Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@cryptobabel
Created September 1, 2020 03:27
Show Gist options
  • Save cryptobabel/f01add9bd05a11aeebeac1fc78b7acca to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save cryptobabel/f01add9bd05a11aeebeac1fc78b7acca to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
If we think of it like the world basically being one big 'megacorp'
with many branches and various focuses things make a little more sense. (at least to me and my tinfoil..ofc..).
With that, we could then call out the owners, the managers, the project managers, the workers,
the marketers and the users then other things start to align, like many of the conspriacy theories..
From that we can then see these actions, more specifically
starting year 2000 and picking up it's first real shift in 2015,
for what they are and how they start to add up.
As any good business would do, you strive to become more effcient to become more profitable.
With new tooling and capabilities there comes a time when all businesses must make drastic
foundational changes or risk losing money or your business entirely.
While a lot of this was already in motion for many decades we see a 'speedup' in
2020 because other targets were failing to be hit. That in combonation with advancements in travel and global connectivity
the workers, users and even some of the upper level were starting to take advantage of the tooling
to benefit themselves. The users and workers were starting to better talk amongst themselves how things
simply aren't fair for them. This has to be reigned in before things slip out of control entirely.
This means steps must be taken to modernize operations, refactor controls as well as
management in order to prepare business for the next century of development.
Considering all that, some may construe this as a capitalism reference. But it's not really. It's just a way to
explain, simply as I can, my thoughts around what things really are. By that, I'm saying by now we understand there's people/entities
pulling strings. The managers and project managers never fully agree all the time. Sometimes they focus on specific tasks,
other times they experiment with different types of leadership and even get in arguments over this or that.
To wrap up this silly thought... what I believe we're seeing is a long-game shift that had initial plans from many years
and was dependant on a certain level of advancement both technological and social structuring/controls. We reached a point where
we started to get behind on those goals and things are being ramped up. I believe this shift is not only in social structure but the
leadership itself. In the goofy context above think like 'promotions'. Potentially in terms of 'jobs well done' but more for strategic
reasonings.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment