daaronr/barker_et_al_evals.csv

## barker_et_al_evals.csv

          
            Title
            Eval_1
            Eval_2
            Category
            Rating_1
            Confidence_range_1
            Comments_1
            Rating_2
            Confidence_range_2
            Comments_2

            
              Mental Health Therapy As a Core Strategy For Increasing Human Capital: Evidence From Ghana
              Anonymous
              Anonymous
              Overall assessment
              75
              4
              
              75
              (70, 84)

            
              
              
              
              Advancing knowledge and practice
              65
              4
              
              60
              (55, 65)

            
              
              
              
              Methods: Justification, reasonableness, validity, robustness
              60
              3
              
              90
              (82, 94)

            
              
              
              
              Logic & communication
              75
              3
              
              70
              (62, 82)
              I wish these categories were separated - would rank it high for logic but lower for communication. Even though this is an extremely well written (clear and easy to follow) paper, I struggled with some of the framing and messaging (i.e. higher-level communication).

            
              
              
              
              Open, collaborative, replicable
              50
              3
              
              90
              (80, 95)
              Data and code are provided alongside the published paper (https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/164481/version/V1/view) I have not tried to reproduce any of the analyses as I do not have access to Stata, hence wider CIs. Readme file is detailed and seems clear enough.

            
              
              
              
              Engaging with real-world, impact quantification; practice, realism, and relevance
              75
              4
              
              50
              (48, 52)

            
              
              
              
              Relevance to global priorities
              75
              3
              
              50
              (40, 60)
              While the overall topic is relevant to global priorities research, I am hesitant to rely on the results of this manuscript to make any direct policy recommendations given the short follow-up period, the selection of some of the measures, and the corresponding p-values

            
              
              
              
              What ‘quality journal’ do you expect this work will be published in? Note: 0= lowest/none, 5= highest/best
               
               
              NA - already published
              
              
              N/A already published

            
              
              
              
              On a ‘scale of journals’, what ‘quality of journal’ should this be published in? Note: 0= lowest/none, 5= highest/best
              4
              4
              
              4
              4
Title	Eval_1	Eval_2	Category	Rating_1	Confidence_range_1	Comments_1	Rating_2	Confidence_range_2	Comments_2
Mental Health Therapy As a Core Strategy For Increasing Human Capital: Evidence From Ghana	Anonymous	Anonymous	Overall assessment	75	4		75	(70, 84)
			Advancing knowledge and practice	65	4		60	(55, 65)
			Methods: Justification, reasonableness, validity, robustness	60	3		90	(82, 94)
			Logic & communication	75	3		70	(62, 82)	I wish these categories were separated - would rank it high for logic but lower for communication. Even though this is an extremely well written (clear and easy to follow) paper, I struggled with some of the framing and messaging (i.e. higher-level communication).
			Open, collaborative, replicable	50	3		90	(80, 95)	Data and code are provided alongside the published paper (https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/164481/version/V1/view) I have not tried to reproduce any of the analyses as I do not have access to Stata, hence wider CIs. Readme file is detailed and seems clear enough.
			Engaging with real-world, impact quantification; practice, realism, and relevance	75	4		50	(48, 52)
			Relevance to global priorities	75	3		50	(40, 60)	While the overall topic is relevant to global priorities research, I am hesitant to rely on the results of this manuscript to make any direct policy recommendations given the short follow-up period, the selection of some of the measures, and the corresponding p-values
			What ‘quality journal’ do you expect this work will be published in? Note: 0= lowest/none, 5= highest/best			NA - already published			N/A already published
			On a ‘scale of journals’, what ‘quality of journal’ should this be published in? Note: 0= lowest/none, 5= highest/best	4	4		4	4