discussion relating to this

Who here feels that perma-banning okok for asking:

is it possible to cut photos on the fly with js?

link

Was justified?

If you do not completely agree, what would you have done?

  • Nothing
  • Bin & Warn
  • 30 minute mute
  • Something else?
@SomeKittens
Copy link

We've been remarkably courteous to okok. He's been a troll this whole time. The only option we haven't done is a permaban. Why continue to do things that we know don't work on him? He'll return and continue his pitiful trolling. The only thing we can do is slam down the banhammer and show him it's not ok to troll.

@darkyen
Copy link

darkyen commented Jun 27, 2013

Annoying people will stay annoying you cant change them :P ... thats all i can say for instance you can't change zirak from trolling when he feels or cant make octavian say yes on a legitmate thing when hes feeling of saying NO or wanting to slap me..

So i'd say give a person a warning and short ban .. but if they continue being a douche troll after a week or two perma ban that person forever.. .Its a general reply to all.. Besides being a troll not helpful help vampire causes migranes and frustrations and leaves bad marks on their mind..

in OkoK's context

we dont like him .. yes

But we dont like him for a reason we didn't came out with this mutual dislike in one second or so its so because of his own faults. Its our common perspective of not liking him altogether and hence the dislike of the majority we have had given him enough chances to repair his mind and become a good person.. I'd say just ban him...

@simonsarris
Copy link

I try hard to understand people and don't like banning, but okok just leaves me confused.

He can't be too hard to ignore, can he?

@honnza
Copy link

honnza commented Jun 27, 2013

I'd be happy with a series of bans starting on one day and growing if he doesn't show the intent to change. If he does apologise, we should be nice.

@mainerror
Copy link

@simonsarris In theory ignoring works but in practice it has proven to be broken.

The reason for that is that while one or two might put him on ignore, some other users won't. The users ignoring him will see other users not ignoring him, react to his trolling and knowledge/energy sucking attempts.

We've tried that but it just doesn't work.

@honnza

He's been suspended at least four times by mods IIRC. The first two suspensions were for 24 hours, then one for two or so days (I could have been more, I'm not sure about this one) and the last one was for two weeks.

The above suspensions were just moderator issued suspensions, the amount of automatic offensive flag suspensions is probably higher than the mod suspensions. Those are one our to two hour suspensions.

I don't know how many more chances he should get.

@honnza
Copy link

honnza commented Jun 28, 2013

Then we should probably crank up. If two weeks didn't change him, make it four or even higher. A manual reban once per month is low enough for us, and plenty of options for him to ask for forgiveness.

My initial concern still holds, however: lame questions are not neccessarily trolling, and if he's not actively trolling, we shouldn't treat him worse than other repeat vampires. Should we ban repeat vampires if they're as persistent as OKOK?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment